Sub-Saharan Africans are Homo-Sapiens. All other races breed with Neanderthal and evolved past Homo-Sapiens. Proof? Architecture is one of the defining features of a civilization and Sub-Saharan Africans never produced any great architecture or massive works. No pyramids, no Great Wall, and no cathedrals. Ever other race has managed to produce great architecture.
China - Great Wall, Forbidden Palace
India - Taj Mahal, Agra Fort
Middle East - Hanging Gardens, Petra
Native Americans - Tenochtitlan
Europeans - Saint Peters Cathedral, Colosseum, Temple of Zeus
Race Redpill
James Hill
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
Isaac White
Like why are africans even mad about slavery. Sure it was bad but it probably prevented their extinction as a people.
Landon Bailey
What about Abos?
Cameron Butler
We financed all your buildings. Thank you
James Parker
European castles collapse with an earthquake of upper-middle class.
I know Germany doesn't have such a class earthquake.
Mason Bennett
Go suck a foreskin Shlomo
Your people never did shit either
Juan Walker
Great Zimbabwe is a ruined city that was the capital of the Kingdom of Zimbabwe during the country’s Late Iron Age. The monument first began to be constructed in the 11th century and continued to be built until the 14th century, spanning an area of 722 hectares (1,780 acres) which, at its peak, could have housed up to 18,000 people. Great Zimbabwe acted as a royal palace for the Zimbabwean monarch and would have been used as the seat of their political power. One of its most prominent features were its walls, some of which were over five metres high and which were constructed without mortar. Eventually the city was abandoned and fell into ruin.
The ruins were first encountered by Europeans in the late 19th century with investigation of the site starting in 1871.[1] The monument caused great controversy amongst the archaeological world, with political pressure being put upon archaeologists by the government of Rhodesia to deny its construction by black people. Great Zimbabwe has since been adopted as a national monument by the Zimbabwean government, with the modern state being named after it. The word "Great" distinguishes the site from the many hundreds of small ruins, known as Zimbabwes, spread across the Zimbabwe Highveld. There are 200 such sites in southern Africa, such as Bumbusi in Zimbabwe and Manyikeni in Mozambique, with monumental, mortarless walls; Great Zimbabwe is the largest Zimbabwe is the Shona name of the ruins, first recorded in 1531 by Vicente Pegado, Captain of the Portuguese Garrison of Sofala. Pegado noted that "The natives of the country call these edifices Symbaoe, which according to their language signifies 'court'".
Grayson Nguyen
They're the same as africans. Africans and aboriginals are essentially a tribal society that never evolved further. Every other race on the planet has managed to organize themselves into some sort of government organizations such as empires or republics.
Thomas Richardson
This look familiar.
Bentley Morgan
-The valley complexes are dominated by the Imba Huru. The height of the main wall of the Imba Huru is about 32 feet, it is 800 feet long, and utilizes an amazing 15,000 tons of granite blocks. The impressive blocks were constructed without mortar. The building of this complex took skill, determination and industry, and thus the Imba Huru demonstrates a high level of administrative and social achievement by bringing together stone masons and other workers on a grand scale.
-The extensive trading network made Great Zimbabwe one of the most significant trading regions during the Medieval period. The main trading items were gold, iron, copper, tin, cattle, and also cowrie shells. Imported items included glassware from Syria, a minted coin from Kilwa, Tanzania, and Persian & Chinese ceramics from the 13-14th centuries.
-Great Zimbabwe was an important commercial and political center. In addition to being in the heart of an extensive commercial and trading network, the site was the center of a powerful political kingdom, which was under a central ruler for about 350 years (1100–1450 AD). The site is estimated to have contained perhaps 18,000 inhabitants, making it one of the largest cities of its day. The conclusion is inescapable that Great Zimbabwe had a condensed population sufficient for it to be considered a town, or even a city. However, many Western writers have attempted to reduce the significance of Great Zimbabwe by several methods: by estimating low population numbers (e.g. only 5,000 instead of 18,000 inhabitants); calling the dwellings “huts” instead of homes; calling the areas “villages” instead of towns or cities; and identifying the rulers as “chiefs’ instead of kings. These writers are well aware that smallness means less significance.