Sexualized anime children

Legally speaking, judges in court actually judge the age of an anime girl by looking at her curves.

Could the girl in pic relatex possibly be seen as underage, considering her flabby butt?

it's so subjective it's stupid. If you absolutely HAVE to then have a provision in the law that says hyper realistic renderings of child sex acts are illegal, but if it's obviously not real then just ignore it and focus on actual bad guys.

Fuck off, retard. Loli != pedo. They don't even look like 3D little girls.

Depends on the country, I don't live in burgerland

i know that 3rd grader butt
the manga actually ended up being very good; loli fanservice was just the cherry on top

Oppai loli master race

Legally speaking in the only relevant part of the world, it's a fucking cartoon, not a child.

Also watching a video of a crime logically shouldn't be illegal either

Asians look like that though.

Yes, but could you argue in court that she's not a child because of her flabby butt?

That doesn't look like the butt of someone underage, does it?

> judges in court actually judge the age of an anime girl by looking at her curves

honestly if this happens in America, then I want it to stop and I want laws changed so that judges don't waste their time on stupid shit like this

point to actual judges actually wasting their time on this stupid nonsense or gtfo

Once again autists prove they can't distinguish faces.

disagreed, but [noise] made some decent oppai-loli content

Well in america we have a provision in our child porn law that states that the victim being portrayed doesn't need to be a real person in order to prosecute. So people have tekn this to mean that now lolicon is illegal, but there's a clarification that this is intended to prosecute creators and distributors of highly realistic 3d renderings that appear real, and specifically not stylized cartoons. But I'm not sure if that clarification actually is part of the letter of the law and not just a "note" or something.

"come back to reality, nip-man"

In California if no child was involved in the making of the image, then it is in no way legally child porn

it doesn't. It looks like the butt of someone who has gynoid fat meaning puberty.
But so what? She has no age because she's not real. We can't establish an age in any objective basis. We can rely only on the subjective interpretation of a judge and jury, as long as we chose to involve ourselves at all.

>Legally speaking, judges in court actually judge the age of an anime girl by looking at her curves.
You know a lot of female Asians have loli bodies

That a boy.

What if a child draws loli?

Good job.

Children can legally prostitute themselves in California. Not joking. Only illegal for the adult in the situation

And?

>simplified and exaggerated face
>durr why does it look different

...

That is a good one.
pic

>Loli bodies
Japs just don't have tits, no need to beat around the bush here.

No, literally lots, if not most, of them don't progress from prepubescent bodies

I've traveled Asian countries for 10 years.

left one actually has a body like OP

Puberty can still mean underage, legally speaking though. But no underage girl (who isn't fat overall) can have a butt that flabby, right?

Why is that such a bad thing? Thin/flat is great.

Truly the fetish for men of taste

>Well in america
This is a state by state thing and some states have precedent that its nothing and others have set precedent that its something but as far as i know loli has only ever been something brought along in adition to actually cp, not prosicuted in its own right.

theres an old Sup Forums infographic but its probably outdated

Who cares?

Talk about drug jokes in popular movies instead. Like the one in Deadpool 2 teaser.

I recall the same thing. There was a period of several people being "prosecuted for lolicon" who, as it turned out, were in possession of real child porn too.

It's still a scary precedent to set and prosecutes always go for it. At any moment a federal judge could make half of all anime illegal to posses.

bump

Cartoons are not people. Shall not be infringed.

>Who cares?
user when he is in court.

>illya chew
That's not Illya though?

Basically
>It's not pedo if I think it's sexy

A 12 year old girl with a fit butt and a little premature fat development isn't pedo, but a 20 year old girl who was never really estrogen-sensitive in the right places is pedo as fuck.

OP is the retard of the century.

Pedo or not pedo was never a question about muh 10% improvement in fecundity, but more important things, like:

Pedos snatch up girls before they can distinguish between a good mate and a shitty one, leaving the girl fucked if she grows up and realizes hubby is not a chad at all but is actually a creepy, dysfunctional piece of shit that doesn't deserve to have a sperm count higher than 0

Pedos snatch up girls before it's apparent if the girls themselves are good mates or have shitty genes that cause them to spoil like milk before they're even 39

The last two lead to actual, kiddy fiddling pedophilia lowering the genetic quality of a population

All the human rights stuff about muh girls have a right to their own lives, whether you care about it or not.

THE UBERMENSCH prefers a woman who is at least half a decade older than she looks. People who look their age and people who look older than their age have bad genes. Aging is the prelude to death. Those who fend it off are more alive than the "mature" folks!

Remember, sex crimes are the only crimes for which obtaining video evidence of the crime is also a crime.

What does this gook shit say?

A well chinged chong, being necessary to the low prices we offer on chow mein, the pleasure of cumming inside, shall not be infringed.