What is the true difference between men and women?

What is the true difference between men and women?

Why do men always automatically dominate new things? Bitcoin is a curious example. It's not physical strength. You don't need any strength to get Bitcoin and can't get them through violence. It's not intelligence. You don't need intelligence to get them. They are designed to be accessible from every shithole in the world and are so.
It's not a secret society that gives men the advantage. Bitcoin are anonymous and anyone can get them. They are not handed to you, everyone needs to get them themselves.

So why are 95% of people who have and use Bitcoin male?
It's the ideal currency that isn't controlled by anyone and anyone can get in, yet it's dominated completely by men. Why is that?

Other urls found in this thread:

suitpossum.blogspot.de/2014/01/crypto-patriarchy-problem-of-bitcoins.html?m=1
archive.is/aIoQS
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Pls post link to article

they are called uncurable philistines for a reason

Easy answer is woman are dumb as fuck

First off, how the hell would anyone know who owns how much Bitcoin? Thus, making the claim of ANYONE's ownership or patriarchy, bologna. You can see whose wallet has what, but there's no public disclosure as to who owns what wallet.

We don't actually know the full story yet because neuroscience is in its infancy, and there is probably more to it than just that anyway.

Some theories that likely have some truth to them:
1. Men are more aggressive, prone to risk-taking
2. Men have more variability on things like IQ
3. Men are more oriented towards systems and objects, women towards people

suitpossum.blogspot.de/2014/01/crypto-patriarchy-problem-of-bitcoins.html?m=1

Surveys.

>blogspot

Men are pushed to the fringes of society where the bleeding edge of new ideas is. It's escapism.

Women live in the fold, even if they come out to the fringes because "I want dat, dat man has something I want" they're still not driven by a crippling desire to escape which means they still "disadvantaged"

Sort of. It's also true that a large part of modern feminism is an all out effort to get women to behave like men.

If women are afraid they'll be left out of crypto currency when it becomes big enough to be used just like fiat dollars, then why don't they just get into now while it's still in it's infancy?

>someone gets paid to write this horseshit.
maybe its because men are good at computers and women are good at sucking dick and complaining?

im gonna /thread my own post fuck you

Feminists are just miserable cunts
Thats all.

Women never think of anything new. Not even feminism. Had it been left up to women we'd still be in the jungle---They wouldn't even have bothered upgrading to caves.

I don't agree with her opinions but it's interesting how she gets mad at nobody doing an effort to get women into Bitcoin as there is literally nothing stopping them from getting into it.

My question just is why there even is a NEED to do that. Why do women always need to be convinced to do things (similarly to how women need to be convinced to get into STEM) instead of just doing things

>Why do women always need to be convinced to do things?
Might be because since the dawn of mankind they were followers. They did what ever men instructed them to do in order to survive.

I believe there's a few studies about differences in risk-aversion between males and females, it may help explain this

But it has nothing to do with risk. Even in the early days when Bitcoin was nothing but a toy, it was male dominated. It only later turned out to be so valuable.

We’d be in caves but the carpets and drapes would be lit af.

Everything new is a risk Psychologically

easy answer:
women don't care that much about money, and if they do - they prefer not working for it. They're not that nerdy, most likely most of women haven't even heard of bitcoins, or if they have they would think it isn't that accessible and it's hard to get or to invest. It isn't about intelligence at all, youre right but it's about motivation and knowledge

there's always risk involved with investments, and women tend to shy away from risks like this. they're also not as technically literate in my experience.

Agency

I remember a few years ago some femcunt was bitching about how men are more into music and know esoteric music trivia and obscure genres, bands etc. This was somehow sexist. As if women couldn’t get on YouTube or iTunes or Spotify and spend a few days or weeks or months researching what they like, exploring, trying new things. Women are by nature hopeless cowards. They need to be told what to do and when someone leaves them on their own they whine like children. Absolutely useless holes.

/thread

Women like shopping and buying pretty dresses and shoes and colorful sparkling drinks. Look at the movies and shows they like.

I'll warrant 95% of men dont own bitcoins either, but we're more likely to spend our money on our own versions of dumb shit.

Bitcoin was a pretty dumb thing to spend money on for several years, but men generally take more risks and tend to spend money on things that improve their lives.

women prefer buying things that will incite jealousy in their peers because they are slaves to the opinions of strangers.

Women can't into money

Women are not wired to take part in the expansion of strategies for resource obtainment

Huh

Does anyone actually read this shit

How did you as a male hear about bitcoin in the early days?

It was probably in a thread on Sup Forums or some tech news article or maybe on tor when you tried to buy some drugs or some shit.

Women are less likely to do any of that and therefore come across it later than most men.

And even then they will likely see it as a stupid idea and carry on with their lives. Which I can't say I disagree with desu.

They were too busy bitching about other things that they failed at. This has been a cycle for them over the last several years.
>fail to get something
>complain and ruin it
>everyone moves to something new
>fail to get something new because too busy crying
>move into new thing and ruin that

Never once did it occur to these people to do anything for themseleves. That’s the real danger of the SJW, feminist, socialist, and communist mentality. It teaches losers that they are the same as winners. If you lose at something, it’s someone else’s fault and never your own. So they spend their time bitching and ruining everything until they feel included.

Starting to realize that coiners were right all along and that fearmongering was just intended to stop plebs from boarding the train at 8k

too late now but I don't think it's ever gonna crash

On an evolutionary timescale, when resources were scarce and new plans needed to be hatched based on exploration of new territories etc, do you think men or women were most involved in this?

that women carry children

so for 99.99999999999% of human history men go out hunting and women stay at home looking after the kids

thats it

This was meant for you

They neglect anatomy and biology.

Men take risk, women just want to profit from it while not taking any.

As others have said: risk. Men tend to be early-adopters of new things in particular. Most are clear on this but murky as to why. Imagine a village of about 100 people, this is the group size we're actually adapted to and lived in before the beginning of history. Groups meeting sometimes conflict and warfare is born - add in simple math, there's only, say, 60 women in this group of 100 people and if you kill 30 of them how much does that reduce that group's capacity to reproduce compared to killing 30 males? A human takes 9 months to gestate but 9 minutes to conceive. The reality arising from this: men should fight and women't shouldn't is so old and so true it's built into our neurology anyway.

All that cave man rape shit is propaganda cartoony shit, early man was likely an egalitarian fisherman moreso than anything. The social behaviors of chimpanzees are more gentle and complex than what feminist harpies wrongly accuse early man of.

Nailed it, tpbp

Women do not CARE.
Men have done pretty much everything wrt. bitcoin - financed it, mined it, used it, told others about it, sold it, bought it, programmed the sysem(?).

And still to this day the risk are enormous wrt. what it really is and its value.

But it has a value, and NOW women want in.
well fuck that.

what's the cheapest and fastest way to buy bitcoin?

> imagine a scenario ten years from now

Isn' t bitcoin already a top 10 global currency, ahead of the S Korean Won and S African Rand? Tell me if I'm wrong...

archive.is/aIoQS

No food for the matriarchy tonight

Oh this article was from 2014

>implying
It's beyond obvious for anyone with the most lightest of common sensibilities to understand that the early human (see male: as females are largely reactants of our being, save for individuals or characteristics) was a simple, free creature that did not harbor emotional negativity or see the world through anything but it's rose-tinted goggles. Any bias of pain they introduce into the world with their perceptions is only bias' of pain, something women are much more open, but also ignorant too.

Bitcoin is going to supplant Gold. When that happens Bitcoin will be worth ~$500k. That's just the beginning.

This is now a crypto thread

>dear readers please insert yourself into this carefully crafted imaginary scenario I have designed for your horror because it contains words that will trigger you
>now go ahead and imagine yourself one more fucking layer deeper into the fiction and hold on to your feels

Liberal journalism is like the movie Inception, but less fun.

yeah actually, I don't think humans in Dunbar's number sized groups actually have existential problems, especially not the ones we're dealing with caused by a sudden loss of social capital. I mean if Sup Forums itself has a raison d'être it's effectively group contemplation of the fact we should all have something better to do than rot on our computers.

bampu

Women like testing men to find out how much shit they can get away with. What you are seeing here is a modern progressive woman, who has learned, through years of unresponsible public discourse, that she can get away with holding retarded beliefs. And so she does.

the fact that crypto currency is dominated by men illustrates just how stupid women are when it comes to money and investing.
testosterone allows for more risk taking behavior whereas estrogen eliminates risky behaviors.
its science niggers

>all the people not in Crypto right now are Nu-Male cucks

It checks out

>1. Men are more aggressive, prone to risk-taking
>2. Men have more variability on things like IQ
>3. Men are more oriented towards systems and objects, women towards people

These 3 points should be stickied at the top of every Sup Forums thread and Youtube comments section, it would save a lot of wasted time.

Yep

this. women will more often than not end up being like infp or enfp where as men will more often end up istj or istp. Its why most women will go out of their way to get into jobs that have them at a pay disadvantage just so they can help/interact with people more. That is what they like doing

Seriously. I have been on Sup Forums for years, reading these kind of articles and it still shocks me how retarded people really are.
This is not the only article either about leftists saying that bitcoin is dominated by males btw.

It's just a matter of time before they tell us to stop investing and give females your current knowledge about a crypto so they can get an upperhand just to keep it diverse.
Absolutely fucking retarded.

/thread

you sexis waiciss! I've reported you to twatter police

women dont do shit. At most they fool themselves into thinking they would be happier working and train to do a job(poorly).

How many of you guys actually have Bitcoin?

Astronomy & physics IQ has gotta be 100% bullshit lmao. This whole chart is prob bs

ME, cuz I bought a couple while it was cheap a year ago

Then:
>Hey user, are you really wasting your time on those stupid comics? Haha you'll be a virgin forever!
Now:
>Why is the comic community so sexist? It's all men! Women can enjoy comics too!

Then:
>Hey user, are you really playing games? Such a nerd!
Now:
>Women can be nerds too! DOWN WITH THE PATRIARCHY!

Then:
>Hey user are you really wasting time with that stupid fake money thing? NERD!
Now:
>SEXISM!!!!!!! Why do men have all the bitcoins!!!!!!!!

Started in 2013

Then:
>Haha look at those sweaty losers learning nerd programming and stuff. I bet they don't ever leave their basements!
Now:
>Why isn't there enough women in STEM? Is it sexism?

Have you guys seen the pattern yet?