New Study Shows Gay Men Earn 10% MORE

In light of the gay cake case reaching the Supreme Court tomorrow, why should men and women who contribute 10% more in taxes receive no legal protections (that are afforded federally to Christians under the Civil Rights Act), who contribute only brainwashing and high suicide rates for groups they don't like?

archive.is/glwMm

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/soej.12233/full (plug into sci-hub.bz to read)

Economists and management scholars have been crunching the numbers on this question for over 20 years, and until very recently, nearly all the studies have found an identical result: if you compare the earnings of two men with similar education profiles, years of experience, skills, and job responsibilities, gay men consistently earns less than straight men (between 5% and 10% less). The stability of this finding has been remarkable: it has been replicated across numerous datasets in several different countries (e.g., Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and time periods. It seemingly did not budge.

Until now. In a recent paper, a PhD student and I analyzed data from a major federal survey in the United States that had not previously been used in this literature – presumably because it only recently began to ask about sexual orientation – and found that the gay male earnings penalty had disappeared. And not only had it disappeared, it had turned into a 10% premium, meaning that gay men in recent years earned substantially more than straight men with similar education, experience, and job profiles. We went back through the published literature to see if we were making new or strange measurement or specification choices. We were not. We double- and triple-checked the dataset for other patterns that would indicate some fundamental error or data problem. We found none. We subjected the gay male earnings premium to a host of extra tests to see if we could make the result go away. We could not.

Other urls found in this thread:

thecouplesstudy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CHOICES-Younger-Gay-Men-final-160812.pdf
prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PRRI-Millennials-Web-FINAL.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=gAs9HZC9c7Y
psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-00463-014
psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-02599-001
pastebin.com/gt0eK0xE
individual.utoronto.ca/james_cantor/blog1.html
ipce.info/sites/ipce.info/files/biblio_attachments/every_fifth.pdf
beyondhomophobia.com/blog/child-abuse-research/
psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html
pandys.org/articles/abuseandhomosexuality.html
dailykos.com/stories/2010/09/18/903178/-Gays-are-pedophiles-No-Here-s-the-proof
archive.is/ztjf2
blog.donnawilliams.net/2011/12/17/mothers-who-sexually-abuse-their-daughters/
centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/Anti-gayActivismandtheMisuseofScience_1.pdf
patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a-major-study-of-child-abuse-and-homosexuality-revisited/
thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/religious-rights-top-anti-gay-researcher-says-he-was-attracted-to-men-as-a-boy/politics/2012/05/16/39681
shadowproof.com/2011/10/19/paul-cameron-why-the-religious-right-cant-keep-him-in-the-closet/
washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/16/AR2010041602026.html
archive.is/a2iRU
religioustolerance.org/hom_chil.htm
childluresprevention.com/research/profile.asp
childprotection.lifetips.com/cat/63573/sex-offender-statistics/index.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635900
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/cdev.12989/full
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000058/
whatweknow.law.columbia.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/
slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/02/12/what_we_know_about_lesbian_and_gay_parenting_making_sense_of_the_studies.html
archive.is/j0S7Q
dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000228
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Patterson-Farr-Forssell-AppliedDevScience-Jul-2010.pdf
bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=userIsAuthenticated=false
pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/131/4/e1374
ibtimes.com/study-having-gay-parents-does-not-affect-childs-gender-identity-2579343
pastebin.com/PaAFXqQj
bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635?site=bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29144882
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Making 10% more doesn't mean you pay 10% more taxes. Are you retarded?

That means you have 10% more income to contribute to taxes.

>Gay
>Men
Pick one homo, they might be males but fruits ain't men

The point here is that Sup Forums often points out there are NO advantages to being gay or lesbian. But if you make more money, isn't that an advantage?

These findings also applied to lesbians, but only newly to gay men.

FUCK NOW I HATE GAYS

KILL HOMOS TAX THEIR DEGENERACY THEY'RE STEALING FROM US

Not if you spend it all on HIV medication.

But you can't spend it on raising your biological children that you made with your loved one. Pretty pitiable desu. Extra dosh to die with, that's all.

So if i suck cocks and take it up the ass, i will earn 10% more money?

Explain how this works

Truvada is available without cost to anyone who needs it and now in generic, too. Only 4.5% of gay men have HIV and very few lesbians have it.

It's called nepotism. Fags and Jews love fags

Surrogates are biological children.

Wait don't you guys just have sex all the time whenever you want it as an advantage? Or is that a meme?

Not surprising. I think its the same reason they tend to be better but together fashion wise. When most of you are not raising families you have time and effort to spare.

Men literally cannot contribute an egg. You're cucking yourself (and you have to have some whore who probably smokes when you aren't looking squeeze it out her pussy). Then you miss out on the socialization that occurs with breastfeeding

Kinda hard to study to be honest but I think a lot of the public sex and bathhouse stuff was not being able to have sex at home because you weren't out and maybe married. Openly gay people, especially those in long term relationships or married (now) have much less incentive for hyper sexuality. I'm not saying it isn't present, but much less than 20-30 years ago.

The study, titled “Choices: Perspectives of Younger Gay Men on Monogamy, Non-monogamy and Marriage,” was conduced by researchersBlake Spears and Lanz Lowen. They surveyed over 800 single, monogamously-coupled, and non-monogamously coupled gay menages 18-40 years about their relationships. A handful of “monogamish” men were also interviewed.

“The most striking finding of this study is younger gay men’s greater inclination toward monogamy,” the researchers report. “We see this in the overwhelming number of relationships that are monogamous (86percent). In addition, 90percentof the single younger gay men were seeking monogamy. This is a sea change compared to older generations of gay men.”

thecouplesstudy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CHOICES-Younger-Gay-Men-final-160812.pdf

No shit sherlock. Good thing we have turkey basters!

Either way it's

>>>>NOT
>>YOUR
>EGG


>mentally ill people deluding themselves who would've thought!

I think this. Also I think they've always been in this position but the men on the successful end are more likely to report as being gay now.

Also they dont need to spend time on maintaining a beard family.

No family obligations means that you can focus totally on your career.

That's now how tax brackets work

Earnings mean something up to a certain point. Jews earn even more, but which one of us would become as much of a jew as they are only to earn more? Well, would you suck dicks just for that?

There are two ways to explain this:
>most gays are whites in occidental countries, and to end up being such faggots, and even have the time to care so much about their sexuality, they live very comfortable, wealthy lives, so of course they'll earn more than niggers
>gays mostly go for high-paying fashion and marketing jobs

But sure OP, keep sucking those dicks.

>Men literally cannot contribute an egg.

Soon. The sperm and egg are made from normal cells when exposed to the right hormones and chemical triggers. Soon theyll figure out how to make your cells into either in a dish.

And Im not even gay just want straight men to have an option that does not involve binding yourself to a female that comes with a courtroom advantage built in.

...

>when you're dependant on expensive and prototypical technology to have a baby but I can just stick my dick in my wife for 10 seconds

gays on suicide watch

You are also ignoring adoption and the fact that thanks to your bigotry, lots of gays, especially women, have kids from prior heterosexual relationships that they then raise alone, or with a homosexual partner.

wtf i hate gays for making uncessesary money now

bump

It would be an advantage if they didn't spend it all on std and aids medication

wtf i love sodomy now

I'm not honestly sure now o feel about this. On one hand I guess I should act like an sjw and scream equality and shit for memes. But on the other hand i really just don't care enough. There's probaly reason for this for example no kids so better work quality or can spend time at work.

Just remember this is the kind of think PhDs are spending their time studying and the kind of thing that the Jew Stream Media decides is worth reporting.

How dare they spend money researching things! We should just use data from the 1960s and 1970s about gays! *cues ancient infographics*

I work in research and curiosity is a good thing but really who actually cares about how much gay people earn? I hope they weren't getting funding specifically for that.

Well, studies had previously shown that gay men earn less than straight men, and now we have a new survey that actually asks people directly if they are gay, and most earlier ones didn't.

You're missing the point though. Why is this something worth studying in the first place? It costs real money to do human experimentation, even if it's just a survey.

everyones afraid to fire them, and they can get away with grabbing women's asses. seriously, if a girl who normally gets offended at shit like that gets groped by a fag they just laugh it off

Right, we should only study white straight Christian males.

Why should a privileged class be given additional special privileges because they like it up the butt?

These results have applied to lesbians for the better part of two decades.

Why should Christians be given special privileges because they believe in a sky daddy they cannot prove exists?

Yeah that was obviously my point. I've been unmasked.

Get over yourself. Nobody likes faggots.

Money does apparently.

This is true. I went through a period of doubting my sexuality and all of a sudden I started finding money on the ground and I got a raise out of nowhere. In retrospect, I should have gone gay.

If you want to make money, have sex with other men. Our secret is out!

>3% of population
>4.5% have aids
Disgusting

7% of millennials are gay or bisexual:

prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PRRI-Millennials-Web-FINAL.pdf

Millennials draw no distinctions between discrimination protections that should be afforded gay and lesbian people, on the one hand, and transgender people on the other. More than seven in ten (73%) millennials support legal protections against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing for gay and lesbian people. A nearly identical number (72%) of millennials say they favor these same protections for transgender people.

While no significant racial or gender differences exist on either question, there are large religious divides in support for expanding nondiscrimination legislation. Roughly eight in ten black Protestant (80%), white Catholic (82%), Hispanic Catholic (81%), religiously unaffiliated (83%), and white mainline Protestant millennials (78%) favor laws that would protect gay and lesbian people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing. About two-thirds (66%) of Hispanic Protestant millennials also favor such laws. White evangelical Protestants are closely divided on this issue, with a slim majority (51%) favoring laws that would protect gay and lesbian people against discrimination, and 47% opposing them. Among religious groups, the pattern of opinion about non-discrimination legislation protecting transgender individuals is nearly identical.

>that's a couple and they are in love
REEEEEEEEEEE

See, there again though: why study and write about it? It's pretty normal for guys to have doubts or curiosity without needing a big study and a news story telling them it's the cool thing to do. It's always been like that, just like there have always been gays.

That's nice, faggot

...

HIV medication is a cocktail of roughly 4 drugs ya soyboy

Truvada is only given to HIV - men.

i bet you've got a nice tight boipussy and you long for a meaty cock to push your prostate in

Fags cant into economics

The majority of LGBT people are non-white and low-income. Freud said schizophrenia is latent homosexuality. Schizophrenia is caused by the social defeat hypothesis. The majority of schizophrenics are homeless and brown skin immigrants in Western countries. The gayest cities are in El Salvador and Brazil. "hue hue hue"

youtube.com/watch?v=gAs9HZC9c7Y

The gays that are shown in the media are the exception, not the rule. Just like how type 2 diabetes is the majority diabetes.

Mods ban this pedotrash

...

>if you hate gays that means you're gay
I guess arachnophobes want to fuck spiders

>Only 4.5% of gay men have HIV

Well duh, questioning your sexuality and gender is someone only a person from a privileged family has the luxury of.
Trans/ non binary peeps are literally the most privileged people on the planet, who else has time for that shit.

The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992). Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.

psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-00463-014

A 1996 study from the Journal of Abnormal Psychology found that homophobic heterosexual men were most sexually aroused by gay male porn than non-homophobic hetero men.

psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-00463-014

A 2012 study of 785 college students published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that “self-described highly straight individuals” who “indicated some level of same-sex attraction” were significantly more likely than others to “express greater implicit hostility toward gay subjects” including supporting anti-gay policies.

psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-02599-001

A 2017 study published in the journal Sex Roles said that men who felt insecure about their masculinity were more likely to make homophobic and sexist jokes to appear more manly.

pastebin.com/gt0eK0xE

Gays shouldnt be allowed to adopt. They have a high chance of being pedophiles. I'd rather let orphans stay in fostercare where rape and. Molestation are almost guaranteed than risk one of you fetishits

Niceblog faggot

Are gays more likely to be pedophiles?

Child sexual abuse (CSA) is a pervasive problem with myriad short- and long-term consequences for victims and their families. Its impact is far-reaching with recent estimates that 26.6% of girls and 5.1% of boys experience sexual abuse or assault by age 17 (Finkelhor, Shattuck, Turner, & Hamby, 2014).

individual.utoronto.ca/james_cantor/blog1.html

ipce.info/sites/ipce.info/files/biblio_attachments/every_fifth.pdf

beyondhomophobia.com/blog/child-abuse-research/

psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html

pandys.org/articles/abuseandhomosexuality.html

dailykos.com/stories/2010/09/18/903178/-Gays-are-pedophiles-No-Here-s-the-proof

archive.is/ztjf2

blog.donnawilliams.net/2011/12/17/mothers-who-sexually-abuse-their-daughters/

centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/Anti-gayActivismandtheMisuseofScience_1.pdf

patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a-major-study-of-child-abuse-and-homosexuality-revisited/

thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/religious-rights-top-anti-gay-researcher-says-he-was-attracted-to-men-as-a-boy/politics/2012/05/16/39681

shadowproof.com/2011/10/19/paul-cameron-why-the-religious-right-cant-keep-him-in-the-closet/

washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/16/AR2010041602026.html

archive.is/a2iRU

About 60% of the male survivors sampled report at least one of their perpetrators to be female.
-Mendel, 1993.

religioustolerance.org/hom_chil.htm

childluresprevention.com/research/profile.asp

3/4 victims of molestation are female:

childprotection.lifetips.com/cat/63573/sex-offender-statistics/index.html

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635900

"A 2015 study (linked above) looked at virtually every substantiated child sexual abuse case reported to child protective services in the United States in 2010. It concluded more than 20% of child sexual abuse cases reviewed involved a primary female perpetrator – so estimates vary significantly."

I absolutely believe this. One of the largest flaws in Capitalism is that it rewards those who are willing to become the best GDP batteries and best consumers. Problem is the rewards are not only shallow and frivolous, but corrosive as well.

You can't buy loyalty, only rent it. And once the Wests natural immune system/bone marrow(Straight White Christian families) realizes it's a bad deal, and/or, attempted replacement with third world savages, then this systems cracks will finally fall apart altogether.

When the time comes to make ends meet, the Socialist State will care less about money then bodies and loyalty. Something fags have never been very good at providing.

>infodump bullshit
Nice try cocklover

...

...

To just illuminate my point. If you're a poor panjeet your thinking about how you will eat, maybe what you will eat and you're happy sticking your dick into whatever smaller person you find in the alley next to the shitting street.
Only someone living a hedonistic privileged life has the time to think hmmmm what would I rather put my dick in / what do I want inside of me. Same with uhhh what's my social role in society what gender and I. A person actually working wouldn't waste time on such inconsequential questions, they would just act and assume their place in the world, which will naturally come to fruition.

>only arguement is pedoshit
You're not winning

...

We need to end gay privilege and close the straight male pay gap now!

Please meme this into reality, I beg of you user.

It's cute how faggots try to defend themself when sodomy is bad regardless
Sweetie who care about what straight people do, the focus is on you poofuckers

I mean more so we just need to stop letting the hedonism of the actually privileged classes push us around and pretend they are being discriminated against in order to even further gain rights over us.

It's cracked up like a glued together smashed bong user. But things can, and WILL, get a hell of a lot worse.

These shitty things trying to be passed for memes are so fucking stupid. Tell your dog you ate a literal bowl of shit. Tell him you murdered your mother. Tell him you've been selling children into sexual slavery all over the world for 20 years. Dog still wagging its tail. WOW.

I think this pay gap needs to be addressed.

bump

Off the roof you go filthy degenerate

Jesus, I'm a fag but I hate seeing gay couples with children, old gay couples are absolutely disgusting too

...

Two men are just not ment to have children, also if they surrogate, one of them are literal cucks

And one woman have sold her own child, which she carried in her body for 9 months. This is truly disgusting

It makes me wonder if homosexuals who want to raise a child and don't see anything wrong with that is a sign that they might not be mentally or emotionally fit to do so. I'm sure there are plenty of situations where it's a net good, but I think that's about the point to put the brakes on and ask if this is really the world we want.

Science on gays as parents:

Parental Sexual Orientation and Children's Psychological Well-Being: 2013–2015 National Health Interview Survey:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/cdev.12989/full

Nontraditional Families and Childhood Progress Through School:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3000058/

whatweknow.law.columbia.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/02/12/what_we_know_about_lesbian_and_gay_parenting_making_sense_of_the_studies.html

archive.is/j0S7Q

www.asanet.org/documents/ASA/pdfs/12-144_307_Amicus_%20(C_%20Gottlieb)_ASA_Same-Sex_Marriage.pdf

Farr, R. H. (2017). Does parental sexual orientation matter? A longitudinal follow-up of adoptive families with school-age children. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 252-264.
dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000228

williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Patterson-Farr-Forssell-AppliedDevScience-Jul-2010.pdf

bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635

How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00678.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=userIsAuthenticated=false

pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/131/4/e1374

ibtimes.com/study-having-gay-parents-does-not-affect-childs-gender-identity-2579343

pastebin.com/PaAFXqQj

Australia gay parenting survey:

bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2458-14-635?site=bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com

Closeness to fathers best predicts quality of health for sons raised by gay dads:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29144882

>pseudoscience

Straight masculinity is so fragile.

>Christians under the Civil Rights Act), who contribute only brainwashing and high suicide rates for groups they don't like?
if you're so fragile that you end yourself after a few mean words then feel free to do so desu.

homosexuality and transexuality are symbols of privilege and must be abolished

All faggots will go straight to hell

That is the stupidest ducking argument I have ever read. Then all straights don't have children either

Religious belief should be classified as a psychological disorder as it is based on fantasy not fact. If somebody was ranting about what the non-visible green pixies on the streets were up to, they would be in a sanitarium, but call it "religion", and the government would give them tax breaks.

...

gays have slightly higher IQs
butt pyrate master race

Are you euphoric?