Is there a more Jewish philospophy than Libertarianism
>value shekels over everything
>God is bad. Be an atheist. Care about no one but you.
>Your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ don't mean shit if you can't get rich off of them.
>Mammon is great.
>Temporal success over spiritual success
Other urls found in this thread:
theamericanconservative.com
twitter.com
oyo, isn't libertarianism about individual rights above all else? What is stopping anyone in a libertarian system from doing whatever they want?
>let muslims and fags do whatever they want
tolerating evil and sin is passively endorsing it.
>Jewish capitalism is bad!
>The Jews have an ideology that's the better way!
user, I...
Yes it’s called Marxism
>God is bad. Be an atheist. Care about no one but you.
Then why can we do whatever we want?
Agreed, lolbertarians are commies larping as right wingers.
fight against (((them))) trying to infect your countries, 2nd and 3rd worlders.
the eastern slavs know what's up.
>you're people don't matter
>foreign scum are your "brothers in Christ"
>it's your duty to help all the scum of the world
This is what Christians actually believe.
>Being a Christcuck
Don't forget to open your home (and boipussy) to all those poor refugees and their sexual emergencies! It's what (((Jesus))) would want!
>56%
>our people
which ones? the west africans? the mestizos? are you 1/16th cherokee too?
gentiles
i-is that Sam?
lolbergs are even more degenerate than liberals
>libertarianism = atheism
fucking kill yourself
and sage
That's not Jewish, that's just fucking American 'conservatism' to it's logical extreme.
You're literally strawmanning by your first fucking line.
Fascism is the only moral ideology desu
this is a legit question
I honestly can't tell if you're baiting or if you actually don't know what a political compass looks like.
Sam was the cutest.
Wtf I love Libertarianism now
You forgot Ayn Rand donated all her money to Zionist movements and was a hardcore pro-tribalist Israeli.
Food for thought...
>value shekels over everything
Values Individual Freedom
>God is bad. Be an atheist. Care about no one but you.
No central spiritual belief
>Your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ don't mean shit if you can't get rich off of them.
Literally what the fuck are you talking about?
>Mammon is great.
Same point just using Hebrew, which makes you sound like a jew because most goys don't know that word.
>Temporal success over spiritual success
Again what the fuck are you talking about.
KYS Shill
good troll. the most disgusting part of it is lumping ayn rand and milton friedman together with mises and rothbard
what compass do you mean, the 4 quadrant one, or the one invented by libertarians in which everybody else "is a commie". Now to help you about about your confusion, for matters of this explanation lets use the term "commie" as a totalitarian douchebag, and yes libertarians are crypto totalitarians and crypto jews. Hans-Hermann Hope talks about reinstating monarchies, what is more totalitarian than a king that owns everything you have?
>in which everybody else "is a commie"
Everyone who isn't a libertarian IS a commie. You favor violent subjugation of others to some kind of authoritarian rulership and the theft and redistribution of their property.
so then what is fascism? Its called the third position for a reason: denies commie fuckery and denies far right libertarianism while focusing on national and spiritual values to keep the good costumes of a civilized society, and still respecting the importance of a free market. If libertarians and ancaps could read a bit more about modern fascism you would realize you are just uninformed fascists at heart.
communism is way more jewish
If
>you favor violent subjugation of others to some kind of authoritarian rulership and the theft and redistribution of their property
then
>you are a commie
The difference between commies and fascists is merely who they want being the rulers.
Jews hate Libertarianism and austrian economics. Do you think the average person knows who Hayek is? Do you think Ayn Rand is well liked? That is by design. The Jews can't stand that members of their own tribe "sold them out"
Disagree with all of OP, but this is legit
>tolerating evil and sin is passively endorsing it
By this logic you have an obligation to protest every speeding ticket or police citation ever.
Welcome to libertarianism!
Then again going Paleo fixes everything.
>christcucks
You're a fucking retard.
Libertarianism is about personal freedom, not wealth or atheism.
so then we are all commies according to you, again I have read HHH and he explains how only one ruler owns everything and people can only own their body, explain how is that different than:
>If you favor violent subjugation of others to some kind of authoritarian rulership and the theft and redistribution of their property.
Just stop it man, there is nothing you can
>so then we are all commies according to you
Yes - I already said that explicitly.
>Everyone who isn't a libertarian IS a commie
Yeah, that's pretty much as Jewish as it can get, which is part of the reason why Libertarianism is an utter meme and those who support it a bunch of morons doing their supreme kike overlords' bidding.
Which is why every "libertarian thinker" is a kike.
>>God is bad. Be an atheist. Care about no one but you.
I hate to break it you, but jews are religious
>Is there a more Jewish philosophy than Libertarianism
Communism.
>God is bad. Be an atheist.
You do realize that your god is the god of the jews right?
>what compass do you mean, the 4 quadrant one, or the one invented by libertarians in which everybody else "is a commie".
The four-quadrant one that measures the extent of economic planning on the horizontal axis and centralization of decision-making on the vertical axis.
>libertarians are crypto totalitarians
This is the most logically incoherent thought I have ever come across.
>and crypto jews
>muh jooz
>Hans-Hermann Hope talks about reinstating monarchies, what is more totalitarian than a king that owns everything you have?
It doesn't seem like you have ever read any of his work.
The central thesis in Democracy: the God That Failed is that, while not the absolute ideal, traditional western monarchies were preferable to modern democracies.
>Everyone who isn't a libertarian IS a commie
Is this nigga 4 real?
If
>you favor violent subjugation of others to some kind of authoritarian rulership and the theft and redistribution of their property
then
>you are a commie
off topic, but is this reaction image from "Totally Spies"?
I'd be fine with libertarianism but only in a world without nonwhites and degenerates.
Yeah, isn't her name Sam or something?
Do you even know what communism is, my underage friend?
>violent subjugation of others to some kind of authoritarian rulership and the theft and redistribution of their property
Too simple for a definition.
Alex>Mandy=Clover>>>Sam
>value shekels over everything
>God is bad. Be an atheist. Care about no one but you.
>Your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ don't mean shit if you can't get rich off of them.
>Mammon is great.
>Temporal success over spiritual success
You don't understand Libertarianism one bit. Being free to interact with people in the absence of coercion means none of that.
Mises can help add some clarity here:
> [T]he critics who speak in this vein show only that they have a very imperfect and materialistic conception of these higher and nobler needs. Social policy, with the means that are at its disposal, can make men rich or poor, but it can never succeed in making them happy or in satisfying their inmost yearnings. Here all external expedients fail. All that social policy can do is to remove the outer causes of pain and suffering…It is not from a disdain of spiritual goods that liberalism concerns itself exclusively with man’s material well-being, but from a conviction that what is highest and deepest in man cannot be touched by any outward regulation. It seeks to produce only outer well-being because it knows that inner, spiritual riches cannot come to man from without, but only from within his own heart. It does not aim at creating anything but the outward preconditions for the development of the inner life.
The definition of "skin" is
>the thin layer of tissue forming the natural outer covering of the body of a person or animal
I suppose that's "too simple a definition" as well.
And that's a strawman.
Completely off summary of libertarianism Schlomo. Try harder with your bait.
OP abandoned his thread
To all libertarians spewing shit on this thread, just keep it to yourselves, go make your own thread and circlejerk around it. We dont give a fuck about any of your self-righteous bullshit, Sup Forums is mainly a fash board and we respect that ancap larping as long as you dont try to actually make us believe that shit.
I used to respect LOLbertarians.
Pic related.
You haven't told me what constitutes "too simple a definition". The definition of "skin" seems far more simple than the definition I gave.
If water is a human right, you can force people to get it for you. The pursuit of water is a human right, claiming all water as your right is just anti-nature because we live in a world of scarcity and the tragedy of the commons is serious fuckin business.
Fucking fava beans, think a lil.
If we are talking about a political ideology, which is a bit more complex than the definition of skin, we are going to need a bit more specific definition than what you just gave for Communism. Hell, we might as well talk about National Socialism or Fascism when it's
>violent subjugation of others to some kind of authoritarian rulership and the theft and redistribution of their property
>we are going to need a bit more specific definition than what you just gave for Communism
What are you confused about? What is insufficient in my definition? That it includes Nazis and whatnot? That's intentional - I think they're not importantly distinct from commies at all.
>Tripfag
>Namefag
>Memeflag fag
>Nonstop posting
What the hell is your problem user, are you new, did you lost your plebbit tab?
You think? Some see Fascism as a reactionary middle-class (or bourgeois) ideology where the State is more important than a single individual. In Communism, there is no State and no classes - or that's how it is supposed to go in theory - and I consider this to be a very significant distinction between the two.
I've been here since /new/. Jesus fucking newfags.
>Some see Fascism as a reactionary middle-class (or bourgeois) ideology where the State is more important than a single individual
That doesn't deviate from my definition in any way.
I really don't care what REASONS people spew up for violently subjugating others - I care that they're violently subjugating others.
I despise ancaps because you literally always change the meaning of your "ideology" I don't know if ironically or unironically but its is seriously worrying to see how not a single ancap agrees on anything at the same time they try to "always be right" when in front of some sort of criticism; that is literally the definition of someone affected by narcissistic personality disorder; which BTW I consider HHH suffers from that...a total circlejerk ideology for stuck up ignorants.
>I despise ancaps because you literally always change the meaning of your "ideology"
Who is "ancaps"? I haven't changed my understanding in years.
sure is a nice strawman you have there. shame if something were to happen to it.
>value shekels over everything
i believe by shekels you mean personal liberty and self determinism
>God is bad. Be an atheist. Care about no one but you.
faith in god must be voluntary. all who find the light and the salvation of jesus christ must do so on their own. otherwise they will not truly believe in their heart of hearts and they will be denied on the day of judgement
>Your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ don't mean shit if you can't get rich off of them.
libertarianism is about free association. voluntary communes are acceptable under libertarianism. that said however it is a basic fact of life that all people consume resources simply by being alive. given that it is not unreasonable to expect those who live in society and consume the resources of society to contribute labor to society to compensate for what they consume. we used to call this "earning your keep"
>Mammon is great.
literally who?
>Temporal success over spiritual success
do you mean "temporary success"? regardless an individuals path in life is theirs to choose. shallow empty people will deny the truth of god regardless of the political system. libertarianism guarantees freedom of religion so that those who seek the father through the son are free to do so.
Easy peezy lemon squeezy.
>I really don't care what REASONS people spew up for violently subjugating others
> I care that they're violently subjugating others
Then why not just call them simply ''authoritarian'' or say that it's ''authoritarianism'' that you are witnessing here? There's no need to redefine concepts if you aren't willing to play the concept game to begin with? There's no need to water their definitions down and ruin their meaning just for the sake of your political leaning.
Christianity is literally jewish philosophy you retarded kike
Because commie seems to offend people more and I value their being offended, because I think they deserve to be offended because they promote morally abhorrent things.
Why do you hate freedom, user?