I'm a communist, debate me

I'm a communist, debate me.

Other urls found in this thread:

gommies.gom/fug/
gommies.gom/starve/
gommies.gom/ohfugme/
gommies.gom/ohshid/
gommies.gom/1984/
gommies.gom/guck/
gommies.gom/probaganda/
gommies.gom/XDDDD/
gommies.gom/wheresfood/
gommies.gom/benis/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

FOOD

...

Starve to death already.

Not an argument

About what retard?

I dont debate for free.

how do you prevent people from leeching off the system while contributing nothing, without jailing/killing them?

it doesn't work

kys

1944-1989 worst years of my life

not an argument

How's Venezuela doing?

free helicopter rides soon

not an argument.

>its never been implemented properly
Kys

this is a legitimate argument. If you can't answer it, you're just proving my point.

Food

not an argument

it isn't necessary to debate you because all of your arguments have already been refuted. I gain nothing by retreading the same ground and I lose nothing by ignoring you. you are totally powerless in a world which has long since moved on from your sophistry.

Thoughts on Sorrelianism?

Queues for products?
You do not choose what to pay for, it is the state that chooses and you just might not get a cut of it.

Isn't that picture inaccurate simply because lots of hillary supporters are niggers and spics, and they tend to be shorter than white people on average? especially spics

theres nothing to debate
your ideology is such a massive failure that even the last "communist" countries have capitalism.

china stopped being communist after mao died. is one of the most capitalist countries in the world.

north korea has private markets to stop people from starving.

literally nothing to debate, if your delusions worked then a country would be doing it. stay forever cucked, faggot.

not an argument..

capitalism has been reducing world poverty since the 1800s what have Communism done besides mass starvation?

I don't think you know what an argument is

I win by default then. Enjoy your other "debates".

KYS faggot

I don't debate economically challenged faggots!
save your strength you must be starving!

>not an argument..

that's exactly what I said. can you not read?

not an argument...

As it has happened every single time Communism is implemented, how will you prevent your predecessors from being dictators? The government holding complete authority over the people rarely ends well.

Is 2+2=5?

How much internet cost in north korea?

/thread

Can you build roads?

>not an argument
Is not an argument

not an argument.

I'd 'debate' you but you'd probably pass out from starvation.

This is a troll you retards.

saged

not an argument

Why does the revolution always kill the productive members of society?

not an argument..

>Step one: ask for legit points
>Step two: refuse to argue all points made
>Step three: signal my retardation to reinforce what everyone already knows
>Step four: ????
>Step five: labor?

not an argument

>debate me
>people raise some legitimate point
>"not an argument"
Didn't expected nothing else coming from a commie.

Dude, I don't need an argument, I just need some roads.

not an argument.

> step 1: be buttblasted by sargonigger

Not an argument. But seriously, are you a secret lolbertarian shilling against commies(rightfully so, but still)?

>sargonigger
A what?

everybody knows commie won't argue if they don't get food

not an argument

Hello gomrades! XDDDD Dis general is for disgussion of margsism-lebonnism, da ideology of revolutionary socialism and gommunism.

Gommunism is da next stage of guckery following real society.
Wat exagtly is gommunism according to gommies:
>Gommunism is a stage of guckery in which the produgtive infrustrugture runs away from gommie country, and no goods are produced and beeple starve. XDDDD
>Gommunism in full form is obressive, statist society dat follows maxim "gib gib gib!" :DDDD
>To achieve gommunism we must replace broduction with murderous obressive rulers liek me, fug working glass beeple. XDDDD Struggle while I liquidate you all lol. When capitalists run away we win and I kill you all. Eventually the functions of state cease and state becomes murderous and indistinguishable from other gommies. Da state withers away liek da people.
gommies.gom/fug/ gommies.gom/starve/

GL uses philosphy of gib and starve, see here:
gommies.gom/ohfugme/

It is recommend you kill yourself so you can avoid starving.

Resources:
gommies.gom/ohshid/
gommies.gom/1984/
gommies.gom/guck/
gommies.gom/probaganda/
gommies.gom/XDDDD/
gommies.gom/wheresfood/
gommies.gom/benis/

_________________________________

Da sdages of gommunism.
>Sdage one Bourgers aren't allowed to vode :DDD but otherwise da system is digtadorshib of gommies. Everything is stole by digtadors and digtadors rule all.

>Sdade two Withering All beeple who aren't digtador glass starve. XDDD Once glass disabears and we steal everything more beeple wither away. Bolice begome unnecessary as beeple are dead lol :DDDDD Central blanning begomes unnecessary begause sgarcity caused starving. Money is all ours.

>Sdage three Gommunism. No beeple. No food. My money. Much benis.

>Sdage four
>Nod real gommunism. Move on to nexd goundry :DDDDDDD

Argument: The labor theory of value has never yet been shown to be viable, despite over 120 years of effort on the part of Marxian economists.

not an argument.

1944-1989 should be studied as the Soviet slavery

Okay, let's start a debate. I will propose the following topic: social fulfillment that can be acquired in a specific political environment.

First argument: Communism isn't a viable platform to acquire social fulfillment since one is forbidden to be 'unique' and therefore expres him/herself, resulting in a continuous repression of that which makes humans humans: intense social bonding and identifying.

Immedietly log out and hand over your ID to the real JahWeh commiescum

Where do you live?

Great thread guys as always

I'm pretty sure the answer is "not an argument" ;)

not an argument
not an argument

Provide a example that has successfully implemented communism

>since one is forbidden to be 'unique' and therefore expres him/herself
Your argument is flawed right here. Why is someone forbidden from being unique under communism? and be more specific, what type of communism are you talking about?

You are mistaken, it is.

Why does it always need to be this debate between Communism X Capitalism? The better solution is to apply functional and prosperous ideas from both systems.

If you invest in a total freedom model, a neoliberal model, without labor law rules, without proper taxation, without large investments in public health and public education you will forever have an abysmal division between the top most rich and the people at the bottom (remembering that many of the families of the most rich are descendent from people that explored, robbed, killed and torture others, so it is not always a fair and clean chain of events that placed the elites of today on the place where they are now).

Some examples of the humanitarian chaos that the model of complete free market and conglomerates-influence-on-government bring can be seen in the atrocious conditions of the workers in the industrial revolution in England (where women and children were corroded alive in exchange of mere scraps while the companies and businessmen amassed huge profits and fought fiercely against government regulations on working conditions, fearing they would become less richer), and also in the role that the United Fruit Company plaid in several Latin American countries, leading to the instauration of dictatorships, torture and killing of hundreds and exploration of workers.

cont.

On the other side, Communism is almost like placing one gigantic company in the control of the whole country: the State Inc. The members of the party are the family that owns that business, and since there are no system of checks and balances all that happens is a massive exploration of the people in favor of a small elite. Without separation between the Judiciary and the Legislative, all irksome individuals are extirpated without due process of law (but remember, far-right military dictatorships work in the exact same way).

So Communism doesn’t work. However, no matter how important the private sector is and the freedom of the citizens to regulate large slices of their lives, some responsibility of the State (like the Welfare system) is extremely important to create an egalitarian society, and, with time, invest the tax money on the most important product of all: the human beings that live in the country.

not an argument.

>The better solution is to apply functional and prosperous ideas from both systems
so.. social democracy?

you're being baited, he's just saying not an argument to literally everything.

not an argument

>ask for faggot to provide a example of successful implementation of Communism
>not a argument
Not a answer faggot

Nope. Debate is closed. You killed over 1 million people a year for an entire century. Now you die.

not an argument

Yeah, I noticed... Thanks though, I mean capitalism right? ', :)

What is your definition of successful?

Does the communist obey communism or the commune?

One that you would be fucking willingly live as a non government official but, as a citizen

How are you going to solve the resource allocation. Are you going to install commissars again?

#include "communismLogic.h"
#include

commissars->allocate(double &amountForGovernment, double &amountForHungryPeople, double resources)
{
amountForGovernment = resources*0.98;
amountForHungryPeople = resources*0.02;
}

while(OPISAFAG){
std::cout

benis :DDDDDD

not an argument.

...

Ideology that has already killed members of my family

I'm not going to "debate" followers of a fucking mass murdering ideology I'm going to fucking punch them before they have a chance to kill me. The debate has already been settled. #punchacommunist

Then Russia

Successful would be a system that lasts, keeps growing because it provides and attracts new citizens, has the capacity to deal with dilemmas etc.

Basically every thing communism can't do lel

PLEASE TAKE ME KANG NIGGER

not an argument

>Successful would be a system that lasts, keeps growing because it provides and attracts new citizens
Then North Korea

FPBP

>debating a communist
Nah, but I am always open for a helicopter ride.

Free market fixes all of those if you have money to pay, dumb dumb.

You don't have money to pay because of commie taxation and fiat money schemes, dumb dumb.

Don't you think you're wasting human potential by forcing people to do jobs they don't excel at?

>20 million people die because capitalism doesn't function in their country
>almost 80 million die because communism functions in theirs

Yeah it is, but your minuscule brain is not sufficient in computing the answer. also sage.
have a tsundere.

/thread/

not an argument

You're a communist. In conclusion, I win this argument.

...