Kraut here

Okay alt-right let us finally end this race-realism debacle. As it is known JF "debunked" all my videos, however he failed to provide one thing. While there may be "molecular biological evidence" "proving" that there is a difference in IQ, it does not address the following points:

1) IQ is inherently sociological, not biological. Therefore one cannot say a biological factor correlates a sociological one.

2) There is no nuclear subatomic biological evidence. What exactly is the difference between the quarks, electrons, protons and other subatomic particles in say, whites and blacks? A quark is a quark, an electron is an electron, hence there is no subatomic biological evidence racial differences in IQ. JF is obviously too fucking dense to answer this question. Sad for him that I have a nuclear physics professor backing up my claims, as well as a chemistry professor.

The end. You can give up already alt right. Facts are stubborn things, you can not hide the truth forever.

If the alt right has any messages or responses to this, please respond here and I will consult my panel of highly respected professors, PhDs from multiple fields and we will debunk every single one of your arguments.

Have a good day,

-Kraut

Other urls found in this thread:

apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-67-2-130.pdf
theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?226741-Apes-and-monkeys-on-GEDMATCH-)
youtube.com/watch?v=_eCr76-hDWA
youtu.be/MkEqI3_J4xg?t=37
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Fake.
Sage and fuck off.

sage in options if you happened to accidentally click on this thread

>IQ is inherently sociological, not biological.
That was disproven by studying blacks adopted by middleclass white families. When you remove slection bias from the adoption procedures, blacks continue to underperform compared with other American races. The 1970s data didn't factor in nice whitemiddle class families choosing nice black middle class applicants as their adopted kids.
>There is no nuclear subatomic biological evidence.
There are no studies? If energy is forced to maintain a form for so long, who knows what effects that has on it? Maybe that's a model for consciousness itself. Yes, you can also zoom out and claim the Universe is one object changing shape, but that won't inform crime policy in your multicultural neigbourhood, will it?

US Niggers are the way they are because they pushed their low IQ out of society and they ended up competing with low IQ Irish and Scotish on the fringes. If you pay attention, the "cultures" are the same. Scarily so, even. The p[roblem was black americans didn't have a very high IQ to begin with, so the dispossessed became the majority (or near enough). I don't think there's an answer to it other than giving tthem their own cities with tall walls and gibs and letting them get on with drugging themselves.

The OP is clearly a joke you autists

Accept Millennial Woes offer to debate, fgt.

Debate Contrapoints you fascist piece of shit.

>IQ is inherently sociological, not biological.
He, who come with an affirmation is the one who have to come with a demonstration.

So far, statistics and observations show that black in Africa have 20 IQ points less than African in EU and USA and the later have 10 less points than an European living in the same condition.

If you are afraid of white supremacy and nazis, rejoices, Jews and Asian have 5 more points than whites.

feeling the need to bring your salty attitude here after getting rekt makes it even more enjoyable

tits or gtfo