"White" is unironically a social construct. or more specifically, an American construct

"White" is unironically a social construct. or more specifically, an American construct.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoruba_Americans
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igbo_Americans
youtube.com/watch?v=53K6kgKbbmI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>people have different ancestors, therefore you can't be white
This is how niggers think. Nice slide thread, though.

Everybody knows what white is.

I recognize European Ethnic groups and ancestry, I don't recognize "whiteness".

It's exactly as arbitrary as 'black' so be consistant at least.

I don't know anyone who says this about whites that won't also cower out of saying there's no such thing as 'black people' or 'black culture'.

I agree, "black" is as we know it today is also an American construct.

"Balck" is unironically a social construct. or more specifically, an American construct. I recognize African Ethnic groups and ancestry, I don't recognise "blackness".

Seriously, THIS IS A SLIDE THREAD. STOP BUMPING THIS.

>"Balck" is unironically a social construct. or more specifically, an American construct. I recognize African Ethnic groups and ancestry, I don't recognise "blackness".

Agreed.

White is evident. Dumb fag.

Agreed. The only race that matters is North/Central european

Everything else is nigger slated for extermination.

Thanks for the post. Nigger

Sure then you're being consistant at least. But think about it a little more. It's a construct, but it has roots in a real phenomenon. White people are decidedly different from black people from a genetics standpoint, in IQ, history. We can argue about what lines we should draw whether it should be more or less specific, but you can't deny that there are differences.

So the real question is whether people identify by it. It doesn't matter whether you want to acknowledge it as legitimate. And in america at least 'white' already means something to most people.

Native Americans invented “whiteness” when they called whites “pale face” - it’s not a new concept

OP is correct, for once. The rest of y'all need to read James Baldwin and Ta-Nehisi Coates. Educate yourselves.

Except this guy. This guy knows too.

No, people only become "white" when "non-whites" show up, see Chicago before the blacks moved up. It was Polish, Irish, German, Lithuanian, as soon as MLK and his people came along, they all suddenly became "white" people.

read
It's not a matter of 'correct' so much as it is a matter of where culture is right now. And where it is right now (and where it has been for hundreds of years) is that 'white' is a solid identity in america.

Just like Koreans, Japanese, Chinese, Vietnamese, and so forth can band together as “Asians”

>y'all
Kys

>What is a European

well duh because niggers make segregation necessary

A Croat talking about segregation hah, but even before the Blacks showed up, the ethnic groups were still separated, Poles stayed with Poles, Germans stayed with Germans, etc.

like niggers?

No, white is evident.
Use your eyes dumb fag.

Just like Koreans, Japanese, Chinese, etc., do but they are still all Asians

So is black.
Now drop that fag flag and stop sliding.

No, "white" is just a box you tick on a census form. Now "German", or "Irish", or "Anglo". That's more evident.

Already discussed this, scroll up, I agree.

Yeah but in relation to America/Europe the traditional "races" are "Black and White"

When I am on a train full of ahmeds, they don’t see me as Anglo, they see me as white.

No, It's just a broader category. You use different categories in different situations.

>live in suburbs
>should I drive a Toyota Camry or a Honda Civic?

>move to city
>should I use a car or a bike?

HURRRR DURRRR CAR IS A CITY CONSTRUCTION, THERE NEVER WERE CARS

...

Uhhhh okay?


Stupid comparison

Do you consider yourself "white" or "anglo"?

"white" is probably history's most shittiest """racial""" taxon ever and one of the major reasons nobody takes racialism seriously anymore

as far as I'm concerned anyone who uses the term unironically is either a rootless new world mongrel or a jew

[Nigger chimpout intensifes]

Nah white is evident dumb fag.

>Now "German", or "Irish", or "Anglo". That's more evident.
Seeing how the census didn't even ask what your ethnicity was until 1980, I'm going to call bullshit. Either way, people are larpy as all hell when it comes to their European ethnic background. If you look at actual genetic testing from 23andme and Ancestry you'll see that the vast majority of the United States is Anglo + something else, which is in no way shocking. Pic related.

I don't care. Just because it's a social construct doesn't make it any less valid

No, I'm well informed of my own ethnic background.


Interesting information, thanks for informing me.

I would say your actual ethnic + religious background is more valid than your "racial" background.

Both, depending on context. Just like aa African American considers himself black sometimes and African other times

>he doesn't know about the hundreds of years of america's precedent to maintain ethnic makeup, preceded by only allow white immigration.

So what ethnicity and religious back ground are black Americans

Sir if you would just kindly look at the left side of the map over that big blue gap between the green blobs.... Yes see that one? It's called A M E R I C A. You'll find most of your missing tribesmen there.

It’s more of a surface level term to compare skin tones like black brown red or yellow. You’d have to use ethnicity if you’re referring to genetic ancestry or nationality if you’re referring to which country they have citizenship.

They don’t have an indigenous religion or ethnicity, therefore American blacks don’t exist. Lol

>only allow white immigration
Because we had our own brownskins to deal with.

Most of them broadly have West African ancestry mixed in with Native American + European due to the slave trade.

The Newer African immigrants coming to America tend to be Nigerians who's ancestry comes from the Southern half of Nigeria, mainly Yorubas and Igbos, most of the time they come from Syncretic/Christian religious backgrounds.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoruba_Americans
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igbo_Americans

Of course you would because you're not white so it's in your nigger/mongrel interest to deconstruct whiteness. White means not a nigger, not a spic, not a gook/chink/zipperhead, not a kike, not a poo, sandnigger, etc. A proper definition means germanic heritage on both sides, mother/father, all the way back. A big tent definition is european heritage on both sides, all the way back. Niggers want there to be whites when they want affirmative action and white guilt, but as soon as we start to group up you want to deny.

didn't think you'd have anything to say

No, you guys mainly wanted Anglo-Teutonic immigration, the WASP ruling class saw the Catholics as a threat as they were more loyal to God than the American Government, hence the anti-Catholic sentiment.

It's not really in my interest, I'm already aware of my ethnic + religious backgrounds and can relate to people who are of similar backgrounds, but when it comes to "Black", I'm now lumped in with completely foreign people who I have no relation to.

>No, you guys mainly wanted Anglo-Teutonic immigration
So you're confirming what I said?

I suppose if you don't consider Irish, Spanish, Balkans, Southern and Eastern Europeans as "whites".

All taxonomic categories are "social contructs" that only exists in our minds. That's a red herring. The relevant question is "it is useful?". If you're walking in inner city at midnight, "white" and "black" are damned useful "social constructs".

>"White" is unironically a social construct
So? Humans are a social construct. What's wrong with social constructs?

I don't care, I'm saying most people consider them white. And the reality is they were let in, the left has been pushing this meme for years and it's totally debunked. The american's evidence in this thread was that they self-segregated, which to me seems obvious, and it's also proof that they were all let in.

And their was 80% less crime.

I agree. Slavs and meds are no better than niggers

youtube.com/watch?v=53K6kgKbbmI

It's more to do with ethnic identification than crime, I think this is partly what lead to the decline of "Culture" in America, people were ripped of their organic ethnic, religious and traditional roots, and suddenly became "whites", who were pitted up to go against the "blacks".

The idea of a European civilization and a European people has existed for at least 1000 years. I don't know how often they are referred to as "white", but as long as the other races have always been refereed to by their skin color, whiteness is pretty much implied.

I don't know what united the people of Europe, be it biology, our ancient history, or more recently the roman empire or the catholic church. Truth is that Christianity has never merged new nations into the European family, neither has liberalism, or other forms of westernization, and so there must be something much stronger tying us together.