>Fox News issues correction on Roy Moore accuser yearbook ‘forgery’ headline
>A since-deleted tweet on the official Fox News twitter account had read, “BREAKING NEWS: Roy Moore accuser admits she forged part of yearbook inscription attributed to Alabama senate candidate.”
>Fox News has since updated the story with a note at the bottom of the piece while removing any references to “forgery” in it.
Fox News are lying cumstains who are openly working for the Moore
campaign. FAKE. NEWS.
she did admit that part of it was forged
She literally did forge part of it though. She admitted she wrote the date and initials. That's tampering, that's forgery. Jew news fuck off.
Nothing was forged. She added a note.
She added initials and date. Forged.
Fuck off kike I'm proudly casting my ballot for Moore. We've woken up to your kike lugenpresse games long ago.
She added the date and location. Moore’s handwriting was not forged.
Wow Fox news issued a correction. When will the rest of the MSM retract their bullshit stories over the past week?
post the image.
circle the """note"""
tell me it wasn't forged. kike.
It literally was forced, though. Tone of the "Moore D.A." matches the notes she admits to adding.
So basically all we know is that some guy named Roy (or Ray) wrote the message.
Who gives a fuck faggot, obviously it’s obviously a forgery lol. Kys already you fucking kike
Tampering with evidence. Not trusting your Jew "experts". Proof she tampered with it.
She didn’t tamper with anything. If she did, why did Fox omit any mention of forgery?
Added a "note"? Oh so she only forged part of it, her credibility isn't effected by this at all! She was totally lying only partially
>forgery
>[fawr-juh-ree, fohr-]
>noun, plural forgeries.
>1. the crime of falsely making or altering a writing by which the legal rights or obligations of another person are apparently affected; simulated signing of another person's name to any such writing whether or not it is also the forger's name.
It was forged you dumb fuck.
>it’s not forged
>I only forged part of it
It’s more fake than tits on a porn star.
Love, Roy (Ray) was one color. Yet Moore, the date, and other notes are made of a different color. She admits she added the notes. So she could've also added the Moore. We also don't know WHEN she added the notes. She could've added it at a later date than what's noted.
You admitted she added date, location, initials to the original signature. Tampering.
See this Jew is using the deflection tactic Hitler himself outlined in Mein Kampf. Hitler knew this is what happens when dealing with the Jew. Round 2 coming soon for you rat fucks, but for real this time. Hitler's mission will be accomplished if you keep pushing misinformation.
Adding a note to something already written isn’t forgery.
It doesn’t become forgery just because you really want it to be forgery.
literally why would she do this?
>the hill
dropped
Adding the last name to a signature does constitute forgery, though.
so what you're trying to imply is that fox omitting that is proof she didn't forge it?
the absolute state of kikes
roy moore is the next senator of alabama
Typical Fag News, I always wondered how long it would take them to go back into full neo-con mode after Trump won
This is a slide thread
Slide threads are made by shills
Do not reply to shill
Do not bump shill threads
Sage and move on
If she forged his last name, why did Fox drop the story?
She forged his last name in the same style of his writing
tell me precisely what she added and what was there before.
Fox knows the damage is done, millions of low information voters now believe Roy Moore isnt a child rapist, and will vote for him.,
>Nothing was forged. She added a note.
Moore D.A. is added in the same color pen as the "note" and he never signed that way. It's consistent with his assistant's co-signature which the accuser would have because moore handled her divorce case and she left that out too.
Can't wait for Tuesday. Gonna stick that knife in jones myself go home and watch the salt excavation.
Because they don't have proof. News organizations can't just make claims without evidence or with weak evidence (although all of them, not just Fox News, have been pretty damn bad about that lately).
Faking stories and then quietly retracting them is fine when it’s Fox News and /yourguy/, got it.
>It wasn't a forgery
What's the word for changing a signature? She even added his last name. The D.A. line is proof she was copying a signature from the divorce papers, since he was the Judge over her divorce. D.A. were his secretaries initials that she added whenever she signed on his behalf, the dumb broad thought it was Roy Moore signing that he was the D.A. (he was not the D.A. at that time)
Yeah, woman had a pretty obvious motive to go after him. Didn't he rule unfavorably for her in the divorce case?
Talk about conflict of interest.
As time goes on and more details come out, all of these accusations against him just seem to be falling apart. Luckily for him, the voters of Alabama were able to see through them from the start.
Going to be REAL close, when the only outlet having Jones ahead is the Washington Post with an outdated poll. That's with Moore being the "public shame" candidate, as well, harming his numbers.
What a waste of money for the DNC. They also sapped the damage from future attacks when they try this in the future. Embarrassing.
>Washington post