>>Oy vey, choose between these two you dumb goy. There is no in-between...
You are falling right into the kike's trap...
There shouldn't even be a law over this. Why can't we have the option to choose an ISP that offers both? Free access to the internet with a slight higher price or a package where you can choose for less money?
Imagine this situation... There is two kinds of people, one that loves to explore the net no strings attached, and one that only cares about online video games an netflix. The guy that loves to have all the net available to him has to pay more of course, but the guy that only cares about his media will be comfortable paying less for the only thing he cares about.
To me, this is an example of right vs. left where the kike is happily overlooking our tug of war, when in reality, we should be able to choose freely what we want.
This ideal with both options possible will not only save our conflict because we are FREE to choose what we want but it will also enable competition and open new markets were prices will fall due to the free market.
I like the second option netflix can pay for the 60% they use
besides... >censoring and dropping sites is already happening. thank the Goolag
Jackson Nelson
Yeah, people like you will be comfortable just paying for videogames and Netflix exclusively because you truly don't give a fuck about kikebook and other services. However, other people value liberty of exploring the net and having no stings attached net freedom. Why are they making us choose only one option? If Google is censoring information (Wich I won't deny, it is...) Why not use other search engines?
Joseph Lewis
True, not only is it better for the consumer, but abolishment of NN would create a market where you actually pay for what you use. It's simply stupid that watching netflix cost the same as browsing Sup Forums, when netflix uses a lot more bandwidth. NN is basically just subsidy for high-bandwidth-users like netflix and youtube.
And remember, this subsidy is happening on the expense of everyone else (you).
To put it simply; a cracker shouldn't cost the same as a loaf of bread.
Kevin Thomas
Oyyyyyy veyy I just came
Jaxon Taylor
I'm not saying abolish completely net neutrality. My idea is to have internet freedom... Sure, I think everyone will start with a plan calling for internet neutrality, but at the end when you discover that services with high bandwidth such as internet video games and Netflix aren't your thing you will opt out of these and save the company bandwidth, thus saving money yourself.
Carson Anderson
>when you discover that services with high bandwidth such as internet video games and Netflix aren't your thing you will opt out of these and save the company bandwidth, thus saving money yourself. >save the company bandwidth
I don't really understand what you mean by this, you are already saving the company bandwidth if you have opted out of those, it's just that you pay the same as someone who hasn't (ie you pay the same for less).
The removal of NN would change this so that you actually pay for what you use, which of course (like you said) would be financially beneficial for those who don't play videogames or watch netflix.
At the same time, those who do watch netflix (and such) would have to pay more since they now have to pay for what others (those who used little bandwidth) used to pay for them.
In the end this would be a fairer system in which, if i were to return to my "cracker and bread" parable, a cracker is cheaper than a loaf of bread.
I think this is common sense, but there are a lot of socialist/communalist who think otherwise.
Josiah Rogers
>Reddit trying so hard to subsidize tech giants bandwidth hogging well ignoring government grant is cartels.
Fearmongeing hypothetical bullshit and virtue signaling an equality of data outcome is retarded at best, malicious at worse.
Tech giant have to pay their fair share of the bandwidth.
Cameron Rivera
True, remember to check this out: the fact that all these fake emails were pro NN is a huge giveaway (only corporations give a fuck enough to spam like that)
Chase Kelly
You just proved my point in your same argument. Once the user decided that they no longer need or are interested in services that require high bandwidth they can opt to pay less form services that need less bandwidth such as reloading a page from Sup Forums. In other words... I support the current system where you choose your bandwidth... But in the other hand, normies don't know what is the minimum bandwidth required to play game of thrones or play battlefront 2 without lagging.
