Nasa Surface Temperature Analysis

Every single month this year has been cooler than the previous year.

Not a fucking word from the global warming alarmists.

Bill Nye The Kike Guy on suicide watch.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=L6kndSJiu8c&t=18s
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
space.com/33001-mars-ice-age-ending-now.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>and warmer than every single one since 1880
don't forget to sage

Big if true.

>temp is going down but goyim its still currently higher, be scared!

its almost as if we are coming out of an ice age...

It’s was the hottest November and December on record in my state

Now do on the other planets. Come on, I'm waiting.

You have to understand how these kinds of scientists work. The whole thing is about finding a way to explain the datapoints after they get them.

So when they get datapoints that don't fit the going narrative, they have to wait for more datapoints that will confirm the narrative. Otherwise they have to come up with a new narrative that explains why the previous one was right, but not quite as right as the new one.

its proof of global warming

Global warming is like a hip way of explaining pollution to retards and old diseased slaves who cant smell it. I cant even stay in a city the whole day without getting an extreme headache

It’s almost like solar output is variable between years.

I used to try to have serious discussions in threads like this but I’ve realized that every person who doesn’t believe in anthropogenic climate change is just an idiot.

I hope your kids have cancer.

Luckily for them you said solar output is down so that's not very likely is it science man

>global warming
>american education

nobody with a clue has called it global warming for more than a decade precisely because of retards like you, its CLIMATE CHANGE

Nah, we're sticking with AGW. NPR slipped up and said so the other month.

It's either that or we go back to calling it global cooling. No word games.

>not realizing that (((modelled))) data is all bullshit
...sigh...

> One year out of a century-long series prove my point against jew warming!!1 I'm a scientist!
American education is not a meme.

>Global temperature is down slightly this year
>I say the root cause is probably because solar output is down

>Some retard says solar output is down
>Thinks that disproves what I said for some reason

If you have any children, or siblings with children, please go murder them.

look up potholer54 on youtube, he destroys all of you faggots on this issue

...

And last year was the hottest. Averages my dude.

Well aren't you just a superior faggot. You must be rilly, rilly smart, mister.

>admits that solar output is still the main driver of temperatures
>doesn't realize we're about to enter the maunder minimum, and thus a mini ice age
>calls the rest of us uneducated.

Op is massive faggot and good goy for even considering Bill Nye any kind of scientist.

Hard to tell is this is a troll as the image you posted shows about a 2 degree rise in temps since 1880.

>>nobody with a clue has called it global warming for more than a decade precisely because of retards like you, its CLIMATE CHANGE

we have crossed tipping points which can not be reversed. It is best to call it abrupt climate change as things are starting to go exponential.

youtube.com/watch?v=L6kndSJiu8c&t=18s

Once the arctic sea ice goes and all the methane hydrates that are frozen under the shallow arctic sea are thawed we are going to be experiencing very quick warming warming

Significant shifts in solar variability take centuries to happen. You can also find measurements like pic related that show recent solar trends. Recent warming is clearly not driven by solar changes.

What really baffles me is you could have found this out yourself, but you chose not to. Did you just pull the idea of "oh it's all the sun" out of your ass, and not bother to do any research into it?

What makes 1880 so special?

This is where scientist put the "baseline" to study warming due to the industrial revolution aka hydrocarbon burning, Really should go back to at least 1748 or even really when coal was first commercial minded.

I remember back in the 70's they were pushing the incoming ice age...I was just a kid and it freaked me the fuckout...then look at what happened...

record accuracy?

around 20 % of scientist believed that we were going into a cooling period while around 80% thought we were going into a warming period.

But somehow the politician Jews, the media Jews, and the social engineering Jews decided to go with global cooling hysteria instead of science.

Maybe not the smartest move.

Any charts on the Earth's and Sol's magnetic fields? Or do climate scientists not care about the protective fields that negate charged particles from bombarding our planet?

Maybe the Goys should turn the fucking tv off and think a little for themselves, do some research.

haven't you heard, goy? it's climate change™ now.

>Live in desert lands and southwestern states
>WTF ITS HOT?!

Meanwhile in glorious Alabama, it snowed the other day, and I can't even leave my house without a jacket past 5:00.

Problem is not everybody has the time or domain expertise to research everything. I can spend an afternoon reviewing the literature and chasing citations like it's nothing because I do that in the course of my day job anyway. But a lot of people would be flummoxed by an instruction manual for setting the clock on their VCR.

Ergo, blame must be assigned to the media.

This

Do you mental midgets ever think for your fucking selves? What would be the point of Jews wanting to promote anthropocentric climate change? The only way to stop run away warming at this point if we even can would be essential to reduce our carbon use to pretty much zero. What would Jews benefit from reduce consumption and buying of products from companies that they own a large amount off?
Any efforts to deal with climate change will severally hurt the status quo that they benefit from.
No shit they see us as Goys, you two are fucking retarded lacking any ability of critical thinking.

Check out the movie, "The Smartest Guys in the Room." It's about Enron, artificial scarcity, and financial derivatives.

Now consider how Al Gore, Maurice Strong, and Ken Ley came up with carbon trading at the 1992 UN summit in Rio, building on previous work like Limits on the Growth from the Club of Rome and really John Malthus as well. It's a control mechanism.

Now fast forward to Romneycare/Hillarycare/Obamacare and the role of the carbon footprint in placing a value on your life to determine what kind of healthcare you will receive. They'll use your water footprint as well, btw.

And pay attention to what's coming out of China in terms of a social good goy score to determine whether you get a job and everything else like that.

Of course with technology would could abate atmospheric CO2, but that's never the solution. Hegelian Dialectic in in operation here, causing a problem to provoke a reaction toward accepting a pre-conceived solution.

Good goy, thinking is to hard so I am going to let the Jews do it for me. I need to work all day so I can buy all the shit Jews want to sell me, no time for thinking.

I have a hard time understanding all of the in's and out of Climate change, and hope what i have learned is wrong, cuz we are fucked, and this shit is already hitting the fan if your head is pulled out of your ass.

It is really not that hard with a little agency to get on you tube or do a internet search to see the vast amounts of data that are planet is in trouble.

You are right though no one wants to take the, the time to learn anything. this is why we will be sold disinfo on climate change were people try and profit from "solutions" that are not going to do a thing, mainly green energy which is just a product of all the fossil fuel industries all over the world.

I don't at all deny that people are going to try and profit from this, but that is a straw man argument as to the actual state of the planet.

What is wrong with the limits to growth or the club of Rome, I know there are a lot of Jew involved but what is your point?

We live on a finite planet of course at some point we are going to be running into limits about how much we can grow. And that leads to the problem of modern industrial society. We have a model that demands infinite growth on a finite planet.

I don't think there is much we can do at this point, we are really fucked, those that propose "solutions: are snake oil salesmen who are trying to profit from this. Does not change the reality on the ground, air and sea,

Carbon capture is total bs btw.

>CIA shill detected

>I don't at all deny that people are going to try and profit from this, but that is a straw man argument as to the actual state of the planet.
>What is wrong with the limits to growth or the club of Rome, I know there are a lot of Jew involved but what is your point?
>We live on a finite planet of course at some point we are going to be running into limits about how much we can grow. And that leads to the problem of modern industrial society. We have a model that demands infinite growth on a finite planet.
>I don't think there is much we can do at this point, we are really fucked, those that propose "solutions: are snake oil salesmen who are trying to profit from this. Does not change the reality on the ground, air and sea,
>Carbon capture is total bs btw.

It's funny when people use such word as "believe" when talking about science.

sorry for all the dup post,

>>I don't at all deny that people are going to try and profit from this, but that is a straw man argument as to the actual state of the planet.
>>What is wrong with the limits to growth or the club of Rome, I know there are a lot of Jew involved but what is your point?
>>We live on a finite planet of course at some point we are going to be running into limits about how much we can grow. And that leads to the problem of modern industrial society. We have a model that demands infinite growth on a finite planet.
>>I don't think there is much we can do at this point, we are really fucked, those that propose "solutions: are snake oil salesmen who are trying to profit from this. Does not change the reality on the ground, air and sea,
>>Carbon capture is total bs btw.

>temperature goes down for a single year
>ICE AGE BY 2020
Yeah, no.

The effect of cloud sending by cosmic rays has largely been debunked, and charged particles never had a measurable effect on the climate, except perhaps electrical potential differentials throughout the atmosphere.

I don't like cities either, but you sound weak.

Manipulation of the magnetosphere controls atmospheric water. What's the biggest greenhouse gas and how much does the weather affect the weather?

That was like a kid trying to make a coherent "science-sounding" sentence.

>Manipulation of the magnetosphere controls atmospheric water.
Lol, no.

>What's the biggest greenhouse gas?
>biggest
What? The most powerful you mean?
From memory, sulfur hexafluoride is the most powerful one I know of.

>how much does the weather affect the weather?
>how much does the weather affect the weather?
>how much does the weather affect the weather?
That's simply beyond my understanding, you might want to try to get an expert's opinion on that one.

I think we've crossed paths before. You have kind of a distinct orthodoxy when it comes to what's officially true and officially false.

>I think we've crossed paths before.
>You have kind of a distinct orthodoxy
Oh there is a method to my madness, and I am far from the only one. You see, I am part of a group of people who only accepts ideas based on legitimate evidence. Crazy, I know.

What's even crazier is that I'm part of that same group. But hey I guess at least that means there's diversity in our ranks.

Thank God for that, diversity is our strength after all.

Seriously. Where would the funding be if the science were ever settled? We'd all have to like splatter poop on a wall and call it art or something.

Yeah, well, usually it's in further research elsewhere. That's how science advances after all, even if questioning early discoveries should not be out of reach.

Should be an interesting next few years or perhaps decade. There's waaaay too much that goes on in secret to the point that it becomes both counterproductive and impossible to hide.

I'm big on the idea of a grand jury for science and medicine as well. Peer review is obviously valuable, but when things get a specialized as they do, you start to need to get regular people who can maintain a broader view using common sense and having an opportunity to ask regular people questions in on grant selection and things like that.

Look closer at the legend, it's not 2016, it's one of the years in 2000

I kind of hope global warming is true... Canada and Russia will make out. Win

None of this is raw data. They apply "corrections".

Suppositious and homoerotic.

Jah man I actually read the publications once in a while. There's some good stuff in there, but the models and corrections they justify are often so convoluted that they wouldn't pass muster if I were doing the reviewing.

Obviously there's something important missing from the model if you can't generalize from the data in a more principled fashion. But hey when you get endless funding to prove a political narrative correct then you get inventive. Just like our "financial innovators."

All this measuring of surface temperature is horseshit. A joke

>the temperature is higher than it was at the end of the little ice age therefore there exists a feedback loop which will generate massive increases of temperature unless you pay our carbon tax

Exactly. 90% of the earth's latent heat is contained in the oceans. Using surface temperatures is like trying to gauge the quality of an orange by it's peeling.

Because its one years weather

Learn statistics

>What would be the point of Jews wanting to promote anthropocentric climate change?
They would get to shove smart meters up everyone's ass and micromanage the economy, tell white people to stop having kids

I don't see George Soros downsizing his accommodations

>CO2 has always correlated with temperature over the earths entire history pay our carbon tax

Bill Priestap

...

>now on a less misleading time scale

I remember one time I was with a group that got some funding to collaborate with some MS-MS guys to see if our ideas could improve the state of peptide identification.

It didn't really work out, but along the way we had a lot of failure analysis to share so we tried to publish a paper explaining how our results suggested that the standard methodology might be measuring the wrong thing, because if you measure it a different way then things seem to work more like what one would expect, and maybe we were looking in the wrong place. We were flatly rejected
>reeeee
>how dare you criticize our accepted methodology!
>you aren't domain experts!

It's as difficult if not more to figure out what to measure as it is to figure out if your modeling is any good.

There is plenty that could be done

1. deport nonwhites back to their low income countries of origin
2. Tax corn so that it becomes unprofitable to feed it to cows
3. Now that the niggers are gone, tax car commuters to upgrade transit so it becomes more attractive than personal cars
4. Issue loans to homeowners so they can massively upgrade their insulation, buy electric panels, etc
5. Dump massive R&D into carbon sequestration, battery technology, etc
6. Graduated energy taxes so Al Gore can't afford to be a bad example anymore

etc etc etc

Won't ever happen because of step 1

You have to apply corrections user, the raw data isn't nearly useful. If you change the process of recording temperature, you move a station or some local artificial influence messes with temperature recordings this will all screw with your results.

Pic related shows controlled data series v homogenised data series.

Temperature cycles on that scale are due to the milankovitch cycles, we know what they're due to

We don't know that man is causing current warming because temperatures have been abnormally high since man came about, temperatures have been much higher and much lower previously. We know man causes much of current warming as it is know that historically CO2 correlates to temperature and that man also produces CO2.

It is.
But sérieux. I'm not even surprised. Academia is bipolar af.
On one side they tolerate pseudoscience vodoo bullshit and in the other side they REEEEEE when you try to do proper science.

Universities need a good cleansing

>If you change the process of recording temperature, you move a station or some local artificial influence messes with temperature recordings this will all screw with your results.
If you take enough readings over a long enough period of time corrections should be unnecessary. We're talking about 2 degrees, not 0.0000002

This is a brand new science, I have no idea why they think they have the "right" corrections

How unfortunate then that as the rest of the world continually develops there'll be absolutely nothing we can do to halt AGW, if it actually exists, without genociding billions of people

This guy pretty much wrecked you, OP.

...

>diversity is our strength

kill yourself faggot.

>dubs

...

>muh epik polynomial fit
ice yourself

Daily reminder that even if global warming is true it won't have a significant net negative impact on the northern hemispheres. All we need to do is shut our borders, give the rest of the world small arms and then sit back and enjoy the show

>If you take enough readings over a long enough period of time corrections should be unnecessary
How do you figure? Temperatures throughout the full 1940's were only ever shifted down when someone realised there was a discrepancy in how ocean temperatures were recorded on US and UK navy vessels. If we never corrected for that the entire decade would've had systematically higher temperature recordings for the rest of eternity. The same goes for the period before which digital thermometers were used.

>This is a brand new science, I have no idea why they think they have the "right" corrections
I might doubt it as well if they didn't verify the adjusted data with controlled data Nice single proxy of interior Greenland

...

It was the time of climate change from cooling to warming.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age

Systematic thermometer recording of temperature began in 1880

>CLIMATE CHANGE
That just causes more hysteria because idiots attribute every rare, yet normal weather event to "climate change". But hysteria is what gives them funding.

Damn those coal burning Viking probes from the 70s. Is there anything more dangerous than CO2 in the entire universe?

space.com/33001-mars-ice-age-ending-now.html

>Temperatures throughout the full 1940's were only ever shifted down when someone realised there was a discrepancy in how ocean temperatures were recorded on US and UK navy vessels. If we never corrected for that the entire decade would've had systematically higher temperature recordings for the rest of eternity.
This doesn't make sense

It it was only the 1940s there would have been a bump only in the 1940s, and there would have been a clear discrepancy between US and UK vessels

If you're applying 40,000gorillion "corrections" at some point you've entered voodoo self-fart smelling math

And that wasn't the type of correction I was talking about

>I might doubt it as well if they didn't verify the adjusted data with controlled data
Physically impossible. How can you check corrections to applied to data from 1940? Other than invent a time machine

Climate change is unavoidably linked to globalism. The way the narrative has progressed is as follows

1. There is climate change occuring
2. Humans are are the cause
3. It will harm the southern hemisphere the most
4. Whites are bad evil colonists who owe a debt to those in the southern hemisphere
5. Whites must pay for green energy in other countries, open their borders to climate refugees, and allow other countries to keep burning 1800s tier dirty fuel

See where this is going? It has white genocide written all over it

Thought of a couple more

7. Puke nuclear power plants in every city
8. Stop exporting coal to China, resulting trade war will cull a good number

Plenty of progress

>Hurr it be warmer than little ice age chegg mate

Who is exporting coal to China? That seems like a foolish thing to do considering that the Chinese are such mining experts as it is.

Hey guys. Bill Nye here. i'm not on suicide watch. I'm fucking 18 year old hookers in my hotel room just right in this moment. Continue to be salty and have butt sex. It's science.

ITT: Dunning Kruger brainlets that have never read a single piece of scientific literature believe themselves (wrongfully) to be knowledgeable on subjects for which they have zero expertise, despite having no evidence to back up a single thing they say.
Never change guys, your willful ignorance does not mean you're superior or special, it only means you need to apply yourself and stop being such morons. No doubt the majority of you are flat earth brainlets or other conspiratards, as is usual of contrarian quacks.
data conveniently stops at 0AD, most autists won't notice my cherrypicked image
Whoa there, really makes me think! Just so you know brainlet, the surface temperature record begins in 1880, and almost all climate data before that period is from climate proxy data, such as tree rings, ice cores, rates of growth in marine organisms, etc.

>7. Puke nuclear power plants in every city
>city

I see what your plan is

>Who is exporting coal to China? That seems like a foolish thing to do considering that the Chinese are such mining experts as it is.

we are mate

china doesn't have much coal of their own

>data conveniently stops at 0AD, most autists won't notice my cherrypicked image
Nice "corrected" data there m8.

Ah. I knew you were basically a big open-air mine for China but I didn't know that they needed to go abroad for coal specifically.

You guys better quit that shit mate. That's not a long-term way to run a country. Also their dirty coal exhaust blows over and settles in the US.