Why does this word scare so many people here?

Why does this word scare so many people here?

If u get scared by a word you do not deserve to be alive

...

because without a GOD it makes selfish kike assholes

also is this why ike is named ike in south park? lol

/thread/

I am so scared of this word typing from under my bed

Because genetically speaking in mammal species there is a hierarchy developed by a sense of belonging, there is literally an isolated gene associated with being a leader or a revolutionary, this gene is rare and could be considered a mutation. The majority will always feel fear of jealousy of that which they cannot comprehend, compensating their denial of an inherent sense of inferiority, wishing they could be that based individual.

We aren’t scared of it, we just know that it’s retarded and not viable for a long lasting society. You need a balance of hierarchy and of individualism, which Communism and Libertarianism fails to do.

The only way for individualists to defend themselves from others is to form a collective. See the irony?

On one side of the coin there is antifa.. on the other side of the coin are frogposters, kekistani retards and most of other Sup Forums retards.

It's why you see collectivism here. People using natsoc flags, kekistani shit and frogs. They need their little support group to back them up. They need their memes and humour since they have no compelling arguments.

This place in an echo chamber for right wing retards, save a few sane threads.

The 'Left' is anyone who holds even few liberal views. The left is the ENEMY.
Just as the FAR RIGHT / ALTRIGHT is an enemy for the Antifa faggots.

Wonder why things were better before? People werent as divided by identity politics and politics in general. Shit was harmony compared to what we have now.

Because we wuz legion and shit

also your thread is way too smart for Sup Forums
You are trying to actually start discussion about something instead of posting news about the latest gangrape in sweden or Trump tweet

Individualism is the disease killing western nations.

Think for yourselves, listen to differing opinions and make up your own mind about the world.

Don't just follow a cultist or an extreme movement that paints a picture for a future utopia for you to live in.

Cause the don't know what it means and they don't have the ability to be an individual. That's where Nazi's come from.

Why are individualists so obsessed with classifying everything into "their thoughts" and collectivist ideological religious spooks?

We are witnessing the rebirth of collectivism in feminist and marxist movements. Those are the ones that undermined the importance of the family and other structures that we are losing.

*thats were nazis and commies come from

Both systems treat you as a peon that works for the state.

...

Because its dumb. Dumb beyond measure. Jews and elites destroy our countries by promoting that.
Communities are stronger than individuals.thats why the powerful people, acting as communities, promote it. Individualism is the gold standard of liberalism.
To illustrate : who is scariest ? A crowd of 100 individualists (if they can agree to get in the same place) or 100 people united by race, religion and duty (and probably eager to beat you if you anger them) ?
100 hipsters/ancaps/antifas/ whatever, or 100 blackshirts ? Which is more dangerous for elites ?

You have no clue how genes work.

no one is debating this, the issue is whether the community creates a place for individual talents to thrive in order to serve the community or do we sacrifice individual endeavors to better the community as a whole.

Its obvious a balance must be made.
One could say: you are free as long as you contribute to the group and answer the call when needed. Which leave a lot of freedom in peace time.
If everyone contribute, then everyone get benefit from everyone. But yes. It means you have to contribute. No lazy NEETs or shareholders. No parasites.

Why should we allow individual talents if not for the collective benefit? Note the biological game that underlies this. If someone is more productive and valuable than you are, you could just kill him and be his superior, if you don't benefit from his work. Why would you let him outcompete you at life? So you don't like violence, you say? Well, at this point there is a niche for violence to be effective so if you don't step in, someone else will and establish physical dominance. Would you stop that guy? Why? Because you are neither benefitting or losing anything in these proceedings. Individualism is a dead end and will be eaten up by collectivists.

The argument for individualism still exists. It makes the group stronger if clever individuals are given room and rewards for their contributions. This is a biological foundation for individualism that works. No other consideration is actually interesting.

People who claim to be individualist are the opposite of that. They don't do the introspection necessary to find and define who they are as a person.

It's a profitable industry though. It's responsible for all the travel and the weird recipes that might look tasty but are not exactly easy to eat, like that avocado-egg sandwich that pops up on /ck/ every so often.

...

so are you saying everyone is equal? so explain to me how there have NOT been found specific genes related to skills and abilities and how we are born being equal....

I think you meant to say collectivism is the cancer killing the west.
America owes it's prosperity to individualism. It's the only mindset that allows for true invention.

kek

APES TOGETHER STRONG =FASCISM

THE STRENGTH OF THE PACK IS THE WOLF. AND THE STRENGTH OF THE WOLF IS PACK. = FASCISM

ONE FROM MANY = FASCISM

The true red pill is realizing that all of these are the Jew.
They’re brilliant people that you can hardly outsmart. Only individualism is the way out.

It associated with "responsibility"

>lack thereof

Uncertainty.

>individualism will kill country, which was raised by individualsts
Literally what? Did you noticed that most of American companies named after one or two persons: Hewlett-Packard, Walt Disney, McDonald's and others. And other companies was raised by one and main persons, such as Apple (Steve Jobs), Microsoft (Bill Gates).

>Scare
No, I'm not a faggot, it annoys me and I want it to stop. Why?

Because there's a time for individualism and a time to band together, and when your very existence is threatened is when you band together, but we're told it's okay when outsiders replace your group, because,eh, who cares about groups anyway?

Well, they do. And you're not part of it.

>Those are the ones that undermined the importance of the family and other structures that we are losing.
Not really. What contributed most to the death of the nuclear family was carrieer oriented individuals, both males and females, focusing more on their own immidiate gratification than forming a family.
All these ideas were promoted by liberals, not marxists (don't get me wrong, marxists have a lot of blame for the decline of the West, but not in this particular field)
For someone that criticezes Sup Forums for being an "echochamber for right wing retards" you sure seem to have your own fixed ideas an no open mind

Kys shill.

Whites in the west are the least collectivist group. The forced rise of hyperindividualism over the course of nearly a decade has deteriorated family structures and race conciousness, leading to solitude and depression. We need white collectivism because a white individualist in a postmodern western country is nothing but prey for the brown races who are themselves unable to be individualists.