Black Americans and dysgenic breeding

This is NOT a "hate" thread - instead, it's a serious discussion of something that many people have noticed: contrary to the rest of the first world, crime rates among black Americans have been going UP in recent years. Many people have noticed that younger black Americans, in many cases, just seem "off" - there is something wrong with them, and they inevitably seem to end up imprisoned, often for very violent and pointless crimes.

Leftists, naturally, blame "structural racism" or economic factors, but that does not explain the SPIKE in crime and murder. It's also incoherent, since American whites are a shrinking portion of the population (hence, "white supremacy", if it exists, must be weakening over time). Conservatives blame liberals, "fatherlessness," etc., which also misses the point, since those factors are CONSTANTS for the past 50 years, and we are talking about RECENT changes.

I think the answer is "dysgenia." The proportion of black kids being fathered by violent criminals/thugs/etc. has gone up in America over time, and we are starting to experience the result of that fact. Behavioral traits are heritable - and that includes things like a propensity for violence. America has empowered the violent black underclass to breed more rapidly than the "talented tenth" (well-educated black women have very LOW birth rates).

We also see evidence of this in the divergence between black murder rates in America and other western nations where there hasn't been as much dysgenic breeding - Montreal (for example) has quite a few blacks, but they are much less murderous. They are not the product of generations of thug-breeding. This is a difficult issue, because neither American conservatives nor liberals have the language to DESCRIBE the dysgenic breeding problem, let alone solve it. But on Sup Forums, we know better.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=sAszZr3SkEs
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It’s crack.

Black people could solve it if they tried.

>those factors are CONSTANTS for the past 50 years
Wrong

let them breed an under class of humans they even take some of those race traitors whos bf ends up killing them or their half breed sons

How have they not been? The big social changes in "black America" started taking place in the late-1950's and accelerated going into the 60's. That was the subject of the famous 1965 "Moynihan Report," which actually pre-dated the implementation of LBJ's "great society" programs.

When I was in jobcorps half of the students were black and about a quarter of the people there couldn't give two shits about graduating or growing up and got kicked out for acting like little thugs.

wow, you just figured that out OP?
the incentives are wrong for all races though, actually.


Violent blacks, leech spics, and low IQ walmart whites are all being encouraged to reproduce.

>merica has empowered the violent black underclass to breed more rapidly than the "talented tenth"
By keeping them in prison for longer periods for lesser crimes?

Want illogical miscreants, that act out and cling to degradation? Remove father's from the equation, the issue with the Black community is lack of rational thought and stability in the home.

Yes, its leftism and american black violent culture.

They put biggie and tupac in the same class as martin luther king. Theyre mentally sick. Being violent is a virtue in black america.

>well-educated black

avg. IQ 85

I do baked bean farts on my dogs head

Actually, lax law enforcement (only 10% or less of murders are solved in many ghetto areas) is a big contributor to the ability of thugs to produce so many kids. If they actually WERE locked up for their crimes, the dysgenic effect might be reduced a bit.

They really could, but they won't.

You left out the most important part. Their crime rates match up internationally, even in Asian countries.

Yeah totally, it's not like they literally starve and start eating each other when another race isn't helping them. Redpill yourself on Africa.

The murder rates don't match, actually. You can look at a city like London (which has around 900,000 blacks), and blacks in that city seem to commit somewhere around 50 murders per year, for a rate between 5 and 6 per 100,000 in any given year.

Then you look at a city like St. Louis, where a black population of 150,000 is committing somewhere around 180 murders per year in recent years, for a rate of 120 or so - over 20 times higher than London blacks.

Sup Forums absolutely hates acknowledging socioeconomic stats for blacks pre 1960s because its a perfect example of environmental factors shaping a groups behavior&cultural attitudes. Sup Forums wants to believe that niggers are shit and have always been shit, so pre 1960 blacks just get ignored here.

youtube.com/watch?v=sAszZr3SkEs

Went out with a childhood friend to a few black clubs last night. Ask me anything

>hes black
>im 100% pure aryan

Let evolution dictate who will be left standing

...

London niggers don't have guns.

When the Irish, the Italians, the Japanese, etc, first came to America, they were treated like shit, lived in ghettos, had prominent gang activity in their communities, just like the blacks. You want to know the difference? All of those groups made it out of the ghetto except for the blacks. Those groups didn't blame the white man, in fact, they tried hard to emulate the white man, and it worked. The blacks would rather blame the white man for their problems and use it as an excuse to do the shitty and illegal things they do to their people and communities. The white man isn't forcing blacks to drop out of school in favor of joining ruthless street gangs. Their low IQs and lack of a family structure is why they do it.

They literally lack the ability to do so because they are too stupid.

What the fuck does any of that have to do with pre 1960 blacks? Why did you even respond to me.