Antifa BTFO

>antifa BTFO
>is Chomsky, dare I say it, our guy?
>(((chomsky)))

I dont know who's jewing who anymore...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pxSLCmwEsG8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

No he just knows street violence isn't the answer because he actually knows history and remembers the SA vs RKB debacle

Chomsky has always been among the most reasonable leftists.

He is being the biggest possible douchebag, he is actually giving good advice to the leftist crazies. The violence of Antifa is a huge turnoff to the middle of the road people the Dems need to win over.

Back flips onto your freedoms

This, sadly.

Is there anyone that isn't our guy

he said something correct

They've lost already
The more rational they get, the more open they are to the rational logic and fact based realities they usually deny based on ideology
They can either bleed followers and turn off new people via increasingly violent obscurity or they can move more towards rationality which is to say, move towards having their indoctrination reversed

Funny that Chomsky was on Steffan Molyneux's show, twice I think.

>Venezuela is a socialist miracle
Venezuela collapses
>Venezuela isn't real socialism

(((reasonable)))

He would be our guy if:
>Noam Chomsky: Moslems are a gift to the far left and ZOG repression

Now how about that, a leftist that actually notices they’re just repeating history. Let’s hope nobody listens, we need the commies to try again to consolidate power.

Another chapters of leftists disavowing their street thugs. They always have some revolutionary rabble somewhere, they did the same thing in the 60s.

Yeah but that's basically axiomatic for a leftist. Without that cope their whole worldview collapses.

WTF I’m a Chompsky-Honk now!

yeah but he predicted maduro is not like chavez

anyway, chomsky on his way out of the futility that is life. he can afford to speak harsh to the left.

they will only recoil and call him an old white man, ofcourse

This. Chomsky is an empiricist and thinks post-modernism is bullshit. His kind or anarchism is closer to libertarianism than it is communism. I still think his ideas are flawed, but he's no Trotskyite. He isn't into 5th columns and mob violence. He believes he can prove his ideas with logic.
Manufacturing Consent is an important work, regardless of partisanship. And his stuff on Universal Grammar...I unironically put him above anyone else who lived in the 20th century, including Einstein, Bohr, Von Neumann. Only one who comes close for me is Crick.

If you actually read Chomsky's books (not shilling, go pirate them or download a free pdf like i do) he pretty much just exposes everybody's hypocrisy and bullshit, left or right. In the recent "Who Rules the World?" he openly talks shit about the BELOVED Robert Kennedy and what a ruthless psychopath he was against Cuba, and his brother Johnny vs. the rest of Latin America, obviously everyone knows about the CIA's coups and other activities down there... Jesuits being massacred... The fact that Bush attacked Afghanistan with implied support from "the world" when really what "the world" wanted was to see Osama charged (with evidence maybe?) and tried in an International Court, not Afghanistan occupied and raped for a decade and Osama assassinated and dumped in the ocean... Things of that nature. He's totally honest about the facts regarding the activities of agents on every end of the political spectrum. I'm not surprised that he isn't discussed more here because doing so would require that people have the attention span to actually read his fucking books instead of just putting words in the poor guy's mouth, usually shit he never said.

you seem to be not completely retarded so why the FUCK are you waving a meme flag?

B-because I'm a Cornish nationalist...

Seriously though, I've read all Chomsky's stuff. I did CS and took a hobbyist's interest in linguistics from there. That got me into reading Chomsky. Anyone who rips on Zizek should be worth Sup Forumss attention. I'm a conservative but that doesn't put me off.

Hahahaha what does he know? I wish these decrepit old future cos would just stay out of the younger generations movements.

> Chomsky Honk

Like most folks I've always been different but .. not like the others

didn't he literally collude with the russians (today)?

He is just pointing out the obvious like Camille Paglia.

WAKE UP

wrf I love Gnome now

wtf i love jews now

>He's totally honest about the facts regarding the activities of agents on every end of the political spectrum.
I read a number of Chomsky books well over a decade ago. I don't remember him saying anything about the wars in the M.E. being at the behest of the jews.

Chomsky remembers what happened when Antifa was created

That's not saying much. He thought the Khmer Rouge was the real deal.

Nice meme.

Well in a way he was right. Venezuela WAS a socialist miracle since it had not collapsed yet.

Manufacturing consent is something every Sup Forumsack should watch. I think him and Zizek are the only leftists that can understand us.

He's one of the few leftists that has said that the left would not win an armed revolution in the US due to them relying on the right for their physical security. Since he's smart enough to figure that basic fact out, I am willing to listen to him when he comes up.

chomsky knows that it isnt smart to tangle with the right

He is SJW

Antifa a.k.a Communists are the ones that got National Socialists into power. Look into the street fighting era of 1920's and early 30's before Nat-Soc Germany and the murders,arson,looting,political suppression and demonisation of Nat-Soc by the lying press.

Pic related. Antifa meeting.
Vid related. Goebbels speech regarding this which in (((schools))) has been edited out of context.
youtube.com/watch?v=pxSLCmwEsG8

Yes yes they are!

Chomsky is such a faggot, I can't believe I was ever into him. Well, I can but still, it's embarrassing. Even when I was I realized that basically he is just butthurt over human nature and the reality of Man and power. He blames modern personalities and institutions, not realize that this is just the way it is, and we actually have come a long way in mitigating the brutality of social existence.

Chomsky is a smart guy and I do respect him even if I do not share his views. I would rather have more smart 'adversaries' like him than braindead 'allies' who do not fully understand the ramifications of the concepts they are fighting for.

Maybe he's setting it up so the left can start to claim Antifa was actually created by the right to make the left look bad.

But since we do have braindead allies let's manipulate them into being useful with operations like this

Haha sounds fun but you think this is really gonna work out? I mean ok, may have a chance ... Christmas is emotionally loaded as hell and might sure trigger a lot of people.

>is Chomsky, dare I say it, our guy?
I often see people drag out this quote as an example of "left-wing intellectual condemns violence." I don't think you understand what he's saying. He's not condemning leftist violence because it's immoral; he's condemning it because it's bad optics and because he sees the right-wing as superior at orchestrating violence.

He wants to attack his opponents. He doesn't attack (physically) because he knows he will lose.

Chomsky has always been wary of the fact that a progressive movement so to speak could give rise to a rise of oppresion from the reactionary forces or the power institutions, but what he doesn't understand is that the left carries a duty to fight under any historical circumstances against the barbarisation of society.

That being said, I don't have a very clear picture of the antifascist movement in the US, but they seem more like hooligans and not that politically oriented.

You might also say that he is acting on some internal moral compass here. Leftist violence is mostly accepted as 'good' by the establishment. If he was thinking utilitarian he would not condemn it as the left tend to see Antifa actions as morally justified. Don't want to defend him too much but looking at the leftist backlash he is receiving I would give him the benefit of a doubt and say that he is acting 'honorable' according to his own standards.

soyfa

This.

>/our guy
>wants to lead us compliantly to the slaughter
>advocates communism.

The guy is a fucking retard stop shilling

Definitely not your guy. But he is intelligent. Once upon a time liberals weren't all a bunch of post modernist muh feels dumb asses.

...

Sup Forums is an inclusive board.