FCC NET NEUTRALITY VOTE THREAD

HERE WE FUCKING GO LADS.
Will /ourpoo/ send liberals into a SEETHING rage, or will one son-bitch flip at the last second?
Stream: fcc.gov/general/live
Youtube stream: youtube.com/watch?v=Rw_udfbMp8Y

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/14619516
broadbandnow.com/
cspan3-lh.akamaihd.net/i/cspan3_1@304729/master.m3u8
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/153172010/#153176056
fcc.gov/news-events/events/2017/12/december-2017-open-commission-meeting
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Is that guy's name, Wu Tang?

friendly last reminder
net neutrality is at game
would you sell your right to shitpost freely for a dollar?
thats what its at game here
people want to censor what say for money
no money no spech for you
no more Sup Forums only kikebook
no more shitpposting only hate specch
no more piratebay just throttling
no more rare pepes just emoji™ for a small fee
take your ass from this cancer containment board and shitpost , shitpost like there is no tomorrow , because it may not be a tomorrow for pepe .

GET THE FUCK OUT THIS CANCER CONTAINMENT BOARD
GET THE FUCK OUT THIS CANCER CONTAINMENT BOARD
GET THE FUCK OUT THIS CANCER CONTAINMENT BOARD
GET THE FUCK OUT THIS CANCER CONTAINMENT BOARD
STOP CIRCLEJERKING YOU IDIOTS
TAKE THIS TO NORMIELAND , KIKEBOOK , THAWTER, JEWTUBE TAKE THE FIGHT TO WHERE IT MATTERS , OUT THIS CONTAINMENT BOX

>AKING FOREIGN
WE

I don't fucking care, as long as reddit and the Soros shills fuck off. Sick of seeing all the shitty NN threads

You won't see any threads, Sup Forums will die.

Nice mutts shutting down their own internet with the help of a based poo

>willing to pay 10 bucks a month for the 'Sup Forums access package' and another 5 bucks for 'potentially dangerous Sup Forums content package'
>all to own the libs
>take that leftists

>dumb shill thinks Sup Forums didn't exist before 2015 and need the FCC to protect them.
yes the FCC will totally not censor us at all eventually

...

Or just break up the monopolies and use and ISP that doesn't.

No Sup Forums will be great again like tge times before the drump kikes invaded it.

Why is he crying?
>not wanting this godforsaken site to be taken down to save us from ourselves
>UN memeflag

I don't understand how you guys would be for this.

Why? Because it makes Reddit and liberals mad? You won't be able to have Sup Forums anymore or infowars or any website you go to for news. Or even porn.

You'll have to go to the same 30-50 websites, and have to play by the big ISPs rules. But its all worth it becsuse youll make some people unhappy, right?

Good luck trying to get different internet too, you be paying for 500Meg datacaps.

nice reddit copy and paste. The counter argument has been explained a million times on this board. If you don't understand it, you're a fucking moron at this point.

They were starting to censor what they didn't like. The rules stopped them. Imagine if the next major school shooting happens and the guy posted on Sup Forums. Then everyone's knee jerk reaction is going to be to block the site.

OFFICIAL Sup Forums POLL:

strawpoll.me/14619516

strawpoll.me/14619516

strawpoll.me/14619516

strawpoll.me/14619516

VOTE!

I didn't copy paste shit, your too dumb to get that corporate dick out of your mouth and ass. But it'll all be worth it, just to make Reddit and liberals angry, won't it? You're a republicans wet dream, someone so stupid, they'll support anything against their best interest, because it'll make some liberals angry.

>americans have plenty of isp cho-
broadbandnow.com/

go ahead and search, you'll find 2-3 viable choices and a bunch more that are too slow, expensive, or both.

>being triggered by memeflag
is this better snowflake

>there's totally been a great counter argument to this i'm just not posting it myself because i totally don't want to, pic related

Because either way we get censored, so might as well censor the fucks who censor us
Also a lot of major corporations are shlling for Net Neutrality which makes it seem really suspicious

How is net nutrality “a liberal thing”
Inb4 le reddit

cspan3-lh.akamaihd.net/i/cspan3_1@304729/master.m3u8

cspan hls stream.

>snowflake

You're suggesting the FCC is not going to do the same in the future given the power? Why not just break up the internet ISPs, and go with one that doesn't censor. Simple fix, and no need to give a censoring regulatory bureaucracy the power to censor the internet. It was already hinted at as to why Obama and friends were setting this false dilemma up -- "Breitbart doesn't have a right to exist". HRC.

How is this so hard to understand? Just break up the monopolies and problem solved. Do you wonder why George Soros' propaganda doesn't include this option? You're being manipulated. You are a useful idiot to them. Wake the fuck up and get behind breaking up the monopolies instead of giving censoring control the the government.

State power

>go ahead and search, you'll find 2-3 viable choices and a bunch more that are too slow, expensive, or both
...which is why I said break them up. Hello?

>there's totally been a great counter argument to this i'm just not posting it myself because i totally don't want to, pic related

SEE

>"hehe gapidalism gunna make librulz mad"

go back to /r/the_donald numbnuts, I'd rather not have one of the most hated companies in america regulate my internet.

>it's a Sup Forums acts smug while it's getting railed up the ass episode
>it's a Sup Forums is against something that's in their best interest only because """"the libs"""" are for it

>wants the government to be able to censor the internet
kys

BLU CODE

>lemme not bother to actually try to argue or discuss at all, just shitpost
niggers like you are what's killing this board

>government rules and regulations are bad which is why we should get rid of net neutrality
>then we should use government rules and regulations to break up the telecom monopolies

>says he wants a free and open internet
>gives power to the government to censor it

I actually agree with you that breaking them up would be the best thing ever, but I live in the real world where that will never happen.

Why doesn't Trump do it? Why doesn't his administration do it?

These fags need to go back to /r/the_donald - Sup Forums never should've associated with that sperglord crowd who do things just to piss people off.

/biz/ checking in.

I'M FINALLY FREE

SEE

>>government rules and regulations are bad which is why we should get rid of net neutrality
>>then we should use government rules and regulations to break up the telecom monopolies

I didn't suggest rules and regulations are bad. I suggested a government bureaucracy entrusted with not censoring wrong think is bad. Hang in there bud, I know you can grasp this.

His son was killed by that nigger from philly that drove to NYC to kill cops. The nigger killed a chink and a spic.

Any proof that will happen? There is no proof only memes.

>"Hey you're being censored already so why are you against everyone else finally feeling what you feel?"
The internet has ruined my life enough, (((They))) want us to watch porn and waste time online, I say shut it down and force us to give reality a try, of course faggots like (You) want it in place because you're just like reddit, as shown by your memeflag

>Because it makes Reddit and liberals mad?
Yep, here for the keks, literally don't give a shit ledditour.

>but I live in the real world where that will never happen.
Well then you are a faggot that deserves to be ruled over by tyrants. The men in this country will get the job done for you. You, however, are in the way by begging the government to take censoring power of the internet.

The moment ISPs attempt to censor content is the same moment breaking them up becomes a big issue. The answer isn't to just let the government censor the net. Sorry. Not gonna sell me on that, and not gonna sell most people on it.

Nigger, the net neutrality rules literally prevent private organizations from treating certain shit different from other shit. It doesn't matter if it's data that says NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER versus data that says I THINK NAZIS SHOULD BE SHOT, it's all treated the same under those rules. You are literally arguing that the government should not do that, and instead leave the choice to private corporations of whether or not to slow down or remove entirely shit they don't agree with or can't afford their fees.

>cant find ANY non-leftist political figures in support of net neutrality

remind me why i support this??

why only libs supporting this?

cheese sandwiches mmm

not an argument.

You are asking me to get behind giving the FCC the power to censor the internet as a way to keep the internet from being censored. No thanks, and you are retarded.

Guys, this is from last year when some nigger chimped out and killed 2 cops on lunch break in NYC, right? Holy fuck I remember that

>hehe google is a private company we should let them gain control over internet media platforms and censor them unrestrained

no you

What part of "giving the FCC power to censor the internet is not actually a free and open internet" is hard to understand?

Because the libs say it's not political so they're obviously telling the truth

Im just going to post this every time now until people realize the kike retards spewing these retarded talking points are actual shills

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/153172010/#153176056

Title II does not protect you from tiered or throttled internet. Tiered or throttled internet was never ever an issue before either

Never change Sup Forums, I love you guys.

You're kidding right? It's a classic pro-corporation anti-corporation divide. It's like asking why only Republicans support corporate tax cuts.

Who is talking about Google? Break them the fuck up too. Useful idiot detected. We are talking about giving the power of censorship to the FCC. Try to focus and not pull from a grab bag of talking points.

Your argument is literally 'we shouldn't bother stopping them from doing this because we'll totally engage in monopoly busting efforts the likes of which haven't been seen since the LAST time we broke up the telecommunications monopolies in the early 80s, after which they just merged back together again, when they finally start abusing their powers for more jewdollars'

NN has nothing to do with censorship retard. Why does everyone keep saying this?

No. My argument is youu are asking me to get behind giving the FCC the power to censor the internet as a way to keep the internet from being censored. No thanks, and you are retarded.

have you seen the the websites tho??

why does a website that needs as many people as possible only appeal to one side?

classic libs i guess

Also a huge majority of Americans support it, like even more than voted for Hillary, so it's clearly not just hardcore liberals.

It's a corporation thing. If you value your freedoms from monopoly and being stolen from for just using the internet as you do now, the choice should be obvious.

how do you expect to break them up exactly?

because it's an emotional appeal, ie all they have.

doing lord's work

You think it appeals to one side? It's Trump's people that are attacking it. And they already have a majority.

fcc.gov/news-events/events/2017/12/december-2017-open-commission-meeting
Looks like NN is the fourth one lads

then WHY is it only advertised to leftists???

>the FCC going 'hey you can't treat different data differently because of the content that's in it' to private corporations is censoring the internet

this whole net neutrality hooah started when comcast tried to throttle netflix traffic to end consumers, you stupid nigger. it's not just 'lol title 2' it's specifically to stop shit like that from happening

It is Trump's administration though. If it was Obama, it would be Obama's.

>Hamilton
>white
???

How does it only appeal to leftists? You're seeing a split that doesn't exist.

Then explain how the fuck Net Neutrality lets the FCC censor the internet, when it is a package of rules that stops private businesses from treating different content in different ways at will.

That's sad

Kikes

if the right are even remotely informed on what it means then it will have no support.

>NN has nothing to do with censorship retard. Why does everyone keep saying this?

>I'm from the government, trust us
The FCC is the same body that regulates what you can say on the radio and television. The rules are set up so it can easily censor if "someone is hindered from having a good experience on the net".... aka "hate speech isn't allowed". The writing is on the wall if you're objective enough to actually research what the rules include.

Literally 70% of Republicans support NN.

shit like this on savetheinternet.com

don't tell me this ISNT left rhetoric

I don't get it, why do you shotlords want net neutrality to die just so libtards get pissed?

>when your entire board gets fucked because people actually start to go against the circlejerk and not be contrarian for the sake of being contrarian
good shit, love, /k/

>how do you expect to break them up exactly?
Anti Trust laws. Same way you get to use firefox and chrome or whatever instead of internet explorer.

Our politics are fucked where nothing can be bipartisan, and everything is black or white.

>Wants to give the FCC the power to censor the internet as a way to keep the internet from being censored.

You're literally making shit up. What's in NN doesn't have jack shit to do with censorship. If they wanted to censor the internet they don't need NN, they'd so something separately. The FCC does a fuckload of things. They certainly don't need NN to censor the internet since there's nothing in it pertaining to that.

And the only that they currently "censor" is adult content on TV and radio basically.

Because it's just fake news that they say so they can be contrarian.

Literly ignore them.

>amblances

>HUR DUR IT WILL MAKE LEDDIT MAD XD
>TRIGGER LIBERALS HAHA XD
Net neutrality isn't a right or left issue faggots.
God Americans are fucking retards. The 52% meme is more true than ever.

bump this pls

shills dont bump organic threads :/

Still waiting for an answer to you stupid nigger

The website is not the idea of net neutrality and has no relevance to what side you want to choose.

when is the fucking vote? i'm sick watching this faggots talking.

It doesn't even has anything to do with race, for gods sake

>Will companies make use of their new freedom to make more money? Prove it!

Ok that's retarded, but it's clearly pandering to get support from apathetic brown people. Majorities of both parties already support NN.

fuck you guys I hope I can throttle you all soon, Enjoy not having internet when your speed is less than 28k Ill be enjoying the party internet.

why can't government officials read?

>give the FCC the power to censor the internet

How does NN do that exactly?

The answer, as always, is "niggers."

Under NN, government bureaucrats can decide what websites they can prioritize or punish. Are you trying to tell me this isn't true?

>being assblasted over a bill that doesn't even affect you
>le "It isn't a right or left issue" meme