Anti-commie thread

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=HN0FFbdWRTA
cetusnews.com/news/Amazon-workers-so-exhausted-by-Christmas-targets-they--fall-asleep-standing-up--please.SkJgy45xz.html
content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1870162,00.html
youtube.com/watch?v=rcaDO7SY4-4
youtube.com/watch?v=PvYNiEO3NBk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

pretty shit thread, saged

Fuck Communists!

Free helicopter rides for communists!

Fuck communism!

Deus Vult

those gets though.
Commie fucks must really be hated by kek!

Only one good kind or red. . .

...

Fuck Communists!

Communism for kids.

Ain't it the truth. . .

>implying nobody starves under capitalism

How it works kiddies . .

our helicopters are literally better than yours

Only those that don't apply themselves or put themselves in that situation Mohammed.

no fuck YOU

Yea, I know where I want my kids to grow up. Thanks for your opinion dumbass.

>mega billionaires hoard wealth and treat their employees like shit while lobbying the government to allow them to hoard even more wealth

>just apply yourself.

How many of those deaths are Africans? How many are caused by irresponsible women pumping out babies?

...

...

...

>Not giving people shit for free = killing them
Stupid logic

And how many people die from mass execution and death camps in western capitalism? Almost all deaths under communism were direct democide. Your meme argues that the state is responsible for your welfare. I do not want the state to be responsible for my welfare because they may decide I am not worth keeping alive. Fuck you

...

Mellinial ice cream truck.

No u

Nobody in any first world countries regularly dies from any of those things.

>Not starting your own business or niche in that case
>Assuming all companies treat employees like shit
>Implying corporations don't have a right to their own money

Fuck off communist.

World wide socialism would fix those deaths tho, neo imperialist capitalism is responsible for most of those deaths. You live decently at the expense of the third world, and still most of the money goes to the porkies

Congratulations, you can Photoshop. I will literally kill every last communist myself if it means my children can grow up with property rights.

If you are not allowed to own anything, than you are not allowed to own yourself and you are the property of the state. If that is what you think is a good idea than I have made my option about your continued existence clear.

Just save yourself the energy of posting and jerk off on your copy of mein kamf you trog

How does the west live decently at the expense of the third-world?

>Couldn't keep the USSR fed
>Will somehow feed 50 bajillion nogs in Africa

Until humans sail the stars and energy is practically free, not happening.

Cut off all forien aid. We have no responsibility to people in other countries. And if ass hats like you want to force us to provide resources than we should use force to defend from communist theft.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Cultural Marxism is, in fact, Cultural Deleuzianism-Guattarianism, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Deleuzianism AND Guattarianism. Idpol is not a political philosophy unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning philosophical non-system made useful by the Guattari's schizoanalysis, rhizomes and vital deterritorializing components comprising a full philosophy as defined in 'What Is Philosophy?"

Many left identitarians use a modified version of Deleuzianism every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of Deleuzianism which is widely used today is often called 'Cultural Marxism' and credit is given to the Frankfurt School, but many of its users are not aware that it is basically the Deleuzian non-system of difference, developed by the Liberal identitarians.

There really is a 'Cultural Marxism', developed by Adorno, Marcuse, and Walter Benjamin, but these people aren't using it; it isn't a part of the system they use. Deleuze is the philosophy: the difference in the plateaus that allocates the machinic desires against the oppressive totalities and identities that you know. Deleuze is an essential part of Guanttarianist identitarianism, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete liberal college campus. Deleuze is normally used against Frankfurters: Cultural Marxism is actually the whole system of Deleuze and Guattari with the name of Marx added. All the so-called Cultural Marxists are really Cultural Deleuzeans!

youtube.com/watch?v=HN0FFbdWRTA

>not acknowledging neo imperialism

>start your own business

Where am i supposed to get the money to start a business if i'm poor.

>Assuming all companies treat employees like shit

I never said all companies

>implying corporations don't have a right to their own money

cetusnews.com/news/Amazon-workers-so-exhausted-by-Christmas-targets-they--fall-asleep-standing-up--please.SkJgy45xz.html

This is not an isolated incident and their boss also happens to be the richest man in the world. This guy works employees to exhaustion and pays them peanuts, it's unethical.

USSR after 1950 was fed pretty well.

content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1870162,00.html

youtube.com/watch?v=rcaDO7SY4-4

Use real words, not buzz-terms

And the west never experienced the shortages that they had. Moving food and medicine to where it is needed takes time, money, manpower and will. And I'm sure as fuck not paying for it.

Do you believe in property rights of the individual or not? If not than you are a communist.

Chinese making a good living extracting precious materials, and then choosing to get lazy about how they dispose of the refuse

The first is a good thing and the second isn't our fault, it's their choice.

>Health reports from the region say that Guiyu's children suffer from an extremely high rate of lead poisoning

this is from literally doing the job. I wouldnt call that a good living

Don't compare not doing anything about unfortunate people to the government forcing their nation to starve.

They don't have to embrace this work. If farming or whatever the fuck it is they did before the west created this work is a better way of life, then they're free to keep doing that instead. But instead they as a society chose this.

>Where am i supposed to get the money to start a business if i'm poor.

By not being a fucking lazy retard. Want to know how I started making bank before I invested it? Looking up images of random thots online and selling it to desperate internet men. Find a niche and work with it.

>
This is not an isolated incident and their boss also happens to be the richest man in the world. This guy works employees to exhaustion and pays them peanuts, it's unethical.

Then fucking quit. They aren't slaves and can find another job, especially one with such a low skill level as working for Amazon. Know what's funny? A janitor, a fucking JANITOR gets paid above minimum wage. Where I live, you start at $13 an hour.

Fuck Communists, never disarm for murderers!

>children should know better than to work a shitty job

Literally somebody has to do that job, it's not a job that will disappear. As long as computers are being used there will be people getting getting the materials out of them to reuse. So even if those specific people don't do it anymore somebody else will.

That doesn't change that people are free not to take the work. If they still choose to work these apparently horrendous slave-like jobs over whatever else they had to do before the evil westerners showed up, what does that say about how things were beforehand?

There are always going to be shitty circumstances caused by evil people somewhere in the world. If you are proposing that due to moral concerns we should use deadly force to correct those wrongs in other countries than I would warn you that not all people share your since of morality. In the case of somebody who is opposed to collectivism you may have violance inflicted on you for perceived imorallity.

But somebody still has to do the job. Period. So it doesn't matter who is getting exploited, it matters that somebody is getting exploited. I'm not saying these people were staying at the Hilton before whitey came to town but this is a shitty job that is bad for your health that is created by a demand for tech in the first world.

You're the one who brought up violence buddy

No, nobody HAS to do the job. They're all free to just leave the guys trying to get rid of all the tech-waste with their mountains of junk, until they realise no one's going to take it from them and resign themselves to paying to landfill it themselves.
Shitty jobs are not sorcery, they do not force anyone to perform them.

Hey dumbass, the state is violance. If you do not comply with state orders than it will use violance on you.

If the state owns you than any disobedance can be met legally with death. This is why communism results in mass democide every fucking time it is tried.

If the state guarantees your individual property rights than the only legitimate use of state force it to protect your property rights.

YOU brought up violance by suggesting that communism has all the answers and we should all be under it. I take that as I direct threat to me and mine. Fuck you, come at me and I fight back!

The point is that they are taking precious metals out of the circuitry. They reuse the metals in other computers. If as you suggest they all collectively choose to stop doing this job and the job disappears the companies will have to pay more for the metal, because since the metals are gold, silver etc. they are expensive to acquire, especially on the scales of mass production, so it's much cheaper to get it from the recycled computers. It's not that the US is just dumping waste there, they're paying these people to reweave the useful shit so they can reuse it to save money. They go into poor communities and most likely this is the only way to earn a livable wage in town. If these people didn't have to poison themselves they wouldn't. It's always easier to say "they should just choose not to" when you personally are benefiting from this unethical business practice.

when did i say i was a communist? I just said capitalism aint that great

I UNDERSTAND the point of the work.
>They go into poor communities and most likely this is the only way to earn a livable wage in town
So WITHOUT these shit jobs, they're actually outright fucked? They'll starve to death? If that's the case, the shitty jobs ARE improving their situation, despite the higher rates of poisoning.

Islamists and communists are both collectivists. Therefore do not believe in individual property rights and are to both be opposed on the same grounds.

Nice you adopted a defensive strategy and invested as such. Congrats. Us offensive infrastructure is far more advanced and the large amounts of land to be defended will make neo-siege warfare by crop, fuel and manufactured good denial means US my stalemate after making gains but it will always win eventually. The hope is that nukes cripple the American supply chain and moral enough to force a peace deal before capitulation.

The original point was

>How does the west live decently at the expense of the third-world?

My point is, this industry exists to make tech cheaper. Their suffering is saving you money period. Like i said before, I never said these villages were affluent or that the standard of living there was good before these jobs were created. The entire point was that these people getting lead poisoning saves both of us money.

the islam flag is just to piss off Sup Forumstards

Than what is your proposed solution? Stop using computers? Or some kind of government intervention backed up by threat of force? If so, what kind?

And they are PAID for that work, they are COMPENSATED for helping us save money.

They are paid in lead poisoning and birth defects

Have you not heard of collective bargaining? America had shit conditions in early industry, but the people demanded a minimum standard.

They accept the money in exchange for these problems, they deem the money to be worth it
If they didn't, the businesses would never find willing communities again as it became known what this industry leads to.

I really dont have problem with an individual who was born into Islam if they reject collectivism. I have a problem with collectivist ideology of any flavor because when you mix collectivism with state power you get democide.

The flag indicated to me your religion, your arguments, or lack of them, indicated your ideology. However, I did make the assumption about your religion; should I than assume that you are a worshipper of state power from the progressive camp?

youtube.com/watch?v=PvYNiEO3NBk