Mueller is reportedly zeroing in on the Trump campaign's data operation — and the RNC

businessinsider.com/mueller-questions-rnc-digital-operation-trump-campaign-russia-2017-12

Nervous, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

businessinsider.com/mueller-questions-rnc-digital-operation-trump-campaign-russia-2017-12
snopes.com/2017/03/30/evelyn-farkas-leak/
lrb.co.uk/v40/n01/jackson-lears/what-we-dont-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-russian-hacking
sputniknews.com/columnists/201707091055380659-trump-putin-up-against-us-deep-state/
sputniknews.com/columnists/201701081049374470-us-in-deep-trouble/
deepstatenation.com/fbi-looking-into-allegations-against-kremlin-propaganda-outlet-sputnik/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Nope, because there's nothing to find

He's looking into the fact that Obama illegally surveilled Trump and the RNC.

>obtained from an octopus familiar with predicting the outcome of soccer games

I hope they build this shit up only for them to find nothing again so the waves of salt keep coming.

Says unnamed sources

The left's intention is to allow this joke to continue for all 4 years of Trump's presidency. They're hoping to keep the focus on total bullshit in an attempt to cover up the fact Trump has done more in his first year than most 8 year presidents.

MAGA
GAS THE KIKES
PUT CONGRESS UP AGAINST THE WALL

Yes, that will be the thing that happens. They will definitely ever stop, and when (not if!) they give up, they will freely admit failure to their base. You clearly have an astute mind for these things.

>Thinks the left makes up false stories because that's what the right does

LOLOL

Mueller coming.

lol you stupid shitlib, kys already

le over for shrumpf tip top

nope. anything that drives the country closer to a much needed civil war is a good thing.

What are they looking for again?

I just don’t know and if I was them this would be the biggest cock boue balls ever created

>Two sources told Yahoo News
Thank God for the Fourth Estate!

...

Why is it always shilling from the same Ukrainian faggot? Whats got you so angry about Trump?

Stop peddling this bullshit

Enjoy your freedumbs while it lasts, Drumpfturds. I wonder how many Drumpfshits will fit in a mass grave? Only one way to find out...

Or arrest everyone on both sides. But only Trump was supposed to be bad...

Then why do they make so many false stories? Accidently?

>reportedly
*yawn*
Wouldn't that have been one of the first things the investigation covered? Idiots.

Protip: You aren't reading real news sources.

What stories have you seen from The Washington Post or The Associated Press that has been fake?

What the fuck does this have to do with the Russia probe? This is really getting absurd

It's all about money laundering France-user.

>Business Insider
Have they been right about anything?

When will the civil war start? Every single merifat deserves death for dragging every news station around the world into this retardation. Fuck you.

I can't wait til these deep state fags start getting charged with sedition...

This has to be bait.

Mueller has been "zeroing in" for months and he's got dick to show for it

>reportedly
You really should stop letting the media gaslight you like this.
It's been almost a year now.
Have some pride.

>Two sources told Yahoo News
sounds legit.

They might want to look at all of the in kind support Google has offered to the dems over the years. Shit they 'loaned' Obama data mining software and over 1000 software engineers.

>reportedly
>zeroing
This is the most noncommital headline Ive ever read

>Thinks I'm bait

>Mueller has been "zeroing in" for months and he's got dick to show for it
That's not true: Multiple FBI people have been exposed for their corruption and attempt to overthrow the government because Hillary lost. Mueller's investigation is turning up all sorts of collusion...by FBI people associated with Mueller.

Yeah except those people that got arrested.
That was totally nothing.
Oh wait, that was Trump's campaign manager? LOLOL

(You)

Mueller can zero in on Deez Nutz niggah!!!

...

Lol you got some nobody on a process crime. Trump will never be removed from office.

Enjoy your fantasy land tho

Lmfao you leftists are still hanging on to the Russia hoax

Trump won't kick Putin out of Ukraine.

Holy shit, he's "zeroing" in... must have found a big breadcrumb.

>is reportedly
>may be getting to it
>someone there is a chance
>its a possibility
>indeed it could be happening
>not certain but maybe

reminder to sage all ukranian shill threads.

you misspelled "Reporter making up bullshit" mate, fair dinkum

It doesn’t. They concluded that part really quickly, Russia did try something but then again they always try something. Nothing changed, Trump won legitimately. That’s what the deepstate hated, because they don’t have a puppet like Clinton.

So Muller who’s part the deepstate is investigating Trump under the guise that they’re looking for Russian Hacking. When what they’re really doing is diggin up dirt to stick it to Trump and make him more compliabe to their will.

bump

johnny warren told you so...

B-but user, Mueller got hold of Trump's transition emails last month!!!!!11

>MAGA
>GAS THE KIKES
wew!

Do even anti Trump people still find this farse entertaining? It's all so tiresome.

Mueller may as well change his name to 'Aint Shit' because people look at him and say 'Man He Ain't Shit'

Hey, you know what? If they break the RNC into tiny little pieces and Gitmo all of Trump's handlers but the price is leaving the tangerine orangutan in the Oval Office, I'll still count that as a win.

>Going after the RNC while they control Congress
Smart plan

That the best you got lmao

It's the Reddit hapa

Show me the money you utter losers.

The speed mueller's team works, it'll be a Democrat-controlled house before he makes a report.

Was there a due date for this report?

It seems like everything is riding on this investigation. Mueller could nail the whole DNC and throw Obama in the big house ...or he may kike out and trump up some dirt on The Donald.

I pray that the general public becomes aware of just how sleazy the Democrats are... most Normans think they are kind, and honourable people... they get no sense of how skeezy they are from the media. The press ride Obama’s dick so hard it’s sickening- he gets a free pass on everything.

T I C K
I C K C
C K C O
K C O T

>businessinsider.com/mueller-questions-rnc-digital-operation-trump-campaign-russia-2017-12
>Nervous, Sup Forums?

The Russians, being experts on American politics and marketing, clearly must have masterminded the whole Trump campaign.

Surely this was illegal, or something.

"Zeroing in" is code for he doesn't having anything on Trump

>As if Mueller and the FBI are better at Cyber than "Kush" and "Bear"

No Chance! SAD!

>zeroing in
yep. as in, producing zero anything.

>Obama illegally surveilled
Obama had his FBI legally surveil the traitors who were caught secretly conspiring with the Kremlin and other enemies of state.
>er-Right, the Trump traitors.
TrumDumpsters is the best description I've seen so far.

>Trump and the RNC
Well it turns out that one source that the alt-right relies on, her words were taken out of context. Very embarrassing for them.

>snopes.com/2017/03/30/evelyn-farkas-leak/

Trump, his family, his advisors and his cabinet all need to spend the next 10 years in prison for conspiring with the enemies of the American people.

Here's a very good article explaining why the whole Muh Russia thing is bad for the Dems. It's from the London Review of Books, so brainlets may need to skip a bit:

lrb.co.uk/v40/n01/jackson-lears/what-we-dont-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-russian-hacking

I will literally kill all of you before that happens

Nope, no end date, no limits.
The swamp will regret that, but they thought they controlled him.

WHERE
ARE
THE
PROOFS???

INB4 planted evidence.

We know the CIA can spoof the origins of digital footprints.

He has been "zeroing in" on Trump for the last 5 months. Leftists are just trying to push this Mueller thing because it's the only thing they have left.

>Gaslight
>Obstruct
>Project

>deep state
Wow, that's the exact same code word the Kremlin is using in its disinformation campaign against the American people!

sputniknews.com/columnists/201707091055380659-trump-putin-up-against-us-deep-state/

sputniknews.com/columnists/201701081049374470-us-in-deep-trouble/

deepstatenation.com/fbi-looking-into-allegations-against-kremlin-propaganda-outlet-sputnik/

Wow, you'd almost swear the alt-right and Vladimir Putin were working together.

>He has been "zeroing in" on Trump for the last 5 months
lold irl

People holding opinions you disagree with does not mean treason. Having such undemocratic beliefs contrary to the basic tenets of our constitution and its guarantees for free speech, however...

>Obama had his FBI legally surveil the traitors who were caught secretly conspiring with the Kremlin and other enemies of state.
>conspiring with the Kremlin
Where's the proof? According to muh 6000 intelligence agencies, there isn't even direct evidence that Russia interfered in a meaningful way in the election, let alone collusion. And do you honestly think it wouldn't have been leaked if there were actual concerns of collusion at this point?

So, what you even admit to, is that Obama directed his intelligence agencies to target the American political opposition. How is this any different from what Putin and the FSB actually do? Basically, the neocon/neoliberal establishment uniparty has turned this country into a 3rd world kleptocratic joke.

>American politics have rarely presented a more disheartening spectacle. The repellent and dangerous antics of Donald Trump are troubling enough, but so is the Democratic Party leadership’s failure to take in the significance of the 2016 election campaign. Bernie Sanders’s challenge to Hillary Clinton, combined with Trump’s triumph, revealed the breadth of popular anger at politics as usual – the blend of neoliberal domestic policy and interventionist foreign policy that constitutes consensus in Washington. Neoliberals celebrate market utility as the sole criterion of worth; interventionists exalt military adventure abroad as a means of fighting evil in order to secure global progress. Both agendas have proved calamitous for most Americans. Many registered their disaffection in 2016. Sanders is a social democrat and Trump a demagogic mountebank, but their campaigns underscored a widespread repudiation of the Washington consensus. For about a week after the election, pundits discussed the possibility of a more capacious Democratic strategy. It appeared that the party might learn something from Clinton’s defeat. Then everything changed.

>A story that had circulated during the campaign without much effect resurfaced: it involved the charge that Russian operatives had hacked into the servers of the Democratic National Committee, revealing embarrassing emails that damaged Clinton’s chances. With stunning speed, a new centrist-liberal orthodoxy came into being, enveloping the major media and the bipartisan Washington establishment. This secular religion has attracted hordes of converts in the first year of the Trump presidency. In its capacity to exclude dissent, it is like no other formation of mass opinion in my adult life, though it recalls a few dim childhood memories of anti-communist hysteria during the early 1950s.

Neither will the Ukrainians. Teach a man to fish, I say. Not that I care if Russia takes a bit of the borderlands back.

wow that coincidence surely is damning...people use the same word to describe the same phenomenon?

holy mackrel my noggin is FUCKIN JOGGIN!!!

>The centrepiece of the faith, based on the hacking charge, is the belief that Vladimir Putin orchestrated an attack on American democracy by ordering his minions to interfere in the election on behalf of Trump. The story became gospel with breathtaking suddenness and completeness. Doubters are perceived as heretics and as apologists for Trump and Putin, the evil twins and co-conspirators behind this attack on American democracy. Responsibility for the absence of debate lies in large part with the major media outlets. Their uncritical embrace and endless repetition of the Russian hack story have made it seem a fait accompli in the public mind. It is hard to estimate popular belief in this new orthodoxy, but it does not seem to be merely a creed of Washington insiders. If you question the received narrative in casual conversations, you run the risk of provoking blank stares or overt hostility – even from old friends. This has all been baffling and troubling to me; there have been moments when pop-culture fantasies (body snatchers, Kool-Aid) have come to mind.

Holy shit

Reminder that they said this investigation would take all of 2018

The objective of it is to hamper Trump's political options in Washington. Trump is being forced to play things safe right now mainly because of this investigation

>Nervous, Sup Forums?

Nah I haven't cared about election/prez politics for a while. We got our guy in there as a repudiation of a couple important things like refugee terrorism acceptance, the concept of no borders states

Never expected him to not be Reagan #2 ie neocon MIC puppet who flirts with "the dangers of populism" by occasionally telling the truth. He'll sink or swim on his own two feet.

>Like any orthodoxy worth its salt, the religion of the Russian hack depends not on evidence but on ex cathedra pronouncements on the part of authoritative institutions and their overlords. Its scriptural foundation is a confused and largely fact-free ‘assessment’ produced last January by a small number of ‘hand-picked’ analysts – as James Clapper, the director of National Intelligence, described them – from the CIA, the FBI and the NSA. The claims of the last were made with only ‘moderate’ confidence. The label Intelligence Community Assessment creates a misleading impression of unanimity, given that only three of the 16 US intelligence agencies contributed to the report. And indeed the assessment itself contained this crucial admission: ‘Judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact. Assessments are based on collected information, which is often incomplete or fragmentary, as well as logic, argumentation and precedents.’ Yet the assessment has passed into the media imagination as if it were unassailable fact, allowing journalists to assume what has yet to be proved. In doing so they serve as mouthpieces for the intelligence agencies, or at least for those ‘hand-picked’ analysts.

>Pwoofs! Pwoofs!
>( sr6+RqwR ) 1 post by this ID
Putinbots, everyone.

>People holding opinions you disagree with does not mean treason.
True, that's why we're relying on the facts instead.

>Having such undemocratic beliefs contrary to the basic tenets of our constitution and its guarantees for free speech,
Yet I will defend your right to spew your anti-American hatred

>there isn't even direct evidence that Russia interfered in a meaningful way in the election, let alone collusion.
Who said collusion? Is that what your bot is programmed to say automatically? Trump's family and advisors and cabinet members all had secret meetings with Kremlin-connected Russians, all lied about those meetings under oath, and some are already facing criminal charges.

Trump himself admitted he fired Flynn for lying to the FBI about the meetings, agreements and arrangements he made with Putin's inner circle. But how could Trump possibly have done that unless he knew about Flynn's meetings, agreements and arrangements he made with Putin's inner circle?

"I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies." - Donald J Trump

>Obama directed his intelligence agencies to target the American political opposition.
No Obama targeted the traitors working with the Russians. You're saying the traitors are Trump and his advisors.

> has turned this country into a 3rd world kleptocratic joke.
We need to stop the rogue, Kremlin-worshiping elements in the GOP from doing this.

LOCK THE NIGGER OBAMA IN A CAGE AND SELL HIS WHORE DAUGHTERS TO SAUDI ARABIA

He already sold one to Harvey Weinstein.

>Besides Trump’s supposed uniqueness, there are two other assumptions behind the furore in Washington: the first is that the Russian hack unquestionably occurred, and the second is that the Russians are our implacable enemies. The second provides the emotional charge for the first. Both seem to me problematic. With respect to the first, the hacking charges are unproved and may well remain so. Edward Snowden and others familiar with the NSA say that if long-distance hacking had taken place the agency would have monitored it and could detail its existence without compromising their secret sources and methods. In September, Snowden told Der Spiegel that the NSA ‘probably knows quite well who the invaders were’. And yet ‘it has not presented any evidence, although I suspect it exists. The question is: why not? … I suspect it discovered other attackers in the systems, maybe there were six or seven groups at work.’ The NSA’s capacity to follow hacking to its source is a matter of public record. When the agency investigated pervasive and successful Chinese hacking into US military and defence industry installations, it was able to trace the hacks to the building where they originated, a People’s Liberation Army facility in Shanghai. That information was published in the New York Times but, this time, the NSA’s failure to provide evidence has gone curiously unremarked. When The Intercept published a story about the NSA’s alleged discovery that Russian military intelligence had attempted to hack into US state and local election systems, the agency’s undocumented assertions about the Russian origins of the hack were allowed to stand as unchallenged fact and quickly became treated as such in the mainstream media.

>Meanwhile, there has been a blizzard of ancillary accusations, including much broader and vaguer charges of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. It remains possible that Robert Mueller, a former FBI director who has been appointed to investigate these allegations, may turn up some compelling evidence of contacts between Trump’s people and various Russians. It would be surprising if an experienced prosecutor empowered to cast a dragnet came up empty-handed, and the arrests have already begun. But what is striking about them is that the charges have nothing to do with Russian interference in the election. There has been much talk about the possibility that the accused may provide damaging evidence against Trump in exchange for lighter sentences, but this is merely speculation. Paul Manafort, at one point Trump’s campaign manager, has pleaded not guilty to charges of failing to register his public relations firm as a foreign agent for the Ukrainian government and concealing his millions of dollars in fees. But all this occurred before the 2016 campaign. George Papadopolous, a foreign policy adviser, has pleaded guilty to the charge of lying to the FBI about his bungling efforts to arrange a meeting between Trump’s people and the Russian government – an opportunity the Trump campaign declined. Mueller’s most recent arrestee, Michael Flynn, the unhinged Islamophobe who was briefly Trump’s national security adviser, has pleaded guilty to charges of lying to the FBI about meeting the Russian ambassador in December – weeks after the election. This is the sort of backchannel diplomacy that routinely occurs during the interim between one administration and the next. It is not a sign of collusion.

Didn't mega say that they were gonna expose election fraud on the GOP ?

>Kool-Aid
You've guzzled quite a bit, haven't you Pavel?

>The chatter surrounding the hack would never have acquired such urgency were it not for the accompanying assumption: Russia is a uniquely dangerous adversary, with which we should avoid all contact. Without that belief, Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s meetings with Russians in September 2016 would become routine discussions between a senator and foreign officials. Flynn’s post-election conversations with the Russian ambassador would appear unremarkable. Trump’s cronies’ attempts to do business in Russia would become merely sleazy. Donald Trump Jr’s meeting at Trump Tower with the Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya would be transformed from a melodrama of shady intrigue to a comedy of errors – with the candidate’s son expecting to receive information to use against Clinton but discovering Veselnitskaya only wanted to talk about repealing sanctions and restarting the flow of Russian orphans to the United States. And Putin himself would become just another autocrat, with whom democracies could engage without endorsing.

I would suggest you read the article (written by a Democrat), but I doubt you will because we both know you're a True Believer. Here's the link again anyway:

lrb.co.uk/v40/n01/jackson-lears/what-we-dont-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-russian-hacking

>mega
Pls don't bring LARPers into this thread, thx

It isn't bullshit you corksoaker. It's all about that fake FISA order. Go cash your ShareBlue paycheck now and be happy that Trump and some reluctant fargin icehole Republicans complied.

tks user

>mueller have found damning evidence that could bring down trump
>for 300th time this year
mueller is more worried about that undercover uranium one fbi agent getting his gag order lifted than anything trump did

Fake news
* hires crisis public relations firm*

The way they think we should avoid all contact with Russia is just bizarre to anyone who lived through the 80s. Gorbachev got the Nobel Peace Prize for being friendly with Reagan. Reagan got blasted every time he said anything negative about the USSR. Every summit meeting was hailed as a great thing, and it would have been a relief to find out the two presidents or their underlings communicated more often on a friendly basis.

It's like the plot of Star Trek VI is coming true: there's a cabal that includes individuals on both sides that wants to bring back the Cold War but make it hot this time. Only difference is the cabal is made up of politicians instead of military men.