Takes less than 30 seconds for the first psuedo-intellectual to start stammering and stuttering

>takes less than 30 seconds for the first psuedo-intellectual to start stammering and stuttering

youtube.com/watch?v=WtftZPL-k7Y&feature=youtu.be&t=103

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermaphrodite
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex
youtu.be/8DAZ8wTxCuw
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I thought we had all seen it by now?

These people have obvious mental issues.

>touches his shoulder
you have a penis.

what?

>um... eh... uh...

Kys

madison is a disingenuous cunt. SHE is a CUNT

The mental gymnastics to say misgendering is an act of violence is insane to me. Going from a few(literally a few) trannies being killed a year because their potential lover was mad and expanding that to all trannies are at risk if you call a man a man. W E W

they and them are plural...what in the fuck is this nonsense trying to describe a single person with plurals...serious question.

Reminder that in 10 years cuckold crowder will be parading his tranny kids in the media to show his liberal masters that he's a good little boy

>makes self to appear a attractive woman in the role you say perpetuates rape culture
>trick man into making out with you while squeezing his dick all night
>pull dick out at his apartment
>get beaten to death by a lamp
misgendering is a crime and intentional deception is victimized. plurals used to describe singles. everything inverted. that bald bitch, man, holy shit..this is manipulation of neural plasticity from conception in order to create a legion of warriors who will never fire a weapon. this is a virus of some sort.

You are just jelly of his 10/10 wife

*blocks your path*

They are possessed by many demons, hence why they want to be addressed as 'they' or 'legion'. Once you understand that liberals come directly from the pit of hell, a lot more things start to make sense.

shoots

Crowder even gets assaulted by some mentally ill faggot

Can you list all types of jobs there are? Sure you could argue there are "two types of jobs": manual jobs and office jobs. But within those two there is a plethora of sub categories and sub sub categories that people identify with depending on what they do.
That's why when you're filling out an online form there's a drop-down list and on top of that a "other/please specify" option. Why can't it be the same when it comes to gender?

That's where I am going with this. This is frothing, gnashing, and, quite frankly, a little upsetting to watch. That woman coming through just to touch him and say, "fuck you, you are fucking scum." For me, this is confirmation of pure evil which, by-proxy, confirms the existence of an equal force of pure good. The great deceiver is quite apt, I will say that. That said, they don't want a real fight.

Not thicc enough for me, and she's going to age horribly.

the difference is that those jobs actually exist and aren't subjectively named depending on the person working them

Man, clock boy is looking rough

>aren't subjectively named depending on the person working them
lol you never met anyone who works in a start-up have you?
>serial entrepreneur
>talent spotter
>linux magician
Fuck even in normal corporations you have the likes of "account managers" being called that instead of the sales rep they actually are.

There are only two sexes. Gender is only the linguistic representation of sex in language, therefore there can only be two genders. It's that simple. Maybe it's hard to understand if you speak english since you don't have gender marks in your language but to anyone who speaks a language with gender marks the idea that there are more than two genders is absolutely absurd.

I love how he uses the terminology of the opposition against them. Some time after 23:20:
>You've been very privileged in speaking over me.

dunno if you watched the video or not, but a chick makes the point that you could just have a third option labled "non-binary" which would cover everyone. anyway the argument isn't really about filling out forms, and since there are an unlimited amount of subjective genders, you would have to have an unlimited amount of categories which would make it impossible and pointless. you might as well have a single one which encompasses all non-binary ones

i'm curious though, would you please list all the gender options that come to mind that you would have on these forms?

I love Crowder, thanks for sharing.

>lol only 6:23 in and SJW fascist landwhale "Excuse me sorry to interrupt but DO YOU HEV PAPERS? VER ARE YOUR PAPERS! and a very smugly sincere sounding thank you by Crowder" and I know it's going to get even better.

These are gold I wasn't aware he started doing this format.

These kinds of people exist entirely in an echo chamber. All of their platforms for conversation are like Reddit, where unpopular or unconventional points are simply deleted.

I debate people about gun control (me on the pro-gun side) on campus and these people always start crumbling within 90 seconds. They never know what the laws on the books actually are or how they are applied. They know nothing of the actual function of different types of firearms.

All they know is that John Stewart told them 'x' and all of their friends said 'x' which means it's true and I don't actually need to substantiate my claims.

The linguistic representation is based on the biological arrangement of chromosomes. That is an outdated concept because the same way there are only three genetic races (caucasoid, negroid, mongoloid) it is also widely accepted that there are hundreds of ethnic groups that identify as a particular race even though they all fall under one of those three.
The same way the concept of nations is highly abstract but accepted, so should genders be.

I can think of trans women, trans men, genderqueer, femme, dyke etc.

Crowder's a good guy. I genuinely think his show is funny. It's a youth appealing "late night" show that's actually funny and doesn't just lecture about muh privilege

James Yeager got castrated?

Didn’t think his YouTube ban hit him that hard

i hate that this shit needs to exist

Crowder is a proud retard.

To argue against modern literature on Gender because, "There were only two sexes/genders," is like arguing against Neuroscience because Phrenology existed. Times change, moron.

And if you don't think gender is a social construct, go look at some Thai ladyboys again, get a confused boner, pray to Jesus that it goes away, spew cum all over your pathetic existence, walk away with your own dissonance.

I mean sure, someone has to do it, but even seeing these people as individuals with their own ideas, instead of just sick mental cases is just so tiring at this point. Everyone KNOWS that these people are retarded and literally brainwashed, engaging them is a waste of time. Its good that some people still produce this stuff as entry level pills or as stuff for boomers to get mad over, but I can't imagine still being stuck in the "I want to btfo sjws" phase, it just seems so tiring to me. Its like discussing politics with NPCs from Oblivion

>That is an outdated concept because the same way there are only three genetic races (caucasoid, negroid, mongoloid) it is also widely accepted that there are hundreds of ethnic groups that identify as a particular race even though they all fall under one of those three.
if you're going to use that racial classification, you'll have to explain australoids. these smaller ethnic groups are based in biology, they cluster together in genetic maps. subjective genders have no basis in biology. unless you're talking about ethnicity from a cultural perspective, which is a totally different thing than race.

>I can think of trans women, trans men, genderqueer, femme, dyke etc.
okay but the point is that if these terms aren't grounded in biology, then i can come up with any gender i want and it is just as valid as those you listed. according to that kind of logic every single person could be of a different gender

I can't declare myself a CEO and then prosecute my company for not paying me accordingly. That is where I think we need to draw the line. You can call yourself whatever you like, but you can't hold others to your spontaneously made up rules.

>The linguistic representation is based on the biological arrangement of chromosomes.
Correct
>That is an outdated concept
No it's not
>because the same way there are only three genetic races (caucasoid, negroid, mongoloid)
That's not true, there are more than three races and the concept of race is determined by genetic distance
>it is also widely accepted that there are hundreds of ethnic groups
Ethnic groups are separated within racial groups, like Han Chinese and the Koreans or Italians and Spaniards.
> hundreds of ethnic groups that identify as a particular race even though they all fall under one of those three.
Self indentification has nothing to do with scientific categorization. I can identify as much as I want as a Japanese man but that doesn't make me japanese.
>The same way the concept of nations is highly abstract but accepted, so should genders be.
What kind of retarded logic is that? The concept of nations is abstract so Mathematics should also be abstract? What the fuck are you talking about you fucking retarded idiot. There are only two genders, Male and Female and they are based on your cromossomes, it's that simple.

...

Wtf is that disgusting goblin like creature

>tfw a local Labour Party's woman's officer in Strood, is a 19 year old Tranny man who kicked out a 55 year old woman for being Transphobic.

/thread

Yeah this thread is full of master baiters

I agree with you on this. There shouldn't be any legal sanctions if you decide not to call someone by their correct gender, but you will need to deal with the fact that is considered rude and there will be a social stigma to you.
It's not illegal to have a gore folder but if you do and your coworkers or friends find out there will be social consequences to it.
This is also why I don't get this whole argument because people make it seem like we are trying to arrest those who claim there are only two genders when in fact we aren't.

Jobs are defined by people. Sex is defined by biology. They are not comparable. There are two genders.

Surely the fact that a man can be tricked into being aroused by someone who is pretending to be a woman discredits your point. I.e This has all the characteristics on preliminary observation of being a woman.... I am attracted to women.

It says nothing about gender or sexuality other than if your senses are tricked, your body reacts as it would to the real thing.

Infact the premise of "if you want people to think you are a woman do X,Y and Z" shows that sex and gender are quantifiable to primary and secondary sexual characteristics such as breasts, hips, facial hair etc. Further discrediting your nonsense.

TLDR: The fact a tranny can trick a man to arrousal shows sex is hard wired to biological standards. I.e Male and Female

These are great to watch but I could never fucking do this. Leftists are just too infuriating.

>This is also why I don't get this whole argument because people make it seem like we are trying to arrest those who claim there are only two genders when in fact we aren't.
explain bill c-16

Sex is defined by biology. Nobody's disagreeing with you. You just can't seem to get it through your thick skull that sex and gender are different.

Explain how biological arrangement of chromosomes is outdated please.

>And if you don't think gender is a social construct, go look at some Thai ladyboys again, get a confused boner, pray to Jesus that it goes away, spew cum all over your pathetic existence, walk away with your own dissonance.

not everyone is a closet fag like you

Very well put

i think its john podesta

>Sex is defined by biology
>sex and gender are different.
These aren't contradicting statements. Sex is defined by biology and Gender is defined by Sex, therefore Gender is defined by Sex.

*therefore Gender is defined by Biology.

FAGGOT ALERT

Comprehensive reading skills

Gender is not defined by sex, they're independent.

>non-manual labor only equates to an office

Loud retard alert

unironically kill yourself

Recognising something as law inevitably leads to litigation and further big government power grabs under the guise of protecting the vulnerable or marginalised. If you are a Brit you should know this better than most.

CUNTY KEKOLD ALERT

Looks great desu. Love that mischeavous look.

god damn i lol'd

Maybe that's why he can't drive manual

Gender is defined by sex, you can't be born a man and be female, that's not how it works. You can be a faggot all you want but if you're born a man your gender is and it will always be MALE. I wonder how much of a lunatic you have to be to think otherwise.

prove it

When I was studying psychology they taught us Sex is Male/Female and a tiny number of individuals who are neither due to development issues in the womb.

Gender was taught as masculinity and femininity heavily influenced by hormones. I.e feminine men are still men, masculine women still women.

This was before the SJWs invaded academia over here mind you.

bandwagon fallacy

Evidence... we'll wait

shill detected

...

They changed the meaning of the word gender to confuse people.

You are a guy, you wear a dress, your gender is female because you are using female fashion. The problem is that the word is now empty of meaning. Go live in a giant mayonnaise pot and mayo will be a legit gender.

Male brains and body is different than women, which determines how each of them acts.

thank you smartanon

>They're independent
Sure bud, hormones that alter brain functions and genetics don't affect anything.
In fact, all biology is subjective

>e are trying to arrest those who claim there are only two genders when in fact we aren't
what is Canada law bill M-103

Your black and white thinking is retarded and you've already proven yourself wrong.
see:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermaphrodite


You know that's a trick question because this isn't a quantifiable task. Besides that, there's plenty of literature to read. The fact that gender dysmorphia was removed from the DSM and we're still learning about and defining what gender is, is proof for me enough that the issue is too complex to understand right now. Who knows, maybe there is something going on biologically with transgendered folks that we don't know about. Maybe it's conditioning by society/environment.

>the issue is too complex to understand right now
but it's not. You're just crying and appealing to authority to make your arguments for you.

>mutations should count as the norm and even those born without mutations should be allowed to pretend they have this mutation because it's rude otherwise
Go fuck yourself.

>people taking this bait
topkek

And therein lies the difference between the schools of thought.

One group thinks that the way it was is the way it is.

The other group thinks that the issue isn't so easy to understand, and doesn't pretend to know definitively.

>when your indoctrination clashes with reality
this is almost sad how murricans made some of the most important facilities for human development into commie nursery

>those two chins

god imagine the girls they will create.

>"In biology, a hermaphrodite is an organism that has reproductive organs and produces gametes normally associated with both male and female sexes.[1] Many taxonomic groups of animals (mostly invertebrates) do not have separate sexes.[2] In these groups, hermaphroditism is a normal condition, enabling a form of sexual reproduction in which either partner can act as the "female" or "male". For example, the great majority of tunicates, pulmonate snails, opisthobranch snails and slugs are hermaphrodites. Hermaphroditism is also found in some fish species and to a lesser degree in other vertebrates. Most plants are also hermaphrodites."

Humans aren't hermaphrodites you fucking baboon. What you're trying to say is en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex which is an abnormal genetic condition. Individuals who are intersex have both male of female characteristics, there's no third gender in the mix and most of these individuals have a dominant gender/sex. Also, fucking wikipedia is literally leftist propaganda, you can prove anything leftists claim by linking to wikipedia.

At least the man in the start had some logic to his words the fat bitchdyke was absolutely bonkers.

pretending the human genome project didn't happen
pretending XX and XY chromosomes don't exist
Okay Goldberg

>woman undergoes surgery to become a manlet

youtu.be/8DAZ8wTxCuw
Everyhthing i dont like is fascism!!
I hate these alt lite soygoys

They are legion

As much as I dislike the 'non-binary' ideologues, she actually beat him in the second argument.

>because another culture did it it's good
>those cultures also practiced slavery
>that's not fair
I hate these people, they can't think at all.

Where?

Actually the point she was making is that the concept exists as evident in other cultures, nobody made the argument that it was good BECAUSE it exists in another culture.

Steven Crowder lost some credibility with me when he started to argue that point.

>it's valid because it's in backwards cultures

>she actually beat him in the second argument.
how? she danced around the whole time without letting him establish a premise to argue from. like when she called misgendering someone "violence" but when pressed on it said that it isn't/shouldn't necessarily be a crime. she just played dumb and switched topics when he pointed out the flawed logic in this

Thanks for saving me the time I would have to spend writing this myself.

>BECAUSE it exists in another culture

Yep and these cultures don't exist anymore we should definitely follow there ways. Also these are the same people that will complain about white men and slavery all the time and how white culture is toxic and evil.

i see this "argument" many many times. Now this got me thinking, in dutch, we don't have the words sex and gender. translate those words to dutch and you get the same result: geslacht.
Is it only in english that you have two words for something that should be the same?

I don't support her idea. I think non-binary stuff is wrong and really a fault down with the individual rather than their society. I don't understand why they refuse to get categorized as man/women. They can be as flamboyant and individualist as they want. If anything behaving like that would broaden the spectrum of categorization of girl/man.

Steven should not have used the law as some concrete point of morality since it changes. The point about violence and it being a crime is not going to the meat of the issue. Many things are violent and not crimes.

Steven means well and fights the good fight but clearly got flustered when the second girl came on. I did enjoy his first point in calling out the first dude and asking why he assumed he had a penis. That is the essence of the argument.

Steven should have just made it clear that everyone thinks you are a girl and shouldn't be forced into playing around in their own ideology.

No its valid because a culture accepts its existence. Steve was in disbelief at this point.

Fuck biology and fuck white people

>No its valid because a culture accepts its existence.
his point was that a culture can just as easily deny its existence, meaning steven doesn't have to change his mind.

There's a porno of this fucking a tranny of the reverse persuasion. I wasn't sure if that would be considered straight porn or what.