RWA Right Wing Alliance

/RWA/ is a place for all right wing ideologies to come together and discuss current events and debate others' opinions. All right wing minded individuals are welcome. We feature a sizable member base of 260+ users, A book club for discussing various literatures, bi-weekly structured debates, and best of all, comfy moderators

join our discord

26BKxn3

...

...

bump

Bump

We need to have more flow of ideas on the right

Am I allowed to call people faggots there? Or you're all faggy about it?

...

This. Please I need to know.

There's no rules on cursing or using insults until it hits autismo territory where youve got nothing else to say.

Fair enough

checked

are fashy trannies allowed?

No, fuck off faggot

>Nazis
>Right wing

Subverted dipshits falling for Marxist propaganda.

Natsoc is closer to capitalism than it is communism though

why tho?

ZERO TOLERANCE FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN FASCISM OR NATIONAL SOCIALISM. WE MARCH ALONE.

>fashy
>tranny
How?

Stop being such a faggot and unite with the rest of us kamerad

well when you go to LGBT events and listen to these people in their meetings and every thing they say is kill whitey, it gave me an epiphany and that pol was right and i want to fight them

Only one question, why are Nazis in this, the Nazi party was a far left national socialist party

If you really were natsoc though, you'd realize that trans sexuality, bi sexuality and homo sexuality are all products of a cultural marxist society.
You'd realize that you're giving into urges that were normalized by your enemy. Please stop what you're doing, and change

Can I advocate the death of the Jew?

to be fair, I persoanlly wish to see neetsocks and flashists converted or killed, however, the right wing needs as much help as we can get. anyone that hates kikes is okay

Nice digits, but you're completely wrong.
The cultural aspect of National Socialism was very righ winged, while National Socialist economy is mainly socialist with hints of capitalism.

gas the kikes man

I know... I'm just too far into this and there really isnt "going back" my body is damaged beyond repair

Race war nao

Have you already undergone gender reasignment surgery?

In case none of you knew, the Commies even admit that they would never have won the war without Lend-Lease

no but fat redistribution and i have breasts now, Im very fucked up but I want to make it very clear that I don't have AIDS

inb4 honeypot

haha yes im totes fbi tryna dox you

Why are lolbergs getting extra butthurt over police lately? I've never seen the word "bootlicker" uttered so many times here.
And these same faggots that get pissy when our cops rightfully beat or kill degenerates will gladly jump on the RWDS meme. I cannot see myself ever allying with these fucking droolers.

Did you get boobs from hormones?
Also, if you really wanted to you could get them surgically removed. Don't let your people down mate

PINOCHET APPROVES!

>larp wing general

does anyone care about how cucked discord is? not exactly maximum opsec, ykno?

I wouldn't see why not. As long as one does not advocate for such cultural marxist ideals, and strives for a white ethnostate with the goal of preserving and advancing our culture and tradition there should be no problem. Especially when the person says they regret their choice and are seeking a change in life, we should welcome them.

Imagine being so colossally, unbelievably autistic you were a un-ironic nazi or monarchist

Imagine then, not only were you one, but you actually thought there were viable political ideologies in current year

I'd like to join, can I have an invite?

Get lost?

imagine being so worthless as to post in a /rwa/ thread and be this myopic

>implying all of us aren't getting special nsa scrutiny for being regular posters on this board anyways

26BKxn3

meh who gives a rat’s ass about the NSA, I care more about some antifa weasels pissing in my mailbox than a bunch of glow-in-the-dark niggers

The Nazi label has become very broadly used

Come on now faggot, we've got common ground and common enemies and should work together to achieve our shared goals. We can also learn through each other.

We get pissed at abuse of power. Release the cops on the AntiFascist mobs, not on crying drunk dads.

This aint the thread for division, this is the thread for mutual hate of greater enemies.

oh man what's more unsettling? a bunch of room temperature IQ disorganized barely armed heavily outnumbered windowlickers or the most complicated, expansive, comprehensive surveillance force in human history?

Hmm, tough call

And that's the thing, half the time the cops don't even give a fuck. They let antifa do whatever the fuck they wanted in cville and let the two sides fight it out

local cops are hit or miss, and when the city is bigger than like 50k the top brass is almost always headed by left wing political appointees

>This aint the thread for division
OP literally says "debate other's opinions"
>muh antifa
bunch of retarded teens. Why can you say they deserve the beatings but degenerate drunks and other criminals don't? We've been calling for these same people to be gassed to death for years. When someone actually goes not even a tenth as far as that, you get all redditor-tier butthurt

yeah but those fags aren’t going to do anything anyway, it’s all show no go

Kikes.
-The Jews are the leadership and vanguard of a movement of literal satan worshippers who want to reduce the world's population drastically and rule over an unintelligent, brown slave class.
-Communism was invented by these people for the sole purpose of instituting a worldwide police state through which they can rule, and they plan to institute it universally through the UN.
-Manmade climate change is a hoax, just like the holocaust, designed to scare and guilt people into accepting new draconian rules and losing their way of life.
-They are perfectly willing to allow Islam to fester so long as they can control its leadership to ensure that it keeps the masses terrified and under control while not harming them.
-They created and control ISIS.
-9/11 was orchestrated by the Jews and their Saudi puppets with Bush's knowledge.
-They control literally every nation on earth that has a central bank.
-They propped the United States and Russia up as superpowers in order to use them both to transform the world. They are now propping China up as they head toward the next stage of their plan.
-The migrant crisis was carefully planned and orchestrated by them in order to flood white nations with low-IQ blacks and muslims.
-They are socially engineering us to believe that whiteness is evil and that racemixing is our duty in order to wipe out whites as they see us as their biggest threat.
-They hate Christianity above all else and are doing everything in their power to eradicate it.
-95% of American pastors for the last century have been bought by Jews and spoonfed kike propaganda to lead their congregations into worshipping the kikes as "God's chosen people" even though the Bible calls them the Synagogue of Satan and Christ-killers.
-Faggotry, trannyism, feminism, and porn are all funded and pushed by them to reduce birthrates, especially amongst whites.
-They are behind every anti-white movement as they desperately want a race war.

just like the stasi

Bump.

Imagine being such this boring

debating is good. it grows each individual's grasp in what they believe in.

How do you ally with people who make themselves your enemy.
I find nothing in libertarians beyond the desire to systematically demolish our civilization. The fact that the Jewry happens to be latched onto it and would also be destroyed in the process is worthless to me.

The guy was drinking after a party and wasn't bothering anyone, not exactly a degenerate drunk. Antifa is a direct violent threat, if you cant see the difference youre a tard.

We want to remove the parasite from civilization - taxes arent what make humanity great.

See, this is exactly the kind of misunderstanding and conversation we should be having, often. So we can understand why each person believes what they do, our shared goals, etc. I cant see at all how libertarianism would demolish civilization when it gives us the tools to reject that which harms it.

HEIL VICTORY

You can’t have nationalism without racial homogeneity. Unless you plan removing 44% of American population (which would be fucking retarded) you really can’t achieve that here.

T. Romanian nationalist living in your shitty country

yeah more or less

No individual policy can make anything great. It's an emergent quality of the collective.
But some means of centralization is needed to define what the collective is. I don't have to be concerned about humanity being great, because I can impose my policies on my nation alone and if they show merit they will be adopted by others.

Taxation has been adopted by every advanced civilization. How do you deny its merits? And what tools does libertarianism give you? Its premise is to deconstruct our tools on the fear that other people might abuse them.

>which would be fucking retarded
How does a Romanian nationalist understand this better than an American nationalist?

The 44% you're talking about aren't part of the American population. They're part of a redefined and illegitimate "American" population.

How did Serbian nationalists and Croatian nationalists reconcile the issue of both of them being defined as "Yugoslavians"?

Can’t lolbergs and fashies get along? Obviously we both think each other’s specific ideologies are some form of Jewish/marxist subversion, but there’s plenty of time to settle these disputes once the people we know are doing the subverting regardless are at least in the process of being dealt with.

That’s why I believe in the Right Wing Alliance, not just this server but the general concept that’s solidified over the past few years. We all agree on who the enemy is and in general what they’re trying to do, and we all are fighting to defend the same entity. Should we avoid standing together because we have different but equally principled and well meaning visions of what to do after victory is secured?

If that's your outlook, why restrict it to these few apparently "right wing" ideologies?
If communists agree to have the same enemy as you, could you not stand with them as well?

communism inherently rejects the existence of private property, which is a core tenement of the right wing position. Communists can only be used as unwitting proxies in the transitional consolidation and acquisition of social memetics.

Is it a core tenet? It has conflicting definitions based on which actual position you're asking.
Either way, libertarians and especially AnCaps reject the existence of some of our core tenets, and vice versa.

Fine, if commies agree to kill themselves for the good of western civilization then sure they can stay.

Communists and other leftists are inherently not fighting for the same thing we are, if you actually read my post you would know why they don’t fit the criteria I laid out. Leftists by nature are internationalist and against everything anyone on the right actually stand for, even if they happen to agree with some surface policy positions of one ideology or another.

the right to private property and the cultivation of wealth is the foremost cornerstone of the right, regardless of orientation. The end goal of communism is defined by Marx in the Communist Manifesto as “the abolishment of private property”. Natsocs, Libertarians, Fascist, AnCaps, Monarchists, and Big C Conservatives all agree on the intrinsic right and ability for free individuals to own both property and material/financial assets. The abolishment of capital is the final movement of all leftist movements; this is incommensurant with the right position of any sort, except total centrist authoritarianism.

>Nazi LARPers still refuse to take the monarchist pill
You'll soon learn bros.

They didn’t. Neither one believed in Yugoslavia, and Yugoslavia collapsed, ironically enough I live with a dude from Bosnia and he’s all fucked up from the bombs.

>how does a Romanian nationalist understand more than American one

It was in my formative years that I was educated on the concepts of love for ones nation and patriotism, respectively. I hope I don’t have to remind my burger friend that Romania has Codreanu and Antonescu in its history, and that Romanians once fought alongside Hitler, while America funded the USSR during the war with both munitions and people, and has turned on the path of Marxism ever since.

tl;dr because I know more


Don’t get me wrong, living in America is the ultimate red pill in the sense that you learn to love your own (fellow waaite peopl) but also learning that irrational hate is unnecessary. Note, I said irrational.

The only type of nationalism that will work for America is a bastard marriage of Natsoc and libertarian capitalism, simply because black people and white people are a part of America just like Croatians and Serbians were part of Yugoslavia. Had they chose to work together in order to preserve Tito’s dream, in a fair but separate style of system, things could have been different. In this case, nationalism killed Yugoslavia. I don’t want America to die, I just want it to get better. That’s the difference m80


AMERICA will have to choose as well, should it get ‘balkanized’ in the same fashion or work together via the dreaded concept of “civic nationalism”

Also fuck anyone who calls me out on Reddit spacing, typing from a phone and I don’t gotta prove shit to nobody

But that's the my point.
See The criteria you're laying out is your proposition, not mine; that our positions are equally principled and that we defend the same entity.

>the right to private property and the cultivation of wealth is the foremost cornerstone of the right, regardless of orientation.
>all agree on the intrinsic right and ability for free individuals to own both property and material/financial assets.
And if that's not actually true (like I said, conflicting definitions), does that mean you don't consider us right wing? That's fine by me, because we don't either, but it kind of defeats the purpose of the thread doesn't it?

is it actually true? If the eventual abolishment of capital and the inability for individuals to possess wealth then you would not be considered right wing; as previously stated, the end goal of Communism as states by Marx is the “abolishment of private property”. Fascism does not subscribe to this notion and neither does monarchy. If you are a communist then you will eventually be either converted to a contributing member of society or removed from agency.

...

>Yugoslavia collapsed
Exactly.
It can be done in a more controlled manner here if it's handled before things escalate as bad as they did in the Balkans. We're in the advantage of not having so much bad blood between ethnicities, and of the largest minorities being incompetent and completely lacking in self-sufficiency.

I don't know how long you lived here, but unless you were raised here it's hard for you to know how much we're indoctrinated to idolize the Founding Fathers, even despite the increasing onslaught of Marxism.
The reformation of America under their original principles will be very straightforward.
>I don't want America to die
It died in 1865.

It's not true. Your idea of what an individual possessing wealth means is different to mine. So is your idea of what private property means.
And there's not really any way around that, either. They're both functions of a society and we subscribe to fundamentally conflicting ideas about what society should be (anarchism vs statism)

how do you define “private property”? If you have a moving goal post it will not be a very consistent definition.

It's a share of the public nation's land that's allocated to private entity. And not because they're an individual and that somehow means they have an inherent right to own land and create wealth for himself, but because they've demonstrated the leadership capacity to do something with that share of the country which is in the benefit of the nation.

"Possessing" wealth is different too. You can be trusted with larger or smaller shares of the nation's wealth, but to try to possess it in your own right would be to rob the nation.

None of this means there's no private enterprise, or that you can't enjoy the fruits of your own labor. It's just a matter of cultivating this reward incentive so it works towards something that's ultimately positive and productive.

An individual is a member of the völk, a citisen of the reich, or a free member of an ethnonationalist anarchistic capital regime who is able to possess and control material assets and physical goods and/or resources in order to generate a meaningful cycle of production and societal development. Incentive cannot be taken away in terms of vertical ascension through society either in terms of socioeconomic status and/or personal influence and wealth. A vertically planned society centralised around the forced distribution of wealth and labour is inherently communistic, and therefore more likely to resemble a Stalinistic regime than a teutonic völkishe reich. Most of your definition seems acceptible to me, however.

do you have gender disphoria?

ca... can other nationalists of other races join senpai?

These are pretty peculiar views for an AnCap to hold, aren't they?
>in order to generate a meaningful cycle of production and societal development
This applies only to the ethnonationalist AnCap regimes?
The property they hold is being "possessed" in the same way then, surely?

>A vertically planned society centralised around the forced distribution of wealth and labour is inherently communistic
Socialistic, I'd argue.
Market competition is very efficient for price-setting and the general division of resources, but it isn't capable of handling non-market factors like national interests.
It's not so much about planning the entire society vertically as about there being an absolute power maintained over the market. Because if the government is unable to protect the nation's welfare, it loses the main justification for its authority.

>it can be done in a more controlled manner

This is what communists believe, and it never comes true

>we’ve been taught to idolize the founding fathers

That’s why white people in America are at the forefront of destroying white history, statues and culture?

>we can turn America into a Natsoc dreamland if we follow the principles of the founding fathers

But that’s fucking retarded, because freedom of speech and freedom to bear arms are two things that neither communism nor nationalism can live with, let alone the rest of the original constitution. America was founded on the spirit of individualism, not collectivism.


>it died in 1865

Sounds like a defeatist mindset to me. You either believe in America as it was originally meant to be or you want to form a new country, but don’t taint the vision of Washington and Jefferson with your half baked Natsoc theories.

I’m going to reiterate this one more time: it is possible to live in harmonious, multi racial society as long as there’s boundaries and an even keel approach to it (like Tito crushing nationalism) while still maintaining a fairly nationalist mindset, but in that case the nation has to come before race.

>no but fat redistribution and i have breasts now, Im very fucked up but I want to make it very clear that I don't have AIDS
Never fucking change Sup Forums

Communists believe in forging racially homogeneous ethno-states from a cosmopolitan republic of states...?

>That’s why white people in America are at the forefront of destroying white history, statues and culture?
No, that's not why. We were taught to idolize the Founding Fathers, but that doesn't mean we're taught what all of their views were;
Namely that Negroes are biologically inferior to and a separate species from Whites, that the Natives (which today includes the Mestizos) are savages, that multi-racial societies are an impossibility, and that it is not only the White man's moral responsibility, but his destiny, to colonize and bring his governance to all of the New World.

>But that’s fucking retarded, because freedom of speech and freedom to bear arms are two things that neither communism nor nationalism can live with.
Not true in the slightest. And I never said anything about NatSoc dreamlands. Notice I'm wearing a fascist flag, not Germany's flag. America is a different country to Germany and will have different policies.
Regardless, the "freedom of speech" you're talking about is actually freedom of sedition; That people should be allowed, without consequence, to spread malicious ideologies and sabotage society.
The freedom to bear arms is not in the slightest incompatible with nationalism. Militias are, in fact, "necessary to the security of a free state".

>America was founded on the spirit of individualism, not collectivism.
Again, completely untrue. You're mistaking the American position of individuals not being unnecessarily restricted in their actions within society to the libertarian position of individuals being more important than society.

>Sounds like a defeatist mindset to me.
It's simply the reality. America was a voluntary union of states. This ended when the Confederate states were prevented from voluntarily seceding.
1/2

>You either believe in America as it was originally meant to be or you want to form a new country, but don’t taint the vision of Washington and Jefferson with your half baked Natsoc theories.
Their vision was of a "more perfect union" that is governed according to the will of the people.
The formation of a new country in pursuit of this doesn't taint it at all.

>it is possible to live in harmonious, multi racial society as long as there’s boundaries and an even keel approach to it (like Tito crushing nationalism) while still maintaining a fairly nationalist mindset, but in that case the nation has to come before race.
I don't know why you would think "possible" means desirable, moral, or even beneficial.