And if you support it you're an anti-white cuckold.
>Rich have their own special interest groups
>They lobby for more and more non-white immigration because they want cheap foreign labor
>the ones not lobbying for non-white immigration are lobbying for fewer regulations on outsourcing and (((free trade)))
>Jews disproportionately make up the elite capitalist class
>Products are designed to break through a process called "planned obsolescence". It's literally cheaper to throw something away as opposed to fixing it which fills our landfills and puts small shops that specialize in repairing damaged goods out of business
All of you faggots who love capitalism aren't nationalists at all. You're money hungry individualists and you're a stain on the right wing.
Capitalism is the most degenerate system on the planet
Other urls found in this thread:
iq-research.info
twitter.com
...
>poorbaby mad I can afford an console AND pc
Maby if you work extra hard you can do it.
>manchild cuck only thinks about playing with toys all day.
I didn't make this thread for it to be ignored. This is the real redpill that is being ignored by the right. Shameless self bump.
Lol, ok
The main reason for all the immigration is bc the pyramid scheme known as social security will collapse without a constantly increasing population.
>tired neocon talking point.
We've had social security for almost 100 years and we've never had immigration levels like we have them today.
as the shadilay song, we have our own song: On the border by the eagles.
First time hearing this song. It's alright.
I like how it fits the symbology the same way the lyrics fit the ideology.
That's pretty true. I didn't even pay attention to the symbolism until after I posted my reply and realized what it was.
Yeah, I've been trying to tell people this for months but they never listen.
>The main reason for all the immigration is bc the pyramid scheme known as social security will collapse without a constantly increasing population.
Negative. Automation will replace half of all jobs by 2050 at the latest. These numbers are constantly revised up because automation seems to be increasing exponentially.
The future will pay for the Baby Boomers, we don't need low IQ subhumans shitting on the system. Not to mention the only group that is actually a net tax-payer instead of assistance receiver is White people.
>be nazi
>believe in darwinism should be applied to humanity
>in every field
>EXCEPT ECONOMICS
>Yeah, I've been trying to tell people this for months but they never listen.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who has come to this conclusion. Do you ever watch cultured thug's channel?
I believe in a certain degree of economic hierarchy but I don't believe in shitting on the worst off within society either. I'm in favor of small businesses operating under a corporatist guild system that allows people to reach their maximum potential.
Meme flags.
Nice try, commie. Eat a bullet.
Not understanding Natinal Socialist Economics, immediately assume that because it has the word "socialism" in it's name, that it's a Marxist-Socialist economic shitshow
In National Socialist Germany, the top individual tax rate was 13.7%, the market was responsible for supplying resources and capital to private citizens, and the only areas that were state owned were the Armaments industry and the public works programs to get Germany out of the depression.
National Socialists went and privatized most state-owned industries (like the Reichsbahn).
The list goes on. Just because the state stepped in to ensure a certain level of hygiene, safety and ensured every worker a job and paid holidays (until the war) doesn't go against "darwinism", it's smart management. Happy workers are productive workers, which is why while the GDP of every country in the world was dropping (except the soviet union), Germany's was rising.
New fags.
Wall Street bankers are the prime example of Capitalism and they were the ones that bankrolled the communists. You're the fucking commie.
Not an argument you uneducated troglodyte.
>capitalism is as pro white as it gets.
>be capitalist, so profit is the primary concern
>have to choose between a): expensive domestic worker, b): dirt cheap foreign worker or c): importing dirt cheap foreign worker
>Choose either option b or c every single time
>use lobby groups to get more subhumans into the country, cause mass immigration waves
>ship industry off overseas, sending millions of whites into unemployment
Yeah, sound "as pro white as it gets". You'll notice that the only countries in Europe that are browning due to mass immigration are the one's that bought into the neoliberal economic shitshow capitalists consistently advocate.
Capitalism is a social disease that destroys culture, tradition and ethnic groups so that new markets can be opened up and the cheapest labour is available to make the products for those markets.
This.
You are an idiot.
The Nazis ran the archetypal mixed economy. The government sucking, and getting sucked off, by the biggest companies. No different than China and the US, and it was just as inefficient. Just look at the armaments during the war. Companies were awarded contracts based on state fiat, rather than effectiveness of armament. The state went to Porsche and friends and said give us a tank. So Porsche, having no real competition, gave them a fat mess that was expensive, mechanically unreliable, and underproduced. But the Fuhrer liked it, so it was given a huge budget. Same thing happened with planes, armored cars, you name it. By the end of the war the krauts were stuck with a bunch of outdated shit mainly, with a few high tech baubles that were unreliable. See the Tiger, Panther, and Schwalbe.
The US on the other hand started the war with a vastly outdated military, but ended with the most sophisticated military technology on the planet, all by opening armament contracts to the free market.
Only faggots post this video unironically.
Good argument.
>source: my ass
It wasn't intended to be an argument since you didn't reply to me. I was just providing backup for my natsoc bro.
Just look at the tanks. The vast majority of the krauts tanks were PzIIIs, PzVIs, and StuGs. Decent at the start of the war, but hopelessly obsolete by the end. Slow, weak guns, bad armor, the list goes on.
Instead of adopting better tanks, or updating the old ones, they decided to built a bunch of meme shit instead. Tigers and Panthers, which they could only squeeze out a couple thousand of. While they were good tanks which could smoke almost anything the allies were driving around, they were way too expensive, and complicated. So they had constant breakdowns and couldn't be produced in large enough numbers to actually impact the war effort.
The Panther was especially bad in this. It was originally contracted to be the new medium tank, but after it emerged from design hell it weighed almost as much as the tiger, the turret took almost a full fucking minute to turn 360 degrees, the transmission was way overworked and would break, the engine was way overworked and would break, the interlinking road wheels meant that if one of the internal wheels was busted you'd have to remove both of the adjacent wheels to get at it, it had no close range optics, and it was highly susceptible to incendiary weapons like molotovs (which the slavs were keen on), it broke down so often driving that they had to rely on trains to move them around, the list goes on. It was a complete fucking disaster.
And yet the Nazis still insisted on making a ton of these things instead of trying to upgrade to replace the old mainstays.
Free market and small government doesn't require complete and open trade with foreign nations which have no such things. The US for the first 150 years of it's existence had almost no government interference with the economy but high tariffs of foreign goods. They also managed to industrialize a barren continent in decades with no central planning or state control.
There is no logical inconsistency in taxing products coming from lands with massive state subsidies, like China. The whole point of the free market is to allow no group or individual the advantage of resources acquired through violence or coercion. Why should someone be suddenly exempt from this principle if they move to another land?
Furthermore, much of what drives companies to foreign labor is state policy. Domestic workers need to be paid more because of inflation of both money and prices, products of central banking and minimum wage laws. Imported foreign labor can be paid less because they will make up the difference with money from the dole, and illegal immigrants aren't beholden to the same minimum wage laws and byzantine regulations as natives.
You guys need to start looking at the disease, not the symptoms.
We just think darwinism can be organized
Holy shit. tl;dr doubled down.
That's not what darwinism is. You can't claim a garden is an ecosystem running on darwinian principles. Survival of the fittest doesn't work if God were to pick favorites.
confuses my flag with the flag of thailand ignoring the fact our countries have the same averaged global IQ. What a fucking idiot.
>iq-research.info
>can't form an argument
>I'm w-white!
t. literal spic
Thailand is 91 btw
Sauce? That QT is moistening verily.
>Changing the argument, while keeping the same topic
>Boiling the world down to economic theory
I sense semitic blood.
I'm not against capitalism. I'm against an autistic obsession with it. If you were in a total war for survival, you would have no choice but to centralize economic control. Economics is a tool. Not the end all be all.
>j-jew!
Not an argument
>If you were in a total war for survival, you would have no choice but to centralize economic control.
And look at how well corporatist policy impacted the nazi war machine. They were outproduced by the slavs, who had to move their entire industrial base hundreds of miles. They spent more money making V2 bottle rockets than the US spent developing fucking nukes.
>Economics is a tool. Not the end all be all.
I'm not entirely sure what argument you're trying to form here other than "rampant materialism bad".
Fucking finally. People blame the jews all the time because they are successful, if it wasnt jews it would be greedy white people that would come to those positions instead, either way someone is going to steal your shit. "Jews" arent the fucking problem, capitalism is. Countries are turning brown because rich capitalists lobby for cheap labour and a stupid workforce, wars are being fought for economic intrests that create the refugees in the first place. The capitalists love seeing right wingers shitting on your average jew because it shows their deception is working, your attacking the wrong group, bandaid the symptoms all you want but the disease will still be there.
mmm you libertarians like to shill on these threads a lot, but first of all nice digits, and secondly nice work BTFO that other shill. Also remember that average means a round up number between the lowest and the highest, usually pushed to the lowest depending on the amount of numeric samples. The average educational level in the USA and CR is almost the same, I'm not your average "spic" user. Let me redpill you on how my country is practically a CIA psyop nation created during the 60's....but anyways, what would I know I?'m just another spic, orale andale tacos tacos.
Is the allies won because they had free economies? The US turned into a socialist state during war time. Controlled economy, food stamps, curbed liberties. Socialism obviously can work if applied to a national cause.
When you put the free market above your nation, you are eroding it.
>Is the allies won because they had free economies?
How did you get that from what I was saying? Are you a literal brainlet? Obviously the US war machine wasn't a real free market, but it was based upon market principles.
>Controlled economy, food stamps, curbed liberties. Socialism obviously can work if applied to a national cause.
Well yes obviously the government can direct the economy to destroy things pretty well, but then again people in their natural state wouldn't organize the mass slaughter of people across the planet.
In peace time state control is obviously inefficient. Just look at all of the massive expanse of government during the world wars that never contracted. Look at the exorbitant sums spent on dem programs and the military, look at the massive subsidies and bailouts given to fiscally insolvent companies "too big to fail", look at the blacks who've gone feral after two generations of welfare, look at the value of the dollar inflating so quick by the time you retire you've lost half your money.
The state is doing much more harm to the nation than "the free market"
Have a bump senpai. There is no excuse for supporting (((capitalism)))
Centrally planned economies fail.
That's the lesson of the 20th century. There's a reason there's not any of them anymore
What's your proposed economic system?
sure could you explain how central economies failed? and how current american neoliberalism is not centralized?
> planned obsolescence
> It's cheaper to throw away good
Do you know what cheaper means retard?
Money and price represent (I can't believe I have to tell a facist this and not a marxist jesus christ); time, labour, resources, values, time preference etc.
If it's cheaper then it means people value replacing it more than repairing because it would take less time and resources to just keep churning more out. There are reasons why some repairs are viable, reasons why some things last longer than others.
We could follow Jacque Fresco and try and build every house out of the best material known to man kind, but we've find out that growing and cutting trees is a good sustainable cheap (time, labour, resources) way of building houses as opposed to a lot of the alternatives, which all have pros and cons. Like being durable but not sustainable etc.
You are so fucking stupid, just think a little bit before you hop on the keyboard aye? Dumb as a fucking Venus Project, Zeitgeist movement style marxist you should be ashamed.
"Planned obsolescence" jesus christ.
Centrally planned economies fail because of the local knowledge problem. I'd recommend you read Road to Serfdom by Friedrich von Hayek. it explains how fascism, National Socialism and socialism had common roots in central economic planning and empowering the state over the individual.
Basically the idea is that prices have a lot of information contained within them, like for example in the price of a loaf of bread will contain the amount of wheat harvested this season, the quality of the combines harvesting the Wheat, the wage of the truck driver driving the flour to the baker, as well as all the potential other uses of the wheat, like by Pizza makers, as well as the other potential uses of their labour by the baker and truck driver. Non centrally planned economies have all kinds of major incentives for finding waste within a system. These are called arbitrage opportunities and tend to be very rare, like one town not having any bakers so their bread is all imported and stale by the time it gets there. Someone can correct that problem and makes money by doing so.
Neoliberal policies right now have some major government distortions. Like in the banking sector, or farming subsidies, or the minimum wage, or anti-price gouging laws, but price signals still play an important effect, and the production of all kinds of goods has gotten cheaper.
Don't forget lads, Mises' economic calculation problem and his other criticisms of central planning were actually from a different direction than Hayek's, two huge thinkers with a long fucking list of of problems but I guess it depends on what people consider "works". Personally peoples standard of living increasing and using resources more efficiently is how a good economic system works.
Someone give me a time capitalism hasn't fucking worked. Guess what you can't, every single time the market has crashed or something that is blamed on capitalism has the been the fault of the state
Well you are not that lost user, so we can both agree on how centralist economies tend to fail due to private and globalized pampeting. You might say now "third positionist economic ideologies are an utopia because they depend on having (((private banks))) gone and unified global market". Well yes, but it's important to know the theory and stick to your beliefs in case shit hits the fan and we have to restart civilization.
Capitalism is the best
>Personally peoples standard of living increasing and using resources more efficiently is how a good economic system works.
we can totally agree on that. Maybe the title is a bit too intentionally subversive for libertarians. So point being the capitalist wealth of a nation ultimately better distributed and planned if approached from an ideological aspect from -lets call it- a central left ideology of unified social nationalism. IMHO the current world order is designed to avoid any of this to happen, so globalist and private interests leach on the national pride of well prepared nations, making them to lose their own north.
What a reddit response
And we both can agree that the bankers need to fuck off.
My problem is moral hazard and how much they have influenced the state to privatize their gains and socialize their losses.
Blackberry doesn't get bailed out when their product is crappy. Investors get scared when other companies are over-leveraged, but don't have a problem with banks doing it because they're guaranteed by the state, through stuff like the FDIC as well as all kinds of events leading up to 2008 including the savings and loans crisis the Mexican banking crisis where the US guaranteed debts and so on. I think if government had less power, it wouldn't be worth buying, and banking would have less problems, but either way we can agree the current financial system is shit.
Wrong
Your answer to what you see as childishness is grinding the human spirit into absolute nihilism. That becomes the individual human experience in one way or another under your boots.
God will not tolerate it.
...
Oh communism is much better i forgot
>Socialism is designed to reward worthless members of society
>Contributes to laziness, lack of accountability, and degeneracy
>Socialism is just communism-lite, which was created, spread, and perpetrated by jews
>Every single socialist country is a piece of shit
>Every single socialist country is a leftist shithole
>He thinks that socialism is good at all
Its amusing when anyone who claims to be right-wing supports socialism.
t. leftypol
Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's
Jesus advocated secular government.
It's not the job of the state to get you to accept Jesus into your heart, but the third column, the civil society.
No he meant Real Communism©®™. Accept no substitutes
Gotta go to sleep but I'm sure we will have more fash/nat soc threads for comfy economical discussions. I'm even starting to like ancaps. If we combine the ideological stubbornness from the third positioners, and the economical savvy from libertarians , the only middle ground to figure is a way to have a common ground between dictatorship and private ownership monarchies; since people don't like to commit to any of those forms of of power. Keep vigilant faggots, you never know what the future might bring.
In an ethnically homogeneous nation, you help your "worthless members of society" like you would help the "worthless" members of your family. Of course it's a broken and degenerate thing to set up such a system when 1 in 5 Americans is a nigger.
You have no clue what Nazism is, do you? Nazism is focused on helping the nation expand. Unchecked capitalism leads to careless and damaging mistakes as we have seen in 2000 and 2008 and soon to be 2020
these /leftypol/ shills are getting more sophisticated
Why is a nation expanding a good thing?
Like the US, where would it benefit the US to expand to if your policies were implemented. Why would this be a good thing?
Aren't the Swiss a counter example of not expanding and having a more narrow and defined set of objectives?