Perfect anime doesn't exi-

Perfect anime doesn't exi-

Other urls found in this thread:

exhentai.org/g/1021131/98eab06096/
kickstarter.com/projects/sekaiproject/nekopara-anime-ova
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre
twitter.com/AnonBabble

The author is actually a right wing nutter.

>right-wing
>nutter

K I N O

Different user but you're shitting me right? There's a shit ton out there. Look no further than this website if you must.

Found the berniebot

user is probably referring that he's a extremist, right wing extremists are not as retarded as left wing extremists, but they can be quite bad too.

As for Kino, probably one of the best episodic anime I ever watched, much better than Mushishi in my opinion.

Btw, what's a right wing nutter to you?

In this context, the author's "we dindu nuffin" in WW2 attitude is what I was referring to.

That's a pretty common attitude among japanese and I see nothing wrong with it.
>Why?
Because there's no point in apologizing for anything that happened during WW2, It does nothing good to your country and only spreads self hating and self shaming behavior among your people, which was what happened to Germany.

Also, apologizing for things that happened in war is fucking stupid. The countries were both fighting and killing each other, like it happens since forever on the world. Thing is, people only ask for losers to apologize, as are the winners who write story and say what's right and wrong.

Kino is my favorite anime so I'm inclined to agree to a certain degree, but you dishonor her by attracting shitposting like that.

>Also, apologizing for things that happened in war is fucking stupid.
Well most of the right wing historical revisionist are the same people who are butthurt about the atom bombs.

>tfw early 2000's digital anime will never look crisp at 1080p

>Denies what Japan did in WW2 but cry about atomic bombs
That's more related to them being dishonest and hypocritical than about right wing ideology.

Although I understand why they do that, it's just more beneficial to the country and their nationalism.

>butthurt about atomic bombs
While most people educated on the subject agree that the nukes were a moral necessity, your tone suggests something a bit more sinister at play.

You wouldn't happen to be Maoist shill would you user-kun? I fucking hate commies.

>Perfect anime doesn't exi-
Why are there so many user's dying mid sentence? Atleast someone's kind enough to post for them.

>Kino will never crawl into your sleeping bag in the middle of a blizzard and say it's just to share body heat.

The series would be almost perfect if not for the stupid tournament arc, such a drop in quality compared to the rest of the episodes. And for some reason it's the only fucking arc with more than one episode dedicated to it, talking about terrible decisions.

I wish that would actually happen to narutards who keep making narutofan-grade threads.

Anime is killing people. It's the perfect master plan designed by Japan to kill everyone and conquer the world. Once a wise man said, the best form of fighting is not fighting at all.

I have enough body heat for three right now

Do not sexualize the Kino

It's just for survival user

You should do more cardio, user

It's a poor man's Mushishi.
Still bretty gud tho

>everyone bayonetted babies, raped, pillaged and treated their captives like animals.

When f/a/ggots try to into history.

I should but I've always held a higher temperature. Makes summer time a living hell but winter is the best.

As is consensual sex in the missionary position for the purpose of recreation.

Kino should have remained androgynous imo.

Lain >>>>>>>>

...

you mean sexually ambiguous? She's certainly still androgynous.

But they did that to the Chinese, so it doesn't really count.

Wow, I love Keichi Sig Sauer now.

But they made her a cute little grill as her origin. And that whole episode felt awkward cause I didn't understand if Kino was the adult guy or not.

Why, did she end up developing tits and ass?

Yes.

I mean they shouldn't ave revealed it. There's something more symbolic in Kino just being a person.

exhentai.org/g/1021131/98eab06096/

She was always cute

Mushishi is /myguy/ over Kino when it comes to anime I can stick my noes in the air for every time I mention them. Hard to compare though since Mushishi's setting is entirely consistent and focuses on humans' reactions to hardships out of their control, whereas Kino is a new setting every episode and it operates more on folktale logic sans the moralizing.

Irrelevant to the point. Trying to pretend that X war act is better or worst than Y war act is incredibly childish. At the end of the day, millions were killed in all countries that were involved in WW2 and dwelling on the bad things your country did during that period just for the sake of ''good morals'' would do nothing good for anyone.

The winner side did cruel things too. It's just not written down in your history books.
To get all facts you have to watch banned documentaries on the internet.

After war, things are most of the times even. What is not even, god will make.

>Missing the point
She went from cute and innocent little girl to cold hearted androgynous girl exactly because of what happened in her past.

I'd like there to be an anime about holocaust denial

No, he seems more like a libertarian.

>libertarian
>not right wing
let me guess, american?

Libertarians come in left and right wing flavours.

>butthurt about the atom bombs.

...

Libertarianism is a right wing ideology, at least when it comes to economy and politics. It's just that many lefties identify with some libertarian ideas regarding social aspects.

It just seemed like making her a girl removed a degree of universality.

Well, in my opinion Kino no Tabi is closest that we get from Mushishi and vice versa. Both are calm, episodic shows that make you reflect about various aspects of life through separated stories.

There's one coming soon: kickstarter.com/projects/sekaiproject/nekopara-anime-ova

>degree of universality.
Explain further.

The OVA won't have any lewds, neither Steam nor scamstarter allow porn. But I guess the normalfags who don't even know nekopara has h-scenes will lap it up.

>Trying to pretend that X war act is better or worst than Y war act is incredibly childish.

Trying to prop up your shaky logic with an ad hominem is incredibly childish. Indiscriminate murdering and terrorising of civilians is different from killing soldiers that mean to kill you.

>dwelling on the bad things your country did during that period just for the sake of ''good morals'' would do nothing good for anyone.

It helps to keep the hawks in check when they clamor for another great war that they're not going to fight in themselves.
Saying that we can't learn anything from the effects of unchecked national fervor and fascism of Germany and Japan is just plain ignorant.

A girl raised as a girl and with the biology of a girl is just going to have a different reception to the world. The first few episodes where Kino was just a human observing deepfelt scenes of humanity were great, because everyone could be projected into Kino's response. Kino simply being there and the viewer being the real receiver and thinker (which is what the show seemed to be going for) made more sense.
But it's late and I can't really express myself. It doesn't make big difference, the writer didn't seem to think so. Still a great show.

The worlds in Kino are meant to feel fantastical, whatever parallel you draw to reality won't be as potent as imagining yourself in the fantasy land situation itself. Oh sure, slave trades and book censorship happen in real life, but these aren't things a normal person living in the modern world relates to. Each country has a different set of values, and they are presented in broad strokes. Mushishi fits like a glove on reality, it's about normal people's interaction with the fantastic, and reacting accordingly.

and why we should even care?

>Indiscriminate murdering and terrorising of civilians is different from killing soldiers that mean to kill you.
Just as long as retaining the said civilian population is strategically sound. It's not like we didn't do that for the several millenia preceding WW2.

The point is that you personally can't self-insert as a girl?

>Indiscriminate murdering and terrorising of civilians is different from killing soldiers that mean to kill you.
So do you mean to say that US didn't kill countless japanese civilians? If they did, why aren't people asking them do apologize?

>Saying that we can't learn anything from the effects of unchecked national fervor and fascism of Germany and Japan is just plain ignorant.
It's just different perspectives. You see what Japan and Germany did as being wrong because that's how story was written by the countries that won the war. Had Japan and Germany won, USA, Russia and England would be painted as the villians and would be forced to apologize.

But to give another perspective, you don't need to dwell on something or to feel shame to learn from past mistakes, dwelling too much just kills your country nationalism, like it did with Germany.

...

Much too expressive

>tfw that's exactly what modern Kino would be like
Don't ever wish for a revival.

But you got to admit her expressions to foods is pretty cute right?

But Gakuen Kino has been around for a while now.

Well, I personally prefer Kino as a girl. I don't self-insert into shows and prefer to take the passive, observer stance though, as I think that just relating to a show/characters instead of inserting on them is the best way to experience non active mediums.

Gonna need a source on that.

Not all modern anime is overly expressive though.

I would kill for a reboot or a sequel. Every Dengeki Bunko Festival I get home hopes.

>If they did, why aren't people asking them do apologize?

If you are referring to the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, those were strategic attacks that aimed to end (and did end) a war against an enemy that refused to surrender, not indiscriminate killings of perceived subhumans.

>It's just different perspectives. You see what Japan and Germany did as being wrong because that's how story was written by the countries that won the war. Had Japan and Germany won, USA, Russia and England would be painted as the villians and would be forced to apologize.

Fuck off with this postmodern "What even *is* right and wrong?" bullshit.

>But to give another perspective, you don't need to dwell on something or to feel shame to learn from past mistakes, dwelling too much just kills your country nationalism, like it did with Germany.

And rightly so. When you order the mass murder of entire groups of civilians because your leader says it will make your country great again (inb4 denial) you should step back for a second and rethink your country's values and ideals.

>I get home hopes.
*I get my hopes up

...

>If you are referring to the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
Not just that, USA was bombing Japan pretty hard even before the atomic bombs. In fact, more people died due to normal bombs thrown by planes over time than by Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. Anyway, point is that countless civilizations were killed in both cases.

>Fuck off with this postmodern "What even *is* right and wrong?" bullshit.
Moral is relative though, this is a fact and history pretty much proves it. Trying to deny just makes you look childish, again.

>When you order the mass murder of entire groups of civilians because your leader says it will make your country great again
First, that's not even true, but I won't dwell on it to not derail the thread even more. Second, filling your country with guilty because of things that people who aren't even alive anymore did is retard, and you thinking that's right is even more retarded and just shows how little history you know. You're probably the kind of clueless imbecile who thinks that everything the USA does is for a good cause or has a moral motive, or that your country doesn't kill innocent people to fulfill its own goals.

>fascism of Japan
Dude NICE, I like it.

This this this

USA literally fucked up Vietnam with orange agent, to the point where even after decades the country still didn't recover from the war.
>But they were fighting soldiers
Nope, they fucked the entire country, civilians included.

This is not to mention all the wars and direct and indirect killings of civilians that were caused by the USA and still is. But oh no, Japan is the big bad who has to apologize because it killed chinks 70 years ago.

>And rightly so. When you order the mass murder of entire groups of civilians because your leader says it will make your country great again
I wonder who could be behind this post.

IIRC it was the first story the author wrote. That's probably why it's so different from the rest of the series.

>Criminal aliens
>civilians protected by our constitution
>mass murder (??? not yet)

>literally no one can refute OP so the thread devolves into off-topic conversation
That's when you know a series has something going for it. Really makes you think.

I think no one bothered because everyone knows OP was bait. Heck, even OP knew that everyone knew he was baiting.

...

>Moral is relative though, this is a fact and history pretty much proves it. Trying to deny just makes you look childish, again.
Well that ends that argument. "Durr hurr the rape of nanjing wasn't really bad, we're just too educated stupid to understand that it would have been totally okay if history had turned out differently."

No, actually, doing that is wrong regardless of whether you win or not. And since when are Sup Forums the relativists? Weren't you guys supposed to be saving us from all those postmodern leftists ruining the west with their lack of moral standards?

No, Sup Forums is fuck non-whites for shitting up Western countries with their mere existence that leads to shit.

>doing that is wrong regardless of whether you win or not
The only relevance of morality within a conflict is its function within each warring faction, and a particular morality doesn't necessarily govern over all sides. It's a nice thing to have, particularly if you can afford it, but it's not an iron rule by any means.

What a shitty point.

>rape
Women being raped is almost a cultural sport for humanity, we have being doing it for quite some millennial now and let me tell you, If every country that ever raped the women of the defeated part were to apologize, the entire earth would have to apologize. Women in the past were basically cattle and always were raped in invasions.

>And since when are Sup Forums the relativists?
>Trying this hard to label anyone with opinions you don't like as being Sup Forums
Stop projecting, I'm just being realistic instead of a emotional tool who was brainwashed into thinking that his morals are the only true and right ones.

>laissez faire
>right wing
Americans have ruined politics

Please, explain to me how economic liberalism isn't right wing.

>ignoring death of the author.

>Missing the point
What part of the country who wins writes story you didn't understand?

>tfw Kino will never live with you

>The only relevance of morality within a conflict is its function within each warring faction, and a particular morality doesn't necessarily govern over all sides.
You seem to be confusing whether a general *should* worry about morality with whether they *do,* and furthermore with whether a person looking back at their actions in the cold light of history is allowed to say "this was wrong."

The fact is that there's a big gap between the 'national guilt' you seem so afraid of, and denying that your country did anything wrong in past wars. You're allowed to hold sane positions like "that happened and was awful, and the best we can do now is make sure it doesn't happen again." And admitting this doesn't mean claiming that no other countries did anything wrong.

Now that's what I call edgy. "X isn't wrong because everyone did it, and I'm just being realistic, you're too soft and weak to understand the cruel reality etc etc"

Come back when you have an actual point. Also, you might want to try reading en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre if you seriously think that "durr is just rape no biggie" is gonna help make said point.

You're confusing two different questions, "is this right?" and "are we told this is right?" The problem with relativism is that it denies there is a difference between these two questions when there obviously is one.

No, you explain how it is.
Liberty is about leaving people alone and not letting the government interfere in people's freedom. If freedom is right wing for you, then ok.

When reading Enders game all Im thinking is "the author is doing everything he can to convince me that gay people are sinners".

>"X isn't wrong because everyone did
The point is, if everyone did it, why Japan is the only one that has to apologize?

I know what happened in Nanking, it changes nothing about what I said, rape was always a national sport for humanity. Like I said, women were basically prizes for the winners back then.

Also, moral is relative, this is fact. You simply cannot say what's right and wrong because that's based on culture, society and subjective perspective, not to mention that it changes based on time period. Trying to claim that's some sort of objective morality exists is naive as fuck. How can you say that? Who are you to say that and why people should accept your impositions?

>Relativist garbage
A good man is a good man wherever he goes. If a society regards the good man as an evil man, then it is the society that is evil.