There is literally nothing wrong with Yuri

There is literally nothing wrong with Yuri

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futanari
jisho.org/search/ふたなり
isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&pageid=icb.page346376
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Kill yourself bastard son of a bitch.

Why is that woman's torso so long?

>Oh yeah we also have this character called Yayoi.
>Never develop her character.
>Oh by the way she's a huge fucking Lesbian slut.
Quality writing.

It was Urobuchi's response to Yuri on Ice.

You're right.
Now you dykes have fun over there in that corner..yes..the one that says refuse. Out of sight and out of mind you know.
While we try to dick the hot straight chicks.

S2 was a mistake.


But seriously, I stopped at episode 2, I couldn't stand that ponytail bitch.

Not this ponytail of course The bitch one

It attracts /u/.

>Implying that bi-slut won't brake Yayoi's heart the moment a big dick appear

Are you implying he wasn't a huge dick in S1?

wait, is it from the movie ?

Yayoi was a terrible waste of space regardless of the yuri, though.

>tfw no Akane x Shimotsuki fanart
IT'S NOT FAIR

True, except that it doesn't exist.

Except for the fans who act like actual lesbians, unlike the 2d perfection yuri has.

what about the lack of dick?

It's boring.

What lack of dick?

Did you miss the part where they were lying naked in bed together?

Not really yuri when she fucks anything that walks.

Yeah, I probably did. How long was it again? And probably crucial to the plot and character development, right?

Oh wait it was the inconsequential token lesbian scene, I remember now. Meanwhile the hetero relationship in the focus of the entire show.

>Meanwhile the hetero relationship in the focus of the entire show.
What show are you describing exactly?

“There isn’t more painful, harmful for people thing than sех without love. But also there isn’t a thing that can heal better and make bonds stronger than sех with love. You know, Yayoi, I love you.”

Just wondering, is futa on girl considered as yuri or straight?

>>Meanwhile the hetero relationship in the focus of the entire show.
Makishima is a guy you know?

It's considered disgusting. Like any other porn with hermaphrodites and mutants.

Personally, I consider it yuri. I'm all but alone on that though.

It's not yuri. It's just a fetish.

Reminder me. Didn't the blond one want to fuck that other guy?

>'there was no yuri'
>'they blatantly had lesbian sex'
>'it doesn't count because the show doesn't revolve around it'
Nice goalpost moving.

I mean, you're factually and objectively wrong on that. It's not subjective. Yuri is female on female. Hermaphrodites are not female, therefore it can not be yuri, which is female x female.

Of course.

No.

Futa is not hermaphrodites, or intersex, or tranny, or whatever. Futa is a stock female with a fleshy attachment. It is that way because that is what's intended 9.9 times out of 10 by the futa drawing community.

There are so many good futa doujinshi that might pass as yuri if it weren't for what is essentially a fleshy dildo.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futanari
>Futanari is the Japanese word for hermaphroditism
Whatever way you try to rationalize it in your head, you still like disgusting mutant hermaphrodites.

That's some bad anatomy.

>wikipedia

Not that guy but shouldn't you provide a better link to show him how unreliable wikipedia is?

>sex without love is painful and harmful
But that's bullshit

Why does she have 6 fingers?

jisho.org/search/ふたなり
>hermaphrodite; androgyny; hermaphroditism

isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&pageid=icb.page346376
>nothing

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome
>you

It doesn't matter what the definition of futanari is outwith the anime/manga fandom. Clearly what it means to most doujin artists is not some sort of half male, half female hon. It is almost always used to denote an otherwise female who has an attachment, or a built-in strapon, if you will.

Futa can have roundabout the same appeal as yuri, unless you only like yuri because of the lack of a penis. Which is a fucking stupid reason to like yuri.

Don't necro bump inactive threads with stupid shit like this.
And everything you said is wrong. It's just you trying to rationalize it to yourself in your head so you can think you're not disgusting.

Actually, I think you'll find that everything I said was right. And I'll bump whichever thread I want, whenever the fuck i want.

>bragging about being cancerous
Thanks for admitting it, at least.
And no, nothing you said is correct. Hell, you didn't even know the definition of the word when this started and then you tried to do stupid shit like nitpick wikipidea sources.

Your vile shit is not yuri, get over it.

It is. And that's the final word. Big tent yuri is a thing, you clownish regard.

Why are ESL retards also such cancer?

By literal definition it is not yuri. No matter what you say, the very definition of words prove you are wrong.

It's not yuri if there's a dick, but I don't mind it personally

Of course it's yuri. Stop kidding yourself.
Tell me, when an artist adds a dick to an established female character, do you think their intent is to say that the character is now in part a man? No, you dolt. It's function is simply a strap on with extra features.

>bumping the thread from page 10 again
Confirmed for being the OP and pathetically desperate to keep your shit thread alive. You're a brain dead degenerate who can literally not even think correctly. It doesn't matter what the artist's intent is, because the result is the same either way. Just because you are intending to be smart doesn't mean you actually are. See how that works?

Nah, I don't. And I'm still right. Words have different meanings in different contexts. You're mistaking reality for fiction. In reality, chicks with dicks would be part make, but in fiction it needn't mean that at all. Stop being so angry mate.

>if you disagree with me you're mad
No, but you just made it even more clear you're autistic. And no, the definition of a word never changes based on context. That's not how definitions work. Words can have multiple contextual meanings, but that doesn't mean you can claim a word means anything you want based on "context".

...

I don't think you quite get how language works, son.

No, it's you who doesn't understand, Dad. You are literally trying to say that you can claim a word means anything you want based on the arbitrary context you use. Which is blatantly wrong.

So fly means the same thing no matter whether you are discussing fashion or a frog's diet?

If enough people use it in a particular way, then it it is perfectly capable of acquiring a new meaning.
Take, for instance, the word 'gay', or 'faggot'.

>Implying Gino doesn't count as another woman

Language isn't static. It's constantly evolving in all directions.

No, that's not what I said at all you illiterate fucktard.
Your argument is that you can say a word means ANYTHING based on your arbitrary context.

No, it just means many people are using the word wrong.