>telling us to hate evil people and hate evil things >BTFOs faggots >BTFOs Jews >BTFOs protestors >BTFOs weak Christians >BTFOs degenerates >BTFOs alcoholics >BTFOs sex havers >BTFOs gaythiests >BTFOs fagnostics >BTFOs Japan >BTFOs Iceland >BTFOs Obama >BTFOs France >Banned in like 6 countries for BTFOing faggots too hard >claims to have converted 20,000 people to Christianity >is knocking on every single door in Arizona trying to convert people to Christianity
Pastor Anderson is the future of Christianity in America.
ITT a jew spams Sup Forums with Pastor Anderson in attempt to get him "kicked out."
Chase Cruz
I hope God blesses him and let's the Children of God receive real wisdom from his teachings.
John Cruz
>BTFOs white people
Matthew Wilson
Checked, kek has spoken
Anthony Diaz
His version of Chtistianity is the only one I'm aware of which is based. Sup Forums still hates him though because he has no problem with race-mixing. He is the epitome of a based dude though.
Liam Sullivan
>pol/ still hates him though because he has no problem with race-mixing
Only /polgbt/ shills and other sodomites bring that up
Daniel Harris
You guys DO know that HE'S Ashkenazi Jew on his Grandmother's side, right?!?
Aiden Diaz
he can blow me alright. Faggot OP can blow me too.
Mason Hall
Don't worry about it goy, we're all mixed.
Grayson Cook
LOL
Praise g-d.
Josiah Wright
Hey sodomites Hell is forever. You are mentally ill reprobate abominations and vile sick beasts
Xavier Harris
Something tells me Sanderson just uses his preacher persona to act superior to others. Must be that kike blood in him. I mean I agree with him on some stuff but the way he goes about it is like a Chad picking on nerds in high school.
Jason Scott
Race mixing is a form of sodomy since it produces no human offspring.
Lucas Collins
Every anderson thread the terrified fag patrol floods in and tried to run an anti-Anderson operation
Day of the roof is coming you AIDs ridden faggots
Christopher Gray
Stop spamming this pro racemixing, anti biblical, mentally ill cult leader.
The chad IFB pastor with 10 kids vs. the virgin megachurch pastor with 1 adopted black kid
Adrian White
I'm queer. I'm gay. I'm homosexual. I'm a poof, I'm a poofter, I'm a ponce. I'm a bumboy, battyboy, backside artist, bugger. I'm bent. I am that arsebandit. I lift those shirts. I'm a faggot-ass, fudge-packing, shit-stabbing uphill gardener. I dine at the downstairs restaurant; I dance at the other end of the ballroom. I'm Moses and the parting of the red cheeks. I fuck and I’m fucked. I suck and I’m sucked. I rim them and wank them, and every single man's had the fucking time of his life.
DEAR PR*TOSTANTS: YOU WILL BURN IN HELLFIRE FOREVER IF YOU DO NOT REPENT AND RETURN TO THE ONLY HOLY APOSTOLIC CHURCH.
YOU ARE NOT CHRISTIANS!
Alexander White
Hahahahahha they're scared
Anderson really puts the fear into the sodomites
Juan Jackson
>muh salvation isn't earned >all of this shit I'm angrily preaching about doesn't actually matter as long as they belive in jesus
Gabriel Miller
>the old man playing god in Rome is a Christian though
Isaiah Nguyen
Fuck you, leatherman
Zachary Gonzalez
If Christianity is "the enemy of Jewry", then Jews don't need any friends. "Based Christian" Charlemagne, the father of Europe according to Christians, for killing pagan saxons, gave Jews their economical power > Charlemagne (800–814) readily made use of the Church for the purpose of infusing coherence into the loosely joined parts of his extensive empire, by any means a blind tool of the canonical law. He employed Jews for diplomatic purposes, sending, for instance, a Jew as interpreter and guide with his embassy to Harun al-Rashid. Yet, even then, a gradual change occurred in the lives of the Jews. The Church forbade Christians to be usurers, so the Jews secured the remunerative monopoly of money-lending. This decree caused a mixed reaction of people in general in the Frankish empire (including Germany) to the Jews: Jewish people were sought everywhere, as well as avoided. This ambivalence about Jews occurred because their capital was indispensable, while their business was viewed as disreputable. This curious combination of circumstances increased Jewish influence and Jews went about the country freely, settling also in the eastern portions. Aside from Cologne, the earliest communities were established in Mainz, Worms, Speyer, and Regensburg.[15] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Germany#From_Rome_to_the_Crusades
Their christian "punishment" against the "evil jews" was to receive a lucrative financial monopoly of "sinful high financing that no christians shall ever benefit from" and to move to the next country to fleece when the peasants got too riled up.
Isaac Smith
> Around 400, St Augustine, one of the most influential and foundational figures of Catholic theology, preached that the Jews must be protected for their ability to explain the Old Testament. > Jews must be protected for their ability
> Pope Gregory the Great (c 540–604) brought Augustine's teachings into Roman Law, by writing a Papal Bull which became the foundation of Catholic doctrine in relation to the Jews and specified that, although the Jews had not accepted salvation through Christ, and were therefore condemned by God until such time as they accept salvation, Christians were nevertheless duty-bound to protect the Jews as an important part of Christian civilization.[6 > While a "persecuting spirit" often existed among the general population through the Middle Ages, Jewish communities often had to turn to the Holy See for protection.[7] Papal Bulls reiterating the duty of protection were issued by various Popes,
Christians protecting Jews is not a "corruption of Christianity", all the way back to St Augustine Jews were seen as part of Christianity. That is why Jews never had to leave Europe even when they were constantly expelled numerous times from every kingdom by angry farmers. Papal edicts helped them move to the next kingdom and eventually get back to the first one.
> but muh synagogue of Satan
The only result of Christian "enemty" against Jews was giving them an absolute monopoly over high finances, and protecting them from angry farmers.
And how can it be otherwise? If Jews are the enemies of Christianity, the synagogue of Satan, then it is the duty of Christians to love them and protect them, "love your enemies and provide them with help" was clearly said by both Jesus and Paul, and the early christians like Saint Augustine openly agreed
Adam Howard
> inb4 Turning the other cheek does not mean pacifism. Letting someone else slap your face with the back of his hand was a form of social rebellion back then
no it wasn't. that shit was made up by radical black-nationalist liberal theologist Walter Wink to justify social rebellion in South Africa.
There are NO sources to it outside his books, nothing of what Josephus wrote about life in the ancient Middle East mentions anything close to offering the cheek or giving to your enemies your coat being an insult to them.
In the Greek-Roman world, love meant "common feeling of mutual interest born out of shared experiences"
Early Christians expanded it to a commandment of loving people that we don't know, that we don't care about, just so that we can fill ourselves with misguided pride about how we are friends of mankind itself Agape never has conveyed any sort of violent or agressive implication, as some Sup Forumslacks imply
Among christian writers it has always meant means "a selfless love that is passionately committed to the well-being of others", no implication of tough love whatsoever see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity
Christian semantics are enough of a mess as they are, and then Sup Forums christians wanna add an extra layer of absurdity and mental masturbation: That is where the schizophrenia of right-wing christians kicks in Only a christian could claim something as absurd as love for his enemies
Luis Ward
Only a right-wing christian could take that absurdity to the next level by killing his enemies while declaring his love for them. So here they want us to believe that the Crusaders loved every single damn person that they slaughtered in Constantinople Because, according to Sup Forums christians, Love is not about shared interest, it is about telling to yourself "how I love that guy" right before cutting his head off (mental masturbation, really)
dude, if you wanna hate your enemies, just do that, and stop mentally masturbating about how better and so much more heaven-deserving you are than your enemies because you somehow declared that you loved him while killing him
> Patriarch Bartholomew, the spiritual leader of Orthodox Christians, is urging Europe to stop trying to divide what he calls economic migrants from asylum seekers. > Bartholomew is scheduled to visit the Greek island of Lesbos on Saturday along with Pope Francis, and Athens Archbishop Ieronymos, the head of the Church of Greece, to raise awareness about the troubled state of refugees and migrants in Europe. > The symbolic visit is intended to reiterate the Christian moral duty to show hospitality to strangers, Bartholomew said in an interview published Friday. He added that countries in Europe should find inspiration in the generosity shown by Lesbos residents. > Illegal immigrants make 10 % of the population of Greece
daily reminder that the orthodox patriarchs are exactly the same shit of other christians, and they have repeatly condemned right wing movements like Golden Dawn
But why would it be otherwise?
Christianity rejects all wordly concerns altogether, and right wing concerns ARE wordly concerns
Dylan Phillips
Why do u guys love this guy he doesn't even believe Jews exist
Ian Cruz
Christian Morality attacks the foundations of the monarchy and capitalism, thus its spirituality is left-wing
Jesus saying that for the rich, powerful, strong (i.e. a monarch) it is almost impossible to go to Heaven, while the poor will inherit the Earth, you have a recipe for spiritual marxism that will become the real deal as soon as the Church losses its ability to prevent people from reading the Gospel directly Under Christianity, a hobo is holier than the king, a beggar is holier than an entrepreneur, that contradiction can't last, and it didn't last
It is not an accident Europeans were the first people to violently remove their monarchs to replace them with utopian ideologies it is not an accident either that every christian church outright rejects whatever version of "true Christianity" you may claim to be the truth.
The people devoted to the cult, working for it 24 / 7, spending their entire lives on it think that your interpretation makes no sense
They think that when Jesus and Paul said something they actually meant it, the people joining religious missions because the Gospel inspired them, the people that go to Africa and adopt babies, the people that actually wanna follow the lives of the early Christians like John Chrysostom (which you constantly claim is a "true Christian" because he didn't like jews, while ignoring everything else he ever said) and live a life of self-denial and poverty to feed others, people like Mother Teresa that lived surrounded by filth and excrement in India...
But you don't. You wanna pretend to be a christian while living a life of a roman Jesus himself said that if you wanna be like a roman and love your friends and hate your enemies, then pretend to follow him, you are a hypocrite What kind of argument can you even make to actual devoted christians that go on missions to Congo and India and even DIE for it, to tell them that their version of Christianity is corrupted and damaged by jews?
Henry Carter
Right Wing politics are concerned with the long-term survival of Civilization But Christianity is only concerned with personal salvation to become part of a nebulous afterlife for which no evidence exists, and for which this world needs to be sacrificed, which is best expressed in the way early christians like Martin of Tours refused to fight enemies of their nations, insofar killing in this world could cost them heaven; this is also why more modern christians like Martin Luther said (I quote): - "it is the duty of a Christian to suffer injustice, not to seize the sword and take to violence" - Martin Luther
When Jesus says "if they take your coat, let them have your shirt as well", "do not resist evil", "I have come to turn a man against his own household", "if you don't hate your self and your own family you can't follow me", "love your enemies, pray for your persecutors", "the meek will inherit the Earth", "those that wanna die will live", "blessed are those the persecuted, for they will be my Kingdom", "do not save treasures for tomorrow", "carry your cross so that you can receive eternal reward", "Sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you'll have treasure in heaven", "it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye than for the rich to enter Heaven", "Woe to you who are well fed, Woe to you who laugh, for you will mourn and weep"...
... he isn't kidding, or meaning the opposite, but setting down a morality where the world is a lie and only the afterlife is the real deal, so destroying your life in this world, "carrying your cross" as he says, is completely logical While christian churches seem to be very well of this (including orthodox leader Patriarch Bartholomew), Sup Forums "christians" seem to believe Jesus actually meant the OPPOSITE of all that, and that Jesus wants you to defend your family, that Jesus wants you to kill your enemies, to become prosperous, well-fed and rich in this world, and to avoid persecution and death!
Carson Sullivan
Only a person that does not actually believe in the Heaven for the persecuted, the meek, and the martyred would actually re-interpret Christianity as a cult of earthly power which declares "the strong shall inherit the Earth", "my kingdom is of this world" and "you must destroy the enemies of your nation" Only some one that just wanna use Christianity as an empty shell devoid of any true religious promises would claim that Paul and Peter misinterpreted Jesus when they submitted to their enemies and died to them while praying for them, instead of fighting the romans back and establishing a crusader kingdom, thing that one would expect them to do if Jesus meant "be a fighter and impose your will on your enemies" when he said "love your enemies and lend all they need to them without expecting anything in return"
But using Christianity as a shell devoid of any religious promises simply allows its poisonous morality to survive into the next generation. You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "I didn't come to bring peace", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing what Jesus wanted is for them to put christian morality above the good-being of their own families.
Mason Rogers
You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because "Buy a sword", but you can't stop them from reading the next chapter and realizing that Jesus stopped Peter from using the sword to fight and defeat the romans, and reprimanded him for misunderstanding, all while asking him to carry his own cross (Peter, fully realizing that Jesus meant all the stuff about embracing death and his kingdom was not of this world, that angelic chariots were not going to slay his enemies and bring him victory, realized he was doomed, and would then deny Jesus 3 times) You can tell your children that Jesus wanted them to be earthly warriors because ""Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces", but you can't stop them from reading the rest of the paragraph and realizing that Jesus was asking them, not to destroy their enemies, but to not put in risk their own moral position by criticizing others. You may want them to believe that Jesus, in the middle of a speech about not judging other people and sharing, suddenly decided that speak against the muslims that didn't even exist back then!
That is not going to fly. Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism, because the Gospel will still exist, because your children, like Peter, will realize that Jesus meant it when he said "you are to be persecuted and martyred for me", that Jesus didn't say "you will live in a stable and powerful civilization, free of oppresion and death, thanks to me".
Sebastian Phillips
I know im mentally ill why do you hate me
Juan Cox
Wow all the way back to St Augustine .all the way back to five hundred years after Christ and the apostles
Kevin Rogers
>i dont believe in race
Lincoln Ortiz
>no it wasn't. that shit was made up by radical black-nationalist liberal theologist Walter Wink to justify social rebellion in South Africa
This interpretation is supported by scholars like NT Wright. However it is a double meaning because it's plain meeting is not to escalate violence or discord over being insulted
It is regarding personal insults, not self defense, defense of others, or defense of society
Mason Carter
>bu-bu-but Peter wuz the first Pope! >Peter married and he even told a man not to kneel down and worship him (Acts 10:25-26)
Either Peter was a bad pope or the only good one.
Christian Watson
>Among christian writers it has always meant means "a selfless love that is passionately committed to the well-being of others", no implication of tough love whatsoever >see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agape#Christianity
The well-being of others requires "tough love" do you even read what you post
Joshua Turner
wat
Augustine lived in the late 300s
also Paul the pharisee said pretty much the same
> 14 Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse. > 17 Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone. 18 If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. 19 Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,”[d] says the Lord. 20 On the contrary: “If your enemy is hungry, feed him; > if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. > In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.”[e] 21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
Your Old Testament morality has nothing to do with the Jesus and Paul that you claim to follow, and no church father ever pretended otherwise
You are larpers that does not give a fuck about what Paul actually said, and needs to pretend that Mosaic Law applies to him
If you wanna be a jew, and then go on and convert to Judaism, and stop pretending that Christian Churches want anything to do with you
They don't and they would expel the heck out of you if you said anything close to "jews are destroying us"
Michael Wood
Wtf are you on about
Connor Young
He is the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinopel, he hasn't got any influence at all. He can say whatever he wants. But I didn't hear no patriarch of an orthodox country , from whom something depends to say things like that. Only the catholic pope :D
Robert Russell
NT Wrigh literally is quoting anti-boer Wilkens in his interpretation, it is completely ahistorical
> As the notes make clear, in my exposition of (for instance) the material in Matthew 5, I was borrowing from Walter Wink’s fascinating exposition. Turning the other cheek, going the second mile, and so forth, were not a summons to ‘be a doormat for Jesus’, but were themselves a call to (non-violent) resistance, not just non-violence. I am perfectly happy with your proposal that Jesus’ feastings and healings (and, in my book, a good deal else besides) constituted acts of, and pointed to a programme of, creative non-violent resistance. My whole exposition of Jesus’ kingdom-stories and kingdom-symbols (JVG chs. 6-9) was designed partly to explore this. It would be good to work towards further convergences at this point.
You christians have no idea of what you are talking about at all, you just repeat the same ahistorical nonsense over and over
I have had to point this so many times, it is all tiresome, you don't do research at all
Jason James
Oh so only FOUR hundred years
Living peacefully and providing food and water as aid is not the same as letting people implement destructive policies or trends.
Gavin Peterson
Agape does not imply "tough love" at all
You people don't even know what you are talking about, you are insane
Justin James
And legitimate scholar NT Wright sees it as a valid interpretation. You are committing the genetic fallacy
Nathaniel Young
providing food and water to your enemies is extremely destructive for any society, and for the world itself. 4 billion africans by 2100 is insanity.
i could quite Jesus directly, to prove to you that Paul and Saint Augustine were correct in their interpretation, but you will just say that Jesus meant the opposite of everything he said
You people are not christian, you are just insane larpers
It is not a genetic fallacy, you are the one commiting a fallacy from authority without providing any evidence that the claims of Wink, which he himself said he had made up because Christianity needed more "liberal" interpretation, have any sort of hustorical foundation
Why are you christian "right-wingers" so willing to ignore the obvious? Even if Jesus existed, he never expressed any interested in cultural survival of Europe, or any such thing at all. His kingdom was not of this world
Jayden Sanchez
pictured doing satanic hand signs
Leo Thomas
It's not in someone's best interests to enforce constraints or limitations on someone if what they want will harm their welfare or the welfare of their neighbors?
okay
Liam Moore
* historical
Christian Thompson
numai țiganii, așa ca tine, pun botul la vrăjeala ăstora.
Carter Lopez
>providing food and water to your enemies is extremely destructive for any society,
Not letting people die of thirst or hunger is not a problem for society and in fact creates common ground. This improves society, it doesn't harm it.
Connor Hernandez
Where are such "contraints when helping your enemies" mentioned by Paul at all in the Gospel?
Paul's interest never was the civilizational survival at all, as you seem to imply with your "constraints"
Paul was anti-natalist, as things like wife and family would get in the way of getting people to worship his jewish god.
If unmarried men followed the words of Paul, there would no be any civilization to begin with, people would stop marrying as it would interfere witgh their mental masturbation being a "good person" by telling others that they will go to hell
See: > 8 Now to the unmarried men and women, and for the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. > Are you free from such a commitment? Do not look for a wife. > 32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— 34 and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord’s affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. 35 I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord. t. Paul the Pharisee
Paul makes it EXTREMELY CLEAR that the main concern for every christian is the spread of this virus-like cult at the expense of their own tribe, and his main worry is that Christians may not devote 100 % of their time to the spread of the cult
the organic self-sustaining self-interested self-preserving society that Sup Forums wants is fundamentally incompatible with the "do not save for tomorrow, leave your family and spread my cult" dogma that both Jesus and Paul saw as the main duty of a christian
That is why monks chose not to marry-
Caleb Watson
It's helpless, you are talking to a sodomite fedora. He'll never understand.
Leo Myers
he'll learn, tho.
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
yah, there's no jew or greek before christ. very true. BUT, there's also no male or female before christ. but in the other realms of our life...such things exist. to say the races dont' exist b/c of that one verse (and therefore mudhsarking) is like saying the sexes don't exist b/c of that one verse (and therefore fag marriage).
he's just inconsistent in a point that's been very VERY misused. not really his fault, just a lot of wolves in sheeps clothing have tainted christianity and ppl have a hard time getting past those pretty lies emotionally.
Dylan Brooks
It is the genetic fallacy it is literally 'X is wrong because this person said it'
Andrew Jenkins
yes, the society of the Middle West has improved so much now that all those somalian refugees are saved from thirst and hunger in their native Somalia
Kevin Morgan
you throw buzzwords around to support ashkenazi Christ killer synagogue of satan lisping vagina worshippers. throw up them satan horns
Sebastian Brooks
Not at all. I am asking you for actual evidence that the arguments of Wink have any sort of relation with actual historical evidence
You can't provide that, that is the issue
Jayden Hughes
Oh and he does provide evience for the interpretation in the books he's written
Ryan Martin
>monkey thinking he knows the first thing about western civilization, Christianity, or humanity.
ok, paco.
I'll sum it up here: "Sooner or later, your "strict catholic crusader" state will be reformed into liberalism"
yah..after like 1900 years...
Josiah Wilson
Shut of sodomite. HELL IS FOR EVER This is why they are fleeing in the fist place you faggot. THEY DON"T HAVE ENOUGH CHRISTIANS ARE ONES WHO GIVE THEM ANYTHING IF NOT FOR CHRISTIANS ALL OF THEM WOULD MOVE. How fucking dumb are you?
Jonathan Perez
Dropping people in the middle of a foreign land and telling them to be American is not the same as providing them food and water so they don't die
The refugee crisis is moral because it hurts the people were supposed to be taking care of primarily that is our neighbors and our families
Landon Brown
He's on the radio here about once a month on a late night talkshow. Fucking hilarious the reaction he gets from left wingers, Catholics and atheists.
Daniel Jenkins
Wink does not at all.
NOT AT ALL.
Present to me the chapter, the verse, where he provides any sort of reference of some tradition from the time of Jesus where, if a slave allowed a Roman to slap him with the other hand, that was considered an insult for the Roman
Such thing never existed. Why are you even taking the opinion of one of the people responsible for the current sad state of South Africa seriously? Why is it with this insane need to defend your political enemies?
I mean, what the fuck
Cooper Rogers
>sad state of South Africa It holds better than europe.
Alexander Phillips
>spic, pls.
the good samaritan is perfectly consistend w/ the alt right.
the good samaritan picked the dude up, took him to a hotel, and paid for someone to care for him.
the good samaritan did NOT take the dude back to his house and invite all his relatives to live with them so he could rape the samaritan's daughters and slaughter his sons.
pls, you are just copy pasting incorrect shit without knowing what you are talking about.
Cooper Foster
not really. it has happened numerous times, and every time it is "not real Christianity"
From the the cathars, from Thomas Müntzer, from socialist Popes, from Jonestown, to the Modern Churches, everything time it has happened, the argument is the same:
Not true Christianity
Camden Bell
Protestants believe that only belief can stop you from degeneracy. It's basically "love conquers all" faggotry.
Josiah Anderson
>Pastor Anderson is the future of Christianity in America. >a pro race mixing cuckold is the future of America RIP
Liam Garcia
that's what strawman mastery looks like
Camden Scott
The fact that it was a deliberate insult to use either a back hand or left hand and the Christian moves in a way to make such an insult and possible is the evidence. It is a perfectly legitimate interpretation based on social and historical context. Though he goes into more detail in his books which I do not have at the moment
Benjamin Sanchez
...
Lincoln Perry
...
James Diaz
And you of course don't believe in all the Jewish science because it came from Jews right
Cooper Gutierrez
> the good samaritan did NOT take the dude back to his house and invite all his relatives to live with them so he could rape the samaritan's daughters and slaughter his sons.
Jesus does not show any sort of concern for their actual family of his followers
He outrights tells them to abandon them because they will receive more family in Heaven, whatever that fuck that means
at the core of the issue, is that you dont' actually believe in what jesus preached, about how those who suffer will be the ones that join them in Heaven
You wanna have the cake of the joy in this world and eat it too in Heaven
> Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 29 And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife[e] or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life. 30 But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first
you have normal, animal interests, but those interests do not appear anywhere in the words of Jesus.
he didn't give a fuck about how his family would end up after his self-righteous suicide, and he never complained to Peter for not embracing this suicidism and denying him 3 times
Nathaniel Peterson
lmaoooooo
Parker Cox
CHECKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PRAISE THE LORD ALMIGHTY THERE ARE NO COINCEDENCES
Josiah Lewis
>The fact that it was a deliberate insult to use either a back hand or left hand and the Christian moves in a way to make such an insult and possible is the evidence.
there is no evidence for this. This is no mentioned anywhere in any book from antiquity. There is no historical context that allows for this interpretation
If Wink has actual citations, you would be able to provide them to me right now, but YOU CAN'T
next you will be claiming that allowing your enemies to spit on you and crucify you is a way insult them, it makes no sense
Gavin Moore
>hate the sin AND the sinner
nope. anti Christian
Landon Watson
* way to insult them
Wyatt Barnes
it's kind of funny that him and that other guy in the church, Burger or something, are both jews. really gives the noggin a floggin
>This is no mentioned anywhere in any book from antiquity.
You should shake a middle eastern person hand with your left hand they will love it and consider it cute and charming
Jayden Gray
>Jesus does not show any sort of concern for their actual family of his followers
A) you immediately dodged the first point I brought against you.
typical backpeddling copy-pastetheist.
B) yah, Christ was here to build a new type of family. Or rather, to extend the love of the family to a larger community. Not the same thing as hating family.
>at the core of the issue, is that you dont' actually believe in what jesus preached, about how those who suffer will be the ones that join them in Heaven
nigger what are you even talking about? I said nothing related to this.
Take it from someone who is 10 years older than you. As you grow up, and if you actually become a man, you'll inevitably become a christian. I was a 'college atheist' too, once upon a time.
Jose Young
Lol why do you keep posting this? Pastor fucking OWNED that skin worshipper in this comment.
Andrew Edwards
Jesus uses Hyperbole and this was common for teachers at the time
The only time Jesus says to depart from family is when they become opposition to the gospel and thus adversaries to God, which is perfectly legitimate command. Furthermore it is always assumed in these passages that it will be the family that throws out the believer not the other way around.
Michael Fisher
no shit, things happen in circles. every generation has a contingent that says 'hey we should relax the rules'. and every so often they have success. then their success is undone. welcome to institutions run by humans 101.
Adam Lee
They are known as skinfidels
Tyler Foster
how do you come from:
- if I shake someone with the left hand, they will be offended
to
- if someone is slapping me, and I invite him to slap me with the left hand, then I am offending them
Can you explain your logic? because that is a very twisted logic
Never mind there is no record from antiquity of anyone insulting his enemies by allowing them to beat them some more, and even Paul makes it clear that the purpose of submission is not to "offend your enemies" but to "overcome evil with good", which makes your position even more retarded
David Richardson
cringe
Jose Watson
it is not an invitation to strike you again, it is saying that if you strike me again you won't be able to add insult to injury. It is also a way of saying that you don't care what the person attacking you thinks. The point of slapping is to insult and degrade not to inflict damage through violence
Matthew Price
your first point didn't even make sense, Christiamn Churches consistently denounce the alt-right, with lots of Gospel quotations to support them
> As you grow up, and if you actually become a man, you'll inevitably become a christian
bullshit, Alexander and Julius Caesar were real men, manhood has nothing to do with Christianity. Jesus was a cuck that allowed himself to be killed in the name of self-righteous vanity > which is perfectly legitimate command
Fucking no.
Who the fuck is so deranged that they would forward against their own family because a jewish zombie promised them an eternal life for which there is no evidence?
