We need to rationalize this
Personal Belief
>Choosing women is like trading a Stock (or bitcoin)
>At moment T you have N choices
>One interesting girl: (Y(T))
Now
>If you think that Y(T) is sexier than Y(T+ n), n ==> natural number (1,2,3)
>Go for it
If not
>You are basically betting that somewhere in the future (T+n) you will meet a sexier girl
The Question: how do choose?
>Young Meryl Streep is worth a 90%
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Sperg as fuck dude just go for a girl you click with instead of doing some john nash formula bs
Your life is limited
Therefore some strategy is needed since you cannot swap girls like stocks
BTW, now that you mention Bitcoin, where are all the faggots from last night who were dissing crypto? Come on faggots. Come out from under your rocks.
I wouldn't assess it as simple as that, there are too many hidden variables
this board is about politics, not woman
why don't you shills give it a rest, nobody is buying your forced campaign making females an object of primary focus regarding this week's subject of how to subvert Sup Forums
Just get a girl with strong facial bone structure. Cute butter faces won't last.
elaborate
Your skin loses elasticity as it ages. If the shape of your face is mostly formed by fat, it will lose much of it's shape. Your bones however will retain their shape. Selena Gomez above for example is a butter face. She will not age very well when her skin starts to sack. Meryl Streep however has aged very well because she has strong cheekbones and a good jawline.
Women ARE politics. Virtually everything we do, the entire reason society exists, is for pussy.
i dont want a kike truman show girl
this
Possible strategies
>increase N
>Estimate accurately Y(T)
>Make sure that Y(T+1)
this
Fpbp
Fucking neckbeards
>you cannot swap girls like stocks
average joe beta detected
Man who date 2 girls in his life
>Do this 2+ times
>Dumped girls will gossip in your back and make sure you will get a shitty rep
>Result you miss a lot of opportunities
Correct me if I'm wrong
It will go higher. Cryptocurrency is the future. Maybe not bitcoin in the end but it fixes all the Jewry performed on fiat money
Totally accurate...
good analysis, keep it up. I want a full working equation and tool kit in the future, ASAP.
Go home, Elliot.
It'll be trademarked
Meryl Streep sexy?!? WTF kind of drugs you on? Those are VR level beer goggles.
I'm far from being a perfect gentleman
Thinking about women as financial investments or stocks is why you're an autistic virgin and can't find a quality woman.
SJW opinions aside
Young Meryl Streep is a sexy women
You are a fag. Women are a numbers game. If you are attracted you should go for it. Chances are you will be rejected anyway. If you have one, you can always cheat and pick up an upgrade later.
Isn't that the sad truth.
Well increasing N is one of my strategies
(You) sound like a perfect gentleman, nerd.
Sage
Pussy made us go to the moon
Nope it does not
so does this guy
But you make no mention of what your currency is worth.
Cant buy gold with paper clips.
Sage
>Y(T) interesting/interested girl then
I got an 86% faggots it feels good being chad lmaoooooo
its not 100% acurate
...
she certainly look better than you gf
I really wonder if people like OP are serious or not.
My gf isn't the sexiest (except to meeeeee xD but let's say I'm biased) and she's kind of fat but we like each others. She likes me despite of my issues. She's not always stressing me out or worrying me. I'm happy when I'm with her. I wouldn't be ditching that just because I'd meet a sexier chick that would put up with me (who knows for however long) and that will probably drive me nuts anyway. I mean holy shit I'd miss her.
OP could probably try to quantify all of that to justify people trading each others all the time anyway. The thing is, when you're with someone for a while you affect each others. You grow on one another. You can't quite replace that. You can start over though. But it's a risk. And it takes a toll.
And there's value in loyalty by itself. Why would people ever invest in one another (in whatever way) if they can't trust each others? They wouldn't. And that's everyone's loss.
This really shouldn't take any explaining kek. But I guess the autism is one of the great thing about Sup Forums. More and more people are thinking sort of like this though even if it's not as extreme yet.
Wow
A relationship based on looks only is doomed is say DOOMED.
A singer I never could stand once sang "you can keep you're youthful beauty it's skin deep and never lasts"
Some people just want a car to go from A to Z
Others want something better
Although a respect your opinion, I simply cannot agree.
I will never be able to settle for anything but the best.
It might not be rational (its deeper than me), but neither is your interpretation.
Love will eventually run off and if you lose too much time with the wrong person, you might very well have fucked your life up.
Technically, you can: en.wikipedia.org
Note that I never talk about looks
Y(T) value can be determined by other standards.
Nevertheless looks play a huge role
...
For Plato Beuty is gods way of showing us the way
...
...
...