/neo/liberal

Neoliberal / Globalist thread!
In other words, anti-nationalism, anti-populism, anti-protectionism, pro-immigration, free-trade and global cooperation.
Why are you not following the only successful ideology?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=xWZkHozvDfM
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage
youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

why are you even on Sup Forums

To try and find a sane person here.

I smell Russian....

Can you tell me why any of the things you are against are objectively bad, and any of the things you are for are objectively good?

kys op...

I would bet money you're not sincere in your support of neoliberalism and are in fact simply shitting up the board every day with your weak bait and worthless low iq subhuman drivel.

On the slim chance you are serious can you make the unilateral and immediate decision to improve your quality of life and kill yourself effective immediately. Seriously though you should kill yourself. Go on i'm waiting, get on with it, that is not a request but a strongly implied recommendation, kill yourself please it's the christmas season, think of the children and kill yourself i beg of you.

>kill yourself
>nationalist arguments
How does it feel to be on the losing side of history?

>nationalism is the wrong side of history

Nationalism is the phase that countries enter after communist rule, and we are quickly approaching communist rule

You tell me what's next

losing how?
>import millions of sand niggers into your country
>sand niggers are the most ultranationalistic people in the world
>hates foreigners including natives in their migrating country

In short, because they have won the cultural, economic and political war. Neoliberalism has defeated both socialism and fascism. Capitalism, globalization and tolerance no longer have any substitutes. Fascism was obliterated. Cuba is opening up, NK is an isolated pariah and Venezuela, the only modern country to try and drift away from liberal democracy, is collapsing. Meanwhile, neoliberalism has delivered mass prosperity on a global scale that is unprecedented in human history.

Those are not objective reasons. Try again.

this

...

Thanks for posting this!

We all need to embrace globalisation now or end up even further down the pecking order. Modern economies cannot be self sufficient, merchantilism was debunked by Adam Smith in the eighteenth century.

Please look up the theory of comparative advantage before responding to this comment uwu

>we are quickly approaching communist rule
I haven’t seen anyone calling anyone comrades yet.
Religious radicalism is not the same thing as nationalism. Even so, the radicals are such a small minority that they are almost negligible.

Noice
Globalization is inevitable. Fighting it will only make the transition more painful.

Not a neoliberal but if you know basic economics you know that protectionism (9/10 times) is bad and global free trade is good. It's Riccardo's theory.

>Religious radicalism is not the same thing as nationalism. Even so, the radicals are such a small minority that they are almost negligible.
>cuck ignoring that they are both religious radical and nationalist. Go to Saudi Arabia and talk to them about howgreat Iraq is or vice-versa. go to sweden and tell those dune coons to integrate into swedish culture.

>Globalization is inevitable.
Donald Trump: hold my beer

lol. just lol, straight up empirically wrong.

Nice facts you have there to back up your argument.

you're worse than SJWs

>painful
I'll knock your cunt right in, faggot

protectionism is bad. But ross Perot was right on every point

fascim obliterated good joke,is well and alive waiting to resurge when the times is right and this times will came from the east ,your shitty world is crumbling and there is nothing you can do about that

>Go to Saudi Arabia and talk to them about howgreat Iraq is or vice-versa
Go to China and say that Japan is such a great country. Do the same for Ukraine and Russia, North and South Korea, Vietnam and the US or even Brazil and Argentina. By that logic, every culture is nationalistic.

If your country can be self sufficient it should push towards this. Global trade only cripples your countries strength by making its well-being reliant on others

>I'll knock your cunt right in, faggot

Ah yes, the classic caveman response

If you don't know basic economics then don't come here trying to debate it. Fucking leaf.

*blocks your path*
The only reason why the US is rich and prosperous is because it had a protectionist policy until the 20th century.

So this is the power of nationalism...

the jews have weakened so much the west that they wont be able to safe itself these time china will destroy all of your global ambition is over jew ,you lost and you know it .

It's all you deserve, and all you'll get. But seriously... I'll knock your cunt right in, faggot

Or you could stop sucking globalist cock. There is no reason to not push towards being able to support yourself. (((economics))) isnt an excuse

why not call yourself faggot for short?

You called?

Dumb nigger. Most of US growth came after WW2.

I'm here, globalist family member reporting in
Not a neoliberal though, it's a garbage ideology

Lol. *No* nation has ever risen to prominence and wealth without protectionism--both historically and in modern times. This ranges from the Asian Tigers, to the old European powers, and to North America.

Even a rudimentary understanding of economics reveals that laissez-faire and free trade will invariably lead to destabilizing imbalances. It's why Keynes pushed to have Bretton Woods designed to eliminate such imbalances.

LOL. You asked for a rational argument and I gave you one. Your response is saying (((economics))). Fucking closeminded faggot.

Everyone is better off with trade. It can literally turn a village built on some rocks into a global economic hub. Try and achieve that under autarky.

Considering the states is bigger than a large amount of countries put together I see no reason why can't achieve autarky and trade within the republic. And you guys are giving no reason besides (((economists))) say so. If you can't actually provide the argument fuck off.

Ian Fletcher demolishes ''free'' trade

youtube.com/watch?v=xWZkHozvDfM

It’s close enough, as long as you support free-trade.

>pro-immigration
you act as though all cultures are compatible. I don't think you understand the conflict that occurs when certain cultures assimilate or how r/K selection factors into this

Solltest du nicht Achmeds Schwanz lutschen, Hans?

This isnt finland or belgium or some other small shit tier EU country. This is the States/Canada two countries with access to more than enough natural resources to fully sustain themselves.

>Lol. *No* nation has ever risen to prominence and wealth without protectionism--both historically and in modern times. This ranges from the Asian Tigers, to the old European powers, and to North America.

That's only because free trade is a fairly new concept. Asain tigers came big because they let in capital from all over the world

>Even a rudimentary understanding of economics reveals that laissez-faire and free trade will invariably lead to destabilizing imbalances. It's why Keynes pushed to have Bretton Woods designed to eliminate such imbalances.

What are you saying? That capitalism has to be regulated to an extent? More news at 11. I never advocated fully deregulated capitalism.

A small minority of 1.5 billion people is still a fuckload of people.

I don’t like to sound patronizing, but even if you are allergic to expert opinions you should at least consider that it the argument that free-trade makes every party better off is an unanimous consensus in the field.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage

I did provide an argument. I told you about Riccardo's theory but I see I have to spoon-feed you. Sure any country can achieve autarky just fine but free trade accomplishes A LOT more prosperity than autarky. Ever heard of economies of scale? Fucking leafnigger

Samefagging leaf

Can I be a race realist and anti non white immigration and still be neoliberal? Neoliberalism makes the most sense to me.

This. Literally no other ideology has won and worked as well as neoliberalism/ globalism.

Still can't explain their arguments what a surprise. Why do I want other countries to succeed? I care about Canada. Just because we get 6 more units doesn't mean anything if we BOTH are getting 6 more units, its arbitrary.

Sounds awful

...

Free trade boosts the economy which in turn boosts your nation's prosperity. Protectionism is close-minded and stupid. Just Google comparative advantage.

1933 WILL COMMENCE AGAIN, GLOBALISTS WATCH OUT!

Nothing's free in this life you fucking commie

Actually free trade tends to cause economic convergence which means niggers are more likely to stay where they are

Nope. Neoliberalism includes reducing barriers to immigration and accepting that public policy has global ramifications and should take into account the effect it has on people around the world regardless of nationality. There is no neoliberalism without globalism.

>higher production, and thus consumption, are always a positive

Better hope we find a way off this planet in the next century or two.

As in not migrate to the West

I wonder who is behind these threads? Reddit? Leftypol? Shareblue?

GDP dose not equal quality of life retard
>pro-immigration
>anti-nationalism
youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

>That's only because free trade is a fairly new concept.
Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahha.
>centuries old idea are "new"

>Asain tigers came big because they let in capital from all over the world
You mean a plethora of state-created/owned enterprises which built up their infrastructure, had a central planning which pushed exports over imports, use fixed currencies, and maintain large caches of foreign reserves?

>What are you saying?
Not surprised you don't know the difference between regulation and protectionism.

OK, I'm one:

Peoples culture and history is an integral part of their nation's survial.

OH WHOOPS I THINK THAT IS CALLED NATIONANISM YOU FUCKING COMMIE SCUMBAG

>Someone doesn't agree with me so it has to be a coordinated assault

Don't be afraid to leave the safe space user

>doesn’t mean we are both getting
Yes it does. That’s what comparative advantage is all about. It’s better for each nation to specialise in what they do well and import the rest, even if one country has an absolute advantage when producing every item.

...

If neoliberalism is so terrible why is almost every country on earth pursuing a neolib economic agenda? Protectionism only works short term until other countries find out and stop dealing with you, Keynesianism causes inflation and stagflation, communism is pretty much dead...

If you want to be a successful country in 2017 you need an open economy, competitively low tax rates and investment in supply side policies.

sage fag

Haha praise Jesus. This Finn is on fire with hia posting today. God bless you user

>leftypol
Really triggered now

...

neo-jewism* and jewist*

You don't seem to get it. And thats okay cause i already pegged you as a retard given your beliefs.

>>The wrong side
>>literally supports kikes who want to destroy the world for person profit and out of sheer hate for all things decent

Gtfo Jew and KYS!!!

Neoliberalism threw a lot of money at military toys. The biggest and most expensive of which are now not only obsolete but at a price a mere fraction of their "worth".
>"A Floating Fortress, for example, has locked up in it the labour that would build several hundred cargo-ships.
Ultimately it is scrapped as obsolete, never having brought any material benefit to anybody, and with further enormous labours another Floating Fortress is built."

>Centuries old idea is "new"

Not knowing the difference between the idea being proposed and the actual widespread implementation

>You mean a plethora of state-created/owned enterprises which built up their infrastructure, had a central planning which pushed exports over imports, use fixed currencies, and maintain large caches of foreign reserves?

I'll admit I was wrong. Asain tigers were mostly due to the fact that they caught up with our worker productivity. Not really free trade.

>Not surprised you don't know the difference between regulation and protectionism.

Protectionism is literally government regulation.

Fuck Globalism. I'd break my foot off in your ass if I ever saw your faggot ass in public

Nope you mean this picture you fucking globalist kike faggot

Kek, classic memeflag response

globalism is fucking stupid and it will never work

but fascism still exists in all of western society

How do you lads propose fixing the constant economic crises which have become so much larger and common since neo liberal ascendancy?

Do you consider things like corporate bail outs as protectionism?

BWWAAAHAAAHAHAAAAWAAAAAAHHAAAAAWAAAAAAA
*inhales deeply*
BWWAAAAAAAHHHHHHHAAAAAAHHHAAAAAAWWWWAAAAAAHAAAAAA
>since never

Nationalism has held sway on the world stage for nearly 1500 years. You've had the upper hand for less than 50. History is long, my friend, and can be harsh and unforgiving. i wouldn't claim victory just yet.

Keynesianism is good when unemployment is below the natural tho

153857251
It's ok guys, he's hit his 15 post limit

You are the one who is not getting it. Every nation is better off, including Canada. Read Ricardo’s example on the wikipedia page for Comparative Advantage, which is probably the shortest possible explanation. Don’t let the math put you off.

IGNORE ALL SHILL THREADS
>in all fields
kys faggot

No, economic crises are inevitable to an extent but definitely made worse by deregulation. Free trade does not amplify economic crises.(I think, I don't know if there's a consensus on this one)

>blue antifa
is that what you're calling yourselves now?

Haven’t heard much about the falangists for a while. Why do you think that is?

The only reason Globalism "won" is because the West had unprecedented wealth after WW2, and the populace then (Or at least the upper-class) saw a way to increase their short-term wealth. It's going to swing back hard in the other direction once they realise their kids won't be as well off as they are.

>anti populism
wat, i thought globalist collectivist where all for the common man

>Not knowing the difference between the idea being proposed and the actual widespread implementation
>implying it wasn't pushed by the UK in the 1800s with predictable outcomes (destabilizing imbalances)

>Asain tigers were mostly due to the fact that they caught up with our worker productivity
*Exceeded, and by using protectionism

>Protectionism is literally government regulation
>conflating the two