Daily reminder that wikipedia is a jewish psyop. It creates a culture of linking to opinion articles without thinking of any arguments or checking sources. Literally copy/pasting thoughts. Try arguing with most internet-literate normies - they will simply link to wikipedia and consider you "debunked". Post examples of jewpedia lies.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Other urls found in this thread:
electronicintifada.net
thejidf.org
thejidf.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
wikimediafoundation.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
We should try something like this again.
Is there anything in the world that isn't a Jewish conspiracy?
Not since the end of WWII.
That was quite fun indeed
Eh, take it as it comes. "da joos" can be considered a placeholder for communists, feminists, neo-marxists, all the bad shit. (((coincidentally))), these all turn out to be led by jews. Huh, who'd've thought.
more jewpedia manipulation
In April 2008, the Electronic Intifada published an expose of pro-Israel pressure group CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America). CAMERA had been found to be orchestrating an organised campaign to recruit, train, and manage pro-Israel Internet users who could work as editors of Wikipedia. The CAMERA emails published by the Electronic Intifada reveal the dishonest nature of their highly organised campaign, wherein their operatives would seek Wikipedia ‘Administrator‘ rights before using these privileges to edit, delete, and manipulate information
electronicintifada.net
You can't make this shit up. I bet we can find more.
>Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America
Jesus, this already sounds like something out of the Soviet Union. Unreal
Check out the video where JIDF admits brigading Wikipedia...
thejidf.org
This thread is gonna get shut down in any minute now.
I wish Jews could just chill instead of ruining the western world.
wikimediafoundation.org
ctrl-f for soros and open society. It's clear as daylight at this point.
LE LOOK AT ME MOM I'M LE TROLLING LE SHITLORD FAGGOT TUMBLR SJW KIKES ON LE INTERNET!!!!111!!! XXXXDDDDDD!!! I'M LE EBIN TROLLMASTER EDGY REACTIONARY ALPHA MALE WHITE MASTER RACE XXDDD I'M SAVING LE WHITE RACE FROM LE EURABIA AND LE FUCKING DUMBASS NIGGERS AND DEGENERATE FAGGOTS PUTTING AIDS IN LE FLUORIDE WATER FUNDED BY LE JEWS AND LE CULTURAL MARXIST KIKE BITCH FEMINAZI DYKES DESTROYING MUH PROUD NORDIC HERITAGE AND MUH FOUNDATIONS OF CIVILIZATION XXDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!!!!!!!111!!!!!!!
yeah no kidding
I'm going to have to find the link where that youtuber Kraut & Tea, despite being a douchebag, actually did manage to uncover a group out of NY from a certain tribe and a certain political ideology go on wikipedia to change articles for polcorr purposes.
Open society isn't paying too well these days huh?
the one that comes to mind for me is white pride vs black pride
en.wikipedia.org
>White pride is a motto primarily used by white separatist, white nationalist, neo-Nazi and white supremacist organizations in order to signal racist or racialist viewpoints.[3][4] It is also a slogan used by the prominent post-Ku Klux Klan group Stormfront and a term used to make racist/racialist viewpoints more palatable to the general public
en.wikipedia.org
>Black pride is a movement in response to dominant white cultures and ideologies that encourages black people to celebrate black culture and embrace their African heritage.[1] In the United States, it was a direct response to white racism especially during the Civil Rights Movement.
doublethink
Citation needed
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
So critical theory is described completely without a whiff of its sinister implications, meanwhile race realism is slandered from header to footer with allegations of "pseudoscience". Really makes you think with how basically ALL the articles on cultural marxism are clean and neutral, meanwhile, wander into more edgy territory and suddenly it's all looney nuts and pseudoscience.
It is inconceivable that nobody has actually put in a good word for race realism and the like, considering it's supposed to be a crowdsourced project.
...
It's not doublethink if it's true.
sure it is
kys
When has "white pride" popped up outside of an instance of racism?
Also pic related. Seems like anything white is bad.
when has black pride?
why not describe them using neutral terminology instead of clearly favoring one over the other when they are two sides of the same coin?
no thanks
>types Charles Dickens into Wikipedia
>there's a paragraph on "alleged antisemitism"
>Dickens also poked fun at the French - no paragraph on "anti-gallicism"
>Realizes there's a paragraph on "alleged antisemitism" on 90% of wikipedia.
Senpai, I don't trust anything. It's all with a grain of salt.
>when has black pride?
Ever heard of Langston Hughes?
>en.wikipedia.org
>en.wikipedia.org
>en.wikipedia.org
>en.wikipedia.org
>en.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia articles aren't legitimate sources (anyone can edit those)
Most of those pages are locked, for obvious reasons.
You can make the section on Anti-french sentiments if you want. Nobody is stopping you, emu.
its mostly written by academics so its only ok if it is hard science
So why are they NEVER edited into presenting the non-kike viewpoints on race realism and the like?
>why won't they humor my stupid views and let me link to "totally factual and not at all bullshit" neo-nazi blogs? It's the kikes I tell you! ;_;
Lol, neck yourself.
The articles tell different lies when you switch between different languages.
no i have not
do u think that there are no white people in the modern day who justly feel like their heritage and culture are under attack in a similar way to him? because i feel that way - and based on the constant barrage of articles written with language like this and the removal of statues like lee's - and he wasnt even a bad guy - i think i have reason to feel that way.
my mistake - meant to reply to
You ain't seen nothing yet.
en.wikipedia.org
>So why are they NEVER edited into presenting the non-kike viewpoints on race realism and the like?
They do, but because anyone can edit it, people change it back to what it is now
>en.wikipedia.org
that one is really bad too, i remember that whole thing so clearly and they really missed the point
>keeps claiming "anyone can edit any post"
Expect nothing less of a retarded leaf.
I changed the first person to climb to the to of a top of a certain mountain to my professor by making a website that fake sold a fake book and using a web of citations.
I would link it but I don't want it fixed. It has been up for 8 years now.
Operation break Wikipedia would be a worthwhile one.
Yea, that one is full of kikery. Just check out the sources - most of them are mainstream news outlets ganging up to cover for their journo bros in the anti-GG movement.
Super soakers aren't a Jewish conspiracy that was invented by a nigger.
Thanks niggers
Realistically how likely are they to catch on if we just keep it low key? Seems like most of their sources are stupid news media outlets that they never even check, we could probably manipulate a nice bit of the less touchy stuff.
i dont get why people are arguing with me about this - there is so clearly a double standard here. i guess they forgot that the whites culture and history they seem to resent is part of what dragged black culture out of the stone age
louis armstrong would have been banging on bongos if it werent for slavery sorry for the harsh reality check but africa was a shithole much worse than slavery then and still is now
except ethiopia
Most of the people who edit these articles are probably just whites themselves.
Just because some belshevik revolution in eastern europe 100 years ago was majority jewish, doesn't mean it's the same people editing articles on wikipedia
so when you say ''jewish'' I assume you mean ''people conditioned and brainwashed'' by jews?
Your gay little friend was able to do that because it was an inconsequential post that nobody would care about. Try touch any serious page and they have moderation to prevent you morons and the 12 year olds who try change things to "poop" from being retarded.
No they actual mean that.
As crazy as the removal of Lee statues is, it's nothing compared to the repression and segregation that sparked "black pride."
The truck is to make a different account for every edit.
If they catch you doing one thing they will go into your history and fix everything.
Prolly pick targets that jidf wouldn't care about to undermine the whole sites credibility.
Agreed, I'd also say that slavery was a huge net-negative for whites. You guys lost a fair number of people in your civil war and had your country almost fractured.
Now, the "echoes" of slavery are showing up in Europe as well and black are pouring into France and the UK, and this is justified as (((decolonization))).
Exactly, you could also say it's the general kikey predisposition towards multi-kulti and progressivism. Or maybe those are the consequences of kikery. Dunno.
I didn't say I fixed just that one
I just used an example no would would waste time looking for.
Wikipedia is already fucked beyond repair. The professor I mentioned gives the assignment to edit Wikipedia every year. Bonus points if it sticks.
We should bring segregation back.
These niggers can't steal our bikes if they can't get near them.
I'm sure, bud. The more scientific an article, the less likely it is to be incorrect. I'm sure you thought you understood your professor's point, but that's not how Wikipedia works.
...
bro whites were enslaved and oppressed by romans for a long fuckin time when they were tribal retards like africans were - it hauled us out of the stone age
i appreciate the roman empire for having done that and the romans should be proud of their accomplishments
we did the exact same thing for black people but to an even greater extent - we hauled their tribal asses out of the stone age and into the modern era and we couldnt have done it by treating their backward views with respect and tiptoeing around to make sure they were all happy
just look at shithole africa today versus african americans now - who is better off?
I agree with the scientific part.
The parts that are near worthless are history and everything where subjectivism comes into play.
Some people can't wrap their heads around that and so undermining the whole thing is useful less the whole world accepts the Jewish progressive pov on reality.
slavery economically enabled us a lot but it did have to go at some point - i wonder if we are worse off or better though cuz it did fuckin tear us apart. maybe if abolitionists had been more patient it would have been phased out more naturally because things were headed in that direction but instead they decided to do what most southern states saw as infringing on their rights as soon as they had the chance and it fucked over race relations ever since - i dont think we were quite ready to do that. idk im not super knowledgable about that part of american history i always found it a little boring, probably because high school always centered on the issue of race during that whole time period i wonder why
anything that is politically charged is at risk - much of ancient history is fine and most of the science articles are fine aside from like global warming related ones and that sort of thing
u can tell instantly when its charged cuz words with heavy moral or political connotation suddenly are used much more often