Kraut and Tea

Hes not wrong

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=udnauLOeDE0&app=desktop
youtube.com/watch?v=XOnGNIHTWTk&t=5331s
youtube.com/watch?v=rG2iFmJn3gM
philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/iq-race-brain-size-racism-rushton-cernovsky-j-of-black-studies-7-1995.pdf
web.archive.org/web/20150226124654/http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/Suzuki-Aronson.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

He's on the ledge about to jump off

He's even more of a manlet than Tyrion and has fake accent

been suffering through his last vids. he must be severely autistic but also have low IQ. In addition he seems to be deeply invested in the religion of equality

the pregant trount will nevzer get anyting right

he's actually more wrong than the responses have gotten into in a lot of cases.

Like his bungling of qualitative and quantitative genetics

ze maus eez retarded, kraut

haha and the fucking epigenetics-transplantation. where on earth did that shit come from. he is going balls deep into faking it and there no way back.

Hes a fucking moron.

Its pretty clear the alt-right isnt even watching his videos because they are emotionally ruled people who dont even really care about facts in the first place, and because they know he is probably right. I've not seen one real counter argument to any of his recent videos attacking the alt-right other than 'he dumb!" tier statements.

Yeah, it's absolutely hilarious watching this dude flounder over and over again. He's like a walking case study of "sunk cost fallacy". He just keeps shitting the bed over and over and over again. I've never seen someone sabotage their own reputation this badly

I don't mind though. His dumb shit is giving Faulk and JF tons of new viewers, and he's accidentally redpilling tons of people on race realism by directing traffic toward those channels while constantly making shit tier arguments against it.

isn't it the pther way around though? Both alternative hypothesis and J. F and to a lesser extent Millennial Faggot have been responding thoroughly. (and correctly, mind you)

All alt right and alt left "academics" are just pseudo-intellects

No they havent. AltHyp has done a horrid job, although I only saw one of his responses. He deliberately takes things kraut said, mostly jokes, out of contexts and focuses on stuff like that rather than his main points. He also brought up and shilled some pseudo-scientist as if he were legit, when the guy is a psychologist and a hack whos book on a biological difference in the races when it came to r/K type is regarded as bullshit by every actual scientist. None of them even bring on actual biologist into their videos like Kraut does as well.

> He's not wrong

He's always wrong! Death to traitors!

Bump for krautism

yup thats my take on it too. didnt know people actually believed there is no difference in mental faculties and potential from population to population. This is truly the new creationism resulting from residual dualism and struggling to accept the fact that genes are being selected for all the time and we have been doing so seperately for thousands of years with very little intermixing outside of the ones that resulted in actual ethnic groups

Are you 12 and/or any percentage black?

>Are you 12 and/or any percentage black?
This is the non arguments from the alt right I was referring to user. The alt right always reverts into shitposting the moment they are challanged and havent been able to argue against any of krauts points made

>waagh y u no watch my idiotic and totally stupid videos waagh

Go back to bed, Kraut.

I've seen germans call him "The embodiment of modern german cuckoldry". It's actually quite depressing trying to suffer through his 30-50 minute rambles that circlejerk that amounts to what is basically moving the goalpost when challenged.

They have, under layers of irony and shitposting because it makes people like you frustrated.

He's completely wrong though.

Do you expect me to go about picking this apart? its already been done.

>although I only saw one of his responses

you must be trolling. And to start, you must know psychologists are the ones who specialize in psychometry? like, the actual people measuring IQ and developing unbiased test where the IQ-score actually reflects G? And you sound personally invested in this, thus i think my guess that your at least a quadroon might be right - or alternatively you have a black gf.

What is his argument? I can't sit through his vids anymore

Oh look its another thread advertising some nobodies worthless opinion on youtube that has absolutely no relevance and value, because its just another "I read some shit on Wikipedia about this now I understand the research and my opinion is the science" edgy pseudointellectual leftist manchild.

>jokes on you, I was only pretending to be retarded!
indeed

user, you cant get all flustered in a debate and claim its too much in the middle of it. Also, it hasnt been picked apart, that was my point. This is pretty clear by the fact that you are moving the goalpost away from Alt Hyp invoking a hack fraud psuedo-scientist to back up his claims. Remember, you brought up althyp, not me.

Kraut is a fucking cuck, he has been debunked by several people, HE'S ON COURSE FOR SELF DESTRUCTION AND JUST CAN'T SEEM TO BE ABLE TO STOP IT

nah this guy is like a pretend-aristocratic Destiny, but with low energy

Exactly. And another reason why the "skeptic community" will never win the race argument (besides us just being straight-up correct) is the fact that they don't actually have any valid counter-explanations for what we observe.

Hate SJWs and anti-white libcucks as much as we want, at least their views actually have a twisted logic if you start from a certain premise. There are obvious differences in crime rate, success, etc between the races, but leftists hold on to the idea of tabula rasa and no differences between races as an absolute axiom. So how do they square the circle? Well, there must be environmental causes. Whites must be doing better than blacks because of bias, historical oppression, modern oppression, etc etc etc. In other words, this belief pretty much NECESSARILY leads to some sort of idea of "white privilege" and systematic oppression of minorities. Even the cuckservative have a similar narrative, just instead of "oppression by whites" they say it's "oppression by democrats"

The skeptics correctly reject all the stuff about white privilege, systematic oppression, etc. But they refuse to explain the REAL reason for the disparity. And the problem here is that since they offer NO EXPLANATION, how is anyone supposed to take them seriously. You can't just say "white privilege doesn't exist, and racial differences don't exist either" and leave it at that, because they have absolutely no way to explain major trends we see in real life.

And that's the problems with skeptics overall. Criticize without actually offering any counter-arguments of their own. Because actually putting out an alternative hypothesis would mean putting themselves out there for criticism too.

>is the fact that they don't actually have any valid counter-explanations for what we observe.
your psuedo-science on race is constantly called out, and the only response you have is to shitpost. This is why more and more people are getting tired of the alt right

>it's a find the genes episode

>meanwhile, in reality...
JFG effortless dismantled and destroyed every fallacious point that pompous twat made. Kraut's primary purpose is to serve as an intellectual whipping boy to awaken rational observers now. Not all human groups evolved the same way, and some are less intelligent on average than others. It's so obvious from the outset it would take someone with an agenda to think otherwise.

youtube.com/watch?v=udnauLOeDE0&app=desktop

Okay, so if race doesn't have any impact, then why do blacks have lower IQs and are less successful on average? Keep in mind you need an explanation that works for blacks all across the world, whether it's America or Brazil or UK or Africa.

I'm not even sure if he cares about the truth anymore. His last video was so bad and dishonest that it can't be an accident.
He just want's the masses on his side - by any means necessary.

Still no actual argument or proof. Reminder that althyp shilled psuedo science to back up his pseudo scientific claims

Exactly. At this point, maybe kraut is doing 4D chess and taking one for the team by acting as a proverbial punching bag for guys like JF/Faulk to argue against.

Kek lmao you can do exactly as you want on a kazakh camel-wrestling board. Youre half black I take it.

We are not in a debate, Noone is able to explain the low IQ's of the average black without genetics (or disregarding proper statistical methods). there is not much more to it. IQ is hereditable and there is nothing you can do about it. Do you believe in natural selection?

reminder that you're backing the guy making an argument that gregor mendel couldn't have figured out anything about genetics because he didn't know what a gene was

i guess we've never been able to domesticate a dog either, all those cavemen were too stupid to know they had to find the genes to know how to selectively breed traits

you sicken me

Why do blacks adopted and raised by white families still have the same average IQ as the rest of the blacks in the country? Why don't they have an IQ of 100 like the whites raised in white families do?

Its interesting how you submit to me in a debate before it even takes off, while also claiming Im half black. Its pretty clear you dont wont facts confronting with your emotional attachment to the alt right at this point user. your feels>reals

It's appening Kraut

youtube.com/watch?v=XOnGNIHTWTk&t=5331s

twin studies prove traits are heritable

Did we just fine the Jean?

why do you keep moving the goalpost and refuse to acknowledge that althyp shilled psuedo science user?

>meme flag.
>old bait.
Come on... That's low

Do you even know what that term means?

good observations

geez take your debate fetish and stuff it up your ass. Whats with your fetishisation of "alt right"? What debate? Is this a form of zerg rush? do you have to counter people every time they pop up and say "I disagree!" no matter how stupid their position is? this might not seem very plausible to you, but the game is over. blacks, do, unfortunately, have less of a intelectual potential than average. I'll even throw you a bone: read up on the igbo. Its just too bad that they are a tiny minority in africa.

your insistence on entry-level fallacies that arent really there is just something else. Shout "moving the goalposts!" enough times and surely people will believe you

I brought up the fact that althyp lied, focused on jokes made by kraut, and then shilled a psuedo science book as if it were well respected and actual science when someone else brought up that he gave a great refutation of krauts video. You are ignoring the numerous flaws in althyps video, in particular his shilling of psuedo science, and are bringing up other arguments not even related to that.

That is goalpost moving user.

>AltHyp has done a horrid job
>althought i only saw one of his responses
Take your (You), burgercunt.

you stopped debating me the moment I actually challenged your statements and immediately went into "well you black probably!" shitposting user. This is because, like I said, you know you have no actual argument to articulate, and thats because this racial realism stuff is psuedo science bullshit. Its interesting how you guys suddenly started hating on skeptics the moment they became skeptical of your bullshit.

not an argument. Especially when you havent seen even one of krauts videos.

But you haven't made any arguments, nor have you established any goalposts to argue against in the first place. So no, you don't know what moving the goalposts means.

Watched them on upload, enjoyed the responses of people tearing him a new one. Sadly every response is the same as every video is Trout trying to debunk an argument that was never made.

dude take a xanny and appreciate the fact that you get to live in a society created by anglos.

>althyp lied

about what?

>But you haven't made any arguments,
yes I have, that althyps response was shitty and that he shilled psuedo-science. Are you clinically retarded user? I have said this over and over again in every response to you and you still seem to have a hard time getting it

you might as well stop posting at this point user. you and I both know you showed a horrid attempt at arguing your point and lost. Seriously, Im in the lions den and completely out numbered on this topic, and all you guys can do is shitpost and dance around the question, with not one of you even attempting to engage me

Just saying "that was shitty and pseudo science" is not an argument.

what did he lie about? be specific, give a timestamp or a quote.

try actually reading my post

but I didnt just say that user. Playing stupid to avoid engaging me isnt an argument either. And neither is saying "kraut is wrong!"

This is my assessment as well. They are sjws who haven't come to a reason why equality has bot been achieved.

what did he lie about?

this video

youtube.com/watch?v=rG2iFmJn3gM

he brings up J. Philip Rushton as if he were a well respected sceintist on r/K theory within different races of humans, but rushton isnt even a biologist, but a psychologist, and his book was ripped apart by actual biologist as bullshit. Further, Rushton was part of various racist think tanks, showing that he had an obvious bias that influenced his research in the first place. He even quoted a satrical article about how black people have sex from an issue of Penthouse in his "research"


heres his book being criticized by another psychologist

philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/iq-race-brain-size-racism-rushton-cernovsky-j-of-black-studies-7-1995.pdf

and another one about how he deliberatly ignored evidence that proved him wrong

web.archive.org/web/20150226124654/http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/Suzuki-Aronson.pdf

in other words, althyp shilled psuedo science.

Why would anyone actually believe that there is zero biological differences between races? I mean ffs, there is over 30,000 different species of ants. (A lot of them being practically identical except for a few minor differences) yet we’re led to believe that race doesn’t exist?

You do know that you havent said anything that warrants arguing with yet? its all out there.

but since you insists ill go from the start:
>alt hype has done a horrid job
you said it yourself, you havent watched anything he made except 1 vid.
> out of contexts
nah i think the core is very well attacked - Kraut believes there is no genetic difference, while we can infer that there is through twin studies. = kraut is arguing in bad faith.
>some pseudo-scientist
rushton? i only read the abridged version of his book, but it provides a piece of the puzzle of why it might be that blacks are dumber than people who experience winters. r/K idiocy is just tangential and hardly worth sperging out over. ITS A NICE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK THAT IS A BIT OUTDATED IN ITS WORDING, nothing less, nothing more. psychologists are the authorities on IQ, just accept it.
>None of them even bring on actual biologist into their videos like Kraut does as well.
again, psychologists are the ones proving existence of racial differences in mental faculties, statistical analysis let us figure out the heritabilites of these, and biologists can suggest and prove the exact name and position of the genes, what blabla bla they encode and so on. why do you hate psychologists so much? are you 3/4ths black per chance?

Rushton is complete psuedo-sceince user. by evoking him, you show how bullshit your beliefs are.

POLL CAN'T FIND THE JEAN

Rushton's genetic similarity theory was criticised for being racist, but empirical studies have been shown to be compatible with this theory.

Rushton's work has differential k theory has been criticized by many but has been given empirical support by other researchers. It can be argued to be contested or unproven, but not pseudoscience.

Rushton's work was primarily concerned with gathering wide amounts of data for the benefit of psychometry; abilities, aptitudes, personality traits and IQ. Gathering measurable data is not pseudoscience.

>"kaut is wrong!"
I actually gave a reason why kraut is wrong, see , which you just sidestepped as being moving the goalposts, despite it being the fundamental centerpiece of this entire debate.

>evoke
entry level boy. you havent had time to read my reply and shout out the first things that blows into your brain. j. philippe rushton wrote a nice book with a nice theory of one of the potential mechanisms by which tropical people end up stupider than boreal and arctic people. there are tons of other mechanisms as well, but noones arguing against the fact that blacks are, on average, stupider than the rest.

have some curiosity your dolt. Am I right in thinking that 3/4ths black was spot on?

>Rushton is complete pseudo science
>the measurement of individual differences is pseudoscience
>Darwin BTFO

You're in over your head.