I mean, if we put money in the hands of the poor, wouldn't they actually SPEND it in and put into the economy?
Imagine if we have universal basic income. Wouldn't businesses then be far more motivated to sell to a wider audience because almost everyone would be a potential customer?
We dont need to stimulate demand
Trickle up is Capitalism.
Trickle down is Corporatism.
Stabbing the fuck out of a container of water so it sprays everywhere while bird like subhumans gape and squak for a drop before half of it falls to the ground in waste is Socialism.
OP's logic give money to poor people so they can give it right back to the people who gave it to them?
>not living with 2 other brothers
>each earning a minimum of $53k a year
>an additional $30k a year in Cannabis sales
>living with grandparents, rent-free
>together, pooling $110k a year, to a common fund
>having 7 digits figures by age 28 with brothers, accumulating wealth
>all this without renting, debt, mortgage and being brainlets (no college [we are a trucker, mechanic and dispatcher])
I think he means just not taking so much money from them in the form of taxes, brainlet
It'll work, if you want the crack cocaine, weed and junk food business to boom.
Jesus Christ, the state of Sup Forums.
can't be that much of a brainlet if you're not 100k in debt with a worthless degree
>poor people are all drug addicts
Are you jewish?
Do you know anything about blacks?
sigh....
they certainly are an impasse, I'll give you that
Dropping money out of airplanes to the masses makes nobody richer and does nothing for capital formation.
No, poor people are enslaved by rich Jews. They're both intolerable and should be gassed.
.t Middle Class
maybe all these americans are poor because they have no industry, are being poisoned, are being propagandized to hate themselves, and have no hope.
t. not a poorfag but sympathetic to the dismal state of America
Drug lord degenerate
I don't hate them. I was pretty close to being one. They're just insufferable in their current state. I wholeheartedly believe if we remove the Jews the poor will take their heads out of La-La-Land and stop voting for Hillshills. Maybe even the niggers.
>everyone gets 20 grand a year
>prices go uo to compensate for injection of new 'capital'
>bread now costs 50 bucks
>have to give everybody 40 grand next year to compensate
Its not hard to figure out
Communism is trickel up poverty
Well, if jews didn't control the media, I think even that would be a huge first step in waking people up. Hopefully that's what the internet will do over the next decade or so. sucks to have to wait for the morons to realize every year things get worse, but I'm just looking to make the most of the current situation until then
/blogpost
49 Percent of all Walmart customers are on govt. Assistance. How's that trickle up working for you?
"trickle down" is the belief that if you let companies save more money, the employees will get paid more.
"trickle up," then, would be the idea that if you pay employees more companies will earn more money.
Not UBI, but rather higher minimum wage.
He's a mutt, what do you expect?
>"trickle down" is the belief that if you let companies save more money, the employees will get paid more.
No it's not. It means that when there is more money in the country everyone's quality of life will improve. This money will turn into new opportunities to get ahead and prove yourself since there will be more people who have the cash to bet on you.
I wouldn't mind seeing a politician try to get in to the next tax repeal something that puts and incentive on businesses to increases wages on their employees and not such a huge corporate tax break. Say company A increases employees a's wages by $1 an hour after a year of employment. That employer will also have to pay employer taxes. So, they should receive a credit for say $2 an hour. There would have to be caps on this, etc. But dropping the corporate rate so much only increases company spending and not wages growth. I mean hell, employers are complaining these days about not being able to keep employees and having to spend more money on training new ones. Why not meet in the middle for all 3?
And it's worked in the past.
Why bother starting a business if you get universal income?
it's literally in the name. Instead of giving the poor money directly, if you let the rich have more money, it'll "trickle down" to the poor.
That's typically accomplished through tax breaks.
And it doesn't mix well with "too big to fail"
You seem to misunderstand... The point is to eliminate everyone but the elites, They Live was a play-by-play of what's going to happen.
do you suck each others dicks? can i be your bro?
>What is gravity
>what is evaporation
Let me propose a radical idea. How about letting the people who earn the money decide how they want to spend it.
Thanks. Much fortune for you.
Just weed dude LMAO
I live in a earth home, one brother lives in a cottage and my other brother lives in the house (he's married w/kids) with our grandparents. We live on 12 acres of land, so there is space and privacy.
>t.você bon bunda