The slippery slope argument is not a fallacy

The slippery slope argument is not a fallacy.
It has been proven true time and time and time again.

pic related

That's why transgenderism can never be acceptable. That's like their in to all this other shit

TBF there have always been crazy stories in papers like OPs pic

>mfw

>The slippery slope argument is not a fallacy.
It is.
It's not slippery.
You're voluntarily marching down the fucking hill.
All you had to do was to step on the brakes but you didn't.
No, you voted for trudeau, you voted for immigration, you voted for terrorism.
This is what you voted for.
This is what you wanted.
This is what you got.

I didn't vote in Canada.
I'm actually an American.

Bump

>BARKED

Anyone got a video of this chick using a tree as a dildo and/or hump post?

Anyone who claims fallacy is fucking retarded. It follows the concept of desensitizing. The bottom of the staircase doesn't seem all so dark when you are only one step above it.
It's the reason why so such strange porn exists.

>In love with a tree
It's this guy isn't it?

>Best sex I've ever had

HOW CAN ANIMALIA COMPETE??

Can you point out one thing that's wrong with this without resorting to logical fallacies? How does it affect YOU?

What's right about it tho?

>you voted for trudeau, you voted for immigration, you voted for terrorism.
Trudeau won with under 40% of the popular vote. It's not even a voting district thing, it was vote-splitting. The NDP has strong blue-collar appeal because of its ties with the unions, and it was promising immigration reductions and fiscal conservatism, the same basic platform as the Conservative Party.

Anyway, the CBC and education system are both heavily biased toward the left. That's the slippery slope. If you compromise with evil, it gains strength to exert further pressure to make you compromise further.

>the CBC and education system are both heavily biased toward the left
...not to mention the courts, the bureaucracy, and things like "human rights tribunals".

It is fallacious to say that thing A happening will definitely lead to thing B happening. It is not fallacious to say that thing A happening is a prerequisite to thing B happening.

Just because someone lays some foundations does not mean they'll definitely build a house, but for them to build a house they must first build foundations.

She's not hurting anyone in any way. She has every right to do this.

the absolute state of desiduous forestry. Cucked by a conifer. Sad!

The reason the left doesn't think the slippery slope exists is because to them its a slide.

How come when she fucks a tree it is progressive and great, but when I do it people think I am a horny crackhead.

It is a very real phenomenon yet libshits love to deny it and treat it as a fallacy to push their degeneracy. We're at the point pedophilia is being shilled.

Let me guess, you also think there's nothing wrong with suicide or lesbianism. Behavior that causes people to not produce the next generation is an existential threat to society. Society has made an investment in raising and protecting this woman and seeing that she has the opportunity to make a living, and it will come to nothing because she decided she'd rather fuck a tree. That's a loss.

That which is necessary for the survival of society beyond a single generation is the basis of morality. We must stop Women Going The Oak Way.

She is literally suicidal. Just in denial. If you are in anyway against procreation you are suicidal. Fucking a tree is pretty anti procreation. Suicidal and anti life ideals hurt civilization, it doesn't have to hurt or affect me personally for it to hurt or affect social fabric. Despite what you post modern faggots like to think, norms exist for a reason.

>If you are in anyway against procreation you are suicidal.
Really? How does me being childless cause my untimely death?

Then you can produce 10 children if you care so much about the future you won't be a part of and problem solved.

Every living creation (well lets say 99.99999%) shares one thing in common. A desire to reproduce. By all scientifically measurable means, this is the purpose of life. If you are against procreation you are against life. Plain and simple. To be against life is to be suicidal.

>childless
That being said childless isn't the issue, a mindset that is either anti children or not compatible with procreation is.

Logic of Equality and Logic of Identity with 1 Exception is all you need to have everything snowball out of control.

(1) X == X, Y==Y,
[Self Evident ontological Identity]

(1.5) X == Y
[Forced Logic of Equality]

(3)Therefore X != X and Y != Y

Fig 1 Here you see the definition in the existence of the object you're looking at that gives it, its defining qualities thus self purporting its existence with various characteristics and traits that are either visual and or verbal.

Fig 1.5 X and Y become baseless in definition and through that baseless definition by taking away self evident identity (Objective). They're allowed to legalize and strip any remaining discriminatory and or defining characteristics that separate them (Subjective). This is basic political social engineering from a Marxist handbook. Its operating on a system of aggressive political homogeneity.

Fig 3 Because of the equation of identity, characteristics are nullified from consideration because of the original implication based upon no evidence that contradicts the earlier self evident ontological statement. Because of this, other groups excluded from the system of equality can enter by using the same logical structure and argument as the party that had just entered by asserting its equality by subjective will instead of a causation-ed self evident proportion of existence.

Only when you equate Objects that have no linking basis for equally existing naturally outside of any statement that implicates that they are equal (Subjective), unless they are completely the same and the statement would be rendered redundant(Self Evident Objective).

I care about MY life. And you should care about yours. Future is a meme, because some day we're all going to die any way.

Well said my good man.

>I care about MY life.
Well, I don't care about yours now.

>Future is a meme, because some day we're all going to die any way.
I care about what happens beyond the end of my life. Humanity can be eternal. This is thousands, millions, billions of generations on uncountable worlds to think about. That's far more important than my own life, or the happiness of everyone alive today and for several or even many generations. We are one link in a very long chain, and no more important than the ones that came before or will come after, but if this link is broken, the chain is broken and all the later links are lost.

If you selfishly only care about your own life, and would sacrifice none of it for posterity, then you're a force of evil. I would wipe out a billion like you to keep the chain from being broken.

TRUNKED

>I care about what happens beyond the end of my life. Humanity can be eternal.
Universe is not eternal. It's literally science, you moron. Self-sacrifice is a crime to your own self.

you are a few steps late but it is the new push
biracial relationships was the first step
my grandmother would never have dated a black but many in moms generation did(not her she racist as hell)

>Universe is not eternal. It's literally science
No, predicting the distant future is guessing. Science-informed guessing is still guessing. Nobody knows if the universe will end.

However, even if it's not eternal, we have no reason to expect less than billions of years in which humanity can survive, and the potential for millions of generations on billions of worlds, many trillions more human lives than those that are currently being lived.

Even if the ultimate fate of the universe is to end, your life holds no value worth noticing when weighed against trillions of future lives. Whether your life holds net positive or negative value today depends on whether you are contributing to or impeding posterity.

You people who talk about "being on the right side of history" are whistling past the graveyard about being on the wrong side of posterity.

>branched out

no pics of her seedlings?