Traits such as blonde hair and blue eyes are not possible in the mediterranean clime.
>>153363427
Other urls found in this thread:
perseus.tufts.edu
youtu.be
twitter.com
1. "Subflavum" does not mean blonde
2. Malalas and Sieglin are not credible sources
3. Light hair and light eyes are not rare in Italy
Also, they described as "subflavum" which was a nickname for the nobility (and also means "bright").
The problem is, we don't know what the term 'Flavum' (word from where sub+flavum derived) means, though. So to attribute it to "blond" hair is really a wild guess and overall poor analysis.
Many of the information about the Emperors being blonde comes from the Medieval writers (who were a lot of germanic descendants right before -or after- the fall of Rome).
But light hair/eyes was indeed rare in the Southern part of Europe before the migrations after the Baroque époque. Of course there was contact with germanic tribes, but it wasn't common to see them.
Etiamne Latinam loqueris?
>Also, they described as "subflavum" which was a nickname for the nobility (and also means "bright").
Non verum est, puer. Cur mentiris?
perseus.tufts.edu
Interpretatio est non idem translatione.
It is logical to assume that "rutilae" means blonde instead since that's the term they used to describe the hair color of Germanics and Scythians. I believe the term "rubio" in Spanish is also derived from it and it means blonde as well.
Nordcucks ITT
WE WUZ ROMANZ N SHIET
Literally niggers they have a degenerate history
No. The term we have in Spanish derived from "rutilae" is "Rutilante" which means "to spark" or "bright."