POL BTFO!!!!!

POL BTFO!!!!!

EVEN FUCKING POLITIFACT SAYS THE YEARBOOK WASN'T EDITED!!!! PANTS ON FIRE!!!!!!

archive.fo/mWGRx

>In a Dec. 8 Good Morning America interview with Nelson about Moore’s response to the allegations (he denies them) and her experience since taking her story public, Nelson addressed the inconsistency. Nelson said she added the date and place of the inscription.
>"He signed your yearbook?" ABC News reporter Tom Llamas asked Nelson.
>"He did sign it," Nelson said.
>"And you made some notes underneath?" Llamas asked.
>"Yes," Nelson said.
>"Nelson said she did make notes to the inscription, but the message was all Roy Moore," the video voiceover says.
>To summarize, Nelson says she added the time and location to the inscription. But she says the note and signature was from Moore.
That’s not what the headlines of the Gateway Pundit, Breitbart or Silence is Consent. All three say Nelson said she either tampered with Moore’s signature or forged the inscription.
There’s no evidence of that.

The biggest faggots in the world congregate here. And the biggest faggots of those faggots post shit like this. Kys

>dog fucker defending a pedophile

I'm not defending anyone. I'm telling you how useless and meaningless your life is.

Accusations aside, Moore is mouthbreather tier.

This is technically right. She didn't admit it's forged. Doesn't mean she didn't forge it.

Wow GLOmPf is really done after this

Hey, don't lump us dogfuckers in with that idiot.

I would love to see Politifact go away forever

so you spend your days scouring the interwebs searching for a way to btfo Sup Forums ?

No matter the subject, whenever I see that pants on fire shit, I want to shoot whoever wrote the article.

but that's actually wrong, she did admit to forging it, so what's the fucking point?

But she only admitted to forging half of it user, so it's ok :^)

>being an ableist scumbag

>I didnt forge the name! I just...f-forged the stuff underneath it...yeah...you still believe me r-right?

>Politifact

Washington post, while pushing this scam had a "handwriting expert" say that ALL OF IT WAS WRITTEN BY THE SAME PERSON. Now she says that part of it objectively was written by a different person.

oow only half of it! we can surely trust her now.

People make mistakes.

Like her entire accusation.

yeah mate, ur mum should of taken a load in her mouth and not her foul rotten cunt. biggest mistake of her life.

What kind of idiot doesn't know that you never tamper with the evidence? That's dumb, even by libtard standards.

I didn't forge...I just wrote stuff pretending he wrote it

I can’t believe I’m about to say this but:
THIS FUCKING LEAF GETS IT.

Don’t get too comfortable with it, tho user.

> she didn’t forge it
> she just added part of the signature for no reason
> and add the date when the message already had a date for some reason

Sometimes the fucking truth is more important than the facts, stupid ass.

Sauce me

> EVEN FUCKING POLITIFACT
> EVEN

Wait, are you saying you are valuing sources that are even more untrustworthy than Politifact? I think you just BTFO'ed yourself. The very idea of rating Truth with a continuous spectrum (very false to very true) is so mindbogglingly dumb that i can't even come up with the proper words to describe just how pathetic everyone that takes them seriously must be. Just chose a random DrumpfyDrumpf statement:

>"NFL attendance and ratings are WAY DOWN. Boring games yes, but many stay away because they love our country."
> WAY down? no. [Truth-o-meter on 11]

How the fuck do they objectively measure what constitutes to "WAY" here? Let me tell you: not at all, because you have to arbitrarily define it, and hope that whoever you're directing your answers to admits your arbitrarily made choice.

The very moment you diverge from the True/False dichotomy, there are _guaranteed_ to be subjective aspects (opinions, additional and possibly unmentioned assumptions) influencing the "extent of truth" of an answer. Leave it to a modern day liberal not to understand something that simple...

It's only a matter of time. The Yearbook signature is flimsy at best.

but roy is a pedo, we must expose him
the date was to show when it happened rabbi

The fact people are still defending this, even people on here going to lengths to be reasonable and only say that it's very suspicious, just shows the lengths the media can go to convince you to deny the truth right in front of your eyes.

>haha she didn't forge his signature you stupid flyover state fucks she just deceptively edited the note to add crucial contextual information to support her case
Ok

Do you vote in Alabama? No
I do. Prepare to get mad

Now I know you’re a fucking shill

...

She presented it as entirely Roy Moore's signature, and it wasn't. Therefore it is forgery by definition. Backtracking on the claim later because you got caught doesn't make it not a forgery in retrospect.

Damn. Aus bringing the bantz.

...

No one claimed she forged the signature. The claim is that she made forgeries in the year book in the form of notes.

Also, the Politifact writer is a Jewess.

>politifact
opinion discarded

...

>EVEN POLITIFACT
Are you havin a laugh?
Is he havin a laugh?

She did forge the signature though. Before they switched to black and white photo copies there was footage of the signature which showed everything after "Ray" was in a different ink.

Look at the photos of the inscription, though. The "Moore" in "Roy Moore" is clearly not even the same color ink as the "Roy" and matches the color of the notes she added.

For all we know, it's just some random Roy she know. She obviously added the Moore at the end of the name as well.

She absolutely did forge it and anyone who claims otherwise is a liar and an idiot.
1. The Moore part is a forgery because she forged it in his name AND in an attempt to pass it off as his actual signature
2. The DA part is the second forgery- she forged it straight from divorce decree and thiught the DA was his signature, bit it was in fact his assistant's initials in her own handwriting.
3. The name signed is Ray. Not Roy.