OPEN BORDERS IS THE TRUE REDPILL

Why are people so much against open borders when free immigration is the number one alleviator of poverty in the world?

Don't believe me? Here's the proof

cgdev.org/files/1425376_file_Clemens_Economics_and_Emigration_FINAL.pdf

"Eliminating the planet’s remaining trade barriers would increase global GDP by around $US100 billion.
Eliminating immigration barriers, by comparison, would as much as double world income: that is, increase global GDP by $US60 trillion.
This added wealth would be shared, but the overwhelming beneficiaries would be people who now live in poor countries."

- Lant Pritchett explains this notion in details in his book: Let Their People Come: Breaking the Policy Deadlock on International Labor Mobility.

Ben Powell Immigration:
youtube.com/watch?v=B4GcF_Jl7zU
The Case For Open Borders:
youtube.com/watch?v=jk8J9OGQH50

GEM conference:
youtu.be/kqyXIe5up68

There was a study in Denmark about the effects of immigration after the Yugoslav wars, Iraqi and Afghanistan war refugees. The wages of the less educated natives actually went up. Contrary, to the convential wisdom of supply and demand. The explanation was that low skilled natives gradually moved towards more complex occupations and a fraction received formal training to increase their complementarity with the manual jobs performed by non-EU immigrants.

nber.org/papers/w19315.pdf?new_window=1

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3eyJIbSgdSE
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Kill niggers worldwide and you have a point

>GDP = quality of life
No retard

Think of what you can do with all that money and cheap servants you can boss around. You would be living the traditional aristocratic lifestyle.

Niggers and chinks should focus on improving their societies instead of improving their birth rates and maybe their income would increase. Of course you can't achieve anything if you have so many children you can barely afford food and necessities.

This

Increasing global GDP means giving away all jobs to African slave labor, then forcing all Americans not directly working for the 6 remaining global corporations to go into debt just to feed themselves.(((Free trade))) was perhaps one of the worst things that ever happened to America.

Common Economic Fallacy perpetuated by Backwood Hicks. There are not a finite amount of jobs stupid. The only thing that seperates a first world country from a third world country fiscally is production. Free Trade maximizes the utility of the consumer by giving them more choices of prices and frees up their spending so they can spend on more things.

If the Baby Boomers retire, we will face a massive hit to our production and everyone suffers. If we have free movement we would be able to increase production and everyone benefits. We would be recieving the comparative advantage of the immigrants and the immigrants would help us perform better in our comparative advantage and everyone would benefit.

Yay we can all be unhappy, increasing productivity without wage increases and we get to lose our culture and watch our ethnicities die out

>There are not a finite amount of jobs
wew lad, what is unemployment then?

You will be able to buy more things as the supply curve gets more and more elastic, every single good will get cheaper. And if you currently own a home, the value of your property would skyrocket.

There is always a natural amount of baseline unemployment and lots of people are unemployed because they are more comfortable on welfare.

>lets keep our welfare state and open the borders
You people deserve a bullet for lying so blatantly. What you intend to do is flood countries with people who vote the way you want them to vote.

Our welfare State is a piece of shit but with or without it we will still reap the overwhelming benefits of immigration.

And there's the rub. Create welfare state, invite in more people who will inevitably take more out than they pay in, hope society doesn't collapse.

Neo-libs have been wrong about everything. They're basically responsible for the current resurgence of communism, the only question is how intentional it was. People like you get the rope first.

>Why are people so much against open borders when free immigration is the number one alleviator of poverty in the world?
Is that why the United States is slowly crumbling to third world status?

>buy more things
I do not care about that bullshit

You say that now but once price of everything hyper deflates and the value of your home skyrockets, you will care a lot

America doesn't have open borders which is why our gains from immigration has been so modest. There is an estimated 300 million people that want to move the United States and we only accept .3% of them. We reject 5 million applicants each year. These are people who want nothing more than to make a better life for themselves.

>America is slowly dying from letting in so many people so bringing in more will help it
What stupid fucking logic is this? Adding more people in here is just going to be a drain on us
>Welfare
>Infrastructure
>Resources
>Overall unity of the country
Everything would be drained even more than before. Adding more isn't going to solve anything. If these nations and people want to be prosperous they have to stay in their own country and help it just as we did and Europe

Growing up in my high school, there were 50 applicants for every entry level part time job. I can't see how open borders would help better this dilemma. You would just get an extremely over saturated job market overnight because people will work for a tenth of the wage you would work because it beats working in a shoe factory.

Also you forget that welfare exists in the real world and so your open borders utopia won't work. Why on earth would we not get an influx of a billion immigrants overnight all looking to be on welfare that pays 10x more than what they made back home working 16 hour days?

Everything you mentioned is why some people don't like it. And they take advantage of tribalism, which is another force keeping this from happening. People at that level may be well read, and have a high vocabulary, but it's still stage 2 primitive thinking...if you care to call it thinking that is.

This, they think money can be magically printed. These mouthbreathers know little to nothing of what Intrinsic Value or Inflation is.

Not just a drain, some would say immigration was the root of problems in Europe last century and led to the world wars.

kill yourselfkillkill yourselfkillkill yourselfkill kill yourselfkillkill yourselfkillkill yourselfkillkill yourselfkillkill yourselfkillkill yourselfkillkill yourselfkill

>No Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Huns, or Balts
>Has Israel and Greece

Hahahaha, well meme'd my friend. White people don't belong in your shit hole anyway.

Because I don't live in a poor country.

You ignore the demands that immigrants bring means that they will need to spend on food, shelter, entertainment and their spending will create new jobs.

any day now our somalian immigrants will be net tax payers

hahahahahaha

You started from a false premise, immigrants have been a net benefit to the american economy even when you control for all transfers given to immigrants. If you instead start from the premise that there is capital being underutililized because there are simply not enough people who want to work, then you will realize the added production and spending of immigrants will lead to added jobs, savings and growth for the native population. Especially because the purchasing power of your money will increase exponentially.

>Eliminating the planet’s remaining trade barriers would increase global GDP by around $US100 billion.
which is fuck all kike, kill your family then yourself jew, else one day someone will come for you

Kill yourself faggot. Open borders is death for white western civilization. The Japanese are smart enough not to play your game.

>"Eliminating the planet’s remaining trade barriers would increase global GDP by around $US100 billion.
>global GDP by around 100billion

wow its fucking NOTHING

Go back to plebbit.

Economic Nationalism is just cannabilizing the wealth of other middle and lower class americans. Free Trade works because consumers gain more than workers lose and the added spending creates jobs for displaced workers. There is never a finite amount of jobs.

>Immigration is good for us goys... I mean guys!

India's GDP is 4 times Norway's GDP. Where would you rather live? GDP is a horrible metric for quality of life. I would rather live in a white ethno-state with robots doing to cheap labor. Anybody who wants open borders is a traitor and should be hung for treason.

OP is a retarded idiot and that has no idea how GDP relates to quality of life.

Sage the fuck of of this thread.

Pure lies
It has been proven again and again that cheap labor has caused wages to lower and lower constantly and that the only people who benefit from labor are the big cats who own the company and their share holders. Immigration destroys the country people reside in and replace them as if they are no longer useful. There is no moral justification for immigration. If these people want a good life they need to make it in their home country. Bringing them all here isn't going to solve anything. Leaving a broken home isn't going to magically fix it.
The United States already has millions of people out of the labor force and youth unemployment is at an all time high. We could easily fix the laws here at home to benefit the people of our country which would increase wages, increase competition and increase our GDP without having to rely on cheap labor.

Civilization and culture is not supposed to a Museum, it is supposed to be spontaneous and changing or else it gets stale and boring. You're not supposed to take life seriously.

You're a fucking retard. Account for welfare, hospital bills not paid, crime, ( gang violence, drunk driving, hit and run accidents), forcing insurance rates to go up because of their criminal and fraudulent activity. Taking of jobs, wage stagnation, dumbing down of schools and increased spending on resources to care for their many children.

They take more than they can ever possibly give. If you think otherwise you are either a corporate whore or a politician, as they are the only ones to gain with higher investment returns due to low wages and free votes from all the gibs.

I hope they line you up against a wall.

GDP per capita*

the shills are not even trying anymore.

Wow the rich want to protect themselves from the destitute. Shocker.

and wages lower and the cost rent, food, and energy. A perfect example is California. If you are rich you benefit huge from immigration. Every buddy else can barely survive.

problem is jews would use this to flood is with hundreds of millions of groids.

holy fuck do you kikes not even take a day off?

Exactly. I would happily let massive amounts of white high IQ Europeans in. Absolutely.

But that not (((their))) goal. Their true goal is to flood us with low IQ peasants to dumb America Down.

White people work to make things and have lots of things. It's not fair.

Why does it fall to the west to fix the world's problems? Do you consider the white man superior, and therefore the parent of the world? Or do you consider the 3rd world shitskins so adolescent that they need the white race to fix things for them. Either way leave the white man and the west out of it, it's not our problem and never was.

>increasing GDP increases the wealth of the layman
kek

You're not going to be an (((aristocrat))). You will be a serf along with every imported muzzie or african

Go to Antarctica and try to make a good life for yourself there. You would not fare any better in Haiti than a Haitian would because there is no capital there.

Also your view of wealth as a zero sum game reveals your ignorance on the topic. Everyone benefits from higher producitivity, an immigrant coming here has the same effect of inventing an automated machine that works for little, they both improve efficiency and allows us to have spend more and have more choices.

I'm just making the argument that has been concluded by numerous studies.

>immigrant coming here has the same effect of inventing an automated machine that works for little, they both improve efficiency and allows us to have spend more and have more choices.

YOU DUMB FUCK!!! The machine wont get on welfare you dumb motherfucker! SAGE!

those studies most likely nit pick certain immigrant subgroups to present a positive outcome

Then that is a problem of the welfare state not the immigrant.

That's why rich American fucks continued to import cheap labor while leaving their fellow country man behind. If you understood the concept of supply and demand you'd understand why most Americans can't make a livable paycheck without uncle Sam getting involved. Things went to shit the moment Regan decided to give amensty, that was the true flaw in reganonics.

And you just answered your own fucking question. WE CANT HAVE OPEN BOARDERS WITH SOCIALISM! Please delete this thread now.

You ya go you stupid mother fucker. Watch, then delete this thread you stupid fucking idiot.

youtube.com/watch?v=3eyJIbSgdSE

>You would not fare better than a Haitian in Haiti
>Immigrants have the same capability of inventing as you do
Listen kike, it's true everyone benefits from higher productivity because you get a cheaper product. But there is more to life and more to a nation than the economy and the draw backs to that type of mindset outweigh the benefit.
The United States and all the successful nations of Europe weren't always successful. Every single successful nations succeeded because the people stayed and made it greater after each and every generation.
What you are advocating for is purposefully changing the face of a nation so you can have a cheaper product. Draining the nation of resources, draining the social fabric and draining the identity of the country.

Except for Israel - Zionest kike state forever right faggot?

Pervasive international border control is a relatively recent phenomenon in world history. In the past, many states had open international borders either in effect or due to a lack of any legal restriction. It wasn't until after World Ward I that we have accepted a closed border regime according to John Keynes.

WRONG!

The west closed their borders because they turned socialist.

Here watch this video you stupid fucking idiot.
youtube.com/watch?v=3eyJIbSgdSE

Particularly wrong, you could cross borders but faced reprisal from the populace depending on your own origin

...

It's one thing to have immigrants willing to work it's another having immigrants wanting to just live off of welfare you stupid fuck

Sorry, just meant to say I think open borders would be fine if affirmative action and freedom of association and employment were enshrined in legislation.

Milton Friedman explains it perfectly, you cant have a social state and open borders. It will never work. You must choose one or the other.

I'm not saying the west should do anything. Borders are an act of war, an act of violence. I am just saying we should not stop two people who want to conduct mutually beneficial affairs together from doing so because of something as petty as borders

Stop destroying the areas that actually advance, regressives. It's a beautiful thought, but we're not quite at the level where we can accomodate the world.

sorry, fucked up my post. I meant affirmative action should be abolished and people should not be restricted to who they hire or who they live around. i.e. no forced diversity or anything of that nature.

>Borders are an act of war, an act of violence.

WRONG!!! Its and act of socialism! Watch, its only 5 minutes long you stupid fuck. Its answering and disputing all your lies.
youtube.com/watch?v=3eyJIbSgdSE

That will never work, you must remove the welfare state because kids born here (ancor babies) are citizens and automatically qualify for SOCIAL ASSISTANCE! You cant have both! Unless you outlaw birth citizenship OR complete remove all social programs.

This is the dumbest shit I have ever heard. We already have too many unskilled laborers and more and more work is getting automated.

The free movements of person is perfectly acceptable when there is no welfare state and no forced association. Freedom of movement can only be allowed as far as private property owners want people on their property. There must be no state stealing from the natives and paying for immigrants.

oh yeah, I'm onboard with slashing and burning the welfare state to ashes. I agree with you on that point.

LOL, like a want to share my 50k with the brown hordes that make less than $5 a day. im sure that increasing world gdp and what sounds great to a bleeding heart, but there is a reason 73% of world income in where it is: the brown hordes cant create they only consume. if you want to lower yourself down to their level for the jews benefit then go right ahead and move to africa

>they will need to spend on food, shelter, entertainment and their spending will create new jobs
you mean immigrants end up on welfare that increases gov. spending which retarded fucks like you call an increase in gdp

>>Borders are an act of war, an act of violence.

This lie enrages me! You're stupid fucking college professor didnt teach you anything, that fuck has programmed you. This idea that borders are formed because of war is lies. Modern borders where enacted as a response to social programs. That is a FACT!

You can not have open borders AND a social state. You must choose ONE!

>Keynsian mumbo jumbo

Spending does not grow the economy. You need to fucking save money in order to create new business that produce things before people can buy them.

Saving and Investing grows the economy by fueling increased production that can then be bought.

You also ignore the obvious fact that increases demand for those basic necessities will increase their prices, especially shelter.

>Money is the root of happiness
No, it's not. It's a necessity for certain things, but it stops there. Money is only useful if you can leverage it into power but I'm not sure how many of us are billionaires

Falling goods prices and rising property values are a paradox.

Rising property values always leads to inflation.

so your solution to poverty is to have one group (or a few groups) have the intelligence, innovation, and work ethic to do well
then let people who dont have those qualities move in to the communities/countries that do, and share the benefits?

socialism is an act of war against your own people

Open borders mean that the aristocracy alpha males like me get to monopolize all the women while working class beta males like you can't even breed.

Open borders is actually eugenics.

>HURRRDURRR MUH CONSUMERISM IS WUT MAKEZ DA COUNTRY GOOOOOOD
burn it all to the fucking ground.

Economics is a soft science and anything an economist says can be discarded as easily as it's asserted.

Totally agreed. The Renaissance started and sped up after Europe opened itself to international trade for a reason. I too want scholars and artisans from every corner of Earth.

>number one alleviator of poverty in the world?
Getting subhumans out of poverty will only weaponize them against whites.

Are you implying that immigrants don't work?

No, its not. Its an agreement among citizens to provide a safety net for each other. You cant have socialism and a open borders. Choose one SHILL!

They didnt have socialism during the Renaissance you stupid fucking idiot.

>Making money is worth destroying your country!
Fuck off kike.

There are 1.2 billion Africans
Africa adds more than the population of Europe every 15 years

Is immigration from Africa going to significantly raise the income level of Africa, or is it going to reduce the income level of Europe?

They work, but they don't work intelligently.
Being hard working isn't enough to build a successful and thriving country - the population also needs to have a sufficient amount of intelligent people.

Just as an example, I'm an analyst at a company and in 1 year, my excel and VBA skills surpassed H1B visas and immigrants in the company.

In one of the tools we were working on, the immigrant (Who was ahead of me) wanted to do a sorting algorithm with VBA in a very difficult way that would've taken days to write. Even then, it would be difficult to maintain due to the complexity of the code. I immediately found an innovative and simple solution that took me 15 minutes to write. It stupefied my 'superiors'.

Working intelligently is more important than working hard.

Economics is both an empirical study and a branch of deductive logic

> anything an economist says can be discarded as easily as it's asserted.

just like your post

>hurrr durrr life revolves around economics
fuck off jew faggot

Wh-why are some places rich and others poor?

>just like your post
Not so fast my burgeoning little academic, shitposting is actually a hard science as you can design an experiment to test a hypothesis using correct scientific controls and then publish your result for peer review. As such there are objective truths in regards to shitposting. Economics can not do this which is why, like the other soft sciences it has room for various schools of thought in the absence of hard data driven conclusions being validated as facts.

There is no way to increase the amount of intelligent people, we have what we have and if we combine the different aspects we bring to the table we can improve each others comparative advantage by allowing us to work in our comparative advantage. For example, a brain surgeon who hires an immigrant to clean his house, cook his food, clean his clothes and get his clothes ready for the morning so that the brain surgeon can do more brain surgery has the same effect as if a brain surgeon were to immigrate. We did not need another brain surgeon to increase the productivity of the brain surgeon we already had. All the Brain surgeon had to do was outsource chores he would normally do himself to somebody who can do them more efficiently.