Is mongamy natural?

In general it seems no, but I know that is also degenerate having open relationships. What is the balance of our biology vs our culture?

Personally, I know this is really hard as I have a great gf but I can't stop my eyes/mind from wandering.

Is it pol?

Monogamy is natural for weaklings.

>I post images of hot girls to draw in a crowd

>I use these images as a subliminal message to get my topic discussed to report to my handlers

>I’m really dumb and just want to be accepted

you're allowed to have one wife, and as many consorts as you can steal from niggers

Yes. It is also "natural" for you to be tempted. But if you stop masturbating to other women which only serves to wire your mind to see them all as cum dumpsters, the temptation will subside. And don't even fap to your wife. When you do, you degenerate your mind i to seeing her as a cum dumpster instead of a lover.
>And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. Then the man said, "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man." Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh. And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed. Genesis 2:22-25 ESV

Reporting to handlers right now

Shitting in a toilet is not natural but you aren’t rushing to the nearest shitting street are you?

how do you define "natural". this question is retarded at its very premise.

it doesn't matter if it's natural or not. a lot of things that are "natural" (like feeling anger and wanting to ram into a car that cuts you off) are not good. so if it is natural to want to fuck every girl you are attracted to, that doesn't mean it's good. is it good for society for a man and woman to marry, have children, and remain monogamous? I think so. humans are blessed with an ability to have self-control and resist the temptation to do natural things that are harmful for society.

Back in the good old days men would go to the pub to meet with the local harlot (whom everyone had a ride on) to relieve this stress, and the womenfolk didn't ask any questions.

Women were also barred from the pub because they:

a) cause fights (most men fighting in pubs is because of women)
b) men like to get away from nagging women.

Without monogamy, pedigree becomes less important.

It's arguable. Monogamy is probably more sustainable and safe, although historically men have frequently been able to have multiple wives.
If you think your gf might be the one, and your eyes are wandering, get into some next level tantric, slow sex, or find new depths of intimacy. Even if you don't plan to marry her, it wouldn't hurt and you've got a whole life ahead of you.

Yes. It's so natural we wouldn't even exist as a species without it. That's what this book, by the world's leading anthropologist points out. Monogamy leads to better child rearing and more focus on the child's health and well being thus preparing them for the future better, thus furthering the genetic line. Most ancient humans were found dead with people who were genetically related to them, like children buried next to their parents. They don't find any kids that didn't match their parents in humans.... they do find them in other hominid species though... The ones that went extinct because they were too busy fucking uncontrollably and not taking care of the kids. What does that sound like to you?

Why do you think babies look like their parents so early on? It's to identify who belongs to who and who's supposed to take care of who. All this cuck and hypergamy didn't start until there were a lot of humans in one place, enough to subside the natural need for commitment and partnership. Like we have too much damn food right now too.

...

but everyone agrees that it's bad form. see: increased interest in more natural birthing positions and the squatty potter.

we used to do tons of dum shit

>Is mongamy natural?
No. You know what else isn't natural? Medical science.

Humans are genetically hardwired for harems. Watch a Beatles concert etc.

Interesting point

who cares?
driving a car isn't """natural""" but you do it anyway. the question is retarded.

>Why do you think babies look like their parents so early on? It's to identify who belongs to who and who's supposed to take care of who.

That seems a dubious conclusion. Is it from the book?

Yeah it explains better than I can.

Thanks, I'll check it out.

mongamy is of satin

Same thing with monogamy.

At least from the male perspective, it's not natural.
However, we figured out that the natural state of things tends to lead to a few men getting all the women, and many men willing to rob, kill, or rape in order to get their dick wet.
The solution is to declare that every man only gets one woman, so the number of men without access to pussy declines.
Men who have access to pussy are free to do more productive things, so the economy of monogamous societies improves, and they outcompete societies that don't practice monogamy.

Basically, monogamy isn't "natural", but it is "stable", which is what you want for building societies.

>Basically, monogamy isn't "natural", but it is "stable", which is what you want for building societies.

See It's not even natural at all. Otherwise we'd find early human remains with one dude and a harem. We keep finding couples and small family units. The harem is reversed for the king who just forces something unnatural onto their subjects because they had the power to do so.

We need to make the ratio higher. 2 white women for every white man

It is not natural, bu necessary were there was civilisation there was a state and the founding there was a witten or unwriiten contract (social contract)
Due to 20% of men getting 80% women
This created a class of involuntary celibates which plotted to overthrow the natural state of man; anarchy, and replace it with artificial state of man; the leviathan.
One of the sole functions of the state was enforcement of monogamy through marriage; one public wife per man which creates a horizontal society which is meritocratic and men pursue interests other than sex an build civilization

All under a state dude, read my post

women forget there's a reason for their biological inadequacies and strengths.

their physically weak and able to store seed for up to a week.

their some purpose is to incubate children.

pregnancy and giving birth is still the most dangerous thing a female can experience. it's their end point. fulfill it and good on you, die during, fine you tried your hardest to fulfill your purpose

*sorry about "their" on my phone, didn't bother to check if autocorrect did its job

You have it backwards. Monogamy was natural, the state/religion came and tried to keep it up and THEN people went against it/thought it was oppressive and unnatural.

Yes, it comes from natural law.

As much as I'm arguing pro-monogamy here, I think these situations are only okay in times of population decline or after war, fame, plague, etc and it should always be one man and multiple girls, because the man's shouldering the responsibility of taking care of the children. More than one dude means one guy gets to fuck off and have all the fun and the other's take care his shit.

Our bodies allow us to do this, but it's because we have these flexible mating habits we can adapt to different scenarios. Think about how Man doesn't have a mating season. We're a lot more in control of our own population than any other animal. We just need to not abuse that power.

Since it takes over 18 years to raise a human it would seem like having a single partner is preferable.

It doesn't matter if monogamy is natural or not. What matters is if it's a good thing.

Protip: it is.

What is natural isn't necessarily moral.

Is it weird if you're pro monogamy but support concubines?

Dude, that's what I'm saying, God is pro monogamy, but polygamy is an okay second in His book. Permissible, but not preferred.

isnt that a logical fallacy using the "but its natural" argument? Lots of natural things aren't moral. Control your dick faggot

>Cum dumpster.
That is a brilliant way to put that.

the mormons would still be doing it if it had not been for the fucking us government.

>about as natural as the tits on pic related.

What do you mean by natural? There are literally no naturally monogamous species on Earth, and humans certainly aren't. We used to think for a loooong time that swans were the only monogamous species but even that has been proven not to be true.

It isn't natural but that doesn't mean that is not a desirable practice for a non-degenerate and functional civilization.

not natural but red pilled when it comes to civilisation

Why would someone want autocorrect? Is it to learn how to not be able to spell? So that nobody will know what you are talking about? Simply use the red underline with the correction options, but having your tools do it for you without you even knowing is just retarded.

no

aw yeah it's Sup Forumsyamory time