Checkmate, statists

Checkmate, statists

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quis_custodiet_ipsos_custodes?
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Shhh. That only works on the individual level.

You need to work on your english because that is the most autistic thing I've read all day.

...

>violate your consent
That doesn't even make sense.

All Anarchists are retards, and anarchy is moving backwards, not forwards.

If you want anarchy, move to Somalia. Otherwise grow the fuck up, come to terms with whatever daddy issues you have makes you hate authority so much, and accept the fact that the basis of all functional civilization is hierarchy.

...

...

Are all parents statists?

It literally is possible though. I could be a junkie get a straight head and concent to being sectioned for rehab, knowing full well I would not concent once withdrawal kicked in.

Have you have actually lived among anarchists? Be it at a squat or protest site or commune? I have on numerous occasions and I can tell you for a fact that anarchy doesn't even work among its proponents on a tiny scale. And if it can't work within ideal conditions then how the fuck is it supposed to work worldwide? You get a few anarchists who are genuinely on it but in order for an anarchic society to function, EVERYBODY has to be smart enough to understand how it's supposed to work, willing to make the constant effort to make it work and completely remove anything resembling an ego. Literally everybody. All 7.6 billion of us.

You're wasting your time with anarchy. Do something else with your life.

>the basis of all functional civilization is hierarchy

It's order, actually.

Which is why minarchism is best ism
Limit government to only matters not involving consent/free will

>do you believe da gubmint should ever violate your consent?
>flashback to a sovereign citizen being arrested
>I DO NOT CONSENT, I DO NOT CONSENT
>i should never be allowed to be arrested for any reason. only other people

>"No officer, I do not consent to being arrested for murder"
Fucking loons.

Get your meme ideology out of here Joost

>HURR ANARCHY IS CHAOS AND DESTRUCTION

keep eating that spoonfed bullshit. Anarchism as a political movement is based on the premise of peaceful co-existence as the first requirement for social interaction.

What is happening in Somalia is called anarchy, as a state of being (much like a country can be prosperous, or warlike), but the word "anarchy" that describes the situation in Somalia, has absolutely NOTHING to do with the political movement called "anarchism".

True anarchism means "without leaders", Somalia is full of shitloads of leaders who are all fighting for their own gain. Has absolutely nothing to do with anarchism.

your thoughts on

>Limit government
Who or what limits government? If you say "constitution" you need to explain who enforces it to be upheld. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quis_custodiet_ipsos_custodes?

There won’t be any peace coexist with nigger and Muslim, mate

i consent to raping and murdering you

I actually said yes because I know the government sometimes needs to violate people's consent. So your stupid anarchist bullshit didn't work.

Actually, in a lot of circumstances, a government should violate consent for the greater good. Examples include taxes, arresting those who break the law, war, the draft I'm sure circumstances, etc. Your question is overly simplified and unecessarily binary. Fuck off anarchist.

Unrelated but Captcha:
Siafone telmex

DON'T TAZE ME BRO!

>Strawman
>"Not real anarchism"
>Vague description of your personal opinion
You need to be 18+ to post here.

In regard to Somalia: what you see there what you see on any piece of land which lacks strong leadership and hierarchy - warlords build armies, and strive to become the ruler who fills the power vacuum.

Why do you think no successful anarchist society has ever existed? Because an organized, disciplined hierarchy will always defeat a disorganized, anarchistic mob.

As history proves, any ungoverned land will inevitably either form a government from within, or be annexed by outside forces, because hierarchy is inherently superior to anarchy. Prove me wrong.

>What is happening in Venezuela is called socialism, as a state of being (much like a country can be prosperous, or warlike), but the word "socialism" that describes the situation in Venezuela, has absolutely NOTHING to do with the political movement called "socialism".
You understand how stupid you sound now?

This post is so sad

You don't grasp the concept that the structure of the word doesn't always accurately describe the concept it's supposed to describe.

Just because two words are similar doesn't always mean they describe the same thing.