E. Michael Jones

youtu.be/mCVJPXmE0DE

Skip to 30:40.

Why don't I ever see this guy on here? Talks about media subverting and causing racial tension

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/dA3zGJVoABQ
youtu.be/ygCE9Y28xWg
youtube.com/watch?v=CaJTwwm1nwg
youtube.com/watch?v=XDw8rMAefhk
youtube.com/watch?v=HIgzGjbq7bQ
m.youtube.com/watch?sts=17490&utcoffset=-420&v=XHSPycGUHw0&layout=mobile&client=mv-google&skipcontrinter=1
youtube.com/watch?v=90sNQ9NOy5I
youtube.com/watch?v=htUbL166axQ
youtube.com/watch?v=4qf0Cw3bSog
youtube.com/watch?v=462TtCEVRg8
youtube.com/watch?v=gVaRDqcP4NQ
youtu.be/44fq7rS2Uz8
youtube.com/watch?v=zTrBXSwwsdI
youtu.be/W4p7A0EtZqg
youtube.com/watch?v=Ql05BE8dV6E
youtube.com/watch?v=fjShQolUCcM
mileswmathis.com/ramp.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I'm not getting slid by shill threads tonight. Bumping.

Bump you shills.

Jones is a fucking genuis. He’s what people should graduate to from Sup Forums.

Right about: social engineering, (((racism))), porn being a tool of control, the jews and their lies, human psychology.

Even if you aren’t Catholic(i’m not), you guys should watch him and Peter Helland.

Bumping with degeneracy to catch your degenerate attention.

Libido Dominandi and The Slaughter of Cities are also good talks he gives.

How Meyer Lansky Took Over the Cinncinati Ballet talks a lot about why people aren’t having kids/ have twisted views on relationships.

Stop that.

It's the only thing that gets these shills' attention. It's just me and you so far. I'll look into Meyer Lansky

...

I agree the dude is a geniud, will btfo all other alt-lite shills.

Jones describes modern ballet as “the sex robot dance”. By this he means the meta-narrative is that (((relationships are doomed and you should just fuck whoever and break up))). If you listen to what he talks about you’ll see the sex-robot dance in media, even down to the sex-robot look aka the thousand cock stare. We get our concepts of the different levels of social interaction from the meta-narratives we consume and internalize.

Shameless bump.

I forgot to include a facet of the sex robot dance is that women don’t have kids in those narratives. So we sex and porn but don’t think about how sex is supposed to make children to complete our families. Instead we see sex like eating a cake or drinking, it’s comsumption instead of creation.

Retake the Church.

I've seen some degree of this in children's shows on Disney etc. Broken families, pair bonding is meaningless/boring/patriarchy.

It's being shoved down the throats of children. Even took me a while to get out of it myself.

The precipice of pornography, birth control, (((planned))) parenthood.

Sup Forums needs a daily Dr. E. Michael Jones thread. Seriously, this dude is so fucking smart, well read and just a trove of original and profound ideas. No MORE ECELEB SHILLING!!

Good job OP. Jones has Answers that dr. Peterson is too afraid to provide. Both grea men, but Jones more culturally adept and courageous.

Do you know much on his commentary on fags/homos?

I'm all for individual liberty but they are the most degenerate, hedonistic scum of the earth.

Then bump this thread! Get attention to this man!

bump

More bright minds to end subversion and degredation of the masses.

I've been watching E Michael for some weeks now, quality stuff, he's got me interested in German Idealism and the Catholic view of social order/economics, as well as points out the way to oppose the Jews on a spiritual/religious/metaphysical level.

Found the talk.

youtu.be/dA3zGJVoABQ

youtu.be/dA3zGJVoABQ

Is it true lads? Is Christ really the way?

What are his points for subverting Jews? It's been too long since I've seen his stuff. I need to know

A joke I heard from him that has gotten me off the hook a few times:
Jesus said to loves your enemies therefore I love the Jews.

Lol he still says 'negro'. It's like he's the REAL DEAL. But i love his ideas on media figures being 'idea pushers for existing regimes'.

I think it's because he's too Christian and scares away all the atheists and agnostics.
So do I. "Negro" is not vulgar, but it is still offensive to Blacks, so it works well in a public conversation.

All of you need to watch "The Goy Guide to History".

He is the real deal, but maybe too religious for average Sup Forumsack

Can you give me a quick run down?

youtu.be/ygCE9Y28xWg

youtu.be/ygCE9Y28xWg

youtu.be/ygCE9Y28xWg

youtu.be/ygCE9Y28xWg

This man is the savior of the west. Jordan Peterson btfo.

This MDE snippet is very relevant to Jones' beliefs and a more fun addition to this conversation and nice alpha thread. Good job boys.

fuck forgot link
youtube.com/watch?v=CaJTwwm1nwg

From hereon out, we Should hold a weekly Dr. E Michael Jones thread.minimum. i tried to do this last summer but i got into other things. And if someone makes a pastebin that'd be perfect. This man has many important things that we need to hear.

I'll start one tomorrow morning, video links and all. Feel free to copy pasta if you catch it.

I read Monsters from the Id recently, it was very good. Goes into how horror is a reaction someone has to violations of the moral order when they lack the proper vocabulary to express why it is wrong. He gives specific examples too (Frankenstein, Dracula, and Alien). It changes the way you watch movies.

Like I was watching one of the newer planet of the apes recently, and basically the idea is that a virus created by humans malfunctions and ends up killing the humans while it makes apes smarter and stronger. At one point, one of the apes even says "it makes human weaker and makes us smarter." So what E. Michael Jones might say is that the virus represents violation of the moral law. When humans violate the moral law, it makes them weaker, but it also creates a sort of imbalance in the universe (sin) that doesn't just go away. In this case, Nemesis takes on the form of the apes and the disease, and this is how the humans pay for their violation of the moral order.

bump, for this board is a shithole

We should definitely make a few threads every time he has a new video with Peter Helland though, that could help raise awareness of them on Sup Forums.

I'd much rather that Sup Forums obsesses over intelligent men like Jones and Helland than whatever vapid twentysomething e-celebs that people constantly make threads for.

But you have to understand the reason it is a shithole is because the libtards can’t leave it alone.

Thanks for posting this man. Anyone who names the Jew is okay in my book.

Really fascinating talk.

He digs up good information, but he uses it to form some catholic centred narrative that is never quite coherent or convincing.

How is it incoherent of unconvincing? I've read a few of his books and it's all perfectly convincing and logical, like the Catholic view of the world.

I think it's Incels since their reddit sub got shut down. Women bashing is their thing.
Good idea. But yeah, these e-celebs are trash and are making the board trash.

this watched it a while back, and as someone who has read much of plato's work, I was blown away by his take on the gospel of John, and what is lost in translation from 'logos' to 'word'.
Currently reading libido dominandi, with barren metal and the jewish revolutionary spirit waiting patiently on my desk.

He strongly reminds me of Camille Paglia (Italian) at times especially when he discusses the feminization of men.

Aww man. That's so cool that you have a physical copy of Jewish Revolutionary. I got the pdf ( free) because the price is surprisingly high for the physical text. Not that i can't afford it, but I've recently purchased many of Carl Jung's collected works apart from some of Rene Girard's work on mimetics ( also expensive).

I noticed that he had a bias that way, but let's pick our battles here, user. We can't be fighting among ourselves while simultaneously fighting the Jewish oligarchs.

Bumping

His thesis in slaughter of cities that urban renewal and integration of neighbourhoods was a plot by wasps and jew to destroy the growth of Catholicism in America because they were afraid of Catholics becoming a majority doesn't make sense when you consider that these same elites are letting Catholic Mexicans flood en masse into the country

i watched one of his newer vids about 8-12 months ago and he said something quite unchristian or bluepilled. 99% of his stuff is really good but that one video irked me. he also caught huge heat in the comments over it. it sucks i cant remember which vid it was.

yes it does. the wasp and jew elites did a thing, to subvert catholic power. Also the communists in government did another thing, which was letting in 3rd worlders. These are two things.
They don't have 100% dominant control over everything, which it appears you're assuming.

something to do with evolution? his knowledge of the material is limited so his arguments are cringy, but he's more or less on the right track.

>Why don't I ever see this guy on here

Uh oh, character assassination threads incoming.

EMJ is awesome, he’s so underrated, he pulled me from angry nihilistic Natsoc to aspiring TradCath. I emailed him asking if he might make podcast with just the audio of his talks with Peter Helland, etc. He said he’d look into it, made my month to get a reply. (BTW, the priest who performs my local Latin Mass is a big fan of Father Coughlin and says so openly)

You can still be a Natsoc without being angry and nihilistic, user, and you can still be Catholic, too. Don't get limp-wristed.

Also bump

Currently watching. He's definitely onto something. I recently watched a talk by Paul Gottfried over Jewish radicalization and this is really bringing things full circle. Who would've thought I'd sympathise with Obama after watching this. Holy shit AIPAC is evil.

i really cant remember man. it seemed totally out of character which i guess is why everyone was freaking out in the comments.

is he pro evolution or something?

bumping EMJ thread

> tfw you used to make them but no one replied

lel
no, he's definately not pro-evolution
I was was addressing the 'or blue-pilled' part because that's how he comes across when trying to dismantle it as merely a materialist cult
the two (materialist cult, and useful model for explaining an adaptive quality of living things) aren't necessarily mutually exclusive.

before the thread dies - if anyone's still reading
if you can handle the translator, his talks in poland are interesting. he played a large role in poland's rejection of sexual liberation in favour of more traditional values, and they seem to be doing better for it

I'm 90% sure he's referring to Jones' response to Card. Burke's claim that Muslims and Catholics do not worship the same God. Jones said we do. People were (including me) outraged by this.

It's unequivocally the thing I disagree with Jones over the most. He's absolutely wrong on it.

From looking at the catalog, i think this thread will be up for maybe 5 more hours. Mods appear to be salvaging decent threads since the board has mostly gone to shit, especially with these cancerous e-celebs. Also, Jung>>>>>>> Freud and Solzhenitsyn is a legend. I'm CERTAIN Dr. Peterson is truly red-pilled but is only playing his cards wisely. He's not antisemitiv in the primitive sense, but in the same sense Jones is. Lol poor Dr. MacDonald.

ah
yeah i thought the same
but listening to that again i think i get what he means
he's not saying there's more than one God, he was only questioning the depth and quality of understanding ( or lack thereof) of God on the part of moslims
they, after all, didn't reject the logos incarnate; but rather failed to reconcile the philosophy of aristotle (universe eternal) with the created universe, and just said it was both. i think it was St.Augustine(?) who managed it years later.
This has a lot to do with Jones' time in Iran lately trying to resurrect persion islamic philosophy which he says has been dead for 1400 years
hope so
the differences between Jones and Peterson when they talk about Jung and Freudian psychology are striking, but i still check them both out from time to time. if you listen to one with the other in mind, i find it helps maintain a critical eye rather than fall into hero worship

thomas aquinas (not augustine)
was a thousand years off

can i get a link to the vid senpaitachi? i want to watch it again

EMJ is /ourguy.

The true Jones we should all listen to.

Agreed

I can't remember the original video. He and Peter made a second video in defense of his comment called "Fides et ratio".

Right, but I would argue that that's exactly what Card. Burke was saying. And, really, if our understanding of something so fundamental as the very nature and being of God is so profoundly different - then is it the same God? The Moors reject the Blessed Trinity, the Sonship of Christ, Christ as the Logos, God as love, all of which are core dogmas of the faith. After a certain point, it's no longer fair to say we worship the same God.

And you're right about Iran. I think that his mind has been clouded by his good interactions with Iranian Moors, but I still think he is absolutely wrong.

It was Aquinas, not Augustine. Remember: Aquinas - Aristotle; Augustine - Plato.

It's like three hours long. Just watch it.

pretty sure he's mentioned it a few times but this is what i could dig up right now about the philosophy part
i'll keep searching
youtube.com/watch?v=XDw8rMAefhk
~18:40

Goy guide to world history is fun.

here we go
it's right at the start
youtube.com/watch?v=HIgzGjbq7bQ

thanks mein nagers

I'm sleepy right now since I've been up 17 hrs, but I've watched over half of the film and i have one issue with the film, and that is the one-sidedness of it all ( so far). I mean, sure capitalism is terrible, but it's also done so much good. Sure, usury is bad, but it's driven many economies, infrastructure and business that raises living standards. Finally, there is a somewhat absolute excoriation of individualism (Kevin MacDonald's bit) that is unfairly one sided and dishonest imo. It seems to me that many of these folks want complete and suffocating order rather than utter chaos when BOTH paths are blatantly wrong. Dr. Peterson, i strongly believe, offers the Middle path, as the straight and narrow and ultimately just path (Maps of Meaning).

Ima go to sleep lads. It's been a great thread and I'll discuss more tomorrow. One thing in particular i think I'll try to discuss is the multiple viewpoints on ' the Jewish question' and ultimately why and What type of honest synthesis may be derived From both logical ( yet also and most importantly, emotional) viewpoints. Gn

he may have been a bit harsh on Burke, but I think his reasoning is sound
Jones is critical of MacDonald more than once in his interviews
remember Jones didn't make that history documentary himself, he's merely central to it.
I haven't gotten to barren metal yet, but I will say he's sees usuary as what gives rise to (and forever attached to) capitalism, if that helps

MacDonald is an obvious agent. I'm going to look into this guy, thanks for the heads up.

That guy must have looked at this video.
Around 4:30 girls confirms
>He is the police
>He's an Operative

m.youtube.com/watch?sts=17490&utcoffset=-420&v=XHSPycGUHw0&layout=mobile&client=mv-google&skipcontrinter=1

Agent of what?

wasnt he anti christian? big red flag there

chaos

agent of intelligence... he promotes legal discrimination against jews in his books while a tenured professor at a California public university. Tenured professors get fired for exposing false flags like Sandy Hook and Boston. Obviously, the solution to our current jewish problem in America is to just uphold laws on corruption, not start discriminating against jews. That'd just cause more problems, as evidenced by the 20th century. Corruption and nepotism is the problem, and jewish financiers may be the culprits, but that doesn't mean they're in the same boat as religious jews.

Again, I'm not judaism's biggest fan, but I think it's clear from the red flags surrounding MacDonald that his theories are just mainstream blackwashing propaganda.

He basically views it as a deficiency of fatherhood

the way he explains it, and what i have realized developed among my own friend group is uncanny

the ones who turn out gay or leaning towards homosexuality and acceptance almost correlate 1 to 1 with a somehow weak or deficient father via divorce, being weak or absent, abandonment, etc.

the West more or less has a deficient both literal and metaphorical Father (God), resulting in rampant atheism and this has aided the cause of the NWO in assembling a new dominant cultural reality (libido dominandi)

Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation & Political Control
youtube.com/watch?v=90sNQ9NOy5I

The homosexual is the perfect citizen to the oligarchs: sterile, weak, and sufficiently distracted by hedonism and satisfaction of his carnal and immoral desires to ignore the economic (((policies))) eroding the fabric of his society.

He also does a magnificent job linking this with the topic of gay marriage as any nation such as recently Germany and Australia that accepts gay marriage is a colonized state of the atheist anglo-american jew-indebted zionist empire

atheism, sodomy, bombings, usury, [and probably mass immigration, and governmentally-mandated/pharmaco-profitable vaccines and pharmaceuticals] are the signatures of this (((empire))) and Trump was more or less our rejection of this oligarchic regime

Sodomy in Berlin and South Bend
youtube.com/watch?v=htUbL166axQ

Homosexuals, Jews and X-Men
youtube.com/watch?v=4qf0Cw3bSog

Dionysos Rising
youtube.com/watch?v=462TtCEVRg8
youtube.com/watch?v=gVaRDqcP4NQ

Is Weinstein a Scapegoat Messiah?
youtu.be/44fq7rS2Uz8

Slaughter of Cities
youtube.com/watch?v=zTrBXSwwsdI

E Michael Jones - Barren Metal
youtu.be/W4p7A0EtZqg

was thinking about this recently, and it seems the EU attempted to replicate this model as a means of political control i.e keep the populace fighting among themselves so the oligarchs can avoid unwanted attention while they loot the economy
it's not so far-fetched. it really kicked into gear after the GFC on an international scale, but the US has perfected it over the years
youtube.com/watch?v=Ql05BE8dV6E
worth a watch, but maintain some skepticism

holy shit, nice user

great post desu

also to add on to that: it makes sense.

being ruled by a father seems to be a universal trait amongst humans. girls who dont have fathers turn into sluts early to attract a male to "rule them"; boys without fathers may do the same thing: turn into faggots to attract a male to "rule them".

sexuality is a weird thing...

an user posted on here a fair while ago an analysis of porn, and pointed out lesbian porn as being much more dangerous than it seems (the male observer has only a female to project himself onto in the fantasy).
A boy exposed to this material early in life may develop strange fetishes (homo) as a result.
Worth considering i think

faggot here... interesting stuff. I agree that gays are the perfect slave class and ALL religion MUST be destroyed for them to maximize profits.

I wasn't breastfed and my parents got divorced, but I have a great relationship with my dad now, so... heh, who knows, I know I'm a rare breed considering that most fags are buttfuck retarded aids dumpsters.

I definitely want to check out what he has to say on Weinstein. I think all these accusations are one big fat hoax. I know pedowood is very real, Bryan Singer, for instance, needs to go down. Harvey is almost too comedic to even be thought up, but I guess someone came up with Shrek. What I mean to suggest is that all these actors are, well actors, and now that hollywood movies aren't making so much money, the next project will be the talk show circuit and this accusatory parade, which is a show in itself. It's a nice venting for women, who keep in mind, must also be kept in line by the totalitarian governors.

Ergg, okay lemme just check this dude out. I'm busy doing other shit, but I keep coming back to this thread and it seems like it has interesting content.

Well, autogynephilia, for starters... and now that female beauty is a purchasable commodity, men are now a new consumer class for female products. Gays partly fall under this category, but still have their own huge market of products that are catered to them.

Again, religious folk must be destroyed because they don't spend hedonistically like gays and depressed people looking to buy happiness. They promote buddhism because even though it's supposed to make you turn inward, the bastardized western version is just new-age crystal incense therapy and there's always a market for that cheap crap.

>female beauty is a purchasable commodity
holy shit that sounds like that brazil user who broke down all the male cosmetics marketing
that was spooky stuff

Well, it's true. Trannies are mostly autogynephiliac straight guys who fetishize the idea of being the woman during sex, but the other trannies are just automatically flamboyant gays who feel they can function better as women, and usually transition earlier. Both are vile, but the latter can be sourced from any distinctly effeminate gays (which are most). I bet we'll see more and more trannies as different types of people end up down that path, for whatever reason. Mass delusion? I dunno, there certainly is the imprinted psychological component, and the media and porn doesn't help.

Turning young gays into trannies is another project that'll reap them a lot of money if successful. Many gay men have "gender dysphoria" as kids which is a made up term, but might result from them just socializing better with girls and having female friends, and being confused by such a scenario. Taking advantage of this, the jews will succeed in turning gays into medical slaves for life as trannies. They are already winning this battle in California by legalizing knowingly transmitting HIV because Dick Cheney and other jew demons profit off anti-retrovirals and preHIV drugs like PReP. Having all gays hooked on drugs is important. Most gays are drug addicts. The average lifespan for a fag in the US is over 20 years shorter than a normal person. It used to be something like ~50 years old...

Narcissism and its promotion will also be, and already is, a hugely successful venture. Narcissists have a void for ego, so they will buy and buy to create their ego and their identity since they lack the ability to discern their own identity, and instead create an identity, in this world, based on products. Trannies are the ultimate narcissists, or rather gays are, but the ones who become trannies especially so. The straights who become trannies probably too, I just don't know enough to psychoanalyze them, lol.

How to promote narcissism? Bad parenting practices, schooling gambits, media, hmm, something worth looking into.

so something like this scenario:
youtube.com/watch?v=fjShQolUCcM
would be good for the economy in their eyes
great...

Yes... these people exist. Mental illness is rampant in the west, but especially among abnormal sexualities, obviously. They would love if that was the hot new meme, probably why they advertise it on their jew media.

>anti-logos
kekked and saved

I've tried getting some interest going here on Jones myself; Goy Guide should be mandatory viewing; also Have We all Become Jews?

>skipped to 30:40
>Ramparts magazine

Ramparts was probably a CIA front btw
see: mileswmathis.com/ramp.pdf

>E Mikey Jones scholar over here
Nice write-up user