ITT: we create a viable economic system to replace capitalism

ITT: we create a viable economic system to replace capitalism
Key word viable, so commies plz go.
Now, what are your ideas, Sup Forums

There was nothing wrong with feudalism

National Socialism is best, always will be

Third position liberalism.

Democracy works in an ethnically homogeneus society

Society based on the currency of tug jobs, women's breast are tugged on since they don't have penises, tug machines are used to expedite large payments.

Ignore accidental quote.

Beerhunt is best Hunt ever . !!

Its incredibly problem to fix capitalism and without commie bullahit or huge government intervention like natsoc.
The problem with capitalism is that work is seperated from profit and production. Really in our economy only a handful of people really "produce" anything. For instance like 5 people own nearly all of the media. But this is rediculous they probably dont know the first thing about telling a story or fliming sokething and yet capitalism says only they create media. This is the peoblem of private property. It locks actual producers behind a huge paywall and because PP can generate its own profit the people that own it will just get richer and richer and own more and more because us everyday workers have to produce $100 of profit for our boss to make $20 ourselves. The solution is to simply let the worker recieve the full value of his labor. Eliminate the ownership of private property except by those thst actively use it.

Some form of state capitalism, the state hires and trains business experts to run and help create state controlled businesses. People are paid fairly and profits go to the state and are budgeted back to businesses when they need to expand if they are successful.

Or

Democratic industry, every business over x employees becomes a co-operative style business. All employees own a share in the business and there are no external shareholders, this means all employees can vote for the CEO and all get a share of the profits, they may also vote on key changes at any time.

100% with this guy.

There isn't one.
A mixed economy can be "viable" in that it can exist in a stable state. But it will never be as productive.

The state capitalism would give payouts to people with good business ideas, they would be on the board for the businesses and occasionally get bonuses depending on how successful it is, that is if the state decides it is good and pursues the idea.
Its not gommieism since there is still money and property, people who do more important jobs like being a dr get more moneys, just this time there are no super rich trillionaire tycoons, less of a class divide but still a divide.

Except it should be all bussinesses and not just getting a share of the profits, they should recieve the whole value of their labor and their product should be priced only to account for labor value and material costs so to eliminate the destruciveness of capital accumulation. When someone desires capital they can take out a loan at a mutual credit union. Also there is no need for CEOs ownership of bussiness would only exist through the mutual agreements they have in each factory and all decision making could simply be 100% dwmocratic.

But thats stalinism

What is mercantilism for 800 Alex.

>the individuals share the profit

Every road leads to socialism

There is nothing wrong with capitalism the problem is finding a country that is using it in the 21st century

CEOs are good for making decisions for the business and representing it, they are also disposable incase the business fucks up so can take all the blame and be fired by the workers so there is no harm done to the business itself.
Managers/CEOs are needed for the day to day running of the business, I remember a story where some shitty antifa group tried running a business without any manager and they fucked up so badly.
Like in the real world we elect people in trust that they will make the right decisions, that's how CEOs will work, and if we wanted we could vote to remove them if they are bad.

As for profit, it needs to go back into the business for expansion, so only a certain percent agreed by the shareholders (workers) will go back to them for bonuses.
Essentially its a normal business like any other except all employees have a say in the business as shareholders, they all have a real interest in the business making profit as they get some of that as a bonus.

Technically it has always worked its just the politicians have changed the law to allow people who are not a part of the nation or culture to vote, so maybe its just representative democracy that doesn't work?

Anyone else think we should go back to the old Roman idea that the Father/patriarch holds the power of life over death over all of his children and wife?

Capitalism is undisputably the most efficient system, but its not a means to an end of itself and hsould be manipulated for the nation's best interests.

just remembered the latin Pater Familias

>technocracy or syndicalism
Those are literal opposites user.

Capitalism is without a doubt the best system for industrializing nations. However, as we reach a point of mass automation and scarcity in America becomes less of a problem, I worry that the system may start to bring diminishing returns.
I think in the coming decades we will need some type of replacement to ensure a high standard of living for the citizens

I was suggesting 2 different methods, not the same method with 2 different parts.