The CDC just got a list of "forbidden words" to use in their documentations. The words include "vulnerable," "entitlement," "diversity," "transgender," "fetus," "evidence-based" and "science-based." This is NOT ok.
>CDC gets list of forbidden words, including: fetus, transgender, diversity
>The Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation's top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases -- including "fetus" and "transgender" -- in any official documents being prepared for next year's budget.
>Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden words are "vulnerable," "entitlement," "diversity," "transgender," "fetus," "evidence-based" and "science-based."
>In some instances, the analysts were given alternative phrases. Instead of "science-based" or "evidence-based," the suggested phrase is "CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes," the person said. In other cases, no replacement words were immediately offered.
They just exhibited some of the atlantoaxial instability that is usually associated with the trisomie 21 genetic imbalance!
Xavier Jackson
Source on thee qt?
Jordan Wright
>trump officials so triggered they ban words
Ryder Peterson
Still better than enforcing them
Aaron Rodriguez
who fucking cares go talk about it on leddit why are there so many threads about this crap
Cooper Rivera
"political correctness" is a lie
all of it,all the words,all the texts,all the video propaganda ... all it supporters irrelevant & useless
therefore burning it all down would not create a single loss on any kind,it would actually unburden the body,the mind & society
when something is worthless,nobody will cry for it
Leo Morgan
Fuck you drumpftards for doing this, you fucking rural retards
Joseph Stewart
it seems like they're trying to cut down buzzwords and actually have the CDC explain what they mean
also >WaPoo
Adrian Nguyen
The best!
Carson Russell
>"evidence-based" and "science-based."
The reason for this is because people are submitting bullshit papers that don't link any references. It's the same when the news uses 'a source close to the president.'
Luis Miller
>it seems like they're trying to cut down buzzwords and actually have the CDC explain what they mean Fetus is not a buzzword and it is on the ban list.
Zika virus is one of the major diseases that the CDC is studying and it's biggest risk comes to fetal development. The whole "mosquitos and pregnant women" scare these past 18 months is because of this virus. Now the CDC has to tip down around this dangerous fetus virtus because "fetus" as a word just got banned.
To make it clear trump was not invovled in this: Trump was pro-choice right up until he became a presidential candidate. He supported transgender rights even during his presidential campaign. These are things that put at him odds with his more conservataive faith based colleagues. Trump would not be triggered by any of these words and "banning words" was never a part of his campaign promises.
While it didn't come from Trump himself, someone higher up, maybe someone he appointed, has made a fuckhuge mistake. There will be a massive shitstorm about this come Monday. That person is going to be forced to resign in the coming weeks.
Justin Lee
You mad? I thought you liked banning words
Jaxon Cruz
>Stanhope is the epitome of verbal, Sup Forums tier shit posting. My Nigga
Blake Long
Ha ha. But the CDC got some words as replacements: Was=>Is now vulnerable=>ambivalent entitlement=>theft diversity=> antiwhite transgender=>queerpathic fetus=>preborn evidence-based=>jew science science-based=>jew science
William Ward
>science-based can't have any of that in the center for disease control!
Jacob Baker
Those words are used to apply preferential treatment to one group over another Transgender used in place of mentally ill Fetus is used in place of unborn child -based is used to feign supporting data without specifically referring to any Banning the words (tools) themselves is easier than addressing all the ways they'd be employed individually There you go; I hope the list makes more sense to you now
Jose Mitchell
What’s the difference between fetus and unborn child?
David Adams
Many people don't consider a fetus as a human being, abortion uses this as base against the "you're killing someone" argument.
Levi Walker
Once again, what’s the difference? They have the exact same definition in a dictionary.
Jordan Taylor
Even if transgender people are mentally ill, surely it's a specific mental illness that sometimes needs to be distinguished from other ones?
Easton Turner
Same definition but unborn children implies humanity.
Leo Richardson
>you are inferior to me for not living in a large city >this somehow magically means you are less educated than me too!
wew lad, that's not very progressive of you is it?
what if I was a goat herder from deep afghanistan? did you just hurl a racist slur towards me you bigot??
Tyler Young
forbidden words in a budget proposal.
explain to me why these words benefit anything in a budget proposal?
Ethan Perry
enjoy dying alone in a city full of millions
Logan Watson
Genuinely amazed the thread is an on-topic discussion instead of debate over the most redpilled fetish featured in OPs pic.
Tyler Cooper
“Implies humanity” is justification for banning an equivalent word? Why?
Samuel Gomez
Faggot bureaucrats BTFO, more cancer grant money for me
Joshua Clark
you mean like body dysmorphic disorder?
Bentley Gomez
We should rule our own lands Our enemies should be destroyed Our heros are dead and our enemies are ruling over us. No one will save us but ourselves
Okay Shadow the Edgehog. But while you're here, you may be able to help me. Ages ago, during the Trump campaign, I saw a video someone made which was a speech about hyenas taunting a lion, set over footage of muslim happenings in Europe, been looking for it ever since, do you think you could find it?
William Williams
Basically if humanity is implied upon a fetus it gets closer to be considered murder, but not really since it's on a budget plan paper.
Aiden Fisher
>Now the CDC has to tip down around this dangerous fetus virtus It's the opposite. Now they have to use the expression "unborn child", which is quite a bit stronger. >While it didn't come from Trump himself, someone higher up, maybe someone he appointed, has made a fuckhuge mistake. There will be a massive shitstorm about this come Monday. That person is going to be forced to resign in the coming weeks. Pfffffft. Nothing is going to happen you fucking retard.
Gavin Gonzalez
No it's a fetish in which women are subservient to men, retard. If you're insecure in your sexual preferences its fine, but don't go around mislabelling others to make yourself feel better.
Jeremiah Russell
>what if I was a goat herder from deep afghanistan
The most bizarre part of liberalism: love rural retards who have nothing in common with you and who are 10,000 miles away; hate the ones with the same language and most of the same culture and who live 50 miles away.
Perhaps it's racism. That Afghan is brown so he has an excuse for not living up to urban ubermensch standards, rural whites have none.
Aiden Stewart
Fuck off shill
Jacob Sanders
Look up linguistic relativity. Language frames thought, Nietzsche knew this and the kikes definitely know this. Somebody post the beaver post on this topic. There are associations and implications to words that we sometimes aren't aware of.
"Of course 9/11 wasn't an inside job, because that's a conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorists are crazy!"
Somebody post the beaver pic, it's 1984 shit bro
Jonathan Hernandez
Oh I see, it's just about dominance, totally unrelated that you decide to express your dominance by having women shit their pants
Nathan Baker
If you've ever had a child or a pet you've cleaned up shit, it doesn't mean you're sexually attracted to shit.
Levi Cook
>Now they have to use the expression "unborn child", which is quite a bit stronger. "Unborn child" covers all stages and is not scientific nor specific enough.
Fetus specifically refers to a stage. >Zygote >Embryo (itself made up of multiple stages) >Fetus (after ~8 weeks)
You cannot start banning the science and terminology here because "muh feelins". A fetus is a fetus. An embro is an embryo.
James Smith
I've had pets but I didn't own pets to fuck them or because I got off on it.
Charles Bennett
Notice how "embryo" and "zygote" aren't banned? Fuck off leaf
Anthony Hernandez
nigger
Carson Thomas
Orwell's Ministry of Truth
Grayson Martin
>Notice how "embryo" and "zygote" aren't banned? Fuck off leaf That is because christian science isn't advanced enough and they have not heard of them yet. They only know the fetal stage "because that is a word invented by feminists who hate babies".
Also I thought it was the left who appealed to emotion and banned words and ideas that upset them? Why is the far right suddenly triggered as if they were a purple haired 14 year old girl on tumblr?
Aaron Nelson
>"Unborn child" covers all stages and is not scientific nor specific enough. Usage defines diction. The CDC can use it in place of fetus, and still use zygote and embryo as appropriate. Besides, the ban is just for budget documents. And the point, as you know but are pretending otherwise, is to prohibit the CDC from trying to get funding for abortions, gender transition, and global warming, none of which are their responsibility.
Camden Ramirez
It's used to keep the pawns happy and content so they stand under their rule
Nicholas Davis
>Also I thought it was the left who appealed to emotion and banned words and ideas that upset them? You fucking retard, it's not about banning words that upset people, it's about prohibiting the CDC from including discussion about things that are not a part of their department in their budget write up
Jose Martin
I really really hope someone is paying you to do this because if not your life is even sadder than I thought.
Blake Brown
Someone's getting angry. You're telling me that the Center for Disease Control shouldn't be allowed to use the word vulnerable because it's outside of their jurisdiction? It's a ridiculous argument. They're literally responsible for controlling/minimizing vulnerability to diseases amongst the populace.
Don't even get me started on the ban on "evidence-based" and "science-based". You're all starting to sound exactly like the radical feminists who say that evidence is a tool of white male oppression.
"Usage defines diction" -- so they should just use a different word you like better in its place. This is fucking hilarious. The tumblrinas would say that you have no need for offensive, outdated terms because "usage defines diction." Let's ban the word "nigger" -- after all, there's no use for it! You can just use "black" with an angry tone.
Of course the purpose is to prohibit the CDC from doing things that the right doesn't like. That's obvious. Just like the tumblrinas try to suppress use of certain terms in order to prohibit people/organizations from doing things the left doesn't like.
Angel Baker
>Diaper >Redpill Is this the power of anglo degeneracy?
Hunter Flores
>it's about prohibiting the CDC from including discussion about things that are not a part of their department in their budget write up
The CDC was mandated 4 decades ago to keep score on abortions. Age of mother, age of fetus, and if there were complications from the abortion procedure. This was fine through Nixon, Reagan, and two Bushes. Why is it an issue now to suddenly strike the word "fetus" from their reports? Why appeal to emotion now of all times?
Protip: the CDC sees abortions as a public health crisis. They track it the same way they track lung cancer and sudden infant death syndrome. They are not on the side of planned parenthood, or anyone's side.
Isaac Cooper
Search for "the lion Christopher walken" that is the speech. Don't know what movie.
Brayden Perez
>Someone's getting angry. I am, you're a fucking idiot and it makes me mad. >You're telling me that the Center for Disease Control shouldn't be allowed to use the word vulnerable because it's outside of their jurisdiction? Yes. >They're literally responsible for controlling/minimizing vulnerability to diseases amongst the populace. No they're not. They're responsible for containing and curing disease. "Minimizing vulnerability", what the fuck does that even mean? Nothing, which is the point. >Don't even get me started on the ban on "evidence-based" and "science-based". I'm a scientist. First author published twice, co-author published a half dozen times, written and edited many grants. Never once have I written or SEEN written "evidence based" or "science based" in any academic paper or publication. You don't say something is "evidence based", you present the god damned evidence. Or, if you don't have evidence, you explain what you don't know and why it's important enough that you should get money to figure it out. There is no context appropriate in a formal document issued by a scientific body for the use of "evidence based" or "science based", because that's the assumed behavior of everything the CDC does, and if it's not, that's a fucking problem. No, these phrases are used exclusively to imply that dissent is NOT evidence based or NOT science. >"Usage defines diction" -- so they should just use a different word you like better in its place. This is fucking hilarious. That's what the left has done for years. For example, turning hate of gays into "homophobia". Alinsky's fourth rule, faggot. >Let's ban the word "nigger" -- after all, there's no use for it! You can just use "black" with an angry tone. The CDC cannot use the word "nigger" >Of course the purpose is to prohibit the CDC from doing things that the right doesn't like. Yeah, IE, things that aren't its FUCKING JOB.
Jose Hill
>thinks science-based is actually a good argument
Adrian Rodriguez
The CDC is an organization, not a person, and it has changed dramatically in the last decade
Nicholas Hill
>I'm a scientist. First author published twice Is this "Science" book you wrote one where young children ride on the backs of baby triceratops? Creation science always makes me smile. Do you have a blog I can read?
James Nguyen
>forbidden words >"evidence-based" and "science-based"
Grayson Wright
I study acinar to ductal metaplasia.
Camden Rogers
In actual scientific writing you would never use such an expression, you simply present your evidence.
Christopher Baker
>Never once have I written or SEEN written "evidence based" or "science based" in any academic paper or publication You cannot be serious.
Cooper Torres
Like you've ever read a scientific paper in your life and are not just copying that pathetic excuse from another post you read on here.
Aaron Harris
>not knowing it’s their freedumbs to ban whatever words they want.
Samuel Scott
like its not true
Matthew Gray
Because there is an army of shills and dumb fucking retards who will just post and repost threads about whatever the top CNN and WaPo headlines are at the time.
Kayden Wood
god who invented this baby diaper fetish? This is one of the most disturbing and disgusting things ever
Carter Peterson
All of you idiots are missing the point.
It isn't that the CDC can never say "fetus" in anythimg ever again. These words are only prohibited in BUDGET REQUESTS.
So what they're not allowed to do is go "we need $10 billion to increase transgender diversity in our staff, we need $10 bil to conduct science-based [xyz]" etc etc. Good or bad love it or hate it this has nothing to do with writing papers and everything to do with money.
Jack Fisher
Congrats on proving my point by posting a meme powerpoint slide, dumbass.
Josiah Flores
Right there with you bro, though my situation is a bit different I'm the dom outside, I'm the bread winner, but my mommy is the dom when I'm home
Zachary Hall
So you claim to be a cancer researcher, presumably, and you have never heard of EBM and believe it is a meme?
Jace Thomas
Most of these are political shibboleths. All he's doing is making it clear to the brains-in-jars that if they want to manipulate the current political climate in order to get grants they will have to couch their petitions in a different language, i.e. not that of the American left, to which they've all become accustomed. If they can't adapt, they should die.
>science based
Scientific
>evidence based
Empirical. Good thing these nebulous phrases were banned. 'Meat-based' and 'meat' can mean very different things.
Elijah Adams
Bingo.
Asher Bennett
What's a meme is talking about it like it's some novel concept. It's not. It's basic fucking common sense to include clinical data and expertise into research. It's been done since before you or I were born.
Leo Jackson
I guess you’re righ, good point.
Evan Foster
I believe you and agree with the part about "evidence based" or "science based" But why would you not be able to say the word "fetus" or "Transgender"? Is this just a political thing or is there actually a reason why you wouldn't use those words?
Hudson Bailey
But there are literally thousands of EMB white papers published every year, with the words "evidence based medicine" as a part of the title. "scientific based" comes up almost as often in medical journals and research publications.
This is what I am confused about. How are people unfamiliar with it as a legit medical research and clinical term? And why must the word be banned?
Lincoln Powell
Better example here from the CDC itself. Count how many times the word "Evidence based" comes up:
>user has never heard of mouse upopia and doesn't realize he's the beautiful useless one riht before the collapse. user I-
Dylan Wood
The list of banned words came up in a budget meeting. They were not "banned from the budget" as that makes no sense whatsoever.
Asher Butler
>EBM-based >Evidence based medicine based
This alone is justification for changing the term.
>How are people unfamiliar with it as a legit medical research and clinical term?
If you mean as a technical term, its not. 'Evidence-based' isn't a word, either, its a superfluous term. It shouldn't be used because its ambiguous and informal. There must be a more precise word that can be used, 'evidence based' is a clumsy conjunctive which doesn't say much. Besides, you're arguing as though every time someone uses the phrase 'evidence based' they are referring to evidence based medicine.
Kevin Reyes
>CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes
What is wrong with this? People are emotional creatures, not robots. People don't want to live in a society dictated purely by science, they wantt to live in a society dictated by themselves based on their value systems. Hence the word society i.e. social, not technical. Technocracy is fucking retarded. You think it's good OP?? Example: (((science))) pushes the lie of "the human race" i.e. race is a social construct, we are all just humans. So if we allowed science to dictate everything for us, we would be doomed to living in a fucking mongrel infested melting pot forever.
Nolan Smith
Fuckin' Stanhope
Adrian Richardson
Those are just the words banned in the CDC budget request, it has nothing to do with scientific papers.
It just means they can ambiguously word things like we need a billion dollars for science-based research into trangender fetuses because of diversity"
Jayden Ramirez
I'm just saying thjat EBM is a common term in medical papers, as is the phrase "scientific evidence". As you see in the other post from the CDC's own website they use the phrase "evidence based" a lot.
>Besides, you're arguing as though every time someone uses the phrase 'evidence based' they are referring to evidence based medicine. They won't even be allowed to say the EB part of EBM, that is the fucking point here. This is why censoring specific words and phrases is a terrible idea.
Evan Reed
There are a hundred thousand garbage papers every year that nobody reads or cites. The paper you've posted is a metastudy of a set of national guide lines which provides no new information or even any new meaningful context of existing information.
Colton Myers
>They won't even be allowed to say the EB part of EBM, that is the fucking point here. Good! It doesn't mean anything! It's just filler nonsense.
Luis Sullivan
>haha fucking libtards and feminazis are scared of words and want to censor everything >i-i-it's o-ok when T-Trump does it!
Elijah Brown
>The government shouldn't set standards for itself so it doesn't devolve into some SJW's blog
Here's the current CDC budget that uses the term evidence based.
Noah Perry
Trump is more based than I thought
Lincoln Lopez
Cool, now those faggots have to stop using liberal buzzwords and speak like real scientists
Nathan Davis
>I like fucking women who dress and behave like infants >It's totally normal though, the attraction is based on dominance and has nothing to do with women acting like young children that are pissing and shitting themselves. Possibly one of the most disgusting fetishes imo. Just the thought of smelling the piss diapers makes me want to puke.
Sharia law for Britain doesn't sound so bad after-all.
Henry Baker
And the Reich-wing think that the protagonists of 1984 and new speak comes from liberals.
I’m just fake news though
Lucas Allen
>Looks at flag Nevermind.
Chase Edwards
Fag Kekistanis don't even care it's an actual god
James Rivera
>Cool, now those faggots have to stop using liberal buzzwords and speak like real scientists
I don't want to spoonfeed you with wiki, but let me get out the mushy carrots and a tiny spoon for you since you firmly believe the term is made up by college feminists:
