Women in combat

Greetings /pol

Why do you believe women cannot be into military?

inb4
>Women are too weak
what does physical strength matter when modern guns shoot over 9000rpm
>Women are too emotional
actually, studies show the opposite, women are calmer in combat situations due to lower test
AND women suffer less from PTSD

if women were drafted there would be a net increase of 50% soldiers and this would lead to safer countries on average

think logically...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CGAk5gRD-t0
youtube.com/watch?v=iUSFF4NI_Us
youtube.com/watch?v=Em5AUwRQKFw
youtube.com/watch?v=URGhMw1u7MM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

This is bait but Australia’s military has been ruined by female recruitment.
Women have no place in a life or death situation.
You must have every advantage possible over the enemy, and men are almost always going to be better than women in a life or death military situation.
Also
>a fucking leaf

> ensuring that the standards were lowered so as to make certain that the first women able to pass selection would have the best possible chance of making it through the grueling 14 month pipeline practically unimpeded.
> Being able to say they graduated the first female Green Beret is a milestone no officer can possibly pass up.
The stronk womyn ruins everything it touches.

GI Joe falls in love with GI Jane.

GI Jane gets captured by Cobra Commander.

GI Joe does something stupid like gives up intel for her release.

GI Joe wouldn't have given a shit if GI Steve got captured

>what does physical strength matter
Carrying the gun and gear over vast distances
>too emotional
They cause drama.
>think logically
You can't use that on women, they don't follow its laws.

Nothing wrong with combating women if they decide to operate outside of the kitchen desu

Military bitches are sluts who brag about who they've fucked then they get pregnant

Your pic right there is why it'll be all fucked up.

they are both too weak and emotional user.
It's funny it was on the news here earlier, heads of the army was warning that they couldn't take many women because it would reduce our combat abilities/quality

It is this simple, and you got this thing with pshyche too. They will give up and cry when you really need to be hard at the most, this is maybe the most important part of it all. Nomatter how shiity things are, you stick it out, you follow orders, you are not important. The last one too ohh is so damn important here, you know what they always say
>you must think about your self user
because that's how they tick, and in this case you can see how this is going to crash so hard as it possible can crash. Women have no room there at ALL.

This is a male thing, they are not programmed for this, and they cannot be changed into doing so either.

We have that thing about just throwing them selvses on the back and spreading their legs too, which basically is their instinc in war
>having women at the front is so counter biological, it's just absurd

This is the one issue I really agree with Hitler on, look up his talk on women in the military, should be on youtube. Short answer, if we let women fight through the horrors of war on the front lines, how can we call ourselves men? Any man who lets a woman fight in his place is a coward. It isn't that women shouldn't, but rather that any man who stays behind to make a woman fight isn't worth protecting, and if by necessity we have take women to fight because we ran out of men, then all is lost anyway.

Nice pasta, you fucking Leaf

>>Women are too weak
>what does physical strength matter when modern guns shoot over 9000rpm
Stamina and strength is needed by soldiers to traverse terrain at appreciable speeds. Plus the bags you carry are fucking huge, 50 + lbs of shit.

>>Women are too emotional
>actually, studies show the opposite, women are calmer in combat situations due to lower test
Nice sources, but my experience says otherwise

The few women that actually see combat without getting pregnant all end up with severe PTSD because they aren't wired for it.

Shill threads are terrible. Recruiting below par candidates

Nowadays?
Of course they can since the military is a massive fucking joke full of cowards where drones do all the hard work.

>what does physical strength matter when modern guns shoot over 9000rpm

because it isn't call of duty and you need to physically use your body to move yourself and your gear on the battlefield, which women can't do

GAY BOMB

OK. The following are from documents I found in a closet, left over from my days as a syndicated military columnist (‘Soldiering,’ Universal Press Syndicate). Note the dates: All of this has been known for a long time.

From the report of the Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces (report date November 15, 1992, published in book form by Brassey’s in 1993):

The average female Army recruit is 4.8 inches shorter, 31.7 pounds lighter, has 37.4 fewer pounds of muscle, and 5.7 more pounds of fat than the average male recruit. She has only 55 percent of the upper-body strength and 72 percent of the lower-body strength... An Army study of 124 men and 186 women done in 1988 found that women are more than twice as likely to suffer leg injuries and nearly five times as likely to suffer fractures as men.

Further:

The Commission heard an abundance of expert testimony about the physical differences between men and women that can be summarized as follows:
Women’s aerobic capacity is significantly lower, meaning they cannot carry as much as far as fast as men, and they are more susceptible to fatigue.In terms of physical capability, the upper five percent of women are at the level of the male median. The average 20-to-30 year-old woman has the same aerobic capacity as a 50 year-old man. Using the standard Army Physical Fitness Test, the upper quintile of women at West point achieved scores on the test equivalent to the bottom quintile of men.
Only 21 women out of the initial 623 (3.4%) achieved a score equal to the male mean score of 260. On the push-up test, only seven percent of women can meet a score of 60, while 78 percent of men exceed it.Adopting a male standard of fitness at West Point would mean 70 percent of the women he studied would be separated as failures at the end of their junior year, only three percent would be eligible for the Recondo badge, and not one would receive the Army Physical Fitness badge.

Soldiers will be replaced with AI

I would not worry about it darling.

youtube.com/watch?v=CGAk5gRD-t0

Wait till you get shot, and a woman has to drag you behind cover but she can’t, then 200 yards away you see a sand nigger looking at you, then a small flash appears in front of him, and that’s the last thing you ever see, just because some kike thought women should be in the military :(

>Women suffer less from PTSD

Holy shit you're an idiot.

Why don't they send all female units to combat field missions and see how they fare?

Has this been done?

The Soviets attempted it against the Wehrmacht and got btfo.

The 588th beg to differ

women are indeed less emotional but this also means they are mean socio pathetic. they honestly only care about themselves

>believing Soviet propaganda

damn that is fucking terrifying. why is death so scary especially a shitty death

because she can be the fastest gun in the west but she still cant carry a 300lb guy with a 150lb backpack while carrying one of her own out of the line of fire

>women are indeed less emotional

this is what mgtow incels actually believe

Women should not be in the military. Any man that lets his women fight and die in combat is a fucking pussy who deserves the death penalty.

Gonna take the bait
>>Women are too weak
>what does physical strength matter when modern guns shoot over 9000rpm
Because the only thing you're supposed to carry is a rifle.

Also
>net increase of 50%
Quality over quantity

>AND women suffer less from PTSD
Coming straight from OP's ass.

But regardless, as for the rest of your point, you'd be right, if war consisted of nothing but stationary gunfire that is. Shooting a gun isn't what women would struggle with(I'd hope), it's the carrying a man over a wall, or keeping up with men in a general physical sense. Not to even mention the psychological effects bringing women into combat will have on their male counterparts. For better or worse, men are more efficient killers than women.

>male army
get shot,tortured and die.
>women army
They will be raped every day of their lives . it could even be incentive for enemies. They will love female enemies.

They're not combat effective, sir!

Imagine the women being captured...imagine the POW camp...imagine them being used to breed more enemy soldiers...

ISIS would have a field day

>women are calmer in combat situations due to lower test
>AND women suffer less from PTSD

Studies are moronic because number of men to women who have experienced extreme combat scenarios is a huuuuuuuge ratio, like 50k to 1 probably. Same reason on the PTSD nonsense.

>what does physical strength matter when modern guns shoot over 9000rpm
you still have to walk or run where you're going wearing 30kg of equipment most of the time

thats quality porn

But it's true that women are less emotional. Most times they express emotion its because they want something, it's almost always manipulative. Women are in general very cold

Because if one is shot a Man will risk more saving her dumb ass than he would a Male

> Implying there are no women fighting ISIS

>actually, studies show the opposite, women are calmer in combat situations due to lower test

It's sort of a personal fetish.

(you)
Hey newfags, this is bait. It's what we call a slide thread. It is posted several times a day every single day.

Women soldiers or wives or in genereal WOMEN willl ALWAYS ALWAYS be better than any cuck that asks a question about real women like the one in the photo that the OP posted. Always. GOD bless all of them.

>this bait

>inb4
>>Women are too weak
>what does physical strength matter when modern guns shoot over 9000rpm

Talked with an (american) sarge who had women in his squad. First thing he checked was whether they could drag an injured buddy to safety. Fail this test, and you're out, for everybody's safety.

And guess what, women failed it more often.


>>Women are too emotional
Psychological studies show *men* get more emotional when a woman squadmate gets hit, and act unpredictably; unit cohesion and ability to execute commands suffer.

btw, you should have used the "Israel made it work just fine" argument. Cause facts > feelz.

>implying women fight in ISIS
even if they did, they have to be fully clothed and would best be used to detect land mines due to their low range of vision

Same reason there are no women on mens e-sports teams
She'll get you killed

>believing Kurdish psyop propaganda
Those photo ops of female fighters are exactly that, photo ops.

That smile.

(OP)
>Canada

No they dont.

>what does physical strength matter when modern guns shoot over 9000rpm
People dont carry CIWS into battle you fuck head. More over the target may be 15kms away and you have to walk in with 45kilos of gear on your back. May take days. Try and fire a mini gun with no food or sleep after that
>Women are too emotional
They are.

Now we get onto the reality. This is from my experience having served in two branches of the ADF.

>Women get injured at much higher rates
>Women get special quotas
>Women DO NOT meet the standards as men even though the government say they do. Last year the School of Infantry took away all the gates including the PESA so the girls could pass and most still got injured
>Women get pregnant to avoid trips. Happened on my gulf deployment. 2 others got pregnant in the AO.
>Women in the military are sluts. Much the same reason they become cosplayers. Msot military women are broken souls who join a male dominated organization to feel like they are special. Even if they pretend they dont like the special treatment they really do
>They cause jealousy and turmoil within strong male units. IE a girl will come in and fuck everyone except a few guys and they will get jealous. Soon enough there will be a break down in the order and cohesion. This is a big problem and no its not the Mens fault and we do not have to get over it
>It takes away from the experience. Why join an 'elite' unit if women are allowed to join? Doesnt make it elite or special anymore
>Women are like cancer, once a few get in they flood in. And they band together and organise and soon enough there are sexual assault cases left right and center because they try and get rid of all the men who are a threat.
>They get promoted and put on courses faster than men. Even Men who are more experienced.
We've had a few girls rock up in my unit this year and all of them started fucking guys in the brigade and in the unit. Its a game to them.

Should watch the movie The cross of Iron. Theres a scene where some Germans capture a section of russian females and start tearing off their clothes and raping them.

Because they cannot fulfill the intense training standards. When that becomes a problem, that is where the virtue signalling delusional feminist cuntbags start coming in and start unreasonably demanding that they lower the training standards for both men and women.
And that cannot be done for a good reason, because it will reduce the fighting capability of the armed forces.

Even the goddamned JEWS in artificial land stolen from palestine are not immune to soros' shenanigans

youtube.com/watch?v=iUSFF4NI_Us

But Others here will think this video is staged.
Fine, then.

Cunts need to understand too that if you put a woman in a combat role that means that she is there instead of a guy who is keen to do that job.
There are hundreds of guys in Australia right now who are dying to get into combat roles in our military and who can't and there are currently about 10 women in our infantry when it could have been one of the 10 of us.

This. They only got picked because they had vaginas.

>what does physical strength matter when modern guns shoot over 9000rpm

ammo is heavy

>what does physical strength matter when modern guns shoot over 9000rpm

you've obviously never been near a full military kit these days, they usually weigh half or even closer to the soldier's weight himself. try carrying that for a 8 hour march across a scolding hot desert while having to keep pace, and you'll quickly see why strengh is important, not to mention that if ony of your mates gets hit, you'll have to carry him out of combat, which means 2x that weight

>actually, studies show the opposite, women are calmer in combat situations due to lower test
AND women suffer less from PTSD

first, source, secondly, you've never had more than 3 10 minute conversations with women, have you? They panic about fucking nothing, and about the PTSD, tumblr can prove you wrong on that account

>what does strength and endurance matter
Matters loads, that's why fat puny cunts don't get in.
Fuck off anyway. I hate Canadians now.

The kits I carried weighed about 120 kg (265 pounds) when you were fully stocked (ammo, rations, 16Litres water, full set et al). I only weigh 75-85 kg depending on how lazy I have been.

this...
Except the job isn't just shooting a gun you fucking spastic. In many scenarios you'll be expected to carry 40kg+ of gear to your destination. Living off rations or what you can find.
Woman have less muscle mass and physical endurance, they're also more likely to suffer from physical injuries and psychological trauma.
Why do you think the majority of world-conquering armies have been majority male.

Also if women are capable of serving in the army, why do they have significantly lower entry requirements. In Canada it's roughly half what a man has to do.

As for your 50% increase, history shows that quality is better than quantity.
>Think logically
>A FUCKING LEAF

Reminder

>can't be bothered to sleep with others
>can't piss anywhere like normal soldiers and have rags
>get genital infections from forced lack of hygiene

Oh and also
>get fucked by the whole barrack
>get pregnant
>blame every soldier for rape
and so on.

I let your save and/or read those. They're quite interesting.

Just look at this photo and try to tell me women have any place in the military.

Niggaleaf Logic
>if women were drafted there would be a net increase of 50% soldiers and this would lead to safer countries on average

Because society can't afford losing large number of females in the role they're not supposed to perform.

if you're a male POW, you'll be tortured for information then either killed or traded for ransom.

if you're a female POW, you'll be raped for information then sold.

a unit needs to work together in sync. If they have someone who is a special butterfly (transgender or a woman) then it will ruin this sync of the unit. As long as a woman can carry a full grown man (they can't) then sure, let them in.

Well for starters, there aren't unlimited recruitment slots.
For every position given to a woman, there would be an even more qualified man out there being denied. It's like choosing between a used 98 Pontiac Sebring and a brand new BMW M5. Nobody in their right mind would pick the sub-standard car. So why would you pick a sub-standard soldier that would ultimately put others at risk on the battlefield?

Men are both biologically and physically superior to women. It's irrefutable science.
I think it's admirable that women want to serve their country in combat, but despite what your parents might've told you growing up, not everybody gets to be an astronaut. Other soldiers lives shouldn't needlessly be put in jeopardy just so can live out your power fantasy.

The kiwis have had women in the infantry for ages.
If a woman can do the job then great, however it's unfair to expect most women to meet the standard. If they are fine with there being low representation then it's not an issue. If you push quotas and lower stanards, the job just won't get done.

Also this wouldn't be an issue in a free society.

They rape the men too mate.

Women in their 20s and 30s should be breeding, not serving Israel.

oh this thread again

Why do you have to be so goddamn retarded you have to even ask? Ofc no.
>muh equality t.manlet

Why the fuck do you think no civilizations but some fantasybook ones had women in military? Do you brainlets think society runs on itself? Do you faggots think that men and women are equal? Women are one of the most important resource people have when it comes to preserving their people. Men are the expendable ones, yet stronger and more capable of warfare. Only a idiotic coward would put their women to die in front of them.

>The kiwis have had women in the infantry for ages.
Yeah and they suck.

>on average weaker
>given less physically demanding training and lower pass scores on exams
>more likely to think twice before killing someone
>on average less emotionally stable
>more likely to be a distraction to the squad

Id rather not have my life depend on whether or not a girl can shoot an enemy or whether the girl can carry me to safety whilst im wounded thanks

Female:
>Captured
>Thrown into prison
>Turned into sex slave/raped endlessly by non-government military

Male:
>Captured
>Thrown into prison
>Killed in a the middle of nowhere, probably on camera

All meme flag opinions go straight into the trash.

Yeah they still shouldnt be allowed in combat roles you cannuck cuck.

Also this

#1 pic is not related
#2 US military standards have been eliminated to allow women to "pass" physical tests
#3 show me a woman packing 130pounds @ 10,000 feet for a week, in combat

Why waste resources on a downgrade?

You think I was defending women in the military fucking kangaroo?

>woman
>combat
also,
>leaf

Wow , that was a good read,
conclusion : women are helping out the enemy

>Steven Crowder isn't fun-

youtube.com/watch?v=Em5AUwRQKFw

so you give precious intel.
but because it's war, and the enemy has now lost respect for you after meeting gi jane, the enemy executes her anway after getting the intel.
but with the intel, thr enemy is able to ambush another 50 troops resulting in their deaths too.

but hey, at least some politician was able to virtue-signal to feminists..

women suffer more from PTSD and are more prone to getting it.

Also women are not calmer in combat situations, they panic due to the lack of testosterone.

>m-muh adhominems

youtube.com/watch?v=URGhMw1u7MM

Women (and only some!) can be selectively employed in military, but not as front line troops. They can be snipers though.
>this kills Kraut

Whats the name of the porn video. Please please please tell me

Woman drag man down in every way

For example A man would rather save a heavily most likely dying woman than their lighter injured male comrade who could new up the fight

you never step a feet on a batllegroud I guess

Standards are lowered. They can't be trusted to perform. Sexual harassment shit is another problem we don't need. They re fun to fuck not to work with.