Are lolbertarians the stupidest people in the world?

...

profits get taxed too graph has multiple levels of retard

If Libertarianism is the dream then Fascism is the dream builder. You can't achieve it without some initial weeding of degeneracy in society

>muh surplus value
Literally doesn't exist. You're only capable of making so much because other people bought the tools for you to do so. If you don't want "muh surplus value" to be taken, then go bang rocks together and see how much your "labor" really creates

There are only two kinds of rightists:

1: The greedy, who benefit from rightwing policies
2: The stupid, who think they will benefit from rightwing policies

>Greedy
>Doesn't want to increasingly take more of your income for things that provably don't work

The rich are the greatest welfare whores of all time.

Image unrelated to statement? I'm happy to see corporate welfare gone (as in actual grants and subsidies rather than the left accusing tax cuts of being 'welfare') but I doubt you're happy to see the welfare state gone.

>right is associated with free markets
>welfare niggers on both sides don't exist in libertarian society

Stupid libertarians amirite?

>its greedy to want to keep your income and its morally upright to want other peoples income for your gay programs

eentresting.

...

shut up commie!
without the owners organisation you wouldn't be able to produce jacke shit , think of how many things you are able to produce by yourself withpout coordination form other people? wou would ave to get the resource even if you bought them which ones to buy? who sells best ratio ? etc. the owner of the facility and company organizes people who without him wouldn't be as efficient as they are in a manor that benefits all
if you tink you would organize them in a more efficient manor etc. do so start a company become a entrepreneur.,

Kek, did you just made this?

Saved

Some cool cunt I'm friends with did.

also saved it

>The builder that built my house is its rightful owner.
Commie logic

saved

libertarianism is only for people that are concerned about morality, so you wouldn't get it, obvi

If you don't like it just make your own business.
Oh that's right, you can't because you're a retard with no real skill or ingenuity. You just take a job that somebody else already set up, use their established resources, brand name, infrastructure etc, and probably still do a shit job of it. And you wonder why they keep some of the money.
When you finally get around to making your own business, just give 100% of your profit to your workers and see how long you last.

>Rightists aren't cronyists
Lying sack of shit.

>Commie trying to push the surplus value meme

>""""""Your"""""" income

>surplus value

does not exist

>conflating natsoc and the right

Yes his income he worked for it. Did you work for it faggot

NOT TO SCALE

If you think that your income is more than surplus value of your labor..... you are a dumbfuck.

Example:
Starbucks barista makes about $12 bucks an hour.
That is about 3 coffee's worth.

How many coffee's does he make in an hour. That's around 150 and up to 250 during a busy hour.

Workers are cucks. Capitalists are the chads fucking your wives.

>workers are the only costs of business

NN shill detected

>work for Cinderella company on commission
>make about 240$ for a 2 hour party
>you think its greedy to want to keep that money and its actually altruistic for you to take 50% of my income for your corrupt politicians to blow on bailing out businesses they have investments in.

>OP has never run a business or been close to someone who runs a business
>OP obviously is a cock sucking NEET leech

Taxation is involuntary.

...

This.
T. Small Construction Corp. Owner

...

You drawing is an example of a shitty businessman. Good businessmen actually make profits by shipping their manufacturing costs overseas.

That's why your clothes are made is sweatshops asshole.

>2.5 coffees a minute
>A coffee is made and sold by each starbucks employee across all locations 24/7, every 25 seconds

At least aim for believability.

In the 1900's, David Grant's Industrial Nondescript Items was created. At first he had three workers. For each item created (which took about an hour), the worker would receive 5$, even though it sold for 25$. So if the company is producing 75$ worth of goods per hour, where did the rest go that the workers only see fifteen?
Well, 25$ was paying off the loans for the expensive machines used to produce the items. Another 10$ was on tax and rent. 5$ went to other assorted costs. The last 10$ of the missing income was David Grant's income. That brings up another question, and that's why are the workers working for David if they can get almost twice as much money working for themselves?
They can't. The banks would not have given them loans to buy the machines or the building, and they would've had to sell the items at a market which pays them only 10$ per item. David Grant, however, had run many successful businesses, so the banks were willing to through some money his way, and he knew an item seller that would pay top-dollar for quality items (which he was making). The workers could work for themselves and make one dollar an hour while their company fails slowly, or they could give much of their income to David Grant in exchange for his knowledge and reputation and end up with more money in the end.

THAT is how the economy works. Specialization is multiplicative, not additive.