B-but we wuz the original humanz and shiet

>b-but we wuz the original humanz and shiet

web.archive.org/web/20171205163925/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/

who cares, europe was the birthplace of modern civilization and thats all that matters

I'm actually friends with the paleontologists that wrote and published that paper in PLOS Biology

It helps breaking down the myth that we're somehow related to those mongrels. A dog is smarter(and more loyal) than your average African

I think this is the last thing nogs can cling to in order to muster a small amount of self respect. Let's face it being a nigger sucks and niggers know it.

Despite what all you cucks are saying, this is a pretty big deal. The first men were made in Europe and migrated south during the ice age and crossbred with nigger apes so they kinda sorta became human-ish. Conclusion: We created niggers.

>physical evidence proves Adam and Eve originated in the area around the Middle East and not in Africa

COLOR ME SURPRISED LAD

not many more findings until we find out that every continent had its own genesis of 'people' and it turns out that all races are different species.

post yfw it feels good not to be a nigger

>it's another Sup Forums confuses the sapiens out of Africa with the homo out of Africa episode

...

And so we should return the apes to their natural habitat.

And let them continue their evolution. Who are we to interfere

t. Calogero Aboubakar

stfu homo

Birthplace of man, Birthplace of civilization, Birthplace of hope.

I can't because my flag is American!
being an even 44% nigger zaps my motivation

It was our own fault all along. They are the children we never loved, and we are an eternal Maury Povich segment

>We wuzn’t kangs... we wuzn’t even the first chimps.
Nigger BTFO!

Nice try cucko

WE WUZ KANGS!!!

Humans are BILLIONS of years old and NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:

* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)

(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.

(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.

(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.

>mfw I read the comments

(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end)

FUCK OFF WITH YOUR AFRO CENTRIST NONSENSICAL BULLSHIT.

NIGGERS ARE STUPID FUCK YOU. IT'S LIKE SAYING BECAUSE QUEEN ELIZEBETH WAS SCOTTISH / GERMAN WE ALL WAS KANGS TOO.

FUCK NIGGERS.

YEsterday I saw a thread on Sup Forums that said Greece should not be considered a European country, because they're shit skins.

Now all of a sudden scientists discover the first humans in Greece and Sup Forums conveniently says they're European.

...

>Jesus wasn't whit-

WE

Once again fpbp.

I see brown civilizations
I see Asian Civilizations
I see BLACK civilizations
But I can't see wh*Te civilizations. Where is your civilization, wh*Te subhuman ?

>Sup Forums is one person or one opinion
Hi newfag

...

My interest is at full-mast, where do I read more?

>FUCK OFF WITH YOUR AFRO CENTRIST NONSENSICAL BULLSHIT.

UNLIKE YOU, I AM NOT AN AFROCENTRIST AND I WILL NEVER FUCK OFF!!!!! FUCK OFF, NIGGER!!!!!

No it doesn't. All humans have a common ancestor, i.e. the first human. It doesn't matter where the first human originated
What matters is that we spent 60 thousand years separated from Africans and had diverging evolutionary paths to create two sets of humans that are very different genetically..

Read the book 'Forbidden Archaeology: The Hidden History Of The Human Race' by Michael Cremo and the late Richard Thompson, Ameribro. The bibliography of Forbidden Archaeology is SO BIG that it could be ITS OWN BOOK.

I mean more than two sets were created but these two sets (Africans and Europeans) were apart for 60 000 years.

It was India. Read a book, faggot

you are grasping at nothing. there was never a "black" pharoh

:) :) this means the refugees are just returning to their ancient homeland :) :)

>I would be hesitant about using a single character from an isolated fossil to set against the evidence from Africa

DEFECATE

Trayvon the first one, yo

>Humans evolved from Africa
>E-e-volution isn't r-r-real
>Humans evolved from Europa
>Praise science! Praise evolution!
Make up your mind Sup Forums

...

>paying attention to cucktestant burgers on Sup Forums

here's a (you) for making the 6 millionth thread about this

Pol is schizophrenic,bro.

Even the shills are starting to lose their fucking minds. Watched one pro Hillary shill vs a Trump shill...at some point they were all fucking confused about who was worse HAHAAH

...

>taking this containment board seriously

>cherokee niggers are the same as incas the post

I dont think so. The found a live antiquated farm implement in South Carolina with DNA not previously seen in a human, they found it was "pre-human" and maybe up to 190,000 years before modern man split off of the primate tree on it's own 60,000 years ago.

>The first civilisation
The first known civilisation

Its fixed now.

But wait a minute,. does this mean we all gayreek roaches now? Are greeks the new kangz?

WUZ

You're really jumping the gun there because your very own source says that the findings aren't enough for conclusive proof.
You can breed with them, you can produce fertile offspring with them. You're related to them
>Birthplace of civilization
Mesopotamia is in Europe now?

>modern civilization
Nice try though, pajeet

I was talking out of my ass. I have no idea what I'm talking about.

>modern civilization
modern civilization was a mistake though.

>Arabs are white
So why are we trying to keep them out of Europe? Shouldn't we welcome our white brothers and sisters?

>Graecopithecus is not an ape. He is a member of the tribe of hominins and the direct ancestor of homo
We're still related to Africans, modern humans came out of africa a long time ago. At best we're refugees and raped this poor bastard, though this data is one tooth and is challenged because they can't excavate the site because some dude built a pool there

It's almost like there's some kind of diverse thought and not just one collective hive-mind! Really weird I know!

So shitskins deevolved.

True. We must encourage more refugees to return to the homeland. Europe is their birthright!

I'm pretty sure the overwhelming majority of people who post here believe in evolution. 0/10 weak b8 Sven

Take a look at the HWNDU thread
All sorts of neo paleontid sapiens appeared there

>instead lets believe in ancient kike on a kite

>A forum for debate
>Person A states argument for X
>Person B states argument against X
>"Make up ur minds xD"

>A forum for debate
>Person A states argument for X
>Person B calls person A a cuck
Fixed that for you

Most important event has been the hybridization of H. sapiens and Neanderthals somewhere in Southern Europe or the Near East (we will never know where exactly it happened anyway, does not matter).

>antiquated farm implement in South Carolina
You have a source on that? That sounds really fucking interesting.

Wrong.The white man was born by gene engineering just as niggers were born by gene engineering.The only non-engineered humans are the abos in Australia and the people of Oceania.
There is a reason (((they))) do everything in their power to cover the past.

Well at least we can all agree that the white man is the most advanced and the most superior of all sapiens on every level except for the long jump and basketball.

Where's yours?
Thats right ! you dont do civilised , your the SUBHUMAN and you fucking know it!!!!

Cracks me up when I see nigs talk like that. How many African countries are there? They are all native Africans. If being a native is so great, why aren't they a superpower? Why are they all 4th world countries? WHY CAN'T YOU ALL GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER? Is it genetic? Has to be. Can't blame the white man when there's no white men to blame.

i thought pol already know it. fuggin plebs

divergent mentally as well....

Thats because the white man was created to serve as a soldier in a war that never happened,hence the higher IQ to use advanced weapons and tactics and the greater endurance.
Niggers were created as mining slaves,hence the very low IQ and athletic strength,while the asians for personal servants hence the lack of soul(no rebelling) and the highest IQ(use advanced facility to serve master in its ship).

WARNING
this is a jew, clicking a flag:
THIS RESEARCH IS DESIGNED TO MAKE AFRICANS LOOK LESS LIKE THE "UNEVOLVED" MEME
THAT'S ALL IT IS
GIVEN WHAT WE KNOW
IT'S BULLSHIT

Well Asians definitely weren't engineered to be drivers, that's for fucking sure.

Do you have any proof of this or do you just work for the history channel

yet you post a nigger dog

>implying human life only started with one human
>Not knowing that many creatures evolved into us over time, not just one

kek

YOU FUCKING CRACKERZ STEAL EVERYTHING AND THEN YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT BIKES. WE ARE THE ORIGINALS AND YOU WHERE LIVING IN CAVES WHILE WE THOUGHT YOU HOW TO BATH AND BUILD SHIT.

FUCK YOU.

wew

niggers confirmed to have contributed literally nothing to human history

Erectus walks amongst us proven correct yet again. Soon they will admit that sub Saharan Africans are homo erectus sapiens and not the same as us Homo sapiens sapiens. Great book, check out.

...

Yes since our ancestors have gone through the harshest evolutionary pressures in human history, thus allowing us to retain many crucial genes which other populations or races have never had or simply lost as they were not required for reproductive success.

Still, even OUR race is slowly degenerating nowadays and this process is accelerating. It is either eugenics based on genetic research OR going back to a hunter-gatherer or pastoralist nomad society.

Konrad Lorenz was right after all ... Verhausschweinung des Menschen.

yeah you thought us how to thunk, fucking retard neck yourself or jump a cop and get what you deserve. cunt!

You Hungarians are a crazy lot but I like you.

Gott erhalte!

>Found by Nazis
Beautiful


>The original Graecopithecus specimen mandible found in 1944, "reportedly unearthed as the occupying German forces were building a wartime bunker".
>The mandible with a third molar that is very worn, the root of a second molar, and a fragment of a premolar is from a site called Pyrgos Vassilissis northwest of Athens and is dated from the late Miocene.
>Excavation of the site is not possible (as of 1986) due to the owner having built a swimming pool on the location.

I can ask questions where the only answer is because we were engineered to be like this.
Like,if Africa is so full of food that everywhere you turn it just grows on trees and plants(because that was the case,before niggers went on a offspringshitting spree from western money),what evolutional pressure made niggers so athletic with such very low IQ?

The harshest evolutionary pressure should have produced the highest IQ but it didnt.Explain please.

Goddamn you for taking my comment.
Pits are literally the niggers of the animal kingdom. Every time one acts like a subdog people cry it dindu nuffin

>what evolutional pressure made niggers so athletic with such very low IQ?
Lions?

Kys your retarded faggot. Just draw a simple graph you'll see how retarded you are

>It helps breaking down the myth that we're somehow related to those mongrels.

If your uncle is a serial killer you don't associate with him. Relation doesn't imply anything else.