Red pill me on neanderthals, jews, and Italians

>Neanderthals
>Jews
>Italians
2-5% Neanderthal DNA; there was a red pill post I'm looking for referring to a hypothesis...tldr version is ice age brought different protohumans togeather quickly, neanderthals raped and subjugated weaker ones, fast forward to today Vatican is their capital; global 700,000 year war to enslave the weaker goym or something

What the fuck do you want OP
Spit it out

>Red pill me on...
MOOOOOOOODS

You can find this out for yourself by lurking more. Use the archive to speed up your lurking.

The search for Bigfoot is pointless. It was just an Italian tourist on vacation, and like all tourists they get lost.

Rather read some proper population genetics. Protip: the black Homo sapiens did stay in Africa for thousands of years without innovating. Some of those fuckers cross over to Eurasia, mix with Neanderthals and SUDDENLY the resulting Cro-Magnon spreads all over the world within a few generations. Africans did of course not mix with Neanderthals ... and look at them now...

Your presence is always welcome here. Say, what would be a good primer to begin understanding all of this stuff? It seems a lot to parse through. Textbooks, journals, any of that?

Thx! Hm, good question. For general molecular biology I would recommend 'The Cell' ... good to understand the biological basics. If you feel confident enough to dig into publications just go to the pubmed website and try to find what you are interested in ... they also have entries for every gene with corresponding literature list (although sometimes hard to find the right stuff, sometimes even outright confusing as eg. a gene in mice may have a totally different name than its human equivalent). Frankly, you do not have to understand all the experimental procedures behind a work (even I do not if not familiar with the methods used) ... the important information often is in the introduction and discussion and if not written by a Chinese you may usually understand that stuff even without much prior knowledge.

>senpai noticed me
I'll read it. I'll read as much as I possibly can. Sup Forums has slowly turned me autistic and it's only a matter of time before turbo-autism sets in. May as well put it to good use.

In said publications, are there any guidelines on how to sift through the junk research and science?

If you look for specific stuff on human behaviour ... one thing I am currently interested in is the dopaminergic system. The variants of DRD4 are peculiar in regards to human behaviour. Still, if you read into it you may notice that there are some paradoxical results for certain variants. A more recent paper had shown that DRD4 effecrs strongly depend on the interplay with other genes involved in dopamine signaling like COMT. Very complicated, even I have trouble fully understanding it currently. Still, if there are two publications which show drastically different effects for a single DRD4 variant this will most likely be due to other genes which interact but were not taken into account. Also interesting: reproductive strategies. The Red Queen hypothesis in sexual reproduction ... male and female have different genetic 'interests' in reproduction, sex may be considered genetic warfare. The oroginal purpose had been to randomly shuffle your offspring's genes for them to better resist parasites. Similar mechanisms shape human behaciour nost likely. A certain genetic makeup may make you mentally odd but that may provide a crucial advantage if environment changes ... with humans the funny thing is that we tend to copy the behaviour of others ... so one crazy bastard with different mindset may be a nuisance but then save the whole group if his strange way of thinking finds a solution to a problem that the others would not have found. That may be the most important point in population genetics concerning behaviour. You do not need everyone to be a mad scientist ... you don't need everybody to be brave. A population may be measured by its statistical propability (by shuffling around the genes in their overall genepool) to produce a 'healthy' amount of special or brave or crazy individuals bit still habe enough 'nirmies' to provide a stable and reliable baseline for society.

Junk research... hm, don't trust stuff from Chinese universities that much. They tend to doctor their data or to omit negative stuff. Also their English is usually atrocious. Some indicator of high quality research may be in which journal the article had been published. Nature and Science are usually solid stuff, so is PNAS or PLOS stuff, also 'The Cell ' publications. Journal of 'insert field of research here' usually also indicates good quality. If in doubt just check the original publisher ... usually you will notice the fishy ones. Sometimes it is however really hard to make a call ... if an article states something completely different than another one it is damn hard to find out who is right ... but again, doing an experiment twice with slightly varied conditions may produce totally different outcomes. You will never know every single factor involved and small changes may lead to huge differences in outcome. Biology sometimes seems unpredictable.

I will take externalities into account as well. The science of genetics is fraught with variables, that's for sure. It seems impossible to find a control group to compare against.

It's too bad this thread isn't getting attention. Sup Forumsacks love drunk scientists, more so than the /sci/entists. It's slid somewhere down the middle of the between wipipo and wimmins threads.

Btw for free access: sci-hub dot pw
Simply insert the fill name or DOI number of the paper and you should get free access

>Don't trust the Chinese
Solid advice. That rearry herrps.
>free scientific journals
YAY

The only population with have zero neanderthal DNA are sub-Saharan Africans.

You are right, depending on control group you normalize against your results may look drastically different. Btw just came from a good friend's birthday party so I am frankly quite drunk right now. Well, one last beer and then off to bed.

Btw I am really glad that some people like the stuff I am posting here. Usually do not get a chance to talk about this that much. But it is funny ... either these threads go down silently or I get so many requests for answers that I do not even know where to begin! Ah well, in my current state I prefer the silent ones anyway...

Damn typos, should be sci-hub dot TW

Yep, previous didn't work. Got it in the end.

Have a good sleep. Stay comfy user.

>mutt being in charge of defying whiteness

You too! Cheers and good night! See ya

Underated

Does this explain why they're such subhumans or is it something unrelated?

Your neanderthal rape hypothesis is falsified by the genetic record. Sap women couldn't carry thal offspring, but thal women could carry sap offspring.

If there was a rape scheme going on, it was saps raping thals.