They have even lower IQs than SSAs. And this is despite the fact that Aborigines are in a rich country while Sub-Saharan Africans are in poor countries. Sub-Saharan IQ is 70 while Aborigines IQ is 63. If Aborigines were dumped into sub-Saharan Africa they probably would have an IQ in the 40s.
Also Australian Aborigines look even more unhuman than black people do. Look at this picture, for example.
Other urls found in this thread:
krautchan.net
forum.bodybuilding.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
they are the missing link. add the cunts from papua new guinea, solomon islands and fijians. fucking stone aged savages.
Fijians are not on the same level as the other groups you mentioned. Not sure about Solomon Islands natives.
They didn't integrate into said rich society so they're mostly still nomadic sub-humans
>Are Australian Aborigines even lower on the evolutionary scale than sub-Saharan Africans
Short answer: Yes.
Long answer: Yeeeeeeessssss
...
...
...
...
...
krautchan.net
get rid off these scumbags
abos aren't human
Look at this
forum.bodybuilding.com
>Abos
>small cortex
>large rear “animal brain”
Missing link confirmed
there is no way aliens would fail to divide the genus homo into different species or at least subspecies.
Original Aussies classified them as fauna. That should tell you all you need to know about these subapeoids
Indigenous to where? Ireland?
Abbo's are a strange mob, the desert tribes live much rougher than the coastal ones and their appearance shows that. I always wondered whether the ones wandering the desert had been cast out by the larger, more heavily built coastal tribes.
...
...
They are the oldest surviving humans on . They are older than the blacks, whites, other aboriginals throu out the world as well as asians!
...
death to all melanesians and austronesians. german samoans are the uberman of the pacific