Spanish women have got to be the hottest on the planet.
To answer your question OP: economics are not exact science, they're a social science just like sociology, political science, history, etc. Those sciences study the behavioral patterns of mankind and try to induct those patterns into general outlines
because you can't separe it from philosophy and politics, and there's a lot of conflicting view points
>I thought it was a science?
not when people treat it and defend it like religion, dumb zealots.
yea so this
but.. see, im a fan of the austrian school of economics, and i vehemently believe in free trade under some degree of state protectionism (especially in early phases). but yea i agree with this, theres no objective, quantifiable, eternal truth in economics. or, the only one is in psychological terms. the only "truths" in economics are how PEOPLE behave under certain circumstances. therefore, i think economics should be called the study of INCENTIVES, not actual money or trade
cont: economics are the study of scarcity and choice. There's no exact scientific way to predict how humans and markets will respond to certain things
because it's basically like weather forecasts. 1 person claims B will happen when you do A, others will say C will happen when you do A. And then there are retards that still defend ideas that have been proven wrong like trickle down economics.
(((Economic theories))) aren't "science",
they're doctrines of preferred human behaviour.
Economics, money, finance are nothing more than made up human things dependant on voluntary or involuntary participation by human beings. Perpetuated by mimicry (memetic)
Above all things resides the (((System))) in perfect karma neutrality.
It impedes upon its infected host (human mind) so severely that the host becomes unable to even imagine a srate of being without the (((Systems))) omnipresence.
BOLT-ONS
Checked retard
Agreed.
I think the key issue is not to ideologize all those economic theories, that's what socialists and lib dems do. Their entire belief system evolves around those economic theories because they have a materialized world view. As a right winger though I believe the economy should serve the nation, not the other way around. The nation shouldn't serve the free market or the state planned economy.
So yeah, no theory is exact. That's why sometimes it's necessary to do some public spending, while in other occassions it's better to let the free market do it's thing
What's most important is our nation though. I believe in the free market but it ends where our nation's borders begin. We don't need cheap labor from turd world countries