Nazis and catholicism

why did Hitler never target catholicism as hardly as he targeted other jew-based religions?

His doctrine was not religious but racial and materialist with some nordic protestant influences to justify individualism as opposed to soviet communism; why did he never got against the catholics as hardly as against the jews? was it because of the alliance with italy? there's also lots of disagreements on pope pius XII posture when it came to nazism, some say that he saved lots of jews lives and was strongly against it, while he's also named by others as "hitler's pope". who should we believe?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_persecution_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_Germany
youtube.com/watch?v=MKQpd6VMOTg
mordant-truth.weebly.com/hilter-monetary-system-real-cause-of-ww2.html
youtube.com/watch?v=OkJmhxGDd50
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Hitler was evil, Catholics were evil

Hitler was Catholic, numbnuts.

isn't romanism a big influence on liberalism, which was pretty much the biggest opponent that nazism had to defeat?

Because the Catholics didn't control the world banking system that was raping Germany like a street whore. The Catholics also weren't behind Bolshevism and all the eeeery progressive social phenomenon being pushed down the Germans throat.

Comments from Hitler about liking Islam and not Christianity were faked.

He was also a Catholic himself. The swatztica was a symbol he saw in the Catholic Church when he was a kid

In a philosophical sense yes, but I'm referring to both of their goal of secretly ushering in the NWO

Hitler was literally Catholic, thinking otherwise is just jewish

>The Führer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race. This can be seen in the similarity of their religious rites. Both (Judaism and Christianity) have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end they will be destroyed. The Führer is a convinced vegetarian on principle.

—Goebbels Diaries, 29 December 1939

>Jewish propaganda, 29 December 1946

Nice try Rabbi Schlomo

He did. The KZs literally had an own priest block

>American education

exactly, why not also targeting catholicism then if it's as "dirty" and subhuman as judaism? that's pretty much my question on the thread

>as hardly as against the jews

Are you retarded or what?

Goebbels diary is as real as the (((concentration camps))) and the (((diary of (((Anne Frank))))))

No, I am not a Russian fetal alcohol syndrome child

He did target Catholics though.

Read up on operation Dog Collar. The pope himself was about to be CAMP’D.

Bormann, Himmler, and Hitler were planning something much bigger than the “Jew Wars” drama spun by post-war allied narratives.

>German post-war brainwashing

Thats the actual story tho, he saw it in austria in catholic church/cathedral. Not sure if its true.

Jesus rebelled against Judaism. Why don't atheists/pagan LARPers get this?

then if he was so catholic, why did he kill jews like crazy?; all "christianisms" are nothing but jew myths, not only the non-catholic ones

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_persecution_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_Germany

>everything that contradicts me is kike propaganda

It's not. The swastika was used by the Alldeutsche Bewegung and he adopted it because it was already antisemitic connotated

Bcause he was racialist first. Why kill aryan christians like jewish jews. The church was dying under NatSoc either way

>hitler was materialist

Also look up Monte Cassino, the oldest Catholic monastery in Europe.

Completely razed and demolished. The Nazis wanted to kill two birds with one stone by destroying the monastery and also getting the allies blamed for it.

If you read The Sven Hassel book about Monte Cassino he says there was an internal Nazi struggle surrounding the impending destruction of the monastery and some of the soldiers wanted to save the priceless artifacts and illegally smuggled them out before the bombings. No one knows if they were all destroyed or if they did get smuggled out. Either way, there’s a shitload more intrusive surrounding the Nazi’s ultimate plans with Europe.

If Operation Dog Collar succeeded (getting the Pope to protest Nazi occupation of Italy during Martial Law and arresting him), Hitler could’ve literally wiped out all Semitic influence from our history.

...

>intrusive
*intrigue

christianity also comes from jews

its because catholics didn't declare war at Germany as the jews did, catholics didn't boycott every germany goodie, bought or sold. catholics didn't conspire with other leaders to seek the destruction of Germany. catholics didn't made propaganda against germany describing them as everything that is evil in this universe.

That's why.
youtube.com/watch?v=MKQpd6VMOTg

> yeah, he was; not my problem if your closed mind can't stop associating materialism to communism

Like one fifth of Germans were Catholic. He'd have triggered civil war.

Hitler's antisemitism predates all those.

because he was Catholic? Whether he retained his faith or not later in life is irrelevant, he was raised Catholic and that had an enormous influence on him.

Hitler actually had many of the catholic priests executed for meddling in stuff. This is worse than he did to any of the jews

who did declare war on who? The jews did on germany, because germany got rid of their world-controlling banking system and created their own currency without debt.

t. crypto

As far as we know he saw it in church in austria and that just inspired him for the flag design itself. Dont know if its true, but thats the most common reason i read. You might be right.

>who did declare war on who?
Hitler started the war. Hinging on a head title of a newspaper about a boycott only goes to show that you have no real argument.

>germany got rid of their world-controlling banking system
I'm curious how you think Hitler changed the German banking system pre 1939.

>and created their own currency without debt.
German debt increased exponentially under Germany.

the catholic church is the last institution that is inherently good, that has or had some power and will to oppose degeneracy and exploitation

that's why there is so much hate and shilling against it
even to the point where a fake pope has been elected, even when another pope was still alive

>As far as we know
Who is we? It's not up for debate. You know books long predating the Weimar Republic discussing the Swastika as an aryan symbol exist?

Dog Collar was actually the logic step that should have followed Hitler's plans, if he was so hardly against the jew influence he had to prove it by also destroying catholicism, otherwise it would have been some big inconsistence on his doctrine

As opposed to the utopian old world order? Just because a group wants to change society does not mean they want the same society. It is not the presence of a new world order that should frighten you, but its contents. Even the act of strengthening tradition separates the future from the past. All discoveries are world changing. Everyone who fights for power fights for a new world order.

Mein Kampf was written by a Jesuit.

The fuck are you talking about?

The NWO Nazis and romanists hoped to usher in was in opposition to God-given individual sovereignty

Those same presidents also bow to the pope.

Because to him it was a cuck-religion that was easy to control
He was also into occult stuff so I guess he was interested in religions

I'll lay it out for you.
>We
Meaning people who can only speculate due to the fact that we were never there to ask him. So it is absolutely for debate where HE PERSONALY got it from, it does not have anything to do with the fact that it was there already. We are talking about whether he read it in the book or saw it in the church, which one went to inspire him. It could have been church then that made him read up some books, you know there is posibility of that right? So to conclude, the most popular theory is the church one. It matters very little im just trying to explain to you that you dont get to decide on something you cannot know 100%.

>because germany got rid of their world-controlling banking system and created their own currency without debt.
What are you talking about?

fucking hell pick up a book
the Catholicucks supported Nazi Germany.

No one is more for individual sovereignty than the Catholic Church. It was the church that opposed the perpetual scheming of feudal lords and kings which subjugated the common man so terribly. If most people are sheep, who is more liberating--the wolf or the shepherd?

>implying Christianity is a Jewish trick
Holy fuck you're retarded
The new testemant refers to the Jews as followers of Satan many times

uhhh that's not a fact, which is why i mentioned pius XII in the thread

How much were you paid to shill this? Op is massive faggot cock gobbler

that's judaist jews, there were also christian jews, like this guy Jesus, as an example

>you don't get to decide things
>decides things
What reason is there to believe he saw it in a church? Why would it have been in a church? How did it get there? Hitler did not regularly go to church, so why was he there? Your "theory" plants much of the German Folk movement at Hitler's feet. Given that there was such a movement already, why should Hitler have encountered it at Church, which the folk movement was already beginning to reject? Why do you believe Hitler created the movement, instead of commandeering what people were already believing?

mordant-truth.weebly.com/hilter-monetary-system-real-cause-of-ww2.html
youtube.com/watch?v=OkJmhxGDd50

you have no reading comprehension, fuck off

>Not atheist, therefore a catholic
>Not marxist, therefore not a socialist
OP is dumb, but so are you

hwut?

My theory? Sorry i dont remember me coming up with that.

ethnically they were all jews, and nazism was racial, not religious

Then who is we? Where did you pick it up? Just because you did not come up with it does not mean you are not holding it; and if you are holding it, it is yours.

Ethnically, most Christians were not originally Jews. Nor did you have to become a Jew in order to become a Christian. If the Jews had one major problem with Jesus, it was that he was opening their religion--the basis for their culture and race--to not only other semites, but the whole world. For centuries, alone among the semitic tribes, the Jews had kept their faith hermetically sealed to all outsiders, and then came a man claiming to be their Messiah ordering them to treat all other races as their brothers. Christian Jews were seen as nothing more than race traitors to the traditional Jews.

well that seems really globalist and liberal, which is strongly opposed to nazism; was Hitler's racial prosecution wrong from the beggining then?

Stupid mapuche

It seems that way, but it isn't. If you take any single aspect of catholocism on its own, it will look terrible. What makes it immaculate is its balance. The commandment to obey your parents, along with strict sexual standards, and commandments against greed naturally cause someone to focus on their own community first. The ideology goes global, but ethnicity and nationality are untouched. The good samaritan is called brother to a jew, but neither is any less a samaritan or a jew. If Hitler really persecuted the Catholics less, it was either our of arrogance or pragmatism, or both. In the eyes of many modern rulers, the Pope is weak and innefectual. With no lands or armies, and extremely soft language, he simply does not appear like much of a threat. Additionally, the responsibility of the Pope is to safeguard the church, to keep it alive for centuries. They play the longest game, and rarely will a pope engage in direct conflict with evil. It is typically best for them to simply hunker down and preserve the dogma from dangerous ideas, and wait for the storm to pass. When you consider that most Italians were catholic, and much of Germany, it would have been ridiculous for Hitler to try and start a war between the lutherans and the catholics in an attempt to control Germany. Many people blame Pius for not doing more, but he and Hitler were a very long way from being friends. That the church survived such hostile occupation is feat enough.