ITT: I will demonstrate the effect propaganda can have on a person's psyche and their inability to reason rationally.
I will ask anons to prove to me that the earth is not hollow. I am simply asking for the published study of the experiment that was done to prove the earth is not hollow and its results. Anons will not be able to find such a study. They will try to provide me with .edu links about S&P waves and other nonsense. Again, I will ask them kindly to provide me with the specific published study that was conducted. They will call me an idiot and vaguely reference irrelevant mathematical equations. Again, I will ask the scientists of Sup Forums to provide me with the study which proves the earth is not hollow. They will become increasingly angry - mock me, ad hom, call me shill and report me. Again I will ask for the study, they will not be able to produce one. At this point the thread will be deleted/censored and I will receive a 1-3 day ban from the mods and/or US gov shills who run this board.
And this is the effect of propaganda, people are unable to discern reality from what has been told to them by an authority figure during their malleable childhood years.
Do you have a study that proves the earth IS hollow?
Jordan Ortiz
Your fallacy here, famalam, is that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Can't really prove a negative assumption, dickhead. So prove your assumption positively or piss off, shit heel.
Jack Johnson
My stance is neutral. But in the 2 years I've posted this topic across multiple forums, no one has been to provide me with the study. And the mainstream educational claim is that the earth is not hollow but solid or molten. I am simply asking for the study that everyone takes so much faith in, yet has never read for themselves.
Owen Gutierrez
You know as well as I that the mainstream belief is the earth is solid.
What is your stance on the matter?
Cameron Walker
>Nobody cares enough about his thread to give him a solid answer in 2 years Cry harder faggot
Liam Lopez
Not politics.
Matthew Long
Good luck user I just got out of a 'discussion' where i asked some people who were making fun of anti-vaxxers to name ten ingredients found in the 2017 flu shots, nobody could name any beyond mercury formaldehyde saline solution or disabled viruses (not the specific ones easily found with a quick search), then there was the 'there's more mercury in tuna' and 'im going to ignore your fake alternative medicine article' and 'i trust scientists and doctors' blahblahblah Meanwhile, i dont know what's in vaccines either, that wasn't my point, my point (which i explained and watched be ignored) was that people blindly believe whatever they're told to believe, even when some stranger is injecting them with what might as well be a mystery potion as far as they're concerned, these same people make fun of christians for believing in a god Even after explaining I'm not an anti-vaxxer or christian i was still insulted and told I'm wrong somehow The truth is people don't want to know the truth, they just want to believe they're right even when the discussion isn't an argument, it's an ego thing, why take a few seconds to look up anything that validates your position when you can be a condescending faux-intellectual? None of these people want to admit they don't really know anything These people are like 99% of the population so have fun convincing anybody they might not know everything
Owen Perry
Propaganda and your belief and understanding of the world around you as a result of the government public education system isn't political?
Better go make another Trumpy thread for the billionth time today.
Owen Kelly
>How do volcanoes work
what do I win?
Cameron Brown
Taleb had a good piece related to this
IYI (Intellectual yet idiot)
Robert Rivera
Ten? most of them couldnt even name five
Caleb Foster
>Tries to prove earth is not hollow >We don't even know how fucking magnets work
wew lad.
Asher Hernandez
Just start digging.
Evan Mitchell
Seismometers?
Charles Foster
A spherical coil (with hollow interior) has the same magnetic properties as earth
>Can't really prove a negative assumption, dickhead. I can prove there are no unicorns in my living room because unicorns do not exist.
Colton Rivera
Thats what she said
Nicholas Cooper
I tried digging a hole to China once as a kid. FAILED! Too much dirt. #SolidEarth
Jason Thomas
Snake oil salesman arthritis cure device is not proof.
Jordan Lopez
A flat earth cannot be hollow
Henry Garcia
Lel.
Aaron Reed
I didn't say it was. I am open to possibilities. What is your stance on the matter, is earth hollow or solid?
Jason Allen
You have an unrealistic standard of evidence. Nobody needs a scientific study to 'prove' the moon is round. It's easily observable and verified by mathematics.
Anyone with the proper equipment and/or basic understanding of physics can confirm that the earth is not hollow. Your phantom study doesn't exist for the simple reason that nobody bothers to formally confirm truths about the universe that are blatantly obvious.
Jacob Jones
It is a 4D hexagon projection.
Caleb Roberts
In the sense of a basic argument, you cannot prove the existence of something you cannot see. Which is why people continue to argue about God.
Robert Roberts
They didn't even care that they couldn't or that it wasn't easily researchable, apparently it doesn't matter what you're being injected with and asking questions is anti-science (lmao) and ignorant The herd needs a serious culling
Nathaniel Bailey
>the leaf needs a serious culling
Jaxson Lewis
Democrats viable at ALL= proof of effective propaganda.
Noah Garcia
solid or hollow, what does it matter?
Bentley Bell
False equivalence. The moon is observable with our own two eyes. Anyone who can see can see that the moon is circular shaped. You cannot see the interior of the earth.
>Anyone with the proper equipment and/or basic understanding of physics can confirm that the earth is not hollow So what equipment was used and what were the specific results that were recorded? Surely you can provide them? Or have you not read them yourself either and you take it on faith?
>basic understanding of physics I already predicted in the OP that you would try to go down this road. Please be original.
Zachary Taylor
> I am simply asking for the published study of the experiment that was done to prove the earth is not hollow and its results. I can give you plenty of references. Of course, the original experiments done to prove that the earth isn't hollow are so old that most of them aren't online
>1906 The Constitution of the Earth, Quart. J. Geological Soc. Lond., 62, 456-475, 1906 is the specific paper he published on the core
see also >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Jeffreys This guy proved that the outer core is liquid. You can find his bibliography at the bottom of the article
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inge_Lehmann >Lehmann, Inge (1936). "P'". Publications du Bureau Central Séismologique International. A14 (3): 87–115.
really, any of the links at the bottom of the wikipedia pages on the earth's inner structures will take you to studies on the composition of the interior of our planet. For example science.sciencemag.org/content/350/6266/1349
The basic method that scientists use to determine the composition of the core is measuring the shock waves from earthquakes (and sometimes manmade explosions). Scientists then measure the seismic waves at different stations around the planet and use how the speed and deviation differs from one station to the next to determine the density of the material the shockwaves passed though. Googling various topics about seismology should bring up a bunch of papers related to this.
I hope this clears everything up for you.
Jeremiah Cox
wat do you mean
Oliver Bennett
Prove to me this >isn’t a simulation >a dream I’m having >a dream you’re having >a dream someone else is having >that I’m not continuously slipping through the multiverse every single moment. Unprovable
Just look at a basic highschool science textbook, read how sismic waves travel threw earth. Boom done.
Ayden Murphy
Reading about a concept is not the same as a verifiable study with quantifiable data, brainlet
Caleb Johnson
deflection is not a valid argument
Matthew Flores
>t.highschool dropout These textbooks are full of actual studies. (At Least here)
Robert Murphy
When the fuck did the website become so infested with kikes? It’s a sad day on Sup Forums when most of the niggers in a hollow earth thread are pushing normie Jew science.
