...
Why do retarded Republicans love Reagan so much?
Because they think he singlehandly destroyed the USSR by saying "Tear down this wal!".
This fucker made sure that California will NEVER EVER be red again.
tearing down the wall allowed communists to flood into europe,he doomed us all
He was Americana. Like the idea and imagery behind him was better than the policies he implemented.
Also when was the last time we had a coherent Republican president?
> unironically thinks German "Ossis" fed up with their communist regime were the reason for Europe's downfall
> ignores how Leftist American College Campuses (which are the source of renewed cultural Marxism) were not in any way related to- or inspired by East-Germans
To find what doomed Europe, look no further than the Wests concessions to the intersectional feminist movement.
He's one of them.
Democrats don't like him? Must be the good guy then. Go to hell and take your abortion clinics with you.
Like anyone would honestly pay 70% of their income to the state.
Because 4yrs of that peanut-farming sweater-fag Carter was enough.
>amnesty for millions of Mexicans
>signed the full auto ban for FOPA
The average Republican retard only looks at the good and conveniently forgets the treason.
Wren't they SUPPOSE to fix immigration after he signed the amnesty bill? Sounds like a case of never trusting a politician. Even more so if they have a D next to their name.
Back to the Fox News comments section with you, grandpa
Or what? You're going to send a sternly worded letter to parents?
Because your mother is a crack whore
The 80s and the early 90s (which he caused) were some of the best times in modern history. The middle class was strong then, it did trickle down.
Because he was Emperor Ronald Regan
Born again with fascist cravings
Still, you make him president
Human rights will soon go 'way
He is now your Shah today
Now he commands all of you
Now your gonna pray in school
He'll make sure they're christian too
Kek
Except nothing trickled down at all. Inequality exploded under this retard
They literally listed the reasons why
The economy picked up around that time because computers became widespread and increased productivity, not because of trickle down.
Trickle down has never been shown to work
oh noes! Being forced to pray in school! Perish the thought!!! It's almost as if you want The West to be a degenerate shithole.
What do Christians today even do except welcome refugees and shelter them in their churches?
Having to pray in school -> degenerate
Being anti-gays
thats because real trickle down economics has never been tried before.
No content, 1 post by this ID. Mods, eat a dick.
>Being anti-gays
Is welcoming traditional muslims part of their plan?
Jelly beans
Yes
>Why did the United states love Reagan so much
FTFY
Not in the South they don't. Sure be kind to people and all that but letting a wild animal into your home is just plain stupid.
No. People are natural degenerate. It is only through adhering to a higher calling that they can get partially above their degenerate nature. Prayer and non muslim religions help with that.
>lowering taxes
>bad
Income tax shouldn't exist AT ALL, and neither should social security. Tariffs did just fine to cover federal expenses until 1913, and (((social security))) is a Ponzi scam.
The US middle class hasn't been strong since the 70s oil shocks. Reagan just caused a debt fueled boom which led to the savings and loan crisis of the late 80s.
The guy was a fucking moron.
>The 80s and the early 90s (which he caused)
No he didn't cause them. A fucking monkey could have been president in the 80s and the markets would have still gone up. You guys are making the same mistake democrats make when they point to the markets going up after Roosevelt took office.
Social security buys support for politicians with taxpayers money. It's quite genius actually.
Fuck your higher calling, I don't need that fake shit. Religion is a fucking hoax.
>I don't need
Do you disagree that people are naturally degenerate or at least animal like?
Social security is inherently unsustainable because it depends on a constantly increasing population/economy like we had in the 20th century. To make matters worse, social security has created an unhealthy dependency of the old and retired on the government. If we have another economic recession, as bad as the one in 2008, SS might die out for good, bringing catastrophic consequences.
>an unhealthy dependency of the old and retired on the government
True that. If I remember correctly, over half of the Finnish social spending goes to pensions and health care used mainly and most by old and infirm, chuld support is also a huge expense despite declining birth rate. Neetbucks for unemployed were relatively small part of it, under 10%.
>Also when was the last time we had a coherent Republican president
Eisenhower.