Lolbergs smdh

>Libertarians see no problem if every man in America wanted to fuck this all day.

Libertarian hate thread

...

...

If you pay extra $$$ for one of those, do you get a set of replaceable torsos?

...

you do realize fucking this is currently legal in nearly all countries in the world, right?

for libertarian ideas to work you can't go half libertarian and act like it's a compromise
most of their ideas can be exploited by the smallest amount of state interference
other ideas of theirs can be exploited by being a evil nigger with no regard for the environment
so based on the low quality of stock people are today and the intense level of government programs and intervention libertarianism wouldn't work unless there's a small breakaway group practicing it

>see no problem

I see a big problem and whoever fucks that will be no friend of mine. However, I'll let society shun the freak instead of having the state ban it or arrest the man. Freedom is being allowed to do stupid shit and pay the social price for it. Quit being a state cuck faggot.

le free market solves all

If I want to fuck my otterpussy it's my goddamn right to

I don't give a fuck what people do in private.

Is it meant to be a lizard? it looks like a lizard.

...

What is it???? It looks like a dead, shaved muskrat. And why would anyone want to fuck it?

Immigrants are perfect if you have two things:

a) a growing economy and surplus of jobs

b) the ability to actively assimilate them into your culture, or compromize and incorporate their culture into their own

For example, if Dixie broke off from the US and removed many regulations for businesses, many new jobs would open up - enough for the native people AND immigrants.

If we were to remove nearly all of the regulations from business AND simulataneously cut the influx of immigrants, then that would cause a recession in its own right.

Libertarianism, at least in certain forms, will work if there's a revolution for it and the current US laws are thrown out and we only keep the Bill of Rights (and make it a bit more robust.)

The government's task should only be the preservation of your ability to act on those rights and punish those who impede on others' rights, and the formation of a military to protect the nation. A handful of other necessary provisions would be important as well, but those two things are the only proper roles of a government in principle.

What the fuck is this? 56% Human?

> fucking americans every time

>being such a moralistic SJW christcuck that you spend all your days trying to police what other people do in the privacy of their home.

Who will build the roads!?

...

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF EVERYONE'S A MANCHILD RETARD BRO STOP VERBALLY COERCING ME

IF I'M AN UNEMPLOYED PIECE OF SHIT WHO IS A DRAIN ON THE COUNTRY WE SHARE THAT'S MY RIGHT BRO. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO FORCE ME TO STOP INDIRECTLY AFFECTING YOU BRO

I MEAN I'M NOT REALLY AFFECTING YOU INDIRECTLY BECAUSE UM AH WE ALL EXIST IN A VOID BRO, SORRY, MUH RIGHTS AND MUH INDIVIDUALISM AND ALL THAT

ANYWAY LATER DUDE REMEMBER TO BE SELFISH

>Dont be so bigoted!
As much as I used to adore the principles of Libertarianism, as time goeson its easy to see why it isnt a rational ideal in the modern age. Libertarians lose the game as soon as culture moves away from self reliance and turns to dependence, which it will as soon as individuals learn there is a benefit from it. Not only that, they are willing to be outvoted, outgunned, and outsmarted by any group willing to promise gibs. The NAP is as idealistic and foolish as Socialist values are, and sometimes become unreasonable or illogical to an individuals self preservation. A collective, who more often than not holds vastly more power, will undoubtedly defeat individuals. Mainstream Libertarians are political masochists willing to lose every time just so they have something to complain about. Property rights do not exist, only natural laws, that the threat of force and violence determine what a person owns or has, hence why governments are used to assure equal threat against all members who go against those laws.
>When you vote, you're using political authority- you're using force- and force, my friends, is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived

I thought you guys like to strawman libertarians as being all about profit. How do you make profit if you masturbate all day?

Look at Hong Kong.
It's a British city with the white people gone, with the values instilled.
How bad is it?

It's gradually turning into China.

So then why not replace the NAP with the harm principal. And go from being Libertarian to the John Stuart Mills model of classical liberalism.
If social programs are out of the purview of the state then society can continue unimpeded.

I feel like most people have libertarian leanings, in that they want to be left to their own devices. However people are fucking stupid. They've been convinced by a dying media that if they reduce government power that means that everything will be terrible. Simply because Libertarians don't have a good media presence that means that people think that they stand for turning everything over to the monopolistic system our current government regulations have created.

It's supremely succesful. Chinese culture is being absorbed by it, but China is absorbing its culture as well.
Look at things like special economic zones.

dumping

...

...

>being this upset at the desire to be free

...

...

i think lolbertarians are stupid and i dont see a problem with fucking a chunk of silicone made to look like a cat or something i dont even know what it is

...

The capitalists want to shrink the size of state
The communists want to grow the size of state
What's your third position. Keep the state the exact size it is?

Do you use an Intel chip in your PC?. It's made by Jews.

...

Libertarians and communists are garbage people, but at least the commies stand for something.

A lot of economists are Jews, on the left and the right. That doesn't make one side right or wrong, just proves that Jews like Money.

Is that a Dino pussy?

I want to turn the state into an organic entity.
No. Everything in my PC is AMD hardware.

The constitution is literally perfect

...

What the fuck does that even mean.
Do you want to grow the size of the state or shrink the size of it?
That's the argument between the capitalists and the communists.
Saying you want to turn it into an organic identity doesn't mean anything

>just because Libertarians don't want to use government resources to stop it doesn't mean they support it

Saged

In which case you're trying to shrink the size of the state.
I do really respect the constitution.

is that a otter?

>If you go on Craigslist and see meth heads selling their child out to sex slavery for drug money, you might be living in an ancap paradise.

And here I thought no one else but me thought this. Thank you user.

No. It's still bad. Even in a libertarian society.
Being against something doesn't mean you have to use the people we have given a monopoly on force to prevent that thing from happening.
I don't like people doing meth. I don't support doing meth. I don't advocate throwing them in prison for that mistake.

>It's still bad. Even in a libertarian society.
>I don't like people doing meth. I don't support doing meth. I don't advocate throwing them in prison for that mistake.

So it's still bad, but you won't do anything to stop it.

What the fuck.

Found the statist!
baka...

It depends what you want to call the state. The federal government is itself just sort of the external executive instrument of the states themselves. a 3/4th state majority is the highest authority in the US.

I take 'the state' in the us to be the entire system, not just the fed. Id agree to shrink the fed, but i would want state and even county governments to pick up the slack, i wouldnt want some minimal government lolbertarian idea. I just think it makes sense that the lowest level more local form of government possible is the best qualified to handle any locally affecting thing. Leave everything up to the people who it immediately effects.

is that a hairless cat pussy turned fleshlight

>implying chinks are the same as the filth being imported into the west

Shit now that China is taking over

And?... Wouldn't that just mean there is competition, and therefore more for you to fuck?

Ultimately whether or not they do meth is their decision.
I could offer counseling at a local church, or much more likely, donate money to a local church which offers counselling to those who want to quit.
God can help them in their time of need, but God has no place in the government beyond in the hearts of those who choose to believe in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, as the point of government is monopoly on force, and God has no need for Nuclear weapons or Machine Guns.

HK is a disgusting human zoo which is already the best you can hope for from Chinese “people”

More people think this way than you might expect, but many don't realize they do. Spread the word and we might have an actual change on our hands.

Have you not been to Vancouver

The people are smart enough to realize that if they can obtain a status of opressed class than they have a guaranteed supply of food, housing, etc. They are merely taking advantage of a system that has a notorious amount of loopholes, and not being reprimanded by society at large. And this is where Libertarians are severely lacking-Culture- they have a small presence even if you factor out that the more populated our society becomes by importing masses of immigrants, the possibility of ever reducing or removing the welfare state and the cultural attraction to it becomes slim to none. In a society that shuns work and praises victimhood, the Libertarian values of self-starterism and hard work will not gain mass appeal. Hence why Ive been more keen on accelerationism, in hopes that after a balkanization a new society can be created. One prime spot for future Libertarian values is the Midwest/ Great Plains states, since many are of German descent, and although its been americanized, the ability to work hard and achieve sucess through work mimics the work habits of the German immigrants.
Sounds like a but of an improvement, I was just voicing my gripes about the movement and its failures to get a stronger cultural following in the modern day.

Depends on the race

Still has a better ease of doing business rating compared to Britain

You have two option. Grow up with this crazy bitch or grow up with literally anyone else. If there was a legal marketplace she could approach then she could be getting a much better price for it.

>"You have no right to kill your kid"
>"...But you have the right to not Feed, Clothe, or Educate them"
Wait, wouldn't that fall under harm via inaction, thereby violating the NAP?
Assuming that the NAP works in similar fashion to Asimov rules, whereupon "forgetting" to get someone away of an impending danger you are aware of would be tantamount to actually putting said person in danger, that would seem to be the case.

Nothing in this dumb fucking thread is indicative of what most libertarians actually believe.

While most libertarians believe that there shouldn't be actual laws put in place to limit and inhibit degeneracy, they absolutely believe in a moral and structured society. In a libertarian society, degenerates slip through the cracks because schools don't have to educate them, employers don't have to hire them, and businesses don't have to serve them.

I think that more people believe in a classical liberal model of government anyways. Something like garbage collection being handled by the state. Its very easy to dump household trash if the alternative is having to pay a private company direct compensation to pick it up. It's much easier to get your garbage throw it into your trunk and in the middle of the night throw it into the woods, and the cost to nature outweighs the cost of garbage collection, enforcement is also expensive. Eventually there may have been a point where a garbage company could find a means of funding garbage collection, something like funding from the Seirra club, but this kind of stuff like sewers, garbage collection, they are such a small part of the budget I would rather not argue over them

this is the funnier version

That's, not how the balance sheet works. You can't have a state that is bigger for black people, as you're spending more on social programs or less.
If you want more unemployment benefits for white people, and less for minorities, since a majority of people on welfare are white you'd be advocating for an increase in the size of state.

Then that underclass begins to grow in number, and out of empathy or pity, the populace pitches in cash to help feed/care for them, all the while they begin to take part in more and more political events, maybe winning an election and establish a saftey net for similiar people, then you have US:2017. You have basically described the United states transformation from a small nation of Libertarian principles into the nation it is now, its bound to happen.

forbidden pleasure

If this was legal you know there would be a demand for white babies. It could save the white race.

Holy shit you're right.

>Blonde hair, blue eyes go into high demand worldwide
>Aryans start making an easy 100k per kid, shipping them all over the world
You might be onto something here.

True, but you would need some form of moral or cultural policing going on, not necessarily by the state, but by some organization of people who have been deemed worthy of setting a cultural baseline that people are willing to get behind. The problem is multiculturalism, not so much multiracialism, though they usually come hand in hand. Sort of like the way Japan is, no trashcans outside, because everyone knows your stuff is your problem, and that culture is ingrained in each individual.

Scratch the moral thing, now that Im thinking about it.

Then you reset the clock. Shrink it down to the libertarian principals, put more strength in alternative voting blocks like the NRA, and hope in 200 years your success economically, as well as in contributions to the culture result in a group wanting a smaller state too. The desire will always be there as the government gets in the way

No
Youre onto something.
If you have the time I'd recommend Adam Smith's theory of moral sentiments.
There's a book by Russ Roberts that I like examining it too. This is something Adam Smith grappled with, and given his contributions to capitalism it makes sense he did. Morality can come outside of the state.

Well for our sake, lets hope it doesnt take another 200 years for thst sentiment to become popular, considering around half of the people here are seriously considering democratic socialism.

Thanks! Ill be sure to check it out.

...

Sauce?

We just need to contribute to the culture. Also, nobody is paying attention but Trump is basically just taking a lot of his notes and judicial appointees from the federalist society, which is pretty great.
The point is with the collapse of Hollywood to start pushing our ideas into the culture, and I mean beyond memes. Like what the Koch brothers do with book funding, but in other formats

Lonebertarian detected

His woman got laid by a wolf and left him.

>Read classifieds
>"Need white, blonde hair blue eyes man to impregnate white blonde female."
>"Paying $200 per nut "

What could have been....

Wtf is that?

...

Lol wtf is that

>His woman got laid by a wolf and left him.
Thank you.

...

...

...

...

Nationalist on trade, ethnonationalist on immigration, and libertarian on everything else.

china is #1

Third position would be making the state the exact minimum size to achieve the goal of that particular section of it and no bigger. Not this autism of "duhhhh ban all gubmint except bolice to enforce contracts" or "MAKE EVERYTHING THE GOVERNMENT"

it's the otter otter white meat...