Why couldn't Germanic Teutons and Nordic Vikings defeat subhuman pagan Lithuanians?

Why couldn't Germanic Teutons and Nordic Vikings defeat subhuman pagan Lithuanians?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutonic_takeover_of_Danzig_(Gdańsk)
youtube.com/watch?v=Da7hpW1vMa4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because the Teutons and Vikings aren't really all that and were pretty nigger tier at the time

They wuzn't really that much of kangz.

>crusading against your cousin peoples instead of the growing cult occupying your holy land

Teutonic knights fucked up royally.

Teutons had the support of the one true god, though.

Because lithuanians are the most white people

They needed the assistance. Imagine how bad it would have been without it.

The catholic church called more crusades even against Bohemian hussites than the muslims of holy land.

Because without centralization you couldn't conquer somebody roughly of equal size.

Because Poland got into a war with them? They could have rolled through Lithuania just like they did through Prussia

Your history is off.
They were fighting Lithuanian pagans decades before they fought you (if you exclude the Prussian campaign).

They overextended
Got into way too many dangerous conflicts

It got so bad that even HRE emperor was like " well, fuck it and fuck you guys, bye "

if thats your guys then no

Pagans find divinity through ancestry. That means they are divine and must take responsibility for their actions. The Abrahamic religions separate divinity from ancestry abdicating personal responsibility. It was really just a path of least resistance.

Lithuanian crusades started in 1283, our wars with them started when in 1308 when those niggers massacred Poles in Gdansk. That's just 25 years, if we never got involved sooner or later Lithuania would get taken over

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutonic_takeover_of_Danzig_(Gdańsk)

>if we never got involved sooner or later Lithuania would get taken over
(citation needed).
Within those 25 years, they'd hardly conquered any territory from those pagans, so there's zero reason to take your claim seriously.

Lithuania was full of primeval forests, lakes and swamps. There was no roads whatsoever

Teutons were not ready for that, they had heavy western armor and horses. They couldn't advance at all before adapting to the task

Is that enough if an explanation?

>doesn't know that the old gods are superior to a kike on a stick

Of course they are but if has nothing to do with this topic

>Within those 25 years, they'd hardly conquered any territory from those pagans, so there's zero reason to take your claim seriously.
Teutonic Order was one of the reasons why this union came into existence. Lithuanians once they felt safe didn't even bother to fight in the thirteen years war and Poland was left alone by then

>there are people so fucking retarded they believe in faggy tree gods

Yeah, I'm sure your selected "gods" out of the 8000+ to chose from are the right ones.

There is no doubt truth in that explanation, but the other Baltic tribes lived under similar conditions, yet were still taken over and assimilated in a similar time frame.

>oi vey!

Because Nords/Germanics are the most cucks

Lithuanians were more centralized than the others (including us). They were already dominating the neighboring tribes in the Baltic before the Teutons came.

Sure, a terrain played a huge role, but in the end it didn't even matter for the Samis who lived in the most inhospitable place in Europe. When you are divided and small, you don't stand a chance against a larger more united force.

I'm culturally a catholic, but you as a Canadian who left his European homeland could never understand the connection to those "faggy" trees, rivers, moutains, winds and the soil itself

youtube.com/watch?v=Da7hpW1vMa4

Colonial nations will never understand how important can soil be

...