CEOs agree: Corporate tax cuts won't trickle down

Why are rural and suburban retards so dedicated to voting against their own interests?

thehill.com/opinion/finance/362949-ceos-agree-corporate-tax-cuts-wont-trickle-down

Other urls found in this thread:

unvis.it/thehill.com/opinion/finance/362949-ceos-agree-corporate-tax-cuts-wont-trickle-down
thehill.com/opinion/finance/362949-ceos-agree-corporate-tax-cuts-wont-trickle-down
brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2013/11/12/the-economic-value-of-education/
thehill.com/opinion/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Time for archive
unvis.it/thehill.com/opinion/finance/362949-ceos-agree-corporate-tax-cuts-wont-trickle-down

Fake and gay.

if tax cuts and tax increases dont change the economy then why do we have taxes at all? for fun?

I’m no economist, but why doesn’t Trump invest in things that are PROVEN to strengthen the economy in the long term like education, renewable energy, and healthcare subsidies for small business? Instead he chooses to do the exact opposite.

I do not need it to.
I will be getting a cut too.

>leaf
>opinion piece
Discarded

Show us the stats on those proven items.

So liberals suddenly care what CEOs think now? Kek

...

The tax cut will give me a 3% increase. I'll use that extra cash to invest and become even richer than you.

Stay pathetic, loser.

The system is broken. We need someone who is not a politician, not part of the establishment to come and and drain the swamp. Maybe a good negotiator. The best negotiator. Wait a minute...

Why is the US cutting taxes while running a budget deficit

>(((The Hill)))

Soon, you leafs will be raked, very soon

>Not voting for the leftist nigger/spic-loving welfare whore is voting against my own interests.
KYS

Also, how is this not "trickling down?" Broke liberal college students might not, but most Americans who are old enough to know their ass from a hole in the ground have a 401(k) or other money in the market.

>As it turns out, the CEOs of major companies agree with us. Companies including Cisco, Pfizer, Coca-Cola and Amgen have said that the gains from corporate tax cuts will go to shareholders.

Trump supporters: *shocked face* "No! They said I would be rich if I voted for Drumpf!"


Literally everyone else: "Lol."

>we
>leaf

>HALT!
Son im going to need sauce on that...

>zero evidence that cutting taxes on the rich helps the economy

b-but those weren't real tax cuts

>goes to the share holders
>share holders are american people
>Only CA and NY niggers got fucked because their states are shit holes
I can't believe they're still trying to say it's not a cut

>thehill

Thank you

you got proof leaf?

>education is a scam
>renewables are unprofitable
>healthcare is a billion dollar sink hole
>subsidies does nothing for business
None of the above strengthens the economy, it actually hinders it because the feds take money from real proven companies to subside failing ones
Trump removing barriers for entry for small business with executive order has already paid off and that he'll most likely reach 3% annual gdp growth something obama never did in 8 years

B2B spending increases. Gross Output increases. GO is more representative and accurate and encompassing than GNP and GDP. B2B is greater than GDP calculations 90% of all years.

this whole argument is based on investment, a major of factor of GDP.
Much like the liberal arguments for higher govt spending, it falls flat because it is based on rudimentary economic principles taught in 200 level college courses because these are (((journalists))) and/or the CEOs are bookies

tl;dr this is a bullshit article

t. financial economist

If ceo's aka jews thinks it's bad its good

>leafposting

>vague terms that have miniscule economic implications

Chinese student who cheated on too many economics exams detected.

The only thing proven to strengthen the economy is investment. And Investment goes up with lower taxes. Have you not passed the twelfth grade?

Raked by a collapsing shithole on the verge of civil war to the south? or the chinese. Probably the chinese. America has is no longer the great and competent nation it was in the 20th century.

bump

>When CEOs were asked at a Wall Street Journal event to raise their hands, “If the tax reform bill goes through, do you plan to increase investment — your company’s investment, capital investment,” few raised[15] their hands.

>White House National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn asked “Why aren’t the other hands up?” The hands weren’t up because the gains from corporate tax cuts will go to shareholders, not workers.

Holy shit, I don't think I've seen such disingenuous "reporting" and interpretation in my life.

>CEOs agree
Who?

and yet, your economy is smaller california.

Maybe all the indians we import perform better than you arctic chinese moose-fucking tim hortons addicts?

Try being a top 10 economy first before running your mouth

>collapsing shithole on the verge of war with the Chinese

That is rich coming from a leaf. Your war with the Chinese is already over. Have fun paying rent to Mr. Chen for the next 40 years.

It isn't... look at the actual numbers (not the fake cbo metrics) and you will see that there is an actual surplus.

I'm getting a 400 dollar a year tax cut under that tax cut. How is that against my interests?

The only thing in the Bill against my interests is there is no provision for mass hanging of Libtards.

>21 seconds after OP

jesus christ

sage

if it doesn't 'trickle down' then we is every fucking city in america practically giving amazon free land, and no taxes forever in exchange for building their HQ2 in their city/state? huh? Moron. Fucking idiot.

btw profits trickle up. companies invest FIRST.

>thehill.com/opinion/finance/362949-ceos-agree-corporate-tax-cuts-wont-trickle-down
it's an opinion article. obamaleaf this is a new low

>be corporation
>pay less taxes
>accrue more capital
>bid more contracts
>win more projects
>hire more workers in general
>more upper level roles needed for new projects
>promote good workers into those roles, pay them more


why would this not happen? genuine question, as an engineer for a huge US corporation.

Do these people not realize that anyone can become le ebil shareholder?
Your grandma with 30K in a Vanguard fund is a shareholder.
Literally everyone who's over 30 and not fucking retarded is a shareholder of some company or another.

...

Because rich people are evil and need to be taxed at 100% to redistribute the wealth to poor minorities.

They are pushing the fact that most large businesses will use the money to do stock buy-backs and pay out dividends. What you are suggesting will happen, just not right away.

ivan, shut up

It's actually Vlad bigot.

Low taxes are ment to make the country more competitive

da hell, rare.....

what ever commie

Yep
People don't like discussing the real issue plaguing humanity so we make up economic bullshit even though it's all fiat currency now.

You don't earn enough to make a difference with a 3% increase....
like most people which is why trickle down doesn't work.

Not the other guy, but 3% of 25k is 750€. That's not a MASSIVE amount of money, but it's still an entire month's salary for a supermarket cashier/generic factory worker.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather have 750€ more than less, especially since the government would waste them on pointless shit anyway.

Trickle down is a meme when the economy (business and finance sector) is run by a bunch of turbo-greedy kikes. All the gains would end up in Cayman and/or Seychelles banks. What can be done is to track said accounts and (((they))) find it "mysteriously empty". Of course, "accidents" and "suicides" may be in order as well, until (((they))) get the message.

The Hill broke uranium one story.

Shut the fuck up, leaf.

>Trump removing barriers for entry for small business with executive order has already paid off and that he'll most likely reach 3% annual gdp growth something obama never did in 8 years
This, really. Revert back the economy when there are multiple companies trying to destroy each other in earnest. Competition--to gain customers, retain labor, and be ahead of other competitors--is what made the economy boom. Mergers, acquisitions, monopolies, and the like always led to stagnation. The constant chaos that true competition brings is what's best for the middle class.

brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2013/11/12/the-economic-value-of-education/

What the fuck is 'trickling down' supposed to mean?

A solid majority of economists agree that corporate income tax burdens fall on the working class. That has nothing to to with trickling down; it's due to relative elasticites in the labor market.

And yet tax hikes do nothing for the benefit of workers.

If the rich CEOs and celebs think it's bad, then it must really be good for us.

Who is she? I will marry her and sire as many children as her body can handle.

Duck off kike. I often wonder. Do you libshits EVER get tired of lying, being wrong and making fools of yourself EVERY. FUCKING. Time?

And History has proven that excessively high taxes are nation killers.
High taxes are the fertilizer for revolution....says History, not me.

The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.
The Fatal Conceit : The Errors of Socialism (1988), p. 76

...

>thehill.com/opinion/finance/362949-ceos-agree-corporate-tax-cuts-wont-trickle-down
>thehill.com/opinion/
>/opinion/

/opinion/ disregarded

Because leftists don't understand business, they forget that most CEOs out there have to answer to shareholders.

>CEO's

translation:

HOW DARE YOU PASS TAX CUTS THAT DON'T FUCK OVER THE MIDDLE CLASS.

Reaganomics are an absolute meme. Tax cuts for corporations go directly to shareholders, which are the 1%. Anyone who disagrees is a literal retard.

its 4d chess right?

>Why doesn’t the government make everything more expensive?

Neck yourself you actual nigger.

>CEO's getting nervous over tax simplification