What does Sup Forums think about a required IQ test for being able to register to vote?
Does it infringe on voting rights? Is it a necessary infringement moving forward in our country? I mean what are the downsides of only allowing decently intelligent people to vote?
Let's say we put the bar at 115 IQ. Would Hillary or Trump have won if only 115IQ+ people voted?
Other urls found in this thread:
washingtonpost.com
unvis.it
twitter.com
oy vey, that's rayciss goy
Trump, considering that the pool of minority voters would shallow significantly, and the remaining college-educated whites would break for Trump over Hillary given the voting breakdowns.
He might honestly have won just about every state using that criteria.
>population density map of the united states
fake news
He also won every single earning bracket $50,000+, so take that into consideration, as well.
...
Cute. Now let's do crime rates by black populations.
I think everyone should have some sort of ID to vote. I don't know about IQ test because policy can and does affect many low IQ voters.
>crime rates
but that didn't apply at all to op's map, you fucking brainlet
Are you being serious 115 is way too high when you look at the average the iq is below 100 and modus will be even worse as iq is equal distributed you let a minority decide which will most likely represent higher middle class and upperclass and judging from your post you wont be able to vote then either.
no source on this image whatsoever
no definition of what kind of crime, what the threshold for "low crime rate" or "high crime rate" is
try to have a higher IQ than this Sup Forums
It's useless. Why? Because it doesn't matter if you are smart and have a high IQ if you don't think for yourself.
It's better to have 100IQ and think with your own head than be a 130+IQ genius that only thinks as he is told.
No way western mass has more crime than gary ohio
FAKE NEWS
it's fake news anyway, suck my cock right wing retard Drumpfkin
>Higher density areas have more crime
>Big cities tend to be Democrat
Woah...
I would be able to vote. The fact you think 115 (college grade intelligence) is too high is pretty sad.
>population maps
you do realize the image posted was rates right? As in they control for population?
Source please
I didn't mean for the image to be a point of discussion. It's a random post I saved from here that vaguely relates to the topic so I used it for the thread
Asspained nigger detected.
Fascinating! Source on this?
But he seem to be correct though?
IQ can be lowered in some individuals if they've been exposed to heavy metals or acquired developmental issues. It'd probably be ruled unconstitutional.
see
>No way western mass has more crime than gary ohio
where the fugg is gary ohio, faggot?
Haha
Rural and suburban retards BTFO
El Paso is one of the safest cities in the US
It should be as it was, White male land owners only. That includes no jews.
Trump wouldn't even get the nomination if there were IQ requirements
And yet you seem to lack basic thinking that maybe you took one thing from 2013 and from 2016 with no prove of correlation and im not sure about your statement with 115 iq is college level. I can recommend you videos of jordan peterson about iq really interesting and maybe you will see the flaws in iq as it is.
hmm
Also 115 is higher than you think as i said iq is generally equally distributed and averages around 100 i think for Switzerland is around 105 and i thknk is in the top looking at that only 15% score above 115 so... with us being behind switzerland in iq you want exclude at least 85% and tell me 115 is reasonable?
IQ changes with time (its an average). If there were one person alive, that person would have an IQ of 100, by definition.
Also very easy to exploit, like (((university placement tests))) - or the selective lack thereof.
It's a per capita map you stupid nigger
This is the only correct answer. This would preclude the necessity of both a literacy test and a poll tax.
>"higher" and "lower" crime rates
compared to fucking what?
how about you give us the actual crime rates without manipulating statistics to your favor?
I don't know, he likely would still lost the big states like CA and NYC. IQ doesn't equate personal ethics or culture. Theres tons of scientists who are against the right to bear arms as they vaule statistics or just because they're against all conflict because they're inexperienced when it comes to emotions and violence. Not even mentioning modern college professors. Although im not against the idea of having a basic IQ standard (even if its 5 points below) but it doesn't solve all problems because IQ doesn't take sides, the opposition isn't all batshit retarded and not understanding where they're at least coming from will only make them resist you instead of hearing you out.. You can have a high iq and still lack wisdom and experience or be overly optimistic (the same can be said vice versa about pol fags too)
Didnt mean to quote the last guy wtf
Do you have sources for the second image?
Do you even statistic bro?
>Vermont having high crime
Crime rates by population density?
IQ tests to vote sound great.
Especially since so many comparison tests are based in beleif in evolution.
Here is the crime rate map. Other than the NorthEast, the map is actually correct. Even if it is the 2012 Presodential voting map..so it proves Liberal areas do have more crime. Which makes sense, since urban center are typically more liberal and have higher crime rates due to population crowding and lack of resources.
In conclusion the message is true, but by using incorrect images it is misleading.